
India and Pakistan are on the brink of all-out war. Here's what we know
Islamabad, Pakistan / New Delhi, India
CNN —
India launched military strikes on Pakistan on Wednesday and Pakistan claimed it shot down five Indian Air Force jets, in an escalation that has pushed the two nations to the brink of war.
The escalation puts India and Pakistan, two neighbors with a long history of conflict, in dangerous territory, with Islamabad vowing to retaliate against India's strikes and the international community calling for restraint.
New Delhi said the strikes are in response to the massacre of 26 people – mostly Indian tourists – who died in April when gunmen stormed a scenic mountain spot in the India-administered part of Kashmir, a disputed border region. India has blamed Pakistan for the attack, which Islamabad denies.
Here's what we know so far.
What happened with India's strikes?
India launched 'Operation Sindoor' in the early hours of Wednesday morning local time (Tuesday night ET) in both Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
Indian officials said nine sites were targeted, but claimed no Pakistani civilian, economic or military sites were struck. They said the 25-minute operation targeted 'terrorist infrastructure' belonging to two militant groups – Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed.
The name 'Sindoor' appears to be a reference to the red vermilion, or powder, many Hindu women wear on their foreheads after marriage. The April tourist massacre – which singled out men as victims – left several Indian women widowed.
But Pakistan is painting a different picture of the strikes – saying civilians were killed and mosques were hit. CNN has yet to verify those claims.
A Pakistani military spokesperson said six locations were hit with 24 strikes. Some of those strikes hit the densely populated province of Punjab, Pakistan's military said, and were the deepest India has struck inside Pakistan since 1971, when the two countries fought one of their four wars.
How did Pakistan respond?
Pakistani security sources claimed they had shot down five Indian Air Force jets and one drone during India's attack.
They did not say exactly where, or how, the jets were downed – but said three Rafale jets were among those planes. India's Rafale fighter jets are prized military assets that it bought from France only a few years ago.
India has not confirmed any planes were lost. CNN has not been able to verify the claim and has reached out to India's government and military for comment.
An eyewitness and local government official said an unidentified aircraft crashed in the village of Wuyan in Indian-administered Kashmir. Photos published by the AFP news agency showed aircraft wreckage lying in a field next to a red-brick building.
It was not immediately clear from the photos who the aircraft belonged to.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said on Wednesday the country 'has every right' to respond, calling India's actions an 'act of war.'
The wreckage of an aircraft is seen in Wuyan, a village in Indian-administered Kashmir, on May 7, 2025.
Tausee Mustafa/AFP/Getty Images
How many casualties are there?
At least 26 civilians were killed and 46 injured by India's strikes, a Pakistan military spokesperson said, according to the news agency Reuters.
Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, a spokesperson for Pakistan's military, said those killed include teenagers and children – the youngest of whom was three years old.
Seven civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir were also killed by shelling by Pakistani troops from across the border, Reuters reported, citing police there.
What else is happening on the ground?
On Wednesday, the two sides also exchanged shelling and gunfire across the Line of Control (LOC), the de facto border that divides Kashmir.
Authorities in Indian-administered Kashmir have ordered citizens to evacuate from areas deemed dangerous, saying accommodation, food and medicine will be provided.
The strikes have disrupted flights, with Pakistan closing parts of its airspace. Multiple major international airlines are avoiding flying over Pakistan, while several Indian airlines have reported disrupted flights and closed airports in the country's north.
Some context: There have been regular exchanges of gunfire along the Line of Control in the weeks following the Pahalgam massacre.
Volunteers load a body into an ambulance after recovering it from a mosque damaged by an Indian missile strike near Muzaffarabad, in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, on May 7, 2025.
MD Mughal/AP
What prompted all of this? What is Kashmir?
Muslim-majority Kashmir has been a flashpoint in India-Pakistan relations since both countries gained their independence from Britain in 1947.
The two nations to emerge from the bloody partition of British India – Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan – both claim Kashmir in full and, months after becoming independent, fought their first of three wars over the territory.
The divided region is now one of the most militarized places in the world.
India has long accused Pakistan of harboring militant groups there that conduct attacks across the border, something Islamabad has long denied.
The massacre in the tourist hotspot of Pahalgam in April sparked widespread anger in India, putting heavy pressure on the Hindu-nationalist government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
India immediately blamed Islamabad, sparking tit-for-tat retaliatory measures in which both countries downgraded ties, canceled visas for each other's citizens, and saw India pull out of a key water-sharing treaty.
