logo
War in space — the China challenge

War in space — the China challenge

The Hill28-03-2025

Border security is national security, but America's borders are more expansive than the Rio Grande, ocean coasts or the frontier with Canada. In today's world, protecting our borders demands that we fully secure American interests in space. Achieving that goal demands investments to build a balanced Space Force capable of deterring aggressors and, if necessary, defeating them.
Whether they realize it or not, every American has a stake in how the Space Force performs and succeeds.
Our nation's prosperity depends on assured use of space. Financial transactions, critical utilities like water and power, the navigation built into phones, broadband internet on the go, and many more key facets of daily life depend on satellites.
Nor can our nation be safe and secure without fail-safe access to space and the freedom to operate there. U.S. and allied militaries rely on space for communications, remote sensing, early detection of missile launches, weapons guidance and more. Space is the ultimate high ground and the stakes are immense.
Today's U.S. Space Force was initially designed and resourced to 'protect and defend' these critical space capabilities. In the five years since activation, America's Space Force has delivered resilient satellite constellations that are hardened against attack, employed cutting edge technology from our defense industrial base like the X-37 spaceplane, and made prudent investments to avoid surprise from our adversaries. Those investments are paying off, but the Chinese Communist Party is already adapting. The threat they pose is real.
I watch outer space for a living. My job with the U.S. Space Force is to ensure we avoid surprise, and that work is only getting harder as space becomes more crowded and adversarial. Today, space is a war fighting domain because our adversaries have made it so. China's leader, General Secretary Xi Jinping has made space a priority and his Chinese PLA aerospace force is actively conducting 'confrontational training' that sends an unmistakable signal.
Last year, for example, China's military practiced advanced tactical maneuvers that brought their satellites within a few meters of other Chinese satellites serving as targets. They repeated the maneuver with simultaneous passes on multiple targets. In 2021, the SJ-21 'orbital debris removal' vehicle grappled a defunct non-cooperative Chinese satellite and dragged it to a graveyard orbit. This is exactly the kind of technology needed to attack our satellites such as those monitoring severe weather, providing persistent communications, or warning of missile launches. These close proximity operations conducted with little transparency also risk collisions in the increasingly crowded space environment.
These operations demonstrate advanced orbital proficiency and are in addition to previously fielded ground-based missiles and lasers designed to attack satellites. We cannot ignore these developments for many reasons. History, for one, offers lessons. In the 1930s, Germany developed innovative blitzkrieg tactics to exploit cutting edge technologies like armored vehicles and warplanes to penetrate, overfly, and outmaneuver fixed fortifications. Imperial Japan perfected techniques to launch lightning carrier raids across the Pacific. Today we are watching the PLA develop the skills needed for offensive operations in the space domain.
America's assured use of space is at risk unless we evolve from a reactive 'protect and defend' posture to instead build a Space Force capable of maneuvering and fighting in space. Border fences may slow down an aggressor, but history shows that defenders need their own maneuver forces to deter attack in the first place, counterattack, and if necessary, take the fight to the enemy.
Peace through strength matters on Earth, and it also matters in space. The U.S. and especially the Space Force must meet this challenge — it's about deterrence. Just like our capabilities in the air, land, and sea, a strong presence in space discourages adversaries from attacking in the first place. We must protect our frontier in space with the same diligence and determination that we are directing to borders closer to home. This requires investment in a balanced Space Force capable of a full range of operations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More Americans see increased influence from religion in US: Gallup
More Americans see increased influence from religion in US: Gallup

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

More Americans see increased influence from religion in US: Gallup

More Americans said they see an increased influence from religion in the U.S., according to a new Gallup poll. The Wednesday poll found that 34 percent of respondents said they believe 'religion as a whole is increasing its influence on American life,' up 14 points from May 2024. In December, 35 percent said the same about religion, one point higher than the recent Gallup poll. Back in April, President Trump pledged that 'religion is coming back to America' after kicking off his first White House Easter Egg Roll since coming back to office 'We're bringing religion back in America. We're bringing a lot of things back, but religion is coming back to America. That's why you see the kind of numbers that you see, the spirit and the kind of numbers that you see,' the president said in April. In Wednesday's Gallup poll, 59 percent of respondents said they believe religion's influence is dropping, down 2 points from December. Two percent also said religion's influence is the 'same' while 5 percent had 'no opinion.' In February, a Pew Research Center survey found that a decline in the number of Americans who identify as Christian appeared to be slowing down following years of losses. The Gallup poll took place from May 1 to 18, featuring 1,003 people and plus or minus 4 percentage points as a margin of sampling error.

