North Dakota governor unintentionally vetoes $35 million for housing programs
Gov. Kelly Armstrong announced Thursday that he accidentally vetoed part of a bill that set aside $35 million for a state housing development fund.
Senate Bill 2014 is the budget for the North Dakota Industrial Commission. On Monday, Armstrong announced two line-item vetoes for the bill. His office said a 'staff markup error' led to the unintentional veto of $25 million for housing projects and programs and $10 million to combat homelessness.
Staff from the governor's office met with Legislative Council Thursday to discuss options for correcting the error.
'If necessary, we will call the Legislature back to ensure the appropriate funding is delivered, but we hope to avoid the expense of a special session. This was an honest mistake, and we will fix it,' Armstrong said in a Thursday statement.
North Dakota governor issues 7 line-item vetoes, including lawmaker 'immunity' provision
According to his veto message, Armstrong had intended to veto a $150,000 one-time grant for a Native American-focused organization to fund a homelessness liaison position. The veto markup also crossed some surrounding language, axing the full $35 million appropriation in the section.
During a Thursday meeting of the Industrial Commission, which Armstrong chairs, he emphasized his 'full-throated' endorsement of the Housing Incentive Fund, which supports the construction of affordable housing.
'We are talking to whoever, everybody we can — Legislative Council, lawmakers, everybody — to figure out if there is a legal way we can solve this without calling them back into a special session and costing taxpayer dollars,' Armstrong said. 'However, if that is the only alternative, that would be exactly what I will be doing.'
Legislative Council staff will advise on options to fix the error, but it will be up to the governor and legislative leaders to decide how to proceed, said Legislative Council Director John Bjornson. At this point, a special session is the only obvious legal remedy, he said.
'I think we all want the easy solution, but sometimes the easy solution has consequences down the line that you need to consider,' Bjornson said.
Legislators have six days remaining of the 80-day legislative limit. If the governor calls them back into session, it would not count against that limit.
Bjornson estimated it would take about a half day for lawmakers to consider overriding the governor's veto. But there is no mechanism for lawmakers to consider overriding part of a veto, he said.
Lawmakers could also consider a standalone bill that restores the $35 million in funding. But Legislative Council estimates it typically takes three days to pass a bill.
A special session is estimated to cost $65,000 a day, Bjornson said.
Senate Majority Leader David Hogue, R-Minot, said lawmakers are still looking into how to proceed.
'We're just going to do the research first and pick the best course of action,' Hogue said.
Dave Flohr, executive director of the North Dakota Housing Finance Agency, said during the Industrial Commission meeting that once the state sorts out the issue with the funding, the agency plans to set aside $5 million for single-family home projects and $20 million for multi-family housing.
This story was updated to add comments from Gov. Armstrong, David Hogue and Dave Flohr.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Home Paid Off and Ready To Retire — 4 Questions From Experts To Decide if You Should Stay or Sell
Congratulations on paying off your house before retiring! It's a huge milestone. But will that house continue serving you through your retirement years? Check Out: Read Next: Retirement and financial experts urge you to ask these four questions to make the best housing decision for your personal needs. What Future Costs Will Your House Require? Some newer houses require little maintenance work. Others require five figures in upkeep costs every year. Financial planner Nancy Butler of urged homeowners entering retirement to ask themselves some direct questions. 'If the cost of property tax and other costs to live in the home were to increase, could you still afford to live there? How long will it be before the home needs major repairs such as a new roof, appliances, and so on? Would you be able to live in your home comfortably with only minor upgrades if you could no longer manage stairs or needed ambulatory assistance?' Don't ignore yardwork and exterior maintenance, either. If you or your spouse currently does the maintenance work, the time may come when that's no longer practical. Also factor in condo fees and homeowners insurance premiums as you map out your likely future costs. Explore More: Does It Make More Sense To Downsize? Most retirees don't need a three- or four-bedroom house. It simply adds more house to maintain, to heat, to cool, to power. Condos, townhomes, or smaller single-family homes typically require far less upkeep. They also cost less to own and maintain across the board. Even so, downsizing should fit into your larger plan for where you want to spend the rest of your life. John Enwere, certified nursing assistant and founder of senior care startup Caringene, presses retirees to think holistically about their retirement housing. 'Downsizing isn't just about the money; it's about the quality of life. Yes, you may walk away with $300K to $500K in cash, but where are you going? Will downsizing create a sense of isolation, or put you closer to your family and friends?' What's Your Housing Plan as You Age? Your current home may — or may not — make a good home for aging in place. An ideal home for aging in place allows for single-story living with no required stairs. It also sits in a walkable area, where you don't need to drive to reach groceries, restaurants and other amenities. Most retirees also want to live as close to friends and family as possible. All of these factors go into choosing your 'forever home,' or looking into assisted living communities. 'A newer home that has only one floor, or an assisted living facility or other senior housing may make the most sense,' added Butler. 'Moving to a home suitable for aging in place can help you maintain your independence longer.' In fact, she herself strategically downsized when she retired to let her age in place. 'Our home was in great shape, but it required taking stairs both inside and out. We sold the house, and designed and built a single-story house less than a mile away where we can live for the rest of our lives. If we did not do it ourselves now, it may be someone else making those decisions for us later.' Can Your Current Nest Egg Cover Your Future Expenses? Sit down with a financial planner to discuss whether your retirement savings can cover your costs in the years to come. You may not have a choice in selling and relocating. 'If you live in an area with high home prices, selling your home and moving somewhere less expensive can boost your retirement savings,' noted financial expert Melanie Musson with 'It can instantly lift your investment portfolio, and potentially generate enough income for you to retire in a lower-cost area.' More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on Home Paid Off and Ready To Retire — 4 Questions From Experts To Decide if You Should Stay or Sell
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
I was homeless. Trump's plan to criminalize people like me won't make you safer.
