logo
Auto Industry, Consumers Brace for Global Tariff Fallout

Auto Industry, Consumers Brace for Global Tariff Fallout

Yahoo04-04-2025

Automaker trade groups call for high-level negotiations between political leaders as tariffs upend markets and usher in a new era of uncertainty.
US automakers have publicly remained silent on issue of 25% auto tariffs and the new "reciprocal" tariffs, though the first effects from this week's announcement are already being felt at home.
Auto dealers in the US faced an uptick of shoppers seeking to buy existing vehicles before the tariffs kick in, though the longer-term effects of the tariffs remained uncertain for dealer inventories in the coming months.
As the European Union and other major US trade partners raced to respond to the Trump administration's "reciprocal" tariffs, formally announced on April 2, foreign automakers and other heavy industries faced a starkly different world than on Monday of this week.
But the first effects on jobs materialized on this side of the Atlantic.
Stellantis plans to lay off some 900 workers, at least temporarily, in the wake of the announcements of the new tariffs, and will also halt production at two plants in Canada and Mexico, one of which produces the new Dodge Charger Daytona EV. An additional 4,500 workers in Canada are expected to be laid of as well, as soon as Monday, April 7.
The new tariffs drew sharp reactions from some domestic trade groups representing auto manufacturers and suppliers, even though the newly announced "reciprocal" levies wouldn't be added to the 25% vehicle import duties revealed earlier.
"The stakes for manufacturers could not be higher. Many manufacturers in the United States already operate with thin margins," said National Association of Manufacturers President and CEO Jay Timmons in response to the tariffs announced on April 2.
"The high costs of new tariffs threaten investment, jobs, supply chains and, in turn, America's ability to outcompete other nations and lead as the preeminent manufacturing superpower."
US automakers themselves, however, largely stayed silent on the issue of the new "reciprocal" tariffs, avoiding direct statements regarding the measures, and for the most part only issuing internal communications to dealers in regards to inventory.
The UAW issued a formal statement last week sounding a positive note in regards to the 25% tariffs on vehicles announced earlier in March, but has not addressed the new "reciprocal" tariffs.
"We applaud the Trump administration for stepping up to end the free trade disaster that has devastated working class communities for decades," UAW President Shawn Fain said in a statement on March 26. "Ending the race to the bottom in the auto industry starts with fixing our broken trade deals, and the Trump administration has made history with today's actions.
"With these tariffs, thousands of good-paying blue collar auto jobs could be brought back to working-class communities across the United States within a matter of months, simply by adding additional shifts or lines in a number of underutilized auto plants," a statement from UAW added.
The new "reciprocal" tariffs announced this week also drew swift reactions from trade groups representing European automakers, some of which have no US manufacturing presence to soften the impact of the new levies.
"The announced imposition of a 10% tariff on all UK products exported to the US, whilst less than other major economies, is another deeply disappointing and potentially damaging measure," said Mike Hawes, chief executive of the UK-based Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders.
"Our cars were already set to attract a punitive 25% tariff overnight and other automotive products are now set to be impacted immediately. These tariff costs cannot be absorbed by manufacturers, thus hitting US consumers who may face additional costs and a reduced choice of iconic British brands, whilst UK producers may have to review output in the face of constrained demand."
British brands, traditionally representing smaller-volume luxury automakers, are expected to be particularly affected by the 25% auto tariffs, with Land Rover, Mini, Jaguar, and others having maintained a manufacturing footprint primarily in the UK, even while their corporate parents reside elsewhere.
Not only will vehicles produced in Europe and elsewhere be affected by the administration's latest actions, but the tariffs are also expected to have an effect on vehicles produced in the US for export.
And in this case, both US and foreign automakers will be feel the fallout, trade groups warned.
Some notable examples of the former include Mercedes-Benz and BMW plants in the southern states that produce SUVs for North America and for export elsewhere in the world—a significant category by transparent volume.
The auto tariffs, which will also cover imports of spare parts produced by suppliers, sparked calls for negotiations by individual countries and automakers, though a concrete strategy for bargaining with the US administration that might immediately bear fruit remained hard to find.
A single strategy for addressing the tariffs is unlikely to emerge, as different automakers now face very different challenges, but US automakers face their most immediate hurdles with Canadian and Mexican plants and suppliers.
When it comes to auto parts, the tariffs on imported components are set to go into effect on May 5.
"European automakers are committed to being active in the US, making an important contribution to the US economy, accounting for around half a million jobs across the auto sector, exporting over 750,000 vehicles to the US in 2024, and actively investing in local communities to foster economic prosperity," said Sigrid de Vries, Director General of the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association.
"We urge our leaders to meet urgently so that they can find a solution to any issues preventing free and fair trade between historic allies and allow the EU-US relationship to flourish once again."
US automakers' main exposure to tariffs will be reflected not only in the cost of parts, but also through assembly of domestic-branded vehicles in Canada and Mexico, with the latter having seen a factory building boom over the past decade that attracted US and European brands alike.
Uncertainty over implementation of the tariffs could cause cargo back-ups on the borders with Canada and Mexico, it is feared, and also in US ports as automakers adjust shipping schedules.
The good news for Canada and Mexico trade, if any, is that it is exempt from the baseline 10% tariff.
The more granular effects of the tariffs have yet to be felt by auto dealers and consumers, as dealers are currently sitting on a supply of vehicles that were delivered weeks or months earlier.
So price hikes, even though they are on the way, won't hit dealerships right away.
Auto dealers have already begun to feel an uptick in the numbers of vehicle shoppers eager to buy cars and trucks ahead of the tariffs—a trend that may persist while pre-tariff inventory lasts—with used cars also predicted to see a bump in retail prices as a result.
The spring and summer car shopping season, therefore, could see two separate populations of pre-tariff and post-tariff new vehicles, as well as stronger demand for off-lease used cars.
Are the tariffs, if they persist for months, likely to affect your vehicle purchase plans or their timing this year? Let us know in the comments below.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook
Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook

By Yuka Obayashi TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices edged lower in early Asian trade on Wednesday, weighed down by a loosening supply-demand balance following increasing OPEC+ output and lingering concerns over the global economic outlook due to tariff tensions. Brent crude futures dipped 5 cents, or 0.1%, to $65.58 a barrel by 0040 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $63.32 a barrel, down 9 cents, or 0.1%. Both benchmarks climbed about 2% on Tuesday to a two-week high, supported by worries over supply disruptions from Canadian wildfires and expectations that Iran will reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that is key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer. "Despite fears over Canadian supply and stalled Iran-U.S. nuclear talks, oil markets are struggling to extend gains," said Tsuyoshi Ueno, senior economist at NLI Research Institute, adding that OPEC+ production increases were capping the upside. Ueno said hopes for progress in U.S.-China trade talks were overshadowed by profit-taking, as investors remained cautious over the broader economic fallout from tariffs. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. As the Trump administration pressed U.S. trading partners to provide their best offers by Wednesday, the protracted negotiations and moving deadlines have led economists to scale back growth forecasts. On Tuesday, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) cut its global growth forecast as the fallout from Trump's trade war takes a bigger toll on the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, scores of wildfires have swept across Canada since the start of May, forcing thousands of evacuations and disrupting crude oil production in the country. U.S. crude stocks fell by 3.3 million barrels in the week ended May 30, market sources said, citing American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. Gasoline inventories rose by 4.7 million barrels and distillate stocks rose by about 760,000 barrels. [API/S] A Reuters poll of nine analysts estimated an average draw of 1 million barrels in crude stocks. [EIA/S] Official inventory data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is due on Wednesday.

White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill
White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill

Politico

time40 minutes ago

  • Politico

White House allies ‘disappointed' at Musk's opposition to the megabill

Republican allies close to the White House are privately argue that the former special government employee — who spent Tuesday afternoon blasting the spending bill and threatening to retaliate against its supporters — is opposing the bill because it harms the tech billionaire's business interests. The House-passed megabill represents the president's chief — and potentially only — major legislative priority this Congress. But Musk's opposition suggests that the coalition that vaulted Trump to the White House is still facing internal disagreement over it as it makes its way through the Senate. It marks another dust-up between the MAGA and Tech Right. And it raises the possibility some members face pressure from Musk if they ultimately support it. 'The West Wing is perplexed, unenthused, and disappointed' with Musk, who left the White House to attend to his ailing business empire, according to one White House official, who like others interviewed for this story were granted anonymity to be candid about an ally who spent hundreds of millions to ensconce them in the White House.

Army hits recruiting goal four months ahead of schedule
Army hits recruiting goal four months ahead of schedule

The Hill

time42 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Army hits recruiting goal four months ahead of schedule

The Army has hit its annual recruiting goal of 61,000 new active duty soldiers, four months ahead of the end of fiscal 2025 in September, the service announced Tuesday. The Army said the goal – 10 percent higher than the 55,000 recruits it sought last year – 'represents a significant turning point for the Army and indicates a renewed sense of patriotism and purpose among America's youth,' according to a statement. The surge in new potential troops comes as the Army has significantly ramped up its recruiting efforts over the past several years in response to its struggle with number shortfalls over the past decade. That outreach included loosening certain rules and restrictions to target young Americans who historically have been unqualified to serve due to tattoos, prior medical conditions or drug use. In 2023, the Army fell about 11,000 people short of its 65,000-person goal but rebounded in 2024 to meet its goal of 55,000, though just barely. The U.S. military as a whole struggled to entice young people to serve in the midst of and in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as during periods of low unemployment across the country and the emergence of more attractive job opportunities within the private sector. It is unclear exactly why the uptick in enlistments occurred after the service struggled to meet its goals across the finish line last year, but the Trump administration has insisted that the recruiting momentum is a sign of renewed excitement to serve following the presidential election. 'I want to thank the commander in chief, President Trump, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth for their decisive leadership and support in equipping, training and supporting these future Soldiers as they face a world of global uncertainty and complex threats,' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said in the statement. 'Putting Soldiers first is having a tangible impact and shows that young people across our country want to be part of the most lethal land fighting force the world has ever seen.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store