MSNBC host tells Colbert that Trump has started to ‘f— around with the military'
MSNBC host tells Colbert that Trump has started to ‘f— around with the military'

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

MSNBC host tells Colbert that Trump has started to ‘f— around with the military'

MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said Tuesday that it felt different to have President Donald Trump 'f— around with the military' in his second term during an interview with late-night host Stephen Colbert. Wallace argued that there were no 'normal Republicans' in Trump's current administration and said 'what's different about Stephen Miller running the ICE raids, and running basically a siege of Los Angeles, is that there is no Mark Esper, Jim Mattis, and that's the big difference, and that is the danger.' Colbert then asked Wallace about the National Guard troops and the Marines that have been sent to Los Angeles to help quell the riots. 'We have seen Trump stretch his presidential powers over the last five months. Is this different?' 'It feels different, it feels different to, can we swear here?' she asked as Colbert said she could. 'To f— around with the military, it feels really different, and he wanted to the first time, but people like Mark Milley, people stopped him. It feels really different to use the military as pawns out loud and as a public tactic. That feels different to me.' A battalion of 700 U.S. Marines are mobilizing in Los Angeles to respond to anti-immigration enforcement riots, just days after Trump deployed the National Guard to the area as well. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson responded to criticism of Trump's actions on Tuesday, telling Fox News Digital that 'violent rioters in Los Angeles, enabled by Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom, have attacked American law enforcement, set cars on fire, and fueled lawless chaos.' On The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said President Donald Trump 'f— around with the military' had a different feeling compared to what he has done throughout his time in office. Scott Kowalchyk/CBS 'President Trump rightfully stepped in to protect federal law enforcement officers. When Democrat leaders refuse to protect American citizens, President Trump will always step in,' she added. Colbert also asked Wallace about the state of the Democratic Party and asked the MSNBC host if they were 'in danger of an autocrat.' 'I don't know, and I think that, in politics, you are one leader away from a comeback, you're one moody character away from this unlikely hero. And so I think the Democratic Party hasn't rotted. I mean the Democratic Party has not corrupted itself, it hasn't turned on itself in the way that the Republican Party has. And I think the Democratic Party is one leader away from being something fresh and appealing to a majority of others again. I think the Republican Party is still heading down, down, down following Trump and his authoritarian ways,' she said. Wallace claims there are no 'normal Republicans' in Trump's current administration and that the difference is that with Stephen Miller running the ICE raids, it is basically running a siege in Los Angeles, California. AP Wallace previously made headlines earlier this year while covering Trump's address to Congress, during which the president made a 13-year-old cancer survivor, DJ Daniel, an honorary Secret Service agent. 'But I think this was a lesson in finding one thing that you let yourself feel,' Wallace said during her coverage of the address. 'And I let myself feel joy about DJ, and I hope he's alive for another, you know, 95 years, and I hope he lives the life he wants to live. He wants to be a cop. He knows what he wants to do, and maybe when you have childhood cancer, that crystallizes for you.' 'I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer,' she continued. 'But I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump's supporters, and if he does, I hope he isn't one of the six who loses his life to suicide, and I hope he isn't one who has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy and then lived to see Donald Trump pardon those people.' The MSNBC host was criticized by Trump and the White House at the time.

Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content
Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — The majority of justices on Brazil's Supreme Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal postings by their users. Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass. The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens. The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his vote was made public last week. The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the measure. The current legislation states social media companies can only be held responsible in those cases if they do not remove hazardous content after a court order. Mauricio Savarese, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store