logo
Groups that combat sexual violence clash over how to handle Trump's LGBTQ orders

Groups that combat sexual violence clash over how to handle Trump's LGBTQ orders

Yahoo06-03-2025
For the National Sexual Violence Resource Center, the choice was impossible: erase mentions of transgender people from its website or risk the ire of the Trump administration, which has required that groups receiving federal funding end diversity, equity and inclusion programs and recognize only two sexes.
So the group reluctantly took down references to transgender people from its website, including mentions of services for transgender veterans and LGBTQ-focused book recommendations.
It did so just as the nation's largest group fighting sexual violence, the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN), also pulled down pages referring to transgender people.
The backlash was swift. Local and national organizations that support women and sexual assault victims issued rare public criticisms of their allies, accusing them of abandoning trans victims, who face high rates of sexual violence, and urged other groups to 'hold the line.'
The conflict exposed a sharp divide in the ecosystem of nonprofit groups that work to address sexual violence, many of which rely heavily on government funding to operate. Leaders of such groups say they feel pressured to choose between protecting grants they need to serve people in crisis and taking a stand for vulnerable members of their constituency.
'It's thrown a lot of chaos into a sector that's already — let's face it — grossly underfunded,' said Emily Miles, executive director of the NYC Alliance Against Sexual Assault. 'I can have empathy for difficult decisions organizations are having to make right now while also holding them to account for survivors who need their assistance.'
Shortly after the executive orders were signed, the Office of Management and Budget instructed the Justice Department, among other agencies, to review its programs for compliance. A spreadsheet provided by the OMB included roughly two dozen Justice Department programs that dole out more than half a billion dollars combined to combat sexual violence.
That, along with reports that the Trump administration is using keywords that include 'sex,' 'trauma' and 'gender' to identify science grants to cut, worried many nonprofit groups.
White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields did not address questions about how the groups were responding to the executive orders but reiterated the administration's commitment to same-sex services for victims of sexual violence.
In recent weeks, the Justice Department's Office on Violence Against Women has removed all grant applications and has not explained why. The department did not respond to a request for comment.
'On the horizon, that's the big question mark about what's going to happen to those funding opportunities,' Miles said.
Yolanda Edrington, CEO of Respect Together, the umbrella organization of the National Sexual Violence Resource Center and the Pennsylvania Coalition to Advance Respect, said more than 90% of the National Sexual Violence Resource Center's funding comes from state and federal government grants. Losing it could mean laying off staff members and not being able to provide services like legal counseling for victims.
But after it removed references to LGBTQ victims, the organization quickly reversed course, restored them and issued a public apology Feb. 20, calling it 'a fear-based decision to the executive orders.'
In an interview, Edrington said the group was wrong to cave in to the administration so quickly. 'We know exactly who we are and who we should represent, and we failed at that. I don't want to mince words with that at all,' she said.
Edrington said she recently participated in a call with nearly two dozen other nonprofit anti-violence groups in which they discussed 'which one of us can take the heat and be the loudest' while withstanding a potential loss of federal funding. They did not come to a decision.
Emily May, a co-founder and the president of Right To Be, a nonprofit anti-harassment organization, said her group relies on the federal government for at least 10% of its funding. It provides workplace culture training to several federal agencies and has already received word that two of them are unlikely to renew their contracts.
'Everybody is incredibly aware everything you say or do can put a target on your back, and that can be incredibly scary,' May said. 'But the target is already on our back.'
Feeling that pressure, RAINN — which runs federally funded sexual assault hotlines, among other programs — removed its inclusion policy and pages expressing support for LGBTQ survivors. It also sent an email to everyone in its speakers bureau Feb. 7 saying it had unpublished victims' stories, along with videos and social posts, in part to comply with federal guidance. The organization would be in touch with victims, it added, to see whether they 'would like to update and republish' their stories.
Jennifer Simmons Kaleba, a RAINN spokeswoman, said federal agencies instructed the organization to change its website. She declined to offer specifics or identify which government offices advised it to remove LGBTQ-related content.
For Ethan Levine, an activist and member of RAINN's speakers bureau, who is transgender, RAINN's removal of the survivors' stories was insulting. 'I felt cast aside,' he said. He felt the group was asking him to update his story 'to make it more palatable in this moment' and hoped that RAINN would follow the National Sexual Violence Resource Center's lead and reverse its decision — or at least explain it further.
'If the biggest sexual assault organization in the U.S. is not willing to stand up, then what message does that send to smaller organizations?' he asked.
Simmons Kaleba said RAINN's mission has not changed. 'Any survivor can come to us as their authentic selves, and they'll be safely received — so we do support every survivor of sexual assault,' she said. 'That said, not everyone will support what we've had to do to continue our crisis services, and that's a very reasonable reaction.'
On Feb. 20, as backlash mounted, the group sent an email saying that 'RAINN stands with ALL survivors' and that it remains 'steadfast in this mission,' urging supporters to sign a petition of support. It did not explain its decision to remove language from its site.
Sexual Violence Center, a Minnesota-based organization supporting rape victims, condemned RAINN in a statement last week and urged it to use its 'considerable influence' to push back. The post was shared by Christian Nunes, president of the National Organization for Women, who warned the groups not to become 'complicit' with the administration.
For Miles, of the NYC Alliance, RAINN's decision to quickly comply with the Trump administration's guidance put pressure on smaller groups to follow suit.
'Now is the time we have to show a little bravery, and we need to be banding together,' Miles said. 'That's the only way we are going to sustain this.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Severe consequences': Trump warns Putin ahead of Alaska summit
‘Severe consequences': Trump warns Putin ahead of Alaska summit

