Picking a Marine to run Navy shows China that Britain is serious about amphibious warfare
The appointment of Gen Sir Gwyn Jenkins, a Royal Marines officer, as head of the Royal Navy is a massive vote of confidence in the 'Future Commando Force' concept by the Prime Minister and Ministry of Defence (MoD)
The First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, to give Gen Sir Gwyn his full title, is responsible for commanding the 'dark blue' part of the Navy – the ships, submarines and aircraft that project Britain's global maritime power (which has admittedly been eroded by decades of underfunding).
But he also commands the 6,000 or so Royal Marines who are expected to storm enemy beaches once safely delivered to combat zones by their sister organisation.
The problem in recent years has been twofold. First, that phrase, 'safely delivered'.
With modern anti-ship missiles able to reach hundreds of miles out to sea and ubiquitous surveillance from satellites and drones, just getting to the fight has been seen in recent years as a huge problem, one which has focused the minds of those in the Ministry of Defence who wear Royal Navy uniforms.
The second problem causing some angst to Britain's naval planners – and particularly those from the Royal Marines – has been how to fight in territory held (or dominated) by an enemy force, even if our own troops can make it safely to the shore.
These two issues have led to the development of the Future Commando Force concept: an amphibious group able to defend itself at sea, project force onto land and take the fight to the enemy once ashore.
Finding a way to do this effectively in the face of fearsome (mainly Chinese) capabilities that can render such an outfit irrelevant has taken considerable teamwork from both sides of the Navy.
Gen Sir Gwyn is seen as the perfect champion to lead this work, having a foot in both camps and a deep understanding of the capabilities of each in the face of a challenge that is worsening daily.
Senior Royal Navy officers have already told The Telegraph that Gen Sir Gwyn's appointment is a positive endorsement of the Future Commando Force concept.
It marks a significant uptick in the fortunes of the Royal Marines.
With the UK re-focused on global conflict after the expeditionary years in Iraq and Afghanistan, some analysts had cautioned that the days of amphibious forces were over.
Power projection, they argued, would come from the air, through long-range precision missiles and drones knocking out enemy defences. Regular infantry from the Army could then be dropped off by friendly naval ships to march into the newly-acquired territory.
What would the point be of expensive specialised amphibious troops such as the Royal Marines, if the concept of surviving, let alone fighting one's way into such an environment had been rendered irrelevant by technology?
To accept that maxim, however, would be an act of self-deterrence and an endorsement of one of the key theories of Sun Tzu as he wrote in The Art of War.
The ancient Chinese philosopher theorised that the supreme art of war was to subdue the enemy without fighting. He advocated achieving victory through strategic manoeuvring, diplomacy and the display of military might to make an enemy force decide it was not worth fighting in the first place.
The Future Commando Force has looked at this problem and decided against self-deterrence.
It is believed that small, aggressive groups, highly supported by technology such as secure communications, drones and radars, and operating in concert when required can get inside an area dominated by an enemy force (under the somewhat clunkily titled Anti-Access/Area Denial, or A2AD, umbrella) and project sufficient power to hold on until heavier forces arrive.
Such a force does not come cheap, however, and will require some reorganisation not just of the Navy and Marines, but also Britain's Army, which would be required to offer supporting functions.
Cash and the desire for more tinkering with the organisation chart are currently in short supply.
However, it is an idea very much in line with current thinking in the US Marine Corps (if not totally bought-into yet by the wider US Navy), the cousins alongside whom Britain's commando forces, based around a core of Royal Marines, might have to fight if China decided to test Taiwan's defences and the world's appetite to reject military conquest.
Britain's maritime planners – both Navy and Marine – hope the 'Future' part of the concept will be jettisoned in the Government's long-delayed Strategic Defence Review, currently inching tortuously towards publication this summer.
