Musk says he'll dedicate more time to Tesla starting in May as company sees big drop in Q1 profit
NEW YORK: Elon Musk says he'll dedicate more time to Tesla starting in May after the company reported a big drop in first-quarter profit. The company has faced angry protests over Musk's leadership of a federal government jobs-cutting group that has divided the country.
Tesla, based in Austin, Texas, said Tuesday that quarterly profits fell by 71 percent to to $409 million, or 12 cents a share. That's far below analyst estimates. Tesla's revenue fell 9 percent to $19.3 billion in the January through March period, below Wall Street's forecast.
The disappointing results come as the company struggles to sell cars to consumers angry over Musk's role in the Trump administration. Musk also has publicly supported far-right politicians in Europe and alienated potential buyers there, too.
Some Tesla investors have complained that Musk has been too distracted by his role at the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to effectively run Tesla.
'This is a big step in the right direction,' said Wedbush Securities' Dan Ives, referring to Musk's time commitment. 'Investors wanted to see him recommit to Tesla.'
Tesla' stock has fallen more than 40 percent this year but rose more than 3 percent in after-hours trading.
Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein said earlier reports of plunging sales that had tanked the stock made the results almost predictable.
'They're not particularly surprising given that deliveries were down,' Goldstein said, adding that the company is still generating cash. 'It was good to see positive cash flow.'
The company generated $2.2 billion in operating cash versus $242 million a year earlier.
Tesla investors will be listening closely for updates on several strategic initiatives. The company is expected to roll out a cheaper version of its best-selling vehicle, the Model Y SUV later in the year. Tesla has also said it plans to start a paid driverless robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June.
Its closely watched gross margins, a measure of earnings for each dollar of revenue, fell to 16.3 percent from 17.4 percent.
The company that once dominated EVs is also facing fierce competition for the first time.
Earlier this year, Chinese EV maker BYD announced it had developed an electric battery charging system that can fully power up a vehicle within minutes. And Tesla's European rivals have begun offering new models with advanced technology that is making them real alternatives, just as popular opinion in Europe has turned against Musk.
Investors expect Tesla will be hurt less by the Trump administration's tariffs than most US car companies because it makes most of its US cars domestically. But Tesla won't be completely unscathed. It sources some materials for its vehicles from abroad that will now face import taxes.
Tesla warned that tariffs will hit its energy storage business, too.
'While the current tariff landscape will have a relatively larger impact on our Energy business compared to automotive,' the company said, 'we are taking actions to stabilize the business in the medium to long-term and focus on maintaining its health.'
Retaliation from China will also hurt Tesla. The company was forced earlier this month to stop taking orders from mainland customers for two models, its Model S and Model X. It makes the Model Y and Model 3 for the Chinese market at its factory in Shanghai.
The company side business of selling 'regulatory credits' to other automakers that fall short of emission standards boosted results for the quarter.
