&w=3840&q=100)
T'gana plant blast: 5 workers still missing, DNA matching to be undertaken
While relatives of four missing persons have given DNA samples for matching, kin of the fifth person will reach the southern state during the day.
Among the missing persons, two are from Nabarangpur district, two from Ganjam and one from Cuttack. The bodies of the deceased have also reached their native places in Odisha.
So far, 38 people have been killed and several others injured in a powerful blast at a pharmaceutical plant in Pashamylaram in Telangana's Sangareddy district on June 30.
"The local administration informed us that 143 people were working in the factory when the blast took place. Some people from Odisha were working in different sections. Of them, four were killed, four injured, among whom one is serious, and five others are still missing," Pritish Panda, Officer on Special Duty (OSD), Directorate of Odisha Parivaar told PTI over the phone.
The deceased from Odisha have been identified as R Jaganmohan from Chatrapur area in Ganjam district, Lagnajit Duari from Tigiria area in Cuttack district, Manoj Rout from Simulia in Balasore district and Dolagovind Sahu from Dharmasala in Jajpur district, he said.
The injured persons were Samir Padhi of Ganjam district, Chandan Kumar Nayak of Bhadrak, Nilambar Bhadra of Nabarangpur and Chitrasen Batra. Among the injured persons, Samir Padhi is in serious condition with 35 per cent burn injuries and he is in the ICU, the officer said.
Panda, along with another officer, are in Sangareddy district to extend necessary support to the people from the state.
He said the bodies of people from Odisha have been sent to their native places in ambulances.
The body of Jaganmohan (56) reached his residence in Chhatrapur area of Ganjam district on Wednesday.
Locals, relatives and Chhatrapur MLA Krushna Chandra Nayak and officials of the Labour Department visited his home and expressed condolences to the family members.
His wife Vijayalaxmi (50) and two sons, who have been living in Hyderabad for over two decades, also accompanied the body in the ambulance. They performed the last rites of the deceased as per tradition.
Jaganmohan was working in the accounts section in the factory for over two decades. He was inside the plant for an inspection when the explosion took place, said R Sai Yashwanth, elder son of the deceased.
"We immediately rushed to the plant but saw only his charred body," he said.
The body was dispatched from Hyderabad on Tuesday and it reached Odisha early on Wednesday. The Telangana government provided Rs 1 lakh as assistance to perform the last rites, he said.
Samir Padhy (24), another victim from Ganjam district, was battling for his life in a hospital in Hyderabad.
Samir, a resident of Baharapur, was working as a machine operator in the factory for the last seven years.
The explosion occurred in the plant just 10 minutes after he entered the plant, said Papu Kumar Choudhuary, Samir's brother-in-law, who was working in the same factory.
"We both entered the plant just 10 to 15 minutes before the blast. I came out of the plant when the first explosion occurred at a distance and survived," said Choudhury (31) of Aska area. He was working in the paper-cutting section of the factory.
"Within a few minutes, the entire area became dark with smoke and several of them could not come out," he said.
Papu said Lagnajit Duari (20) of Tigiria in Cuttack district along with a man from Bihar were working in his section before the blast. They could not come out from the spot and were charred to death.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Money laundering case: Court rejects Jacqueline Fernandez's plea to junk case; ED says 'prima facie case made out'
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Thursday dismissed Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez 's petition seeking to quash the money laundering case filed against her by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with alleged gifts received from conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar. Chandrasekhar and his wife Leena Paulose were arrested and are also accused under the MCOCA. The court, after hearing arguments from both sides, declined to interfere in the ongoing trial proceedings. Justice Anish Dayal pronounced the order, while the detailed judgment will be uploaded in due course. Jacqueline Fernandez had challenged the second supplementary chargesheet filed by the ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), maintaining that she was an innocent victim manipulated by Sukesh Chandrashekhar, who is accused of orchestrating a Rs 200 crore extortion racket from prison. Appearing for Fernandez, Senior Advocate Sidharth Aggarwal argued that being a celebrity should not render someone automatically liable. He pointed out that Sukesh was introduced to her as a businessman and contended that the ED's interpretation of her association as money laundering was flawed. 'Today, I am paying the price of being a celebrity,' Aggarwal said during the hearing. He also questioned the ED's logic that anyone receiving money from someone accused of a crime could be liable under the PMLA — even if they were unaware of the criminal origin of the funds. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Aggarwal added that Fernandez had no knowledge of Sukesh's background at the time. However, the ED countered that Fernandez knowingly accepted luxury gifts from Sukesh despite having learned of his criminal past. ED counsel Zoheb Hossain said Fernandez continued to benefit from proceeds of crime and that her petition was merely an attempt to derail the trial. The ED insisted that its probe was independent from the police case and that the ongoing trial had already seen a special court take cognisance of the charges, establishing a prima facie case.


New Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
HDFC Bank's Jagdishan moves SC seeking to quash Lilavati FIR
MUMBAI: Sashidhar Jagdishan, the chief executive of the largest private sector lender HDFC Bank, has moved the Supreme Court seeking to quash the FIR filed by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust alleging that he has taken a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore from one of the past trustees. The apex court will hear the matter Friday. The desperate move by Jagdishan comes after three judges of the Bombay High Court had over the past few weeks recused themselves from hearing the case citing their investments in the bank's shares or their personal associations with the both the petitioners. Also, according to an earlier administrative order by the High Court, cases related to the Lilavati Trust are not be listed before six other judges too. The FIR filed by the Lilavati Medical Trust, which runs a superspeciality hospital under the name of Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai, had accused Jagdishan of accepting a bribe of Rs 2.05 crore from an erstwhile trustee Chetan Mehta, for giving him financial advice and helping him to retain control over the Trust's governance. According to a report in LiveLaw, a website that covers legal matters, on Thursday senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi mentioned the matter before a bench of justices MM Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran and sought urgent listing of the matter Friday. Justice Sundresh, who presided over the brief hearing, directed that the matter be listed for Friday. The FIR also accuses Jagdishan of interfering in the internal affairs of the trust by misusing his position. Initially, Jagdishan's plea was listed for hearing before a HC division bench of justices Ajay Gadkari and Rajesh Patil on June 18. However, Justice Patil cited some personal difficulty and recused from hearing the matter and the court has agreed to hear the matter Friday. HDFC Bank had been refuting all the charges lelvelled by the trust and Mehta saying the bank and its senior officials are being targeted by unscrupulous persons who are abusing the legal process to thwart the recovery of the long outstanding loan due to the bank from recalcitrant defaulter- Splendour Gems (formerly known as Beautiful Diamonds), a company owned by the petitioner Mehta and had owed Rs 65.22 crore to the bank till end May.


India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Bad news for Anil Ambani, these company shares fell by…, after fraud tag by India's largest govt bank…
Shares of Reliance Power and Reliance Infrastructure dropped on Thursday after the State Bank of India (SBI) declared the loan account of Reliance Communications (RCom) as fraudulent and named former director Anil Ambani in the case, according to the Times of India. Reliance Power fell 4.8% to Rs 64.75, while Reliance Infrastructure hit the 5% lower circuit at Rs 377.45 on the BSE. Anil Ambani's Response To SBI Reliance Infrastructure and Reliance Power on Thursday said that State Bank of India's move to classify the loan account of Reliance Communications as fraud has no impact on their business operations and financial performance. The development also has no impact on their shareholders, employees, or any other stakeholders, the two Reliance group companies stated in separate exchange filings. The companies said they are separate and independent listed entities with no business or financial linkage to Reliance Communications. Further, Anil D. Ambani is not on the Board of Reliance Infrastructure and Reliance Power. Accordingly, any action taken in relation to Reliance Communications has no bearing or impact on the governance, management, or operations, RInfra and RPower said. SBI On Reliance Communications Public lender State Bank of India has decided to classify the loan account of beleaguered telecom firm Reliance Communications as 'fraud' and to report the name of its erstwhile director — Anil Ambani to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), an exchange filing on Wednesday. According to the filing, Reliance Communications and its subsidiaries received a total loan of Rs 31,580 crore from banks. The Fraud Identification Committee of the bank has found deviations in utilisation of the loans. The letter marked to Reliance Communications and its erstwhile director Anil Ambani stated that SBI has decided to report the loan account of the company as 'fraud' and to report the name of Anil Ambani to the RBI, as per the extant RBI guidelines, the filing said. (With Inputs From PTI)