logo
US, China reach deal to ease export curbs, keep tariff truce alive

US, China reach deal to ease export curbs, keep tariff truce alive

CNAa day ago

LONDON: United States and Chinese officials said on Tuesday (Jun 10) they had agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade differences.
At the end of two days of intense negotiations in London, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels.
But the Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, chemicals and other technology goods to China.
Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove some of the recent US export restrictions, but did not provide details after the talks concluded around midnight London time (7am, Singapore time).
"We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents," Lutnick said. "The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework."
In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also said a trade framework had been reached that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders.
"The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li told reporters.
The dispute may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding US complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model.
The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington.
"They are back to square one but that's much better than square zero," Lipsky added.
The two sides have until Aug 10 to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or tariff rates will snap back from about 30 per cent to 145 per cent on the US side and from 10 per cent to 125 per cent on the Chinese side.
Investors, who have been badly burned by trade turmoil before, offered a cautious response and MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan rose 0.2 per cent.
"The devil will be in the details, but the lack of reaction suggests this outcome was fully expected," said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone in Melbourne. "The details matter, especially around the degree of rare earths bound for the US, and the subsequent freedom for US-produced chips to head east, but for now as long as the headlines of talks between the two parties remain constructive, risk assets should remain supported."
RESOLVING RESTRICTIONS
Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US will be resolved as a "fundamental" part of the framework agreement.
"Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming," Lutnick said. "You should expect those to come off, sort of as President Trump said, in a balanced way."
US President Donald Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3 per cent, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies.
But markets have made up much of the losses they endured after Trump unveiled his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs in April, aided by the reset in Geneva between the world's two biggest economies.
PHONE CALL HELPED
The second round of US-China talks was given a major boost by a rare phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last week, which Lutnick said provided directives that were merged with Geneva truce agreement.
Customs data published on Monday showed that China's exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5 per cent in May, the sharpest drop since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic.
While the impact on US inflation and its jobs market has so far been muted, tariffs have hammered US business and household confidence and the dollar remains under pressure.
Lutnick was joined by US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the London talks. Bessent departed hours before their conclusion to return to Washington to testify before Congress on Wednesday.
China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains.
In May, the US responded by halting shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued.
Just after the framework deal was announced, a US appeals court allowed Trump's most sweeping tariffs to stay in effect while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that they exceeded Trump's legal authority by imposing them.
The decision keeps alive a key pressure point on China, Trump's currently suspended 34 per cent "reciprocal" duties that had prompted swift tariff escalation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Los Angeles ‘safe and sound' for two nights after protests
Trump says Los Angeles ‘safe and sound' for two nights after protests

Straits Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says Los Angeles ‘safe and sound' for two nights after protests

The protests had ignited over an escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants in the US illegally. PHOTO: AFP Trump says Los Angeles 'safe and sound' for two nights after protests WASHINGTON - Los Angeles 'was safe and sound for the last two nights', US President Donald Trump said on the morning of J une 12 , as he hailed troops for helping to restore order in the city after days of anti-deportation protests. 'Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the LA Police in a position to effectively do their job,' Mr Trump said on Truth Social, adding that without the military the city 'would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years'. The mostly peaceful protests ignited last week over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants in the country illegally. But there were also pockets of violence, including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police. Mr Trump deployed several thousand National Guard troops and some 700 active-duty Marines over the objections of Democratic California governor Gavin Newsom, the first such action by a US president in decades. In his post, Mr Trump said Mr Newsom 'had totally lost control of the situation'. 'He should be saying THANK YOU for saving his a**, instead of trying to justify his mistakes and incompetence!!!' the president added. Similar protests also ignited in other cities across the United States, as California prepared on June 12 for a legal showdown of Mr Trump's deployment of the military. A second night of curfew was in place as city leaders tried to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the 1,300 sq km metropolis. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Here's why Trump's tariffs won't work
Here's why Trump's tariffs won't work

Business Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Here's why Trump's tariffs won't work