The endorsement of the Prime Minister, through the appointment of Gen Sir Gwyn, suggests that is a likely scenario. The US, and China, will have taken note.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dow futures dip as stocks eye record highs ahead of U.S.-China talks and inflation reports
Stock futures ticked lower on Sunday night as the S&P 500's recent rally has brought it within 2.4% of its all-time high reached in February, before President Donald Trump's trade war ravaged markets. That comes ahead of a big week, which will see another round of U.S.-China trade talks and key inflation reports. U.S. stock futures pointed down on Sunday night ahead of a big week that will be highlighted by more U.S.-China trade talks and fresh inflation data. A strong jobs report on Friday added more fuel to a rally that has lifted the S&P 500 to within 2.4% of its all-time high reached in February, before President Donald Trump's trade war sank markets. Futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 44 points, or 0.10%. S&P 500 futures slipped 0.15%, and Nasdaq futures eased 0.23%. Tesla stock may see more downside after Trump said his relationship with CEO Elon Musk is over. The yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped less than 1 basis point to 4.506%. The dollar fell 0.11% against the euro and 0.15% against the yen. While Wall Street may not react to Trump sending National Guard troops to Los Angeles, his overall immigration crackdown represents a labor-supply shock to the economy that has implications for the dollar. Gold dipped 0.28% to $3,337.20 per ounce. U.S. oil prices climbed 0.08% to $64.63 per barrel, and Brent crude gained 0.05% to $66.50. On Monday, U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London to begin another round of trade talks after agreeing last month in Geneva to pause their prohibitively high tariffs. Since that de-escalation in the trade war, both sides have accused the other reneging on their deal. For the U.S., a key sticking point has been the availability of rare earths, which are dominated by China and are critical for the auto, tech, and defense sectors. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, sounded upbeat on Sunday that the London talks could result in a resolution. 'I'm very comfortable that this deal is about to be closed,' he told CBS News. Meanwhile, new inflation data are due as the Federal Reserve remains in wait-and-see mode to assess how much Trump's tariffs are moving the needle on prices. The better-than-expected jobs report on Friday eased fears of a recession, taking pressure off the Fed to cut rates to support the economy. That means that any rate cuts may have to come as a result of cooler inflation. The Labor Department will release its monthly consumer price index on Wednesday and its producer price index on Thursday. Also on Wednesday, the Treasury Department will issue its monthly update on the budget, offering clues on how much debt the federal government is issuing amid concern about bond supply and demand. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
I hope the U.S.-China trade talks go well. But I worry we don't have the cards
What exactly were we thinking starting a trade war without having this rare earth elements issue all buttoned up and ready to go? How did we get so far along in this contest of wills when we hadn't invested the money to explore rare earth material refining and production in this country? The group of 17 minerals known as rare earths are used to make smartphones, tablets, speakers, touch screens, wind turbines, solar panels, robotics, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, lasers, electric vehicles, and, yes, the F-35 fighter jet, which uses a huge amount of rare earth minerals. Given all that, shouldn't someone have checked to see if we had refining capacity and were hoarding these the way we do oil in the strategic petroleum reserve? Why do we have a bitcoin reserve and no rare earth reserve? Does anyone know how we could let things go this far without thinking that China — which controls the majority of rare earth global production and almost all if its refining — wouldn't just shut us down? In April, China implemented export controls on a subsegment of rare earths and magnets, and automotive supply chains have started to feel the bite . A report Friday said suppliers to the Big Three automakers gained the necessary export approvals from China . President Donald Trump also claimed Friday that, in his phone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Xi agreed to let rare earths go to the U.S. In any case, there's little denying China's leverage here ahead of trade talks in London. Trump spends a huge amount of time excoriating any CEO who refuses to relocate their manufacturing to the U.S. But do we really care about bringing back manufacturing for softballs or hosiery when we don't have enough workers anyway? Shouldn't our top priority be the production of things like rare earths, which are essential inputs into the products we're pushing companies to make here, like smartphones? On that note, how is it possible that the U.S. government let the Mountain Pass rare earth mine in California amass such a troubled history, beginning with the production suspension in 2002? MP Materials now owns it and is reviving it, part of its plan to be a fully integrated producer of rare earth permanent magnets in the U.S. However, the