logo
Airlines revenues to hit near US$1 trillion record this year : Iata

Airlines revenues to hit near US$1 trillion record this year : Iata

Business Times3 days ago

[SINGAPORE] Airlines' revenues will hit a record of close to US$1 trillion in 2025 with a stable net profit of US$36 billion.
But US tariffs are a drag on the industry, as airline performance and the growth in both air passengers and cargo numbers are down from estimates made at the end of 2024, said the International Air Transport Association (Iata) Monday (Jun 2).
'The first half of 2025 has brought significant uncertainties to global markets. Nonetheless, by many measures including net profits, it will still be a better year for airlines than 2024, although slightly below our previous projections,' said Iata director general Willie Walsh.
Iata, which is the global trade organisation for airlines, said in its 2025 aviation industry outlook report that airline revenue for the year is projected to increase 1.3 per cent from 2024 to US$979 billion. That is a new all-time high, although below the US$1 trillion previously put forward at the end of 2024.
Net profit will improve to US$36 billion from US$32.4 billion in 2024, also below the original projection of US$36.6 billion.
Net profit margins will improve to 3.7 per cent from 3.4 per cent in 2024, and outdo the original projection of 3.6 per cent.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Higher, but thinner air
Speaking at Iata's annual general meeting in New Delhi, India, Walsh said that he anticipates 'airlines flying more people and more cargo in 2025 than they did in 2024, even if previous demand projections have been dented by trade tensions and falls in consumer confidence,' he added.
Iata's expected airline performance figures are be a result of improved passenger and cargo numbers as the reduced cost of jet fuel will trim operating expenses.
Like airline revenues and profits, the passenger and cargo numbers are expected to grow in 2025, but less than originally forecast.
Total air traveler numbers will increase 4 per cent to 5 billion (original forecast 5.2 billion) while total air cargo volume is expected to tick upwards 0.6 per cent to 69 million tonnes (original forecast 72.5 million tonnes).
Total demand for air travel is expected to grow by 5.8 per cent year on year, measured in revenue passenger kilometres (RPK), down from the original prediction of 8 per cent. In 2024, it increased 10.6 per cent, compared to 2023.
Asia-Pacific is still expected to lead the world in industry growth at 9 per cent year on year, and will contribute 52 per cent of the industry's RPK growth in 2025, a result of its continued economic growth and reduced visa requirements in several countries including China, Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand.
North America will be the slowest growing market, expanding just 0.4 per cent on uncertainty from tariffs and migration policies.
The price of jet fuel – expected to average US$86 per barrel in 2025 – has fallen 13 per cent compared to 2024 and is the 'biggest positive driver' said Walsh.
That will translate into a total fuel bill reduction of around 10 per cent to US$236 billion, compared to S$261 billion in 2024.
However, Iata predicts total expenses for 2025 to increase 1 per cent to S$913 billion as a result of the costs of capital, labor, and aircraft maintenance and ownership.
Some headwinds
Air travel demand is traditionally driven by GDP. Despite global GDP growth slowing to 2.5 per cent from 3.3 per cent in 2024, largely a result of trade slowdowns and uncertainty brought about by US tariffs, Iata expects airline profitability to improve in 2025 as oil prices continue to fall, employment remains strong and inflation projections remain moderate.
But Walsh warned that airline margins remain relatively thin, the industry's supply chain problems will remain a continual drag, and its sustainability efforts remain at a nascent stage.
'While (the forecasts) are big numbers, let's remember this equates to a net margin of a mere 3.7 per cent or US$7.20 net profit per passenger,' he said, which is only half of what all global industries achieve on average.
Iata notes that while tariffs affect the global economy, it does not anticipate large-scale impacts on passenger traffic for the industry as a whole.
Aviation's persistent supply chain problems, however, will still dampen growth, as aircraft manufacturer deliveries continue to slow.
The backlog of aircraft orders reached a record high of 17,000 at the end of 2024 as deliveries continue to be stymied. In 2025, 1,692 aircraft are expected to be delivered, 26 per cent less than year-ago estimates.
Iata indicates airlines are lacking 5,400 aircraft or almost 20 per cent of the active global fleet, which could take around three to five years to resolve.
This is in addition to engine problems and spare parts shortages that have grounded planes, with the number of aircraft less than 10 years old currently in storage now more than 1,100, or around 3.8 per cent of the total fleet, compared to 1.3 per cent from 2015 to 2018.
Walsh also called on sustainable aviation fuel producers and governments to boost production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), a key method of achieving the sector's goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Governments must focus on 'delivering policy actions and certainty, preferably production incentives, that have a track record of success…' while SAF producers '...must stop procrastinating and get to work at ramping-up production capacity.'
SAF production will double to 2 million tonnes in 2025, but meet only 0.7 per cent of airline needs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Xi agree to further talks to settle trade disputes
Trump and Xi agree to further talks to settle trade disputes

Business Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Trump and Xi agree to further talks to settle trade disputes