[SINGAPORE] US President Donald Trump's tariffs have been widely panned as reckless, short-sighted and self-defeating. Economists called them 'taxes on Americans' rather than the rest of the world – penguin-majority islands included. Many blame those tariffs – imposed under the banner of 'America First' – for worsening the global trade slowdown. But zoom out, and Trump's actions are not so radical. Throughout history, many leaders have believed that security lies in self-sufficiency. From imperial China to Nazi Germany, ancient Rome to modern-day Brexit Britain, the instinct to turn inward runs deep. The logic: Tighten borders, produce everything at home and cut reliance on other nations to shield against risk. Two new books argue that this instinct, while understandable, is exactly what has led great powers to fall. It is not narrow self-interest that builds empires – it is exchange. Civilisations rise not by going it alone, but by embracing openness – even when it is messy or uncertain. The two timely books are Exile Economics: What Happens If Globalisation Fails by Ben Chu, and Peak Human: What We Can Learn From History's Greatest Civilizations by Johan Norberg. Both were published in May 2025 – shortly after Trump waved around a cardboard chart that sent shockwaves through global markets – though their writing predates the latest phase of his trade war. Chu is the British economics editor at BBC Newsnight; Norberg is a Swedish historian and bestselling author. They have observed the same global trends from very different angles – Chu from the world of policy and supply chains, Norberg through the long arc of history. Yet they arrive at a shared conclusion, which serves as a sobering warning about the deepening divide between China and the US, and the risks it poses to global stability and prosperity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up When empires close themselves off If you had to pick just one of the two books, I recommend Norberg's Peak Human. His grasp of history is sweeping, but he also knows how to keep things light and entertaining – which helps when you are sprinting through centuries of civilisation in a single chapter. The book explores 'golden ages' such as ancient Athens, Song Dynasty China and Renaissance Italy – moments when humanity flourished economically, intellectually and artistically. What these societies had in common, Norberg argues, was openness. They welcomed outsiders, embraced trade and encouraged innovation. But when they turned inward, they stagnated. Peak Human by Johan Norberg is an entertaining guide through the golden ages of human history. PHOTO: ATLANTIC BOOKS In Song China, trade and cultural exchange drove technologies that Europe would not see for centuries. But when paranoia and conservatism took hold, progress ground to a halt. Similarly, Abbasid Baghdad was once a hub of Islamic learning and diversity. That golden era ended with religious orthodoxy and invasions. If Norberg looks to the past to explain why empires thrive or collapse, Chu turns his gaze to the present. He coins the term 'exile economics' to describe a world turning its back on global trade in favour of national self-reliance. The appeal is obvious – who does not want independence, security and control? But the reality, he argues, is that autonomy comes with steep costs. Want food independence? Expect higher prices and less variety. Want to make your own microchips? That is a decades-long, cross-border supply chain you will need to build from scratch. And good luck finding anyone else eager to handle rare earth metals like China does. Ben Chu's Exile Economics explores anti-globalisation sentiment across economies. PHOTO: BASIC BOOKS Chu offers real-world examples to show just how entangled the world is. Global trade is not just about cheap goods, it is about shared resilience and rising living standards. Break that in the name of sovereignty, and you often get more fragility, not less. He even points to history: Nazi Germany's push for self-sufficiency helped fuel its aggressive expansion. Resource nationalism, in other words, is not just inefficient. It is dangerous. Lessons for today Both Peak Human and Exile Economics warn that today's anti-globalisation sentiment threatens to undo decades of progress. It is not trade, immigration or openness that causes modern problems – it is poor governance and weak systems. The solution is not retreat, but reform. Both authors highlight how interdependence, while complex, is more resilient than we give it credit for. Chu notes how supply chains adapted swiftly to pandemic shocks. Norberg reminds us that empires rarely fall because of enemies abroad – they collapse when they close in on themselves. And the effects are already visible. In response to Trump's tariffs, China did not panic – it pivoted. Supermarkets swapped out US beef for cheaper Australian imports, thanks to the China-Australia free trade agreement. Meanwhile, US consumers are expected to pay more for beef – a tariff own-goal. In April 2025, research and consulting firm Ipsos released a poll which found that the US' reputation had sharply declined in 26 out of 29 countries over the previous six months. For the first time in the survey's decade-long history, more respondents viewed China as a more positive influence on world affairs than the US. What these books make clear is that prosperity is fragile. The systems that brought billions out of poverty and spurred innovation did not emerge by accident. They were built on trust, trade and cooperation. Undoing them is easy. Rebuilding them is not. Exile Economics: What Happens If Globalisation Fails by Ben Chu and Peak Human: What We Can Learn From History's Greatest Civilizations by Johan Norberg are available at Kinokuniya

Trump to world: 'Take it or leave it' as U.S. unleashes hardline trade ultimatums in global power play
Trump to world: 'Take it or leave it' as U.S. unleashes hardline trade ultimatums in global power play

Independent Singapore

timean hour ago

  • Independent Singapore

Trump to world: 'Take it or leave it' as U.S. unleashes hardline trade ultimatums in global power play

Photo: Depositphotos/actionsports (for illustration purposes only) WASHINGTON, D.C.: President Donald Trump declared Wednesday that the U.S. will be issuing immutable trade offers to many nations soon, asserting a hard-hitting attitude in a continuing determination to restructure international trade on American terms. The move, anticipated within the next two weeks, signifies a sudden shift in U.S. trade negotiations as countries vigorously seek to evade castigatory tariffs and steer the fluctuating targets of Trump's trade schedule. 'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out,' Trump said to reporters outside the Kennedy Centre in Washington. 'This is the deal—you can take it or leave it.' Flexibility meets finality According to the latest Axios report, while Trump's requirement indicates exigency and resolve, his comments, and those of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, imply that deadlines may remain elastic for countries making a deal 'in good faith.' Initially, a 90-day extension was established following the enforcement of global tariffs on April 2, with a fixed July 8 goal. But, on Wednesday, Trump said he'd be open to giving some latitude, though he toned down the probability of necessitating them. See also Selena Gomez aspires to be next Angelina Jolie or Oprah 'I would [extend], but I don't think we're going to have that necessity,' he said. Bessent resonated with that sentiment earlier in the day before the House Ways and Means Committee, signifying that a leeway was 'highly likely' for supportive and obliging nations. Nonetheless, the duality of fixed targets with possible compassion has left industries and overseas leaders ambiguous on how to react. Markets on edge The unpredictable messaging from the Trump government is already echoing through global markets. Investors, industries, and consumers remain nervous after months of trade pressures and tariff intimidation. Many are eager for distinct terms in the impending trade letters, cautious of the economic consequences if major trade allies discard the U.S. proposals. What's on the horizon? All eyes are on how convincingly the U.S. will carry out its relationships, and whether foreign administrations will agree to take the proposals or face risks and further economic tension.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store