previous company that owned the mine with the goal of resurrecting it, Molycorp, ended up filing for bankruptcy . MP Materials went public in November 2020 through a reverse merger with a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. That was all the rage back then, and so many of those SPAC deals were busts. Now here we are at a fraught geopolitical moment, and a former SPAC — admittedly a good one, at least — has control of Mountain Pass. The Department of Defense has granted some awards to MP Materials in recent years, but it's fair to ask if the support to date has been adequate, considering how vital its long-term success is for the nation. Getting all the production and refining up to speed is a costly endeavor. Oh, and who the heck thought this was a great idea to rely on China for the F-35 rare earth minerals? Sure, MP Materials is doing yeomen's work and is no longer sending rare earth concentrate to China for refining — something it stopped doing in mid-April as U.S.-China trade tensions heated up and tariff rates had reached triple-digit percentages. But the fact is that MP Materials produces around 15% of rare earth content consumed globally. So, the Chinese, for all intents and purposes, really own these materials lock, stock and barrel. And that puts us over a barrel. Now, I am sure someone in this administration knows something about this stranglehold China has over us and maybe realized that it was foolhardy to be relying on a former SPAC to spend all the money needed to become vertically integrated in time to reduce our dependency. But here we are on the eve of the second round of talks with the Chinese , and we have become mendicants because of something that is so obvious to anyone whoever listened to a couple of MP Materials conference calls: We don't have the cards. Perhaps someone actually took the Ukraine rare earth materials claims seriously? Maybe we have a second source buried deep somewhere in the Rockies ? Or did we really not know that China owned us on this issue and wouldn't have any compunctions about shutting down access to their minerals — or their refining capacity — when we are waging a cold war against them? Can you imagine if we were reliant on Russian oil if we were still in a Cold War with the Soviet Union? You think Richard Nixon wouldn't have known the score ahead of time? I find the whole thing embarrassing. It's bad enough that we are challenging a command economy to endure without our toy orders and tool orders. We are actually going to have to beg for unfettered access to a country whose word has meant nothing multiple times since Xi took over as China's president in 2013? If you were a neutral arbiter and came across these two countries, which one would you pick to win the war? Who would you play for if you were a free agent and didn't care about human rights? More important, why aren't we spending $100 billion to build out an exploration and refining platform where we used to produce these? We were huge at one time and relied on domestic production into the late 1990s . Why did we not figure that the Chinese would have to be laughing at us because a little-known company is in charge of our meager mineral repository while their whole government is in charge of theirs? I don't think slow-walking liquified natural gas exports to China, as vital as they can be, is enough to offset China's leverage on rare earths. The recent decision to restrain U.S. companies from shipping ethane to China is not going to counterbalance the rare earth dominance. Could we really be that bush league? Now it all comes down to something we have — less-powerful version of Club name Nvidia's artificial intelligence processors — to trade for access to rare earth minerals, a deal that can only work if we start a rare earth Manhattan Project to extricate from our ridiculous dependence. A dual-track Nvidia deal and a Molybdenum Manhattan Project might work. My hope, of course, is that everything I have written above has been thought about, and that there have been many secretive meetings — perhaps even with Elon Musk, whose Tesla relies on magnets that contain rare earths, and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum — to discuss the development of a North American Rare Earth Pact because Mexico has them galore. I hope we're just playing for a time until we don't need China. But, somehow, I do not think our team has really thought about this. So, I am going into these talks with low expectations because I have to believe that, without the rare earth materials we need from China, we can't really get a deal because we won't negotiate the rights to Nvidia's chips. Perhaps we would rather go without parts for the F-35 then give China access to the AI computing they want. Let's see how that goes. The president has been adamant that every company should build everything here even as we don't have nearly as many workers as we need to do so. He wants to punish China for everything it has done and punish every American company for doing what it was supposed to do for the last 30 years, which is to open plants in China, and for the last five years, which is to move those plants to Vietnam. But these are small-time measures compared with getting us off the rare earth addiction, something so strategically important. As investors, we want these talks to go well. As it is, everything seems like a sideshow to our China showdown. And without a Supreme Court ruling saying Trump really does have a right to implement these broad-based tariffs, if I were the leader of any country, I might just want to play a wait-and-see game betting that Trump would obey the Supreme Court. So, let's hope something's accomplished in London between the two sides. But until I hear that Nvidia chief Jensen Huang has been told to divert from the company's Paris GTC being held this week, I sense that there's a nothing-done situation brewing. That could be disappointing for those who are still playing the "no more tariffs, let's buy stocks" game. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long NVDA. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds vow to continue immigration enforcement 'every day in L.A.' Here are your rights