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Severe consequences': Trump warns Putin ahead of Alaska summit

President Donald Trump warned on Wednesday that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if he determines during Friday's summit with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader is still not serious about ending the war with Ukraine. Trump, who did not specify what those consequences might be, has been reluctant to increase economic sanctions or tariffs on Russia despite his mounting frustration with Putin's intensifying attacks on Ukrainian cities, civilians and indifference to peace talks. Lowering expectations that the sit-down with Putin in Alaska would yield a breakthrough, Trump said that he's hopeful this initial meeting could lead to another that includes Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and, potentially, Trump. 'First, I'll find out where we are,' Trump said. 'If the first [meeting] goes okay, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately.' But, the president cautioned, he won't pursue a trilateral meeting if he doesn't think Putin is acting in good faith. 'There may be no second meeting because if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting,' Trump said. Trump's comments came during an appearance at the Kennedy Center and shortly after an hour-long call with European leaders, including Zelenskyy, in preparation for Friday's summit. Trump described the call as 'very good,' and several European leaders were quick to issue statements about the call Wednesday morning to underscore their alignment. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that Trump 'largely shares' Europe's position on peace talks, and French President Emmanuel Macron stated that Trump is indeed pushing for a ceasefire, a top priority for Zelenskyy and NATO. Putin's stubborn refusal to entertain Trump's diplomatic entreaties so far has pushed the president into closer alignment with NATO allies and even Zelenskyy, who he dressed down in the Oval Office less than six months ago. Friday's sit-down with Putin, who many analysts believe is likely to try to repair his personal relationship with Trump in a private meeting while convincing him that Ukraine shares the blame for the prolonged conflict, will put the president's shifting convictions to a serious test. Even as he sought to put the onus on Putin to demonstrate new seriousness about ending the war, Trump downplayed expectations about his own ability to persuade the Russian president to do so. When asked whether he could convince Putin to 'stop targeting civilians in Ukraine,' he demurred. 'I guess the answer to that is probably no,' Trump said.

White House Demands Thorough Review of Smithsonian Museums so All Exhibits Match Trump's Interpretation of U.S. History
White House Demands Thorough Review of Smithsonian Museums so All Exhibits Match Trump's Interpretation of U.S. History

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White House Demands Thorough Review of Smithsonian Museums so All Exhibits Match Trump's Interpretation of U.S. History