Indian soldiers stand guard at Pampore, in Indian-administered Kashmir, on May 7, 2025.
Dar Yasin/AP
What could come next?
The three previous wars over Kashmir have each been bloody; the last one in 1999 killed more than a thousand Pakistani troops, by the most conservative estimates.
In the decades since, militant groups have fought Indian security forces, with violence killing tens of thousands. The two countries have clashed multiple times, most recently in 2019 when India conducted airstrikes in Pakistan after it blamed Islamabad for a suicide car bomb attack in the region.
But those recent clashes did not explode into all-out war. Both sides are aware of the risks; since 1999, the two countries have worked to strengthen their militaries, including arming themselves with nuclear weapons.
How is the world reacting?
The strikes have raised global alarm and pleas for the two nations to prevent further escalation.
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres voiced 'deep concern' over India's strikes, warning that the world 'cannot afford a military confrontation' between the two nations.
The United States – which had urged restraint from both countries last week – said it was 'closely monitoring developments,' according to a State Department spokesperson.
'We are aware of the reports, however we have no assessment to offer at this time,' the spokesperson said Tuesday. 'This remains an evolving situation, and we are closely monitoring developments.'
The United Arab Emirates, China and Japan have also called for both sides to de-escalate.
A senior Indian government official told CNN that New Delhi had briefed its international counterparts on the steps it had taken – including the US, UAE, United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Russia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
31 minutes ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
French Cargo Giant 'CMA CGM' Resumes Services via Suez Canal by Mid-June
Taarek Refaat French shipping giant CMA CGM remains the only major global operator that has resumed its services via the Suez Canal. As of mid-June, CMA CGM plans to restart the Med Express (MEDEX) service via the Suez Canal, with the support of the French Navy. While the Asia-Europe trade line continues to grow, it is not the fastest growing, over the past 12 months, and services linked to Latin America have recorded the greatest growth, with the size of the fleet operating in Latin American services now quite similar to the capacity of all ships serving the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent. The Red Sea shipping crisis and the need to take a much longer route through the Cape of Good Hope has raised the total cargo vessels there from a fifth to a quarter, according to a new study by Alfaliner. In just two years, carriers have added 2.26 million TEUs equivalent to 20 feet of additional capacity on the Asia-Europe trade corridor, bringing the total fleet on this route to 7.8 million TEUs. With 24.4% of the world's fleet now trading on this route, which is the largest shipping lane for the shipping fleet, according to Alvaliner data and two years ago, the ratio was 20.8%. When container ships change their route from the Suez Canal to cross the Cape of Good Hope, the trade route between Asia and Europe becomes longer by about 3,500 to 4,500 nautical miles (6,500 to 8,300 kilometers), depending on the ports of origin and destination, and this transfer usually adds 10 to 14 days to transit times, depending on the speed of the ship. Although US President Donald Trump last month said that more than 17 months later, the Red Sea shipping crisis, triggered by the Houthis, is coming to an end, most shipping companies questioned in recent quarterly results have insisted that it is still too early to resume Red Sea crossings. For example, Maersk CEO Vincent Klerk said it would be "irresponsible" to resume Red Sea crossings based on an unclear ceasefire agreement, warning that the area remains too volatile to be returned safely. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Sports Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Arts & Culture New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump signs proclamation to ban travel from 12 countries
CNN — President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan; Myanmar, also known as Burma; Chad; Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. People from seven countries will have partial restriction: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. 'These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' she wrote. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' 'The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe,' the president said. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on June 9, according to the White House. Wednesday's proclamation comes less than five months after the president was inaugurated. On his first day in office, he issued an executive order directing cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' In his first term, Trump barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US, a policy that saw court challenges before President Joe Biden repealed it when he took office in 2021. The barring of nationals from Afghanistan could impact Afghans who worked alongside the US during its two decades of war there. Tens of thousands of Afghans have already been caught in limbo due to other Trump administration executive orders suspending the US refugee admissions program and the suspension of foreign aid funding for flights of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders. Shawn Vandiver, the founder of #AfghanEvac, a leading US coalition of resettlement and veterans' groups, said the travel ban 'disproportionately affects families and individuals seeking lawful entry into the US.' The proclamation 'is a strategic move, not a response to an immediate threat,' Vandiver said in a statement. The ban also sparked criticism from the governments of impacted countries. Venezuela's Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace said on Wednesday that being in the US 'is a big risk for anyone, not just Venezuelans.' 'If you're really that foolish, then go to the United States,' Diosdado Cabello said on government TV, Reuters news agency reported. Oxfam, meanwhile, warned that the proclamation 'marks a chilling return to policies of fear, discrimination, and division.' The ban will deny entry to the US for individuals and families fleeing war and persecution, 'forcing them to remain in dangerous conditions,' Abby Maxman, Oxfam America's President and CEO, said in a statement. Helen Regan contributed reporting. This story and headline have been updated with additional information.


