Police: Couple withdrew funds from missing disabled adult
Debra Collins and Loni Collins are each charged with a count of fraud as a Level 5 felony for allegedly spending money out of an account meant to pay for the care of a 68-year-old special needs adult. They are also charged with theft as a Level 6 felony.
Warrants for their arrest were issued May 9 with bond set at $50,000 each.
According to court documents:
The victim was reported missing on March 10 and the Elkhart Police Department issued an alert seeking information on April 30. An investigator with Adult Protective Services also began looking into her disappearance.
Debra Collins had been granted permanent guardianship of the victim in 2010 due to the woman's mental disabilities. Collins was ordered to obtain court approval before spending more than $1,500 of the victim's money or to move house, according to the APS investigator.
Debra Collins opened a representative payee account at a bank in August 2020 to deposit the victim's Social Security payments and cover her expenses. The victim was placed in a group home in October 2021 but Collins removed her in July 2022, according to the investigator.
The investigator obtained bank records from the start of January to the end of March allegedly showing that Debra Collins withdrew $2,959 from the woman's account and transferred it to an account owned by her husband. The money was allegedly spent at Amazon, Kroger, Walmart and other internet-based vendors.
No payments were made to care facilities, group homes or other services that would be connected to the victim, according to the investigator.
Loni Collins was questioned and allegedly told investigators that he had not seen the victim in over a year and didn't know where she was living. Debra Collins also allegedly told a bank representative in April that she didn't know where the victim was, after the bank froze the representative payee account.
Another witness was interviewed and said that Debra Collins claimed she moved the victim to a different group home, but would not give any further information when asked, according to the investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
How to outfox financial scammers
While financial scams have always been around, the variety of schemes that scammers employ to steal money are easily proliferated these days with the internet, social media, AI and crypto. Frauds and scams ranked No. 6 on the list of top consumer complaints last year, according to a recent report from the Consumer Federation of America. And the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center found that financial losses from cybercrime alone last year reached $16.6 billion – a 33% increase over 2023, with the vast majority of those losses coming from fraud. The average reported loss was $19,372. Earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission noted that there was a more-than-four-fold increase between 2020 and 2024 in the number of reports of older Americans (age 60 and up) who said they'd been scammed out of $10,000 or more. The increase among those reporting that they'd lost over $100,000 was nearly seven-fold. Some people 'reported emptying their bank accounts and even clearing out their 401(k)s,' according to the agency. How can that happen? Any number of ways. And it's not just those over 60 who are susceptible. 'Any type of scam can happen to anyone,' said Emma Fletcher, senior data researcher in the consumer response division of the FTC. Imposter scams, where criminals masquerade as a trusted government agency or business, are among the most common. Whereas in the past a lot of scams tried to trick you into giving out your financial account numbers, many now seek to persuade you to move your money from one of your accounts to another type of account the scammers can access. 'The scams generally involve someone contacting consumers to alert them to a fake and urgent problem and then proceeding to try to persuade them to transfer their money to 'keep it safe' or for some other false reason,' the FTC said. Among the lies they might tell: Your Social Security number is linked to serious crimes. They're calling about suspicious activity on your account. Or you're in trouble with the law and have to post bond. Or they may offer something that is too good to be true, like easy money for a simple task. In exchange, they will ask you to pay something up front. Among other types of imposter scams are: Tech support scams: These can take the form of a pop-up security alert or audible alarm on your computer, purporting to be from Microsoft or Apple. The message might be that your computer has been hacked, and it will include a number to call for help. Sometimes the criminals will tell you they need to get remote access to your computer to fix something. Prize and sweepstakes scams: It's never the victim's lucky day when a scammer, posing as a representative of a sweepstakes or lottery entity, contacts you and tells you that you have to pay money to get your big prize. To help spot a potential financial scam, keep an eye out for common red flags: A government agency or company contacts you out the blue and makes threats and demands. There are currently imposters even pretending to represent the FTC itself. The FTC notes it 'will never demand money, make threats, tell you to transfer money, or promise you a prize.' The same is true of any reputable business or government agency. You're told to go to a bitcoin ATM or make a bank transfer. Last year, the FTC found that 33% of older adults who reported losing $10,000 or more to an imposter scam said cryptocurrency was the method of payment requested, while 20% said they were asked to make a bank transfer and 16% said they were told to pay in cash. The most typical crypto payment involved sending someone to a bitcoin ATM, which some scammers may refer to as a 'safety locker,' Fletcher said. A case reported by CFA, for instance, involved a scam caller telling a consumer they were 'under arrest for failing to appear in court and was in contempt for missing jury duty. They insisted that the consumer needed to post bond, and the sheriff could not accept a check or credit card. Instead, the scammer directed them to a federal kiosk, specifically a Bitcoin ATM.' You're told to buy gift cards to pay the scammer: Another type of scheme has victims go to one or more stores to buy gift cards and then share the unique numbers and pin with the scammer. There are several ways to reduce your chances of being swindled. Do not engage. When you get an unsolicited call, text, social media message or email – or you get a strange warning alert on your computer – don't respond. Do not call the numbers suggested nor click on any links offered. Instead, if you're concerned it may be legitimate, call the actual entity the person contacting you claims to be from and do so by looking up that entity's real number and website yourself. 