[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping agreed to further talks between the countries to hash out differences on tariffs that have roiled the global economy, according to US and Chinese summaries of their phone call on Thursday (Jun 5). 'There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of rare earth products,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined.' Trump and a Chinese government summary of the meeting said the leaders had invited each other to their respective countries at a future date. 'The US side should take a realistic view of the progress made and withdraw the negative measures imposed on China,' the Chinese government said in a statement published by the state-run Xinhua news agency. 'Xi Jinping welcomed Trump's visit to China again, and Trump expressed his sincere gratitude.' The highly anticipated call came amid accusations between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over 'rare earths' minerals in a dispute that has threatened to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Though stocks rallied, the temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has repeatedly threatened an array of punitive measures on trading partners, only to revoke some of them at the last minute. The on-again, off-again approach has baffled world leaders and spooked business executives, who say the uncertainty has made it difficult to forecast market conditions. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets continues to disrupt supplies needed by automakers, computer chip manufacturers and military contractors around the world. Beijing sees mineral exports as a source of leverage – halting those exports could put domestic political pressure on the Republican US president if economic growth sags because companies cannot produce mineral-powered products. The 90-day deal to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions is tenuous. Trump has accused China of violating the agreement and has ordered curbs on chip design software and other shipments to China, while also doubling steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 per cent. Beijing rejected the claim and threatened counter-measures. In recent years, the US has identified China as its top geopolitical rival and the only country in the world able to challenge the US economically and militarily. Despite this and repeated trade threats and tariff announcements, Trump has spoken admiringly of Xi, including of the Chinese leader's toughness and ability to stay in power without the term limits imposed on US presidents. Trump has long pushed for a call or a meeting with Xi, but China has rejected that as not in keeping with its traditional approach of working out agreement details before the leaders talk. The US president and his aides see leader-to-leader talks as vital to sort through log-jams that have vexed lower-level officials in difficult negotiations. Thursday's call came at Trump's request, China said. It's not clear when the two men last spoke. Both sides said they spoke on Jan 17, days before Trump's inauguration and Trump has repeatedly said that he had spoken to Xi since taking office on Jan 20. He has declined to say when any call took place or to give details of their conversation. China had said that the two leaders had not had any recent phone calls. The talks are being closely watched by investors worried that a chaotic trade war could cut into corporate earnings and disrupt supply chains in the key months before the Christmas holiday shopping season. Trump's tariffs are also the subject of ongoing litigation in US courts. Trump has met Xi on several occasions, including exchange visits in 2017, but they have not met face to face since 2019 talks in Osaka, Japan. Xi last traveled to the US in November 2023, for a summit with then-President Joe Biden, resulting in agreements to resume military-to-military communications and curb fentanyl production. REUTERS

Trump, Xi spoke by phone as trade and tech disputes strain ties
Trump, Xi spoke by phone as trade and tech disputes strain ties

Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Business Times

Trump, Xi spoke by phone as trade and tech disputes strain ties

[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on Thursday (Jun 5), according to China's Foreign Ministry, as trade tensions roil relations between the world's two largest economies. Relations between the two rivals have soured in recent weeks, with both sides accusing the other of violating a trade truce that brought down tariffs from massive highs. With the fresh conflict threatening the fragile détente, market analysts were hopeful the conversation would pave the way to a trade off-ramp. Stocks rose on news of the call, with the S&P 500 extending gains into a fourth straight day. The phone call between the leaders marks their first known formal contact since Trump took office. The last conversation between Trump and Xi took place in January before the US president's inauguration. The Chinese Foreign Ministry said the call was initiated at Trump's request. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Rare earths have emerged in recent days as a key flashpoint. The US has accused China of reneging on a promise to relax export controls on such metals needed for cutting-edge electronics. Beijing has been frustrated by fresh US restrictions on the sale of chip design software and plans to start revoking visas for Chinese students. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Trump has long said direct talks with Xi were the only way to resolve differences between the nations, but the Chinese leader had thus far been reluctant to get on the phone with his American counterpart – preferring that advisers negotiate key issues. Export controls and US actions on student visas and technology curbs will likely be central to future negotiations. US and Chinese trade chiefs only agreed in Geneva last month to lower tariffs for 90 days, as they worked towards a broader deal. History suggests that any final deal could be a long time coming. In 2018 during Trump's first term as president, the two sides agreed to put their dispute 'on hold' after a round of negotiations, but the US soon backed away from that deal, leading to more than 18 months of further tariffs and talks before the signing of the 'Phase One' deal in January 2020. One goal for China this time around will be seeking relief from US export controls on cutting-edge chips vital for AI and military advancement. That's likely to be a sticking point in Washington, with both Democrats and Republicans in rare agreement that Beijing poses a national security threat. Beyond strains in economic ties, geopolitical frictions are also growing. Foreign Ministry officials this month protested US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's assertion at a gathering of military chiefs in Singapore that China poses an imminent threat to Taiwan, a self-ruled island claimed by Beijing. BLOOMBERG

