
Dr. Brian Day's clinic to pay B.C.'s trial costs after failed private health lawsuit
Cambie Surgeries Corp. — owned by private health-care advocate Dr. Brian Day — launched a lawsuit back in 2009. It claimed B.C.'s Medicare Protection Act was unconstitutionally preventing people from getting private health care when the public system was unable to provide it.
The B.C. Supreme Court, the B.C. Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada all shot down the private surgery clinic's case, but the issue of trial costs was left in the air.
WATCH | Dr. Brian Day says the patients are left suffering:
Dr. Brian Day discusses Supreme Court's dismissal of his case
2 years ago
Duration 1:14
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Lynn Whately ruled Monday that Cambie Surgeries should pay the attorney general of British Columbia's trial costs, calling the long-running litigation "prodigiously lengthy and complex."
The ruling says the lawsuit by Cambie Surgeries was being funded by the Canadian Constitution Foundation.
The ruling doesn't specify the province's costs, but the foundation said last year the B.C. government was seeking $1.7 million from the charitable foundation and "its partners."
The court ruling says the government argued that Cambie Surgeries was a "well-resourced" party that had a financial stake in the outcome of the case, rather than a public-interest litigant going to bat for patients let down by the public health-care system.
It says the B.C. government claimed the private clinic was making "tens of millions" in profit by violating the public health-care protection law.
The judge found that Cambie Surgeries' financial interest in winning the case "likely preclude them from being considered true public interest litigants."
Whately found that the case "involved matters of great importance to all British Columbians, not only in a legal sense, but in terms of the practical, day-to-day impact on access to health care, the funding of health-care services, and the principles that uphold our public health-care system."
The private clinic said the case involved "novel" legal issues and assessing the "government's constitutional obligations to provide public health care within a reasonable time, and the 'practical consequences' that must be associated to the failure to do so."
Both sides tried to blame one another for the case dragging on, with the attorney general of B.C. citing "egregious" conduct around document disclosure, experts and witnesses while pursuing a meritless claim under the Charter.
Cambie Surgeries and the other plaintiffs, on the other hand, said the B.C. government had its "own 'massive' shortcomings in document disclosure and production, and that it derailed the litigation process.
The case eventually went to trial in 2016 and spanned four years before the B.C. Supreme Court ruled against Cambie Surgeries. That decision was upheld by the B.C. Court of Appeal, before the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave for a further appeal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Province
5 days ago
- The Province
Opinion: There is no known cure for ALS, but medical tourism exploits desperation for profit
Opinion: Claims of dramatic improvement or cures from ALS by unregulated clinics that seem too good to be true are likely just that There is no known cure for ALS, but scientific breakthroughs in treating symptoms have been made. Getty Images Photo by Rost-9D / Getty Images Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurological disorder of unknown cause, in which motor nerve cells of the brain and spinal cord that transmit signals to muscles progressively degenerate. This weakens limbs and affects speech, swallowing and ultimately the ability to breathe, resulting in death, typically within just a few years. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Each year in Canada, approximately two people per 100,000 are diagnosed with ALS, amounting to about 1,000 cases based on the current population. In British Columbia, where we are located, the rate is estimated at just over three per 100,000 or roughly 190 new cases per year. This equates to approximately 4,000 Canadians — and 400 British Columbians — living with ALS at any given time. Rigorous ALS research is underway locally, nationally and internationally to slow — and ideally reverse — the relentless progression of this disease. Significant advances in understanding the genetic and environmental drivers of ALS are providing genuine hope that motor neuron diseases will one day be defeated. As experts in neurology and ethics, we are committed to delivering the best available health care and information throughout B.C. and across Canada. Trust in science and informed hope are essential to achieving the best possible outcomes and the longest possible trajectories in enjoying life when facing the overwhelming odds of ALS. Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In June, CBC's The National reported on the case of Geoff Sando, a person living with ALS who pursued an unproven intervention for his condition. Sando travelled to Moose Jaw, Sask., to seek treatment at a clinic that claims to provide a cure for ALS. The ALS Society of Saskatchewan and the provincial NDP allege the clinic attended by Sando and several other patients is a form of medical tourism — travelling elsewhere to seek treatment — that can prey on the most vulnerable in society: those whose quality of life is deteriorating, and whose futures are tragically cut short. Medical tourism for a wide variety of other health-related conditions is not new. For example, treatments for cancer, strokes and orthopedic conditions have been available abroad for decades. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In the United States and Mexico, unfounded stem cell interventions for ALS have been advertised for years. But until recently, it had been unusual to find such offerings in Canada. Their emergence speaks to the need for Health Canada to revisit its guidance on both regulated health and unregulated wellness products, including all forms of treatments, medications and device-based approaches. We understand the urgency and desire to pursue any thread of hope in the face of desperation, but claims of dramatic improvement or cures from ALS by unregulated clinics that seem too good to be true are likely just that. Before investing in alternative treatments, we recommend that patients conduct their due diligence by consulting with their health-care team and their provincial ALS society for guidance. Ineffective interventions can jeopardize not only recipients, but also caregivers, especially when financial resources are drained. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Developing approved therapies for ALS has been painfully slow, as evidenced by the failure of more than 95 per cent of ALS clinical trials in the past 28 years. Only three drugs — riluzole, edaravone and tofersen — have been approved by Health Canada and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Although riluzole and edaravone are only modestly effective, they remain the only widely approved pharmacological options for all forms of ALS. Tofersen is the first gene therapy recently approved to treat hereditary ALS caused by SOD1 gene abnormalities. Other treatments are being evaluated worldwide. This marks only the beginning of such treatment approaches to not only hereditary ALS but also non-hereditary ALS, which makes up about 90 per cent of all cases. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. For those affected by ALS and their families, ample resources are provided by various organizations, including ALS Canada and related provincial organizations, including the ALS Society of B.C. Future hope Canadians generally trust science and scientists more than citizens of other countries and, on the whole, value science and believe in our government's support for the work that scientists do. But in this time of geopolitical upheaval, vast incursions of disinformation and reversals of prior evidence-based human and health rights abroad means keeping up this level of trust — trust that leads to hope — will only become more challenging. The disproportionate suffering and impact on people who are marginalized by serious health conditions will only grow if dubious treatment offerings become normalized in Canada. Judy Illes is a professor in Neurology at the University of B.C.; Erik Pioro is a professor in Medicine at the University of UBC. This article was originally published on The Conversation, an independent and non-profit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.


Vancouver Sun
11-08-2025
- Vancouver Sun
Fired Fraser Health CEO is getting more than $600,000 in severance pay
Former Fraser Health CEO Dr. Victoria Lee will be paid more than $600,000 in severance after she was fired as head of the beleaguered health authority back in February. The details of Lee's compensation were recently released without fanfare as part of an executive compensation disclosure for the 2024/25 fiscal year on Fraser Health's website . The figure was first reported on Monday by The Tyee . The severance package of $609,335 is based on Lee's annual salary of about $377,000, plus vacation, pension and retroactive pay, and other benefits, including a one-time job search allowance up to $16,000. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. It is being paid out in instalments that started on Feb. 18, Lee's last day of employment and will continue until Aug. 18, 2026. Trevor Halford, the Surrey-White Rock MLA and Conservative health critic, slammed the NDP government over the 'golden parachute' for Lee as health authorities struggle with overcrowding and lengthy wait lists. Halford tried to get Health Minister Josie Osborne to disclose Lee's severance payout in the B.C. legislature in April, asking point-blank whether it was more or less than $1 million. Despite coming in well below that figure, Halford quoted The Tyee as saying it is 15 times higher than the severance afforded to a nurse in similar circumstances. 'This government is rewarding failure at the top while cutting jobs lower down,' said Halford. He called out the NDP for giving 'golden parachutes for executives, pink slips for workers, and zero accountability for the mess they've made of our health care system.' News of the big executive payout comes after it was reported late last week that the Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) is cutting 57 management jobs and eliminating 61 vacant positions as part of an ongoing review of corporate spending. Lee was forced out after emergency room doctors at Surrey Memorial Hospital declared a crisis of overcrowding and health worker burnout in a letter that leaked last year. Just a week ago, Fraser Health said the emergency room at Delta Hospital was closed overnight because of a doctor shortage, one of many in recent months in the health region that serves two million people from Burnaby to Boston Bar. 'British Columbians deserve to know how many more cushy executive payouts are coming, and how deep these cuts to the health system will go,' said Halford in a statement on Monday. The interim president and CEO for Fraser Health, hired right after Lee's departure in February, is Lynn Roberta Stevenson. She received just under $50,000 in salary and benefits through the end of the 2024/25 fiscal year in March. jruttle@