'Stop and verify. If it feels urgent, if they're rushing you and creating alarm, and you weren't expecting that contact, go directly to the company or agency that they're claiming to be and check it out,' Fletcher said. Never move money on demand. If you do end up engaging, a clear sign something is wrong is that you're told you have to move money fast. You may be told you have to transfer money out of an account that has been compromised in order to 'protect it.' Or to send money to get yourself out of some sort of (fake) trouble. No legitimate business, government agency or law enforcement entity would require this. Never pay money for the promise of getting more money. Anything financial that sounds too good to be true usually is. And that's especially the case when you're being told you need to pay something upfront to get something desirable in return (e.g. a commission, a job, prize winnings, etc.) Don't assume you're too smart to be duped. A scammer can catch anyone at a particularly vulnerable moment. For example, you might already be in a heightened emotional state when you get a call or text; or the focus of the scam may pertain to something you were just dealing with – e.g., you may have recently driven through a number of tolls when a scammer sends you a text about unpaid tolls. 'For each of us there is a scam that can get us at just the wrong moment,' Fletcher said. 'The scammer hijacks your ability to think things through clearly.' Make liberal use of the 'Block Caller' and 'Report Junk' functions on your phone: Getting a call or voicemail from a number you don't recognize should be blocked. The same goes for unsolicited texts and social media messages. And, the FTC warns, don't necessarily trust your caller ID function either, as scammers have been known to 'spoof' it – meaning they can falsify the information sent to your caller ID display. It can happen to anyone. If it happens to you, take steps to minimize your losses and help stop the scammers from victimizing others. Here is an FTC resource page that offers steps you can take if you think you paid a scammer or if the scammer has access to your personal information or to your computer. But, generally speaking you'll want to let your bank and/or other relevant entities such as the credit bureaus or gift card issuers know immediately. To minimize your losses, 'Time is of the essence,' Fletcher said. You also might want to consult a consumer law attorney who specializes in consumer rights and consumer fraud to see what your next best steps are. Then report your scam to the FTC at To prevent others from falling prey to the same type of scam, share your story with people you know. 'Pass on what you know. Research supports that word of mouth is the top way people hear about scams,' Fletcher said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Attorney for father of Abundant Life school shooter asks to dismiss case, citing 'disregard of truth'
MADISON – The father of the Abundant Life Christian School student who shot and killed two people at the school is asking a Dane County judge to dismiss the charges against him, citing a "reckless disregard of the truth" in the complaint filed against him. Jeffrey Rupnow and his attorney, Lisa Goldman, in an Aug. 18 motion, argued that the fact his daughter, Natalie Rupnow, was able to access the family's gun safe didn't mean her father allowed her to. The motion acknowledged that Jeffrey Rupnow told his daughter the combination to the safe was his Social Security number in reverse, but argued he never gave her the numbers or any other clues. More: Father of Abundant Life school shooter will stand trial for providing guns used in attack The document also points to text messages sent by Rupnow in the days before the shooting, in which he tells friends that "my kid would shoot me" if he left the safe open, which alluded to him believing that Natalie could not access the guns inside. "There are no facts in the Complaint or elicited at the Preliminary Hearing that assert Rupnow thought or knew his daughter could access the gun safe on December 16, 2024," the document says. By alleging that Rupnow owning guns led to his daughter's actions at the school, the state is violating his Second Amendment rights to bear arms, the motion says. The motion also argues that Rupnow did not know how his daughter was planning a school shooting online with older friends. The documents says Rupnow was not allowed access to Natalie's laptop or her room, which she had deemed a "safe space." It also states that Rupnow did not know his daughter to be suicidal or a danger to others. "The State's inference that Rupnow knew (Natalie Rupnow) was suicidal and contributed to her delinquency by joining a gun club, facilitating her participation in a gun class which she passed, encouraging her to participate in Rimfire at the gun club, is an impermissible inference given nobody believed N.R. was suicidal or homicidal since October 2021," the document says. More: Mother of Abundant Life Christian School shooter dies by apparent suicide Natalie Rupnow died by suicide after opening fire inside a study hall at Abundant Life in December, killing Teacher Erin West, 42, and freshman Rubi Vergara, 14. That morning, she arrived at the school carrying a .22-caliber Sig Sauer and a Glock handgun, both of which had been purchased by Jeffrey