The company generated $595 million from credit sales, up from $442 million a year ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump's tariffs to remain in effect after appeals court grants stay
WASHINGTON: A federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the most sweeping of President Donald Trump's tariffs on Thursday, a day after a trade court had ruled Trump had exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and ordered an immediate block on them. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington said it was pausing the lower court's ruling to consider the government's appeal, and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. Wednesday's surprise ruling by the US Court of International Trade had threatened to kill or at least delay the imposition of Trump's so-called Liberation Day tariffs on imports from most US trading partners and additional tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico and China. The latter was related to his accusation that the three countries were facilitating the flow of fentanyl into the US. The trade court's three-judge panel ruled that the Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address threats during national emergencies. Senior Trump administration officials had said they were undeterred by the trade court's ruling, saying they expected either to prevail on appeal or employ other presidential powers to ensure they go into effect. Trump has used the threat of charging US importers costly tariffs for goods from almost every other country in the world as leverage in international trade talks, a strategy the trade court's ruling would upend. The trade court ruling had not interfered with any negotiations with top trading partners that are scheduled in the days ahead, Trump's administration said. US trading partners 'are coming to us in good faith and trying to complete the deals before the 90-day pause ends,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Fox News interview. 'So we've seen no change in their attitude in the past 48 hours. In fact I have a very large Japanese delegation coming to my office first thing tomorrow morning.' Many US trading partners offered careful responses. The British government said the trade court's ruling was a domestic matter for the US administration and noted it was 'only the first stage of legal proceedings.' Both Germany and the European Commission said they could not comment on the decision. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed the trade court's finding, saying it was 'consistent with Canada's longstanding position' that Trump's tariffs were unlawful. Financial markets, which have whipsawed wildly in response to every twist and turn in Trump's chaotic trade war, had reacted with cautious optimism to the trade court ruling, though gains in stocks on Thursday were largely limited by expectations that the court's ruling faced a potentially lengthy appeals process. Indeed, analysts said broad uncertainty remained regarding the future of Trump's tariffs, which have cost companies more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher costs, according to a Reuters analysis. Some sector-specific tariffs, such as those on imports of steel, aluminum and automobiles, were imposed by Trump under separate authorities on national security grounds and were unaffected by the ruling. The Liberty Justice Center, the nonprofit group representing five small businesses that sued over the tariffs, said the appeals court's temporary stay was a procedural step. Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel for the center, said the appeals court would ultimately agree with the small businesses that faced irreparable harm of 'the loss of critical suppliers and customers, forced and costly changes to established supply chains, and, most seriously, a direct threat to the very survival of these businesses.' A separate federal court earlier on Thursday had also found Trump overstepped his authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for what he called reciprocal tariffs of at least 10 percent on goods from most US trading partners and for the separate 25 percent levies on goods from Canada, Mexico and China related to fentanyl. That ruling was much narrower, however, and the relief order stopping the tariffs applied only to the toy company that brought the case. The administration has appealed that ruling as well. Uncertainty persists Following a market revolt after his major tariff announcement on April 2, Trump paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive, and the trade court's ruling on the tariffs and the uncertainty of the appeals process may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing in to deals, analysts said. 'Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs — which can't exceed 15 percent for the time being,' said George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers. The trade court ruling would have lowered the overall effective US tariff rate to about 6 percent, but the appellate court's emergency stay means it will remain at about 15 percent, according to estimates from Oxford Research. That is the level it has been since Trump earlier this month struck a temporary truce that reduced punishing levies on Chinese goods until late summer. By contrast, the effective tariff rate had been between 2 percent and 3 percent before Trump returned to office in January. Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and sneakers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen. Drinks company Diageo and automakers General Motors and Ford are among those that have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead. Non-US companies including Honda, Campari , Roche and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their US presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
ArabGT
12 hours ago
- ArabGT
Elon Musk Parts Ways with Trump