The pro-doping Enhanced Games are partly the Olympics' fault
The pro-doping Enhanced Games are partly the Olympics' fault

Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • Straits Times

The pro-doping Enhanced Games are partly the Olympics' fault

NEW YORK – Performance-enhancing drugs destroy the bodies, minds and reputations of athletes. Nonetheless, a group of investors, including Peter Thiel and Donald Trump Jr, see a business opportunity. They recently announced the first edition of the Enhanced Games – a kind of doping Olympics in which athletes are allowed and even encouraged to take PEDs – which will be held in Las Vegas next May. It is a perverse concept, but that has not stopped four Olympians from already signing on. Other athletes will likely follow, lured by millions of dollars in prize money and appearance fees. The actual Olympics have nothing to do with this, but the world's most popular sporting event is not blameless. Its business model, under which athletes are paid little – if anything – creates the opportunity for something as warped as a sporting event that encourages doping to emerge. Consider the dilemma faced by Kristian Gkolomeev, an accomplished 31-year-old swimmer who has competed in the last four Summer Olympics for Greece. By his own admission, it has not exactly been a financially lucrative existence. In 2016, for example, the Greek government supported some of its top Olympians with stipends of less than US$1,000 (S$1,300) per month. Then and now medal winners receive lucrative bonuses, but Gkolomeev has never won one. Enter the Enhanced Games. In 2024, in hopes of drumming up interest in the event, organisers offered a US$1 million bounty for breaking the men's 50 and 100-metre freestyle swim. Gkolomeev signed up, juiced himself, and sure enough, 'broke' – a term that should be used loosely when it involves steroid usage – the 50m record in February. In late May, at the Enhanced Games announcement, he was unapologetic when he told reporters: 'A successful year at the Enhanced Games for me is more than I could make in 10 careers.' That is a sorry commentary on the current state of Olympic sports such as swimming. After all, it is not as if the International Olympic Committee is hurting. Lucrative media rights contracts and sponsorships allowed the organisation to earn US$7.6 billion between 2021 and 2024. What happens to that cash? The IOC says 90 per cent of it is distributed to organisations throughout the Olympic movement, from National Olympic Committees to host cities. Unfortunately, most of that money does not reach competitors. Instead, it is devoted to things like training facilities, host city stadiums and executive salaries. According to a 2020 report by Global Athlete, an athlete welfare organisation, between 2013 and 2016, only 4.1 per cent of IOC and NOC funds went to contestants. The situation does not appear to have improved over the last decade. In 2024, a congressionally mandated report found that around 26 per cent of American participants in the Olympic and Paralympic pipelines earn less than US$15,000 per year. Athletes in developing countries often have it worse. In Kenya, for example, some who trained for the 2024 Olympics received allowances of roughly US$7.50 per day. Bonuses for winning medals can make up some financial ground. In Kenya, a 2024 gold medal was worth around US$23,000; in the US, it earned US$37,500. That is a nice check, but once an athlete spreads it out over four years (or more) and accounts for intensive, often full-time training, it is far less impressive. US Olympians, for example, report spending an average of US$21,700 annually on just competition fees and memberships. That compensation and expense structure is not an accident or oversight. The modern Olympic Games were launched by a European aristocrat who expected athletes to compete for the joy of sport, not money. That sentiment has remained stubbornly intact even as the Games have evolved into a multi-billion-dollar advertising platform for the world's biggest brands. In 2024, for example, the IOC reacted furiously when World Athletics, the governing body for sports such as track and field, announced plans to pay US$50,000 to gold medalists in its events. From the IOC's perspective, compensation only serves to widen the gaps between more and less privileged countries and competitors. It is a tone-deaf response that highlights how out of touch – and perhaps ambivalent – the Olympics are with the lived reality of the athletes who generate its revenue. The Enhanced Games are built to exploit the oversight. 'One of our core principles is we want to make our athletes as rich as possible,' explained Aron D'Souza, president of the sporting event, in a May interview with Men's Health. There will be ample opportunities to do that in Las Vegas. The Enhanced Games plan to host competitions in three categories – swimming, track and field, and weightlifting. Each event will feature a US$500,000 purse, with the winner earning US$250,000. In addition, everyone competing will receive an appearance fee and is eligible to win bonuses for 'breaking' world records (as Gkolomeev did). That is potentially a lot of money, though it is not likely to be enough for the world's top Olympians – those who might win Olympic gold. They would be forfeiting their reputations and chances at sponsorship deals. But the Enhanced Games does not need that kind of competitor. After all, enhancement is all about taking someone who cannot win a race or set a record and turning them into an athlete who can. There are many people who will never touch a medal podium who will be eligible for that role. For anyone who cares about the integrity of sports, this is a tragic outcome. And it would not be the last of its kind. As long as the Olympics and other elite sporting competitions remain tethered to outdated beliefs of compensation, there will be opportunities for exploitation. Over time, each instance will only serve to erode the public's confidence in the fairness of competition. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store