Rupnow and stored in a gun safe at his home. In an interview with authorities cited in the criminal complaint, Jeffrey Rupnow said the day before the shooting, he had retrieved his daughter's handgun from his gun safe for cleaning. He was uncertain whether she returned it to the safe. That gun and another handgun were used in the shooting. Her father told police she must have retrieved the second gun from the safe. Documents found in Natalie Rupnow's room after her death include statements describing humanity as "filth" and saying she lived in a "population of scum." She used a racial slur before saying, "Some of you guys deserve to be dead." She believed, according to the court record, that humanity had forced her into a hole. She also appeared to idolize mass shooters, according to the complaint. She also wrote she was able to obtain the firearms she would use in the Abundant Life shooting as a result of "lies and manipulation, and my father's stupidity," according to the complaint. Other notebooks showed maps of the school, how to best damage a body with a bullet and apparent timelines for when she would begin her attack, according to the complaint. Authorities also found a cardboard model that resembled the school in her room. Rupnow is scheduled to appear in court later this month for a bail hearing, and a pre-trial conference is scheduled for late September. No hearings have yet been scheduled on the motion to dismiss. If you or someone you know is dealing with suicidal thoughts, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988 or text "Hopeline" to the National Crisis Text Line at 741-741 Laura Schulte can be reached at leschulte@ and on X @SchulteLaura. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Lawyer for father of Abundant Life school shooter asks to dismiss case
Time Magazine
2 days ago
- Time Magazine
How AT&T Customers Can File Claim in Data Breach Settlement
AT&T customers in the United States could be entitled to up to $7,500 after the telecommunications company reached a $177 million settlement over two major data breaches. The settlement is still awaiting a final green light, following the initial ruling from a federal judge in June, with an approval hearing set for Dec. 3. But eligible customers need to submit any claims ahead of that date. Here is everything you need to know about the breaches and the settlement, plus how you can file a claim. When did the AT&T data breaches occur? One breach occurred in March 2024, during which the personal information—including Social Security numbers—of around 7.6 million current account holders and 65.4 million former customers was leaked onto the dark web. Another breach was confirmed in July 2024, when AT&T said that it had become aware that hackers illegally downloaded customer data from a third-party cloud platform. The telecommunications firm said that calls and text message records that took place between May 1 and Oct. 31, 2022 were compromised for 'nearly all' cellular customers. Additionally, records from Jan. 2 2023 were compromised for a 'very small number of customers.' Regarding the breach dating back to 2022 and 2023, 'the data does not contain the content of calls or texts, personal information such as Social Security numbers, dates of birth, or other personally identifiable information,' according to AT&T. However, it's thought phone numbers could be linked to customers based on public information. Who is eligible to make a claim for a portion of the AT&T settlement? Those eligible to make a claim for one or both of the data breaches should receive an email from the address 'attsettlement@ with details on claimants' rights and options, according to Kroll Settlement Administration, the handlers of the settlement. AT&T has said that customers can claim compensation in relation to the March 2024 breach if they are a United States citizen and their personal information, including 'names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers, and Social Security numbers,' was leaked. Claimants should receive notice that they could be entitled to a settlement payment, however, if people have not been contacted but think they may still be eligible, they can call Kroll—(833) 890-4930—for further assistance. Regarding the 2022 and 2023 breach, claimants are eligible if they were an 'AT&T account owner or line/end user.' Compensation could also be available to those with 'telephone numbers with which those customers interacted.' Some claimants may also be eligible to claim against both data breaches, this is known as 'overlap settlement class members.' How you can make a claim for a portion of the AT&T settlement Claimants must submit a form via the settlement website or by mail to AT&T, whose address is available on the aforementioned website. Submissions must be made by Nov. 18, 2025. Those eligible for compensation that want to be exempt from the settlement must send a letter to Kroll requesting exclusion by Oct. 17, 2025. Details for the postal address can be found on the website's FAQ page under the section 'How do I exclude myself from the settlement?' Claimants can also file an objection if they object to the settlement and or 'the application/s for attorneys' fees, costs, and service awards' relating to the settlement. This must also be done by Oct. 17. Contact details are available on the FAQ page under the title 'How do I object to the Settlement?' When can claimants expect to receive compensation from AT&T and how much could they receive? The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Dec. 3, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time. If approved, there could still be appeals from AT&T or other parties, which would likely delay the payment process. The roll-out of settlement payments will begin once the amounts have been approved and all appeal deadlines have expired. Claimants for the March 2024 data breach are entitled to up to $5,000. Meanwhile, up to $2,500 is available for those impacted by the data breach that took place in 2022 and 2023. Some claimants are entitled to both, and could receive up to $7,500 if their data was compromised in both breaches.
