
Alabama bans devices converting pistols to machine guns
The Republican governor of Alabama, Kay Ivey, signed a gun control bill on Wednesday, banning 'Glock switches' and other devices that turn rifles and pistols into machine guns.
Ivey said: 'While there is a federal ban on these gun conversion devices, we needed a way to empower our own law enforcement here in Alabama to get these illegal and extremely dangerous Glock switches off our streets.
'I am proud to support law enforcement and work to combat crime by putting my signature on SB116.'
Ivey's office said the bill was part of a 'Safe Alabama public safety package' and Ivey looked forward 'to the other bills … reaching her desk'.
Everytown for Gun Safety, a group that campaigns for gun safety reform, defines 'Glock switches' as a form of auto sear, 'devices that convert semi-automatic firearms, which are designed to fire one shot per trigger pull, into fully automatic machine guns, allowing a shooter to continue firing as long as the trigger is depressed and the gun has ammunition.
'In other words, with an auto sear (also known as a 'machine gun conversion device' or MCD), someone can fire an entire magazine's worth of ammunition in mere seconds. Worse yet, auto sears are very easy to manufacture and can even be 3D printed, which is why these components – especially those designed by third parties for Glock pistols, known as 'Glock switches' – are showing up at more and more crime scenes around the country.'
Everytown points out that 'Glock switches' are not made by Glock, 'even if they are branded or referred to as such'. Such devices have been banned federally since 1986 and were banned by 23 states before Alabama followed suit.
Gun rights groups oppose state bans, with the National Rifle Association saying: 'There's plenty to be done using existing law before law-abiding gun owners should countenance any further restrictions on their rights.'
Gun Owners of America said: 'The rise in new 'machine gun conversion devices' is further proof that gun laws only apply to law abiding citizens and do nothing to stop criminals.'
Criminal use of machine gun conversion devices is indeed an increasing problem. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said nearly 5,500 such devices were taken into custody between 2017 and 2021, a 570% increase on the previous four years.
In 2022, the most recent year on record, Alabama saw 1,278 gun deaths at a rate of 25.2 per 100,000 people, the fourth-highest rate in the country, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Everytown classes Alabama's gun safety laws as 'weak', though it commends laws passed in 2015 that 'keep guns away from domestic abusers'.
Philip Ensler, a Democratic state representative from Montgomery, the state capital, campaigned for the 'Glock switch' ban.
On Wednesday, he said he was 'immensely grateful that our legislation to pass a ban on devices that convert pistols into machine guns was signed into law and that it is effective immediately. With this law, we passed a state law prohibiting one of the most dangerous gun accessories that exist.
'Passing gun safety legislation – especially as a Democrat – in Alabama is not easy. But through the creation of a strong, diverse coalition that transcended party, we were able to enact this important measure.
'Today, we proved that progress can happen and that the Alabama legislature can come together to help solve real problems. May we always remember each and every person who has died from gun violence and may this legislation help save lives moving forward.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economist
36 minutes ago
- Economist
What's happening in LA could be a template for the Trump administration
IS THE UNREST in Los Angeles a one-off? Or is it the beginning of a summer of unrest, and of crackdowns by President Donald Trump, who has no patience for protesters in Democratic cities?


NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty
Oklahoma's top prosecutor said Monday the state intends to pursue a new murder trial against inmate Richard Glossip but without the death penalty after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated his capital conviction in a rare victory for a death row prisoner. State Attorney General Gentner Drummond's decision to retry Glossip, 62, on a first-degree murder charge came out of a status conference hearing. In a news release, Drummond said, the evidence still implicates him in the 1997 murder of Oklahoma City motel owner Barry Van Treese. Glossip, a motel manager working for Van Treese, has maintained his innocence while he was on death row for almost three decades. While Drummond, a Republican, has not agreed with Glossip's innocence claims, he was supportive of the Supreme Court's ruling in February, when the majority of justices, he said, agreed "it is now an undeniable fact that he did not receive a fair trial." He said in a statement Monday that he would ensure Glossip receives an impartial one now. "While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence," Drummond said. "After the high court remanded the matter back to district court, my office thoroughly reviewed the merits of the case against Richard Glossip and concluded that sufficient evidence exists to secure a murder conviction." Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna, a Democrat, had previously indicated that Glossip would not be eligible for the death penalty now if he were to be retried. Drummond said he would seek a life sentence for Glossip at his next trial. "While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today," he added. The continuation of the state's prosecution against Glossip resumes a twisting case that saw him dodge death several times with nine separate execution dates that had to be postponed. Various courts had delayed the executions as he appealed, while state corrections officials also came under scrutiny a decade ago for botched execution attempts. But Glossip's case had been championed in recent years by a bipartisan group of Oklahoma legislators after an indepe n dent report they commissioned in 2022 found that "no reasonable jury hearing the complete record would convict Glossip of first-degree murder." The report centered on the state's primary witness, Justin Sneed, who had confirmed to the report's investigators that he had discussions with multiple family members about "recanting" his testimony over an 11-year period. Investigators also said the district attorney's case file included documentation describing how the state provided Sneed information "so he could conform his testimony to match the evidence" from other witnesses. Glossip's original 1998 conviction was overturned in 2001, when a state appeals court found that the evidence against him was weak. But the state took him to trial again, and a second jury found him guilty in 2004. At Glossip's trial, Sneed, a motel handyman, admitted that he killed Van Treese, but said that it was at Glossip's direction and that he had been promised $10,000. In exchange for testifying against Glossip, Sneed received a life sentence while Glossip was given the death penalty. Prosecutors said Glossip orchestrated the plot because he was embezzling from the motel and feared being fired. The Supreme Court tossed out Glossip's capital conviction in a 5-3 ruling. Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate, presumably because he was involved in the case when he was on a federal appeals court that includes Oklahoma. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the majority's ruling that prosecutors "knew Sneed's statements were false" and that "because Sneed's testimony was the only direct evidence of Glossip's guilt of capital murder, the jury's assessment of Sneed's credibility was necessarily determinative here." "Hence, there is a reasonable likelihood that correcting Sneed's testimony would have affected the judgment of the jury," she added. After the Supreme Court's decision, Glossip was moved off death row, but was held without bail in the Oklahoma County Detention Center on a first-degree murder charge. A next court date in Glossip's case is scheduled for June 17. Glossip's attorney, Don Knight, did not immediately comment about the prosecutors' decision, but had welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling in February that spared his longtime client from the death chamber. "He had nine execution dates, three last meals, and obviously, to finally get relief has been huge for him," Knight said, "and he's thrilled beyond words."


Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
The LA immigration riots are US politics at its worst
This weekend's immigration protests in LA showed every element in American politics at its absolute worst. The right was rabidly xenophobic, President Trump belligerent and authoritarian. Democratic leadership clueless, unfocused, weak and in denial – and the left manipulative and deliberately violent. Anyone with a whit of sense stayed as far away from the proceedings as possible. The right does no one any favours when they discuss America's immigration problems as a war for the future of civilisation. Maybe in the case of the Egyptian national who torched elderly Jewish people in Boulder last weekend, they have a point, but not when it comes to the quotidian ICE immigration operation that just went down in LA. But opposing that operation isn't exactly something on which the left should hang its balaclava either. Judging from the vociferous weekend-long passion play we saw unfold, you'd think that ICE had loaded the residents of an orphanage or a nunnery into a van, gouged out their eyes, and sent them to a windowless dungeon.