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
‘Death and hunger': Videos, expert analysis and witnesses point to Israeli gunfire in Gaza aid site shooting
Editor's Note: This story contains graphic images and descriptions of violence. CNN — A CNN investigation into a deadly incident near an aid distribution site in southern Gaza on Sunday points to the Israeli military opening fire on crowds of Palestinians as they tried to make their way to the fenced enclosure to get food. More than a dozen eyewitnesses, including those wounded in the attack, said Israeli troops shot at crowds in volleys of gunfire that occurred sporadically through the early hours of Sunday morning. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the US and Israeli-backed aid initiative that runs the site, said that Israeli forces were operating in the area during the same period. Multiple videos geolocated by CNN place the gunfire near a roundabout where hundreds of Palestinians had gathered about half a mile (800 meters) away from the militarized aid site in Tel al-Sultan in Rafah. The designated route to the site along the coast, Al-Rasheed Street, is in an area under the Israeli military's control and Israeli troops operate at a base nearby. Weapons experts said the rate of gunfire heard in the footage, as well as images of bullets retrieved from victims, were consistent with machine guns used by the Israeli military that can be mounted on tanks. Multiple eyewitnesses said that they saw gunfire emanating from Israeli tanks nearby. None of the videos definitively show who fired shots outside of the aid camp. However, CNN's review of audiovisual material sheds fresh light on how the pursuit of aid turned chaotic and then dangerous, on the actions of Israeli forces and the consequences of the new aid mechanism, which has been mired in controversy. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) initially said on Sunday that its forces did not fire at civilians 'while they were near or within the aid site.' An Israeli military source later acknowledged that troops had fired 'warning shots' at suspects about 1 kilometer (1,093 yards) away. The Israeli military declined to answer questions about CNN's findings. During a press conference on Tuesday, IDF spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said the military investigated and found its troops played no role in any mass casualty event. Defrin said: 'This week, it was claimed that the IDF fired at civilians in an aid distribution area. This report is entirely false and echoes the propaganda of the terrorist organization Hamas… Regarding the incident on Sunday – it simply didn't happen!' Defrin also suggested casualty figures provided by the Palestinian health ministry were inflated, but did not elaborate as to how many people the military believed had been killed or injured. Sunday's mass shooting, which the Palestinian health ministry said killed at least 31 Palestinians and injured dozens, was the deadliest incident involving aid distribution in recent months. It comes amid warnings from the United Nations that the new aid distribution mechanism has become a 'death trap' for desperate people seeking food in the strip. Palestinians pray during a funeral for people who were killed while heading to the GHF-run Gaza aid hub on Sunday. Abdel Kareem Hana/AP Thousands of starving Palestinians had gathered in the sandy bulldozed area near the GHF-run site before the gates opened on Sunday, braving chaotic scenes when gunfire struck the crowd. 'No one move, stay in your place… no one move!' one Palestinian man is heard yelling in a series of videos posted to TikTok on Sunday, filmed along the coast where crowds had gathered near the aid site. The videos – reviewed and geolocated by CNN – capture Palestinians taking cover amid repeated bursts of gunfire, and what appear to be two explosive munitions seen landing next to the crowd. Mohammed Saqer, 43, told CNN in an interview that he only narrowly escaped death, watching people around him get shot in the head as he crouched on the ground, hoping to survive long enough to reach the site run by GHF and get food for his family. After the US-backed private foundation finally opened the site at 5:00 a.m., witnesses said the Israeli military's gunfire continued nearby. Surveillance footage shared by GHF shows crowds of onrushing Palestinians scrambling to reach the limited boxes of food as tracer fire explodes into the night sky in the distance. By sunrise, the extent of the catastrophe was undeniable. Videos captured bloodied bodies of Palestinians scattered across the sands, roughly a half mile from the food distribution center. Similar deadly incidents on Monday and Tuesday near the same site have raised further questions about whether the militarized aid initiative backed by the US and approved by Israel can deliver food supplies safely. In the subsequent episodes, the IDF acknowledged that Israeli troops had fired warning shots in the area. GHF said none of the shootings occurred within or adjacent to their distribution sites, adding that the location of the shootings was 'an area well beyond our secure distribution site.' For Saqer, who said he managed to finally reach the aid site and escaped with whatever he could carry, the harrowing night still weighs heavily on him. 'We survived a night that was worse than we could imagine,' he said. 