The Province
11-08-2025
- The Province
B.C. doctor loses challenge of dismissal for COVID vaccine refusal
Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak said her Charter rights were violated when she had her hospital privileges revoked for refusing to get vaccinated A B.C. doctor argued her Charter rights were violated when she was dismissed as a hospitalist for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine during a provincial health order. Photo by Getty Images A B.C. judge has rejected a Charter challenge brought by a Kamloops doctor who said her rights were violated when her hospital privileges were revoked for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak brought the action in B.C. Supreme Court in Kelowna against the Interior Health Authority and the Hospital Appeal Board, which upheld the health agency's decision. Judge Steven Wilson said the revocation was an administrative decision, not a matter of Charter rights, and ruled in favour of health officials. Szezepaniak worked as a hospitalist at Royal Inland Hospital in Kamloops during the pandemic. On Oct. 14, 2021, provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry issued an order that all doctors and nurses must be vaccinated. Those who refused were told they must resign their privileges or run the risk of being disciplined. The doctor refused either to get the vaccine or resign, instead launching an appeal with the Hospital Appeal Board, which largely upheld the decision of Interior Health, although it 'concluded that the sanction of termination was too harsh.' Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The appeal board said Szezepaniak should be suspended instead, effectively ending her contract while the health order was in place. Szezepaniak 'argues that her decision not to be vaccinated was one she was entitled to make, and because the provincial health order precluded her from working at the hospital, she ought not to have been disciplined at all.' The doctor argued the discipline meant she has a 'black mark' on her record that will have to be disclosed whenever she applies for new positions. She argued that violates Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it 'includes the right to earn an income to support oneself and family.' The judge noted neither the validity of the health order nor the question of the efficacy of the COVID vaccine were at issue in the case. The judge also said it was not a test of the 'procedural fairness' of the appeal board hearing or of Interior Health's procedures and rules for employees. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Szezepaniak has been practising medicine for 23 years and was a clinical instructor at UBC for 15 years. The primary earner in her family, she moved to 100 Mile House and took a position there after the Royal Inland dismissal. Hospital privileges in all B.C. health authorities are reviewed annually by the regional board of directors, and when a medical worker fails to abide by the Hospital Act or any of its bylaws, a disciplinary process is started. Interior Health's board cancelled Szezepaniak's hospital privileges in a resolution dated Aug. 18, 2022. She appealed to the Hospital Appeal Board, which upheld the dismissal and rejected the Charter argument. The appeal board 'acknowledged that the petitioner was free to make the decision to remain unvaccinated, but concluded that discipline was nonetheless the consequence of that decision.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. As for the Charter argument, the appeal board said the health authority was only making a 'routine or regular' application of existing government policy. 'While made in response to the effects of the (provincial health) order, it did not constitute application or implementation of government policy.' The judge also agreed the operational decision to suspend Szezepaniak's hospital privileges was not 'patently unreasonable' in the circumstances, a condition that could trigger a Charter challenge. 'I do not accept that a hospital board's ability to exclude a practitioner from the hospital for failing to comply with the bylaws is a decision that is governmental in nature,' said the judge in the ruling posted online late last week. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. While the vaccination mandate was a provincial health order, 'the decision regarding how to discipline the hospital medical staff for their breach of the PHO (order) was not subject to governmental control under the Hospital Act, as the responsibility for adopting disciplinary measures for governmental policies rests with the Interior Health Authority board. 'It follows that I conclude that the Charter does not apply to the circumstances in this case.' Though acknowledging that Szezepaniak encountered 'stress and hardship' in making her decision to reject the vaccine, the judge said that 'does not make the orders a state interference with their physical or psychological integrity.' The judge referred to an earlier ruling that said 'the right to security of the person does not protect the individual from the ordinary stresses and anxieties that a person of reasonable sensibility would suffer as a result of government action. 'If the right were interpreted with such broad sweep, countless government initiatives could be challenged on the ground that they infringe the right to security of the person, massively expanding the scope of judicial review, and, in the process, trivializing what it means for a right to be constitutionally protected.' jruttle@ Read More Local News University News Real Estate News