When I moved from New York to Miami for my new job in information technology, my future seemed bright. Four months later, the firm downsized and I was let go, setting off a chain of events that left me homeless. I was homeless in Miami for two years, and I spent 10 months in a homeless shelter in New York City. Growing up in Freeport, Long Island, where my family and I overcame redlining and school segregation, I was an honor-roll student and earned an athletic scholarship to study business and restaurant and hotel management before I pivoted to IT. Homelessness taught me that being unhoused is not a personal, moral failure. Homelessness is a market failure, a housing problem. Rent prices have exceeded income gains by 325% nationally since 1985. Rates of homelessness are tied to rental affordability. Here in New York City, in 2023, rents skyrocketed, more than seven times faster than wages, the largest gap in the country. Stigma distorts these truths. The White House's recent moves toward the criminalization of homelessness and forced institutionalization ignore decades of research and real-world outcomes. They reject proven models like permanent supportive housing and will raise costs in lives and tax dollars for communities nationwide. Your Turn: Violent crime doesn't worry me. Trump is just mad he has to see homeless people. | Opinion Forum Criminalizing homelessness won't solve it. Not in DC, not anywhere. Permanent supportive housing emerged in the United States three decades ago with bipartisan support, then championed by the George W. Bush administration as a solution to chronic homelessness, rooted in a philosophy called Housing First. Housing First stabilizes people experiencing homelessness in permanent housing and provides them with case management support and social services based on the theory that housing stability is most people's prerequisite for success. Crucially, Housing First does not require mental health treatment, sobriety or a job. It is difficult to focus on recovery for people living with a disability when they do not know where they will sleep tonight, and I know firsthand how hard it is to search for a job without a mailing address. More than 300,000 people live in permanent supportive housing, all are chronically homeless and disabled. Many are veterans. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. A systematic review of 26 studies in the United States and Canada found that permanent supportive housing programs decreased homelessness by 88% while significantly lowering public costs associated with emergency services and hospital care. Finland saw equally impressive results following a Housing First approach. From 2008 to 2022, the number of individuals experiencing long-term homelessness in Finland decreased by 68%. Despite its success, Housing First has been chronically underfunded and inconsistently implemented across the country. Another view: Trump's order on homelessness is more humane than failed liberal policies | Opinion Housing First works. Trump has the power to use it for good. Why? In a word: stigma. Stigma drives the narrative that our unhoused neighbors are character-deficient threats to public safety, deserving of discipline and punishment rather than protection, housing and services. The truth is that as many as 66% to 82% of people experiencing homelessness are victims of crimes annually – a rate that should shock our national conscience. Worse, it is a rate that severely underrepresents the true scope of the problem because, according to The Bureau of Justice Statistics, "less than half (44%) of violent victimizations (of people experiencing homelessness) are reported to police." The problem is not that Housing First doesn't work. The problem is that stigma prevents proven solutions like Housing First from receiving the type of modest, sustained, national investment that will solve the problem. President Donald Trump is known as a remarkable pragmatist when it comes to accomplishing big deals. He should know that Housing First is development first, and that 'Trump ends homelessness in four years' has a nice ring to it, from sea to shining sea. Strong government, business and philanthropic leaders follow the data. By investing in a Housing First approach, Congress and the administration, and state and local leaders nationwide, can deliver safer streets, healthier communities and lower public health costs, while making homelessness history. Rob Robinson is a board member of Urban Pathways, a nonprofit organization serving adults experiencing homelessness in New York City. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump may make homelessness a crime. He could end it instead | Opinion
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Quincy's Scott Campbell faces crowded field in bid to retain at-large council seat