Elon Musk has officially concluded his involvement with the Trump administration, wrapping up a turbulent chapter in which he played a central role in drastically downsizing the U.S. federal workforce. Announcing his departure via his platform X, the billionaire entrepreneur expressed gratitude to former President Donald Trump for entrusting him with leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency—commonly referred to as Doge. The initiative aimed to slash government waste and reduce bureaucratic overhead. Numerous media outlets reported that Musk's exit process started on Wednesday evening, officially concluding his stint as a 'special government employee.' While his departure was expected, it came shortly after he openly criticized Trump's most recent budget plan. 'My scheduled service term as a Special Government Employee has concluded,' Musk posted. 'I'm thankful to President @realDonaldTrump for the chance to help eliminate unnecessary spending. The mission of @DOGE will only grow stronger as it becomes ingrained in our federal systems.' Under federal law, Musk's temporary designation allowed him to serve up to 130 days per year. That timeline aligned with the end of May, based on Trump's January 20 inauguration. However, his exit came just a day after voicing disappointment in Trump's budget plan—which includes sweeping tax cuts and expanded defense funding. In an interview with CBS, Musk warned the proposal would inflate the national deficit and undercut the objectives of Doge. 'A bill can be big or it can be beautiful,' Musk remarked. 'But I'm not sure it can be both.' Initially, Musk had set an ambitious goal to cut $2 trillion from federal spending, later revising that figure down to $150 billion. According to reports, around 260,000 government employees either lost their jobs or accepted severance packages due to Doge's cost-cutting measures. The program even triggered legal pushback, with courts ordering the reinstatement of some workers—among them personnel from sensitive sectors like the nuclear program. Musk began stepping back from his government duties in late April, citing mounting backlash and disruptions to his business ventures. 'Doge was turning into a scapegoat,' he told The Washington Post ahead of a SpaceX launch in Texas. 'Anything that went wrong was pinned on us, even when we had no involvement.' His government tenure coincided with turbulent times for Tesla. The automaker posted a 13% drop in sales for the first quarter of the year—the sharpest decline in its history. While Tesla's stock has recovered slightly, it remains 10% lower than before. The company has also withheld growth forecasts, citing shifting political climates as a potential threat to demand. On a recent earnings call, Musk assured investors that he would significantly reduce his time spent on Doge and refocus on Tesla operations. Meanwhile, opposition to Musk's political involvement has intensified, with activists staging demonstrations, vandalizing Tesla vehicles, and even damaging charging stations. In response, Attorney General Pam Bondi declared such acts would be prosecuted as domestic terrorism. Despite the backlash, Musk reaffirmed his long-term leadership at Tesla during an economic forum in Qatar. He also revealed plans to scale back his political contributions after spending nearly $300 million supporting Trump and other Republican candidates in the previous year.
Al Arabiya
14 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
US signals it may use administrative process against Harvard
The Trump administration signaled on Thursday it might back away from plans to immediately revoke Harvard University's ability to enroll international students and would instead pursue a lengthier administrative process. According to a court filing, the US Department of Homeland Security sent Harvard a notice of intent on Wednesday to withdraw the school's certification under the federal Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which allows Harvard to enroll non-US students. Harvard has denied Trump administration charges of alleged bias against conservatives, fostering antisemitism on campus and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party. It has 30 days to respond to the notice. The notice came ahead of a scheduled hearing before US District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston over whether to extend a temporary order blocking US President Donald Trump's administration from revoking the Ivy League school's right to host international students. Harvard has said losing that right would affect about one quarter of its student body and devastate the school. Neither Harvard nor DHS immediately responded to requests for comment. Harvard had argued that the revocation violated its free speech and due process rights under the US Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs agency actions. Its lawyers said DHS regulations required providing at least 30 days to challenge the agency's allegations, and give Harvard an opportunity to pursue an administrative appeal. The revocation announced on May 22 was an escalation of the Trump administration's attack on Harvard. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university's lawyers argued the agency's action was part of an 'unprecedented and retaliatory attack on academic freedom at Harvard,' which is pursuing a separate lawsuit challenging the administration's decision to terminate nearly $3 billion in federal research funding. Harvard argues the Trump administration is retaliating against it for refusing to cede to its demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students. The case before Burroughs, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, was filed after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem revoked the school's SEVP certification. In announcing the decision, Noem, without providing evidence, accused the university of 'fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party.' In a letter that day, she accused the school of refusing to comply with wide-ranging requests for information on its student visa holders, including about any activity they engaged in that was illegal or violent or that would subject them to discipline. 'As I explained to you in my April letter, it is a privilege to enroll foreign students, and it is also a privilege to employ aliens on campus,' she said. Harvard said the decision was 'devastating' for the school and its student body. The university, the nation's oldest and wealthiest, enrolled nearly 6,800 international students in its current school year, about 27 percent of its total enrollment. The department's move would prevent Harvard from enrolling new international students and require existing ones to transfer to other schools or lose their legal status. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday that Harvard University should have a 15 percent cap on the number of non-US students it admits. 'Harvard has got to behave themselves,' he said.