'The reality for people was one of death and hunger searching for food.' Videos capture deadly chaos When GHF announced its distribution plans for Sunday, the instructions were direct: only one aid site would be open starting at 5:00 a.m., and the IDF would be present in the area to secure passage on a designated route. It also warned – albeit after gunfire reportedly already erupted – that the Israeli military would be 'active' in the area ahead of the site's opening. 'Using the passage before 5:00 a.m. is prohibited, as we were informed by the military that it will be active in the area before and after the specified safe hours,' the GHF said in a release on Facebook at 4 a.m. 'We remind all residents to stay on the road — straying from it poses a significant danger.' Having endured an 11-week Israeli blockade of humanitarian aid, thousands of desperate Palestinians began making their way down Al-Rasheed Street in hopes of being among the first to reach the aid site – the only one operating in all of Gaza that day – before the limited supplies ran out. As people attempted to slowly advance to the aid site from the Al-Alam roundabout, more than a dozen witnesses interviewed by CNN described the IDF opening volleys of intense fire on the crowd starting as early as 3:30 a.m. 'I could hear the screams of young people and others from their injuries,' Saqer said. 'In front of me were four young men with direct injuries to the head… there was a person next to me who was injured by a bullet in his eye.' He and others said a quadcopter drone appeared above the crowd, with the voice on its speaker telling people to turn around. But amid the warning, gunfire crackled all around them. 'Even retreating was almost impossible, and everyone was lying on the ground unable to lift their heads because if you lifted your head, you would get shot.' As the chaos unfolded near the Al-Alam area, the GHF aid site officially opened at 5:00 a.m. Security video of the location released by the organization, which was labeled as beginning at 5:02 a.m., shows crowds of Palestinians running into the fenced distribution center. Three minutes later, in the background of the video, bursts of tracer gunfire are seen overhead, which forensics experts told CNN appear to be outgoing from an area near the distribution site. In the video, which has no audio, crowds can be seen running in another direction nearby. It is unclear whether they are running from gunfire. Around the same time back in the Al-Alam area approximately 800 meters (874 yards) away, 30-year-old Ameen Khalifa was filming as he took cover. Several videos shared on TikTok by Khalifa show groups of Palestinians lying flat on the ground and taking cover from ongoing bursts of automatic gunfire. CNN geolocated the video to the area using visible spotlights at the Egyptian border and the unfinished hospital that became an Israeli military base. Robert Maher, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Montana State University, who specializes in forensic audio analysis, examined the footage for CNN and said that the bursts of gunfire were at a rate of 15 and 16 shots per second (or 900 and 960 per minute), fired from a distance of about a quarter of a mile (450 meters). Based on the erratic nature of the sound, Maher said that the shots seemed to be spread out, fired repeatedly in one direction. 'Since the cracks are irregular, it seems more like the gunfire was being sprayed over the area.' Trevor Ball, a former US Army senior explosive ordnance disposal team member, said the rate of fire was consistent with the FN MAG, a heavily-used machine gun in the Israeli military's arsenal. The FN MAG is commonly equipped on the IDF's Merkava tanks, which several eyewitnesses said they saw open fire on the crowds. Ball told CNN he could not confirm the specific weaponry used, or who fired it, but the rate of fire, he said, indicated it wasn't consistent with machine guns used by Hamas. Ball also said the tracer fire – ammunition containing a pyrotechnic charge illuminating its trajectory – seen in the GHF's footage is consistent with the use of machine guns. 'Typically belt fed machine guns have tracer rounds inserted every few rounds. So while only 3 tracers are visible in the video, more rounds were fired.' Khalifa, who loved sports and bodybuilding, survived the harrowing night on Sunday only to be shot and killed by a drone two days later while heading to the same aid site to look for food, one of his close friends told CNN. By daylight, video footage reviewed by CNN captured the dire scene near the coast, with several bodies strewn in the sand. The Palestinian health ministry said that more than 200 casualties reached hospitals, including dozens with serious injuries. It added that all of those killed had been shot in the head or chest. The International Committee of the Red Cross said that its nearby field hospital was overwhelmed by patients, describing the carnage as the 'highest number of weapon-wounded in a single incident' since it opened over a year ago. Other dead and wounded were taken to Nasser Hospital. 'It's difficult to describe what we saw with the young and the old, there was severe injuries to the head, severe injuries to the lung,' recalled Dr. Ahmad Abou-Sweid, an Australian working at the Nasser medical complex. 