QUINCY ‒ Incumbent Councilor-at-large Scott Campbell's bid for a second term pits him against seven competitors for three seats. A Tuesday, Sept. 2, preliminary election will whittle the crowded field to six candidates who will appear on the ballot for the November general election. During an interview at the city council's offices in City Hall, Campbell said he's running on making housing affordable and continuing the council's support for Mayor Thomas Koch's transformation of the city. Campbell described himself as a lifelong Quincy resident and the youngest of eight in a family committed to community service, primarily through sports. Campbell said he continues that legacy to this day by coaching and organizing an annual golf tournament for alumni of Quincy and North Quincy High's football program. "I stayed involved my entire life," Campbell said. "Not because it's something good to do. It's a responsibility." Campbell began his professional life working in sales and customer relations for the telecommunications sector, including such firms as Granite Telecom and AT&T. But when he turned 30, he determined it was more of job than a vocation. In 2001, Campbell joined former Quincy city councilor, state treasurer and gubernatorial candidate Tim Cahill as a special aide, later rising to the position of chief of staff. Campbell described Cahill as a role model in politics. "The stances he took may not always have been popular," Campbell said. "It was the right thing. It wasn't always the easy thing." Campbell began a new job in January with the Massachusetts Sheriffs Association as director of government affairs. He was elected to city council in 2023 in an uncontested race. Quincy City Council candidate Scott Campbell: On affordability Asked what he hopes to accomplish if reelected, Campbell said he's focused on making the city affordable to live in for three generations of families. He said there are existing options, such as property tax abatements for veterans and seniors, which everyone may not know how to access. Campbell also named the Affordable Housing Trust Fund as part of a strategy to bring down housing costs. Private developers building market rate housing in the city can pay into the fund in lieu of building affordable units as part of their own projects. "Can we find a way to utilize that money," Campbell said. Quincy City Council candidate Scott Campbell: On the raises In the spring of 2024, Campbell and the rest of the council approved a 79% raise that Koch proposed for himself, increasing the mayor's salary from about $159,000 to $285,000. At the same time, Koch proposed a roughly 50% raise for the councilors, which increased their pay from $29,500 to $44,500. The council approved that raise as well. After the State Ethics Commission launched a conflict-of-interest inquiry, Koch and the councilors deferred the raises until after the next elections. The raises take effect in 2026 for the councilors and 2028 for the mayor. Or perhaps not for the mayor. A group of Quincy residents are working to put a citizen petition on November's ballot that would set the mayor's salary at $184,000 and take away elected officials' ability to increase their own salaries. Campbell defended his support for the mayor's raise by highlighting what he sees as the city's progress over the 17 years of Koch's tenure. "This is a national story here with the transformation of Quincy," he said. "By and large, it has been extremely successful." Asked why he didn't recognize that the mayor's and council's actions may have violated state conflict-of-interest law, which bars public officials from participating in matters in which they have a direct financial interest, Campbell said that others led the "process" which he only followed. "We were relying on a process," he said. "That process was presented to us." Asked who presented him with the process, Campbell named City Solicitor Jim Timmins and Council President Ian Cain. Performing arts, presidential center: Quincy reveals big new plans. With no price tag. Or address Courts: Quincy health commissioner will fight drunken driving charge at trial, lawyer says Quincy City Council candidate Scott Campbell: On the statues Speaking on the two, 10-foot-tall bronze statues of St. Michael and St. Florian planned for the façade of the new public safety building, Campbell said his initial response was concern over their pricetag, but ultimately he supports them. "My biggest issue was the cost," Campbell said. "At the end of the day, they fell within their budget." The statues cost $850,000, according to city officials. Commissioned as early as 2023, they were not disclosed to the city council, which approved the project's budget, or the residents until The Patriot Ledger reported on them in February. "By and large, (the public safety building) was managed in a really great way," Campbell said of the $175 million project. "We're talking about a landmark building, a 100-year building. To over simplify it, you don't buy a new suit and wear old shoes." Campbell said he doesn't think the statues violate the constitutional separation of church and state. Rather than Catholic figures, he said St. Michael and St. Florian are "accepted symbols of spirituality" for police and firefighters and "less about religion and more about protection." Three civil liberties organizations sued the city on behalf of 15 residents, claiming that Koch violated Article 3 of the state constitution, which bars government from elevating one religion over others. The plaintiffs are seeking a court order prohibiting installation of the statues, which are scheduled to go up in early October. Peter Blandino covers Quincy for The Patriot Ledger. Contact him at pblandino@ Thanks to our subscribers, who help make this coverage possible. If you are not a subscriber, please consider supporting quality local journalism with a Patriot Ledger subscription. Here is our latest offer. This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: Incumbent at-large councilor Scott Campbell runs for re-election Solve the daily Crossword