As the number of immigration raids has increased across Southern California over the last week, there are more questions than ever about how to handle an interaction with federal agents. Agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement made arrests in the garment district, specifically at Ambiance Apparel, where immigration authorities detained employees inside the clothing wholesaler, and other locations on Friday. Protests followed into the weekend, prompting the deployment of National Guard troops in downtown Los Angeles by the Trump administration. The raids are the latest in a string of high-profile immigration enforcement actions over the last week, part of President Trump's deportation crackdown. A few days ago, immigration agents raided a popular San Diego restaurant and made arrests, sparking a standoff with outraged residents. Agents also arrested Chinese and Taiwanese nationals at an underground nightclub in the Los Angeles area. Officials suggest that many more raids are coming. 'I'm telling you what, we're going to keep enforcing law every day in L.A.,' Trump's "border czar," Tom Homan, told NBC News. 'Every day in L.A., we're going to enforce immigration law. I don't care if they like it or not.' Read more: What really happened outside the Paramount Home Depot? The reality on the ground vs. the rhetoric Officials have not said how long the raids will last or described the larger operation. But in the deployment memo sending the National Guard to L.A., officials said 'the duration of duty shall be for 60 days or at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense. In addition, the Secretary of Defense may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion.' Over the last few months, The Times has asked experts for guidance for employees and employers who find themselves in the crosshairs. Here is a summary of what we found: If you're home alone or with family members and you hear a knock at the door, check the window, security camera or peephole so you can identify whether ICE agents are outside. When you find yourself in this situation, the first step is to keep your door closed and locked, advised advocacy groups and legal experts. You must open your door and allow agents inside your home if they present a valid search warrant. Advocates say agents must identify themselves and show you the warrant by putting it against the window or slipping it under your door. A valid warrant must be: issued by a court; have the correct name and address of the person being seized; signed by a judge or magistrate judge. This can be an overwhelming and scary situation. All those emotions are valid, said Pedro Trujillo, director of organizing for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights. Take a moment to gather yourself, he suggests, because there isn't a time limit on the visit. If you need help verbalizing your rights, show the agent a Red Card that helps explain your rights. Read more: The National Guard comes to Los Angeles: What's going to happen next? Red Cards can be downloaded from the website for the Immigration Legal Resource Center. By showing this card, you're affirming that you want to remain silent and wish to speak to a lawyer. The card states that the person ICE agents are inquiring about has the right to decline answering questions and signing or handing over documents based on their 5th Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. You can present this card to agents, whether it's a physical copy or a photo on your phone, by displaying it through the window. If ICE agents enter your home without consent, you have the right to say: 'I do not consent to this entry or search," according to advocates. Don't physically resist. Instead, you have the right to document what happens, including: getting officers' names and badge numbers; documenting details of their actions; and gathering contact information for any present witnesses. After agents have left, you have the right to reach out to and consult with a legal representative. You have the right to remain silent. For example, if you're asked about your immigration status, where you were born or how you entered the United States, you may refuse to answer or remain silent, according to the National Immigration Law Center. You can simply say, 'I want to remain silent' or 'I am exercising my right to remain silent.' Experts advise that you are not required to sign documents or provide personal information. If ICE agents are present when you're on public transportation: You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. If agents want to conduct a search of you and your belongings, you have the right to refuse the