The Trump administration has ordered eight Smithsonian museums to make its exhibits more "unifying" before the nation celebrates its 250th birthday in Washington next yearNEED TO KNOW Donald Trump's White House sent a letter to the Smithsonian this week, directing the institution to ensure its museums align with the president's vision, according to The Wall Street Journal Eight Smithsonian museums have been directed to thoroughly review and update their exhibitions, internal communications, featured artists and more The directive comes with a deadline, as the Trump administration readies its plans for America's 250th anniversary next yearThe White House continued its cultural crackdown on the Smithsonian this week, pressuring the institution to review its exhibits and operations and align them with President Donald Trump's view of American history. On Tuesday, Aug. 12, The Wall Street Journal reported on a letter that was sent by three top White House officials to Smithsonian secretary Lonnie Bunch. According to the outlet, the letter followed up on the directive laid out in Trump's March 27 executive order, titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," which targeted the Smithsonian museums by name. The executive order read, in part, "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology. This shift has promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive." The new White House letter offers specifics on how the Smithsonian can achieve "alignment" with the president's vision. Following a thorough review of exhibitions, internal communications, visitor surveys, featured artists, outside partners and more, the museums are then instructed to make updates that replace "divisive or ideologically driven" language with "unifying, historically accurate" content. The directive comes with a deadline, as the Trump administration readies its plans for America's 250th anniversary celebration in Washington next year. The Smithsonian is expected to submit extensive documentation of its review within 30 days before starting to make the expected changes. 'This is about preserving trust in one of our most cherished institutions,' said White House senior associate Lindsay Halligan, one of the officials who signed the letter, in a statement. 'The Smithsonian museums and exhibits should be accurate, patriotic, and enlightening—ensuring they remain places of learning, wonder, and national pride for generations to come.' The Smithsonian was diplomatic in its reply to the White House letter, saying, 'The Smithsonian's work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history. We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents.' However, The Wall Street Journal spoke with historians who fear that the president's vendetta against so-called "diversity, equity and inclusion" initiatives may have a negative impact on the Smithsonian's ability to give a comprehensive look at U.S. history. 'The Smithsonian museums have never reflected one person's view, or even one administration's view,' Harvard history professor Tiya Miles told the outlet. 'They have reflected the composite research, analysis, discussion, findings of many different people, scholars and researchers.' Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, agreed, telling WSJ, 'If those things are taken out of the hands of historians, the public stands to lose a great deal in having reliable and engaging content that tells a whole and complex story of the American past." Following his March executive order, Trump's White House has already been accused of trying to rewrite history at the Smithsonian. On July 31, The Washington Post reported on a recent change to an exhibit at the National Museum of American History titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden." A section of the display is dedicated to U.S. presidents who have faced impeachment, and includes information about Andrew Jackson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon. (While Jackson and Clinton were successfully impeached, Nixon resigned the presidency before getting to that point.) Since September 2021, the exhibit had featured a temporary label about Trump's historic two impeachments, along with a notice for visitors that read: 'Case under redesign (history happens).' However, the Post reported that the label was removed in July "as part of a content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director." Without no mention of Trump, the exhibit has now reverted back to suggesting that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal,' despite that Trump has more experience with impeachment than any other president. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. A Smithsonian spokesperson told the Post at the time that the Trump label was merely intended to be "a short-term addition to address current events." 'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion. Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' Read the original article on People

Sylvester Stallone, Kiss among Kennedy Center honorees, Trump to host ceremony
Sylvester Stallone, Kiss among Kennedy Center honorees, Trump to host ceremony

Los Angeles Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Sylvester Stallone, Kiss among Kennedy Center honorees, Trump to host ceremony

President Trump on Wednesday announced his picks for Kennedy Center honorees and said that he will host the ceremony himself — a first for any president. Action star Sylvester Stallone, the glam rock band Kiss, disco singer Gloria Gaynor, country music star George Strait and English actor and comedian Michael Crawford made the list. The Kennedy Center Honors, which recognize lifetime achievement in the performing arts have been given annually since 1978, are the highlight of the center's season each December. The award is considered a career highlight for the performers who receive it. Past honorees have included Leonard Bernstein, Dizzy Gillespie, James Brown and Meryl Streep, among others. 'I want to congratulate all the nominees. They're unbelievable people, and we're going to have a tremendous day in December,' said Trump in a rambling news conference that began with him unveiling five velvet-draped portraits. It went on to include mentions of his recent deployment of the National Guard to Washington, D.C., his contention that the 2020 election was stolen, his disdain for Democrats and his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump said he was '98% involved' in the selection of the honorees. 'I turned down plenty, this is very different than it used to be, these are great people,' Trump said, before adding that he didn't want to politicize the awards. The Academy Awards went, 'woke' he said, and added that the ceremony's ratings tanked. Some culture watchers might be surprised by Trump's choices, particularly that of KISS. Trump fired bassist Gene Simmons during the first season of 'The Celebrity Apprentice.' Simmons went on to support Trump during his first term, but later spoke out sharply against him in an interview with Spin magazine. Stallone, however, made sense. He's one of the actors, alongside Mel Gibson and Jon Voight, Trump named as 'special ambassadors' to Hollywood. His goal: to bring the film business back to Hollywood, 'which has lost much business over the last four years to Foreign Countries.' Trump's announcement, including his unusual decision to host, capped a tumultuous eight months at the Kennedy Center, beginning in early February when Trump sent the arts world reeling by announcing his intention to appoint himself chairman of the board and terminate members of the board of trustees 'who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture.' Trump named a former ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, as interim executive director and the center began rupturing marquee names, including TV producer Shonda Rhimes, musician Ben Folds and opera star Renée Fleming. Trump's takeover of the center came after he actively shunned it during his first term. In 2017, he and First Lady Melania Trump skipped the Kennedy Center Honors after being criticized by honorees, marking only the fourth time in the organization's history that a president was not in attendance. During his first visit to the center as chairman in March, Trump said he didn't like the musical 'Hamilton' and said big Broadway shows were going to be the future of the center. He soon attended a performance of 'Les Miserables,' famously declining to say whether he identified more with more with protagonist Jean Valjean or the cruel police inspector Javert.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store