'There was a heavy proportion of head-targeted injuries from bullet wounds.' Doctors working at Nasser Hospital shared photos with CNN of the bullets retrieved from patients injured and killed in the attack, which weapons experts say appear to match the type of ammunition used in the Israeli military's machine guns. 'This bullet is consistent with the NATO standard 7.62mm M80, which would be fired by IDF 7.62x51mm weapons, including the Negev 7.62 and FN MAG,' Ball said of one of the images. A bullet pulled by doctors from a patient at Nasser Hospital in Sunday's shooting near the GHF aid site. A weapons expert said it was consistent with ammunition used in the Israeli military's machine guns. Obtained by CNN GHF, which runs the site, insisted: 'There was no gunfire in the (distribution) center and also not in the surrounding area.' 'All aid was distributed today without incident. We have heard that these fake reports have been actively fomented by Hamas. They are untrue and fabricated.' The IDF said allegations that Israeli soldiers fired on Gazans near or within the aid distribution site were 'false reports.' It added: 'Findings from an initial inquiry indicate that the IDF did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the humanitarian aid distribution site and that reports to this effect are false.' An Israeli military source told CNN that IDF troops did fire warning shots towards suspects approaching their position approximately a kilometer (1,100 yards) away from the aid distribution site in an incident that happened several hours before the site opened. Ihab Musleh told CNN he had taken his two young sons along to the aid distribution center. When he told them to stay put at a nearby hill as he went inside the site, he heard more gunfire and rushed back out. Yazeed, 13, was shot in the stomach by gunfire from an Israeli tank and survived his injuries, according to his dad. 'He was waving his hands towards the tank and within seconds, he was hit with gunfire and fell to the ground,' Musleh said, speaking to CNN from the hospital where his son was being treated. Other witnesses told CNN they were either injured or saw intense gunfire in the area after the aid site opened. Mohammad Abu Rezeq was shot in the stomach upon arriving at Al-Alam where he said Israeli forces were deliberately targeting the crowd. 'I have seen a lot of soldiers in this war. When they want to clear an area or warn you, they shoot around you. But yesterday, they were shooting to kill us,' Abu Rezeq said. CNN asked the IDF about the claim from witnesses that its troops were firing directly at crowds, shooting to kill, but it gave no further comment beyond its published statement. Not an isolated incident The chaos in the early hours of Sunday morning was not an isolated incident. In consecutive days since, Palestinians attempting to reach the GHF's aid distribution sites have come under fire by the Israeli military. After the intense gunfire near the Al-Alam roundabout on Sunday, GHF's Facebook posts included updated maps of the safe route for the following days. The new maps included a large, red stop sign at Al-Alam. On Tuesday, nearly 30 people were killed and dozens wounded while making their way to the aid sites in Tel al-Sultan in Rafah, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health and Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said that its forces opened fire multiple times after identifying 'several suspects moving toward them, deviating from the designated access routes.' 'The troops carried out warning fire, and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops,' the IDF said in a statement, adding they were looking into reports of casualties. While the Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots in the area three days in a row, posts from GHF's Facebook page show the organization works in close coordination with the IDF to establish safe, defined routes. A Palestinian man carries an empty box of relief supplies from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation near the group's distribution point in Rafah, southern Gaza, on Sunday, June 1, 2025. AFP/Getty Images GHF was set up amid Israeli accusations that Hamas is stealing aid in Gaza and profiting from sales, though Israel hasn't presented any evidence publicly to back up the claim. UN aid groups, such as UNRWA, typically check identification and rely on a database of registered families when distributing aid. But GHF is not screening Palestinians at aid distribution sites, despite Israeli officials saying that additional security measures were a core reason for the creation of the new program. UN aid agencies have criticized GHF's aid mechanism, saying it violates humanitarian principles and raises the risks for Palestinians. Criticism has been mounting against both Israel and GHF after chaos broke out last week when tens of thousands of starving Palestinians arrived at two new food distribution sites. The UN's humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, was scathing in his assessment to the UN Security Council late last month. 'It restricts aid to only one part of Gaza, while leaving other dire needs unmet,' he said. 'It makes aid conditional on political and military aims. It makes starvation a bargaining chip. It is cynical sideshow. A deliberate distraction. A fig leaf for further violence and displacement.' Video edited by Oscar Featherstone in London. Tareq Al Hilou in Gaza contributed to this report.