search by saying you do not consent. An agent may 'pat down' your clothes if he or she suspects you have a weapon. You can ask, 'Am I free to leave?' If the agent says yes, calmly walk away. You may record interactions to document any violations of your rights. If ICE agents approach you while you're in the car: Pull over safely if stopped by law enforcement. Ask the law enforcement officers to identify if they are highway patrol, police or ICE agents by showing their badge. If it is an ICE agent, you have the right to remain silent and not offer any information, said Shiu-Ming Cheer, California Immigration Policy Center's deputy director of immigrant and racial justice. Keep your hands visible on the steering wheel and provide law enforcement or highway patrol officers requested documents such as your license and registration. If you can identify they're ICE agents, remain silent and do not provide any information. You can say, 'I do not consent to a search,' if they ask to search your car. Officers may still conduct a search if they believe it contains evidence of a crime. If you are detained or taken into custody, you have the right to reach out to an attorney and receive a phone call from an attorney. You can prove you have a lawyer by giving the officer your signed Form G-28, a federal document that details your lawyer's information and your consent to their legal representation. Read more: Immigration raids roil L.A., dozens of people detained. What we know so far Don't have a lawyer? You can ask the ICE official for a list of pro-bono lawyers. You can also ask to contact the consulate, which may be able to assist you in finding a lawyer. Get familiar with the rules of the detention center you've been placed in. You can do so by asking for a copy of the Detainee Handbook to understand the detention center's rules, your rights and how you can communicate with loved ones. The book is available in 19 languages, including English, Spanish, Arabic, Bengali, French, Haitian Creole, Hindi, K'iche' (Quiché)/Kxlantzij, Mam, Portuguese, Pulaar, Punjabi, Q'eqchi' (Kekchí), Romanian, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Turkish, Vietnamese and Wolof. A raid is when ICE agents arrive at a work site without warning the employer. They can be accompanied by other agencies or appear in large numbers, according to the California Employers Assn. ICE agents can go to a business to try to find a particular person, or people, according to the National Immigration Law Center. The California Employers Assn. recommends creating a four-step response plan that should address the following: Who needs to be alerted if ICE shows up or a notice is received? Who is authorized to speak to law enforcement agents on behalf of the company? What information can be gathered from the agents? Is there a designated place for agents to wait? Who should be alerted: Alerting management and employee/union representatives within an organization can help reduce workplace disruption and keep employees calm, said Giuliana Gabriel, vice president of human resources at the California Employers Assn. 'Rumors and misinformation tend to create panic amongst a workforce, and some employees may even try to flee or confront agents,' she said. 'Running could give the agents reason to detain or arrest someone, so having an employee representative or member of management to maintain order and keep employees calm is advisable.' Legal counsel should immediately be notified when ICE shows up because they can help 'protect your organization and your employees from agents overstepping their boundaries or taking liberties as far as what they are authorized to do at your workplace,' she added. Authorized speakers: Examples of people who can be designated to speak with agents include the business owner or a member of the management team, such as a general manager or human resources representative. 'Ideally it would be someone familiar with your response plan, if you have one, and authorized to speak on behalf of the company,' Gabriel said. The identified person or people should be able to communicate confidently, clearly and remain composed 'while protecting the privacy of your organization and its employees,' she said. Gathering ICE agent information: You have the right to ask immigration officials which agency they represent as well as for their names, badge numbers and business cards. 'There have been reports of citizens impersonating ICE agents to target, detain and harass others,' Gabriel said. Designated waiting area: Find a conference room or office where agents can wait. This can limit workplace disruptions. Businesses should enact their response plan immediately when immigration officials arrive. Before ICE agents can enter private areas of your business (public areas are parking lots or lobbies), they must present a valid warrant to conduct their search. As when a warrant is presented at a private home, at the workplace a valid warrant must be issued by a court, have the correct name and address of the person being seized and be signed by a judge or magistrate judge. Businesses should ensure that employees know their rights and that they should refrain from engaging with ICE officials, according to the National Employment Law Project. If ICE agents have questions or requests, workers should not respond and instead direct the officials to speak with their employer. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
