Why are the Nationals standing in the way of the best opportunity for regional communities in decades?
The Nationals are supposed to be the champions of the bush. Not just farmers, but also for the people in country towns across Australia.
I grew up on a dairy farm in Gippsland. I have witnessed small country towns shrinking over my lifetime as technology has improved. Mechanisation has reduced the number of people required on farms.
The opportunity to get a skilled, well-paid job in the country has reduced over time and so, instead, young people have moved to the cities. Many rural towns are dying. As the towns shrink, services are removed in a kind of a death spiral, if you will.
In 2025, we are experiencing a technological revolution in electricity generation - a once in a century change to a critical service. We are moving from the old, very large baseload generation model, which has served us very well for a long time, to the new, widely distributed renewable energy generation and storage.
That transition is already under way. In 2024, 40 per cent of the grid's annual electricity supply came from renewables. This changeover is now progressing at around 5 per cent per year meaning that we will be close to 90 to 100 per cent renewable energy in the next 10 years.
With this change comes tremendous opportunities. As we know, Australia has world-class renewable resources of solar and wind and vast areas of land on which to build them. We no longer rely on the electricity generators concentrated on a handful of coal deposits around the country.
Today, from Tasmania to Cooktown and across to Port Augusta, renewable energy generators can be built and connected to the grid. Unlike the large coal deposits which are in specific locations, the sun and the wind is everywhere.
This opens up a new window for rural communities. We all know how tough farming can be. One year they have too much rain. The next year, not enough. Even in the good years, international markets and supply chain issues can undermine profits. People in the cities probably don't understand that being a farmer is more than just a job. It's a lifestyle commitment. Farmers will do just about anything to stay on the farm.
Now, we have a renewable energy revolution on our hands. It has been driven by the need to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions globally but, as it turns out, there are huge side benefits - especially for rural communities.
We are on track to spend hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade or two on renewable energy projects, much of it in rural areas.
There is a jobs boom already under way and it is estimated that between 20,000 and 60,000 jobs will be created by 2030.
If a region has very cheap renewable electricity, all kinds of new business opportunities are created.
Instead of transporting raw materials to the cities, or overseas, for processing, having cheap, local power means processing can be done locally. This also massively reduces transport costs and the emissions associated with it.
There are renewable energy zones or hubs proposed right across the nation, among farms and mining areas.
Locally produced, cheap, clean electricity creates all kinds of new business opportunities in those areas.
So, my question is a simple one. Why aren't the Nationals, the champions of the bush, going into bat for renewables?
Clearly, the opportunity to increase farm security is real. Diversifying farm income is a gift. The opportunity to improve services in rural areas is also real. New, well-paid, skilled jobs in rural areas are available rather than forcing people to go to a city for work.
The rollout of renewables is enabling people to move to the country, get a decent job and buy a reasonably priced house. That is an opportunity we haven't seen in decades and yet the Nationals are rejecting it.
For sure, we don't want to see landholders' rights abused by developers. We don't want to see inappropriate development in sensitive areas. We don't want to see farming operations compromised by a lack of planning on the developer's behalf.
But that's where the Nationals can play a significant role. They can support farmers and ensure that sensible compromises between developers and local communities are secured. They can hold Canberra to account and force the transition to be managed well. They can fight for infrastructure upgrades that communities can use for decades.
MORE OPINION:
Renewable energy is here today. It's proven and reliable. It's not an idea off in the distance decades away. We are already witnessing existing coal power stations become unreliable and fail more often.
The Nationals talk about having reliable power. Renewables replacing old baseload today is how you get there.
The Nationals claim that nuclear power is the answer. But a nuclear power solution for the cities, let alone for rural areas, is decades away. What do they propose that we do in the interim?
The Nationals also claim that renewable energy can't power the grid fully and yet they have never provided the evidence. They have only made empty statements with no engineering reasoning to support such a claim.
To the contrary, the power industry has shown that renewables can power the grid. Through modelling from experts such as the CSIRO and from the actions of our largest electricity suppliers such as AGL, Energy Australia, Engie and Origin, we are already moving to a renewable grid today.
So the Nationals need to explain to their supporters why they aren't promoting the concept of significant economic growth in rural communities via renewable energy when the opportunity is being offered to them.
At the same time, they need to provide the engineering data to confirm their view that renewables can't power the grid 24/7 and why leading energy industry experts in Australia are all wrong.
The Nationals are supposed to be the champions of the bush. Not just farmers, but also for the people in country towns across Australia.
I grew up on a dairy farm in Gippsland. I have witnessed small country towns shrinking over my lifetime as technology has improved. Mechanisation has reduced the number of people required on farms.
The opportunity to get a skilled, well-paid job in the country has reduced over time and so, instead, young people have moved to the cities. Many rural towns are dying. As the towns shrink, services are removed in a kind of a death spiral, if you will.
In 2025, we are experiencing a technological revolution in electricity generation - a once in a century change to a critical service. We are moving from the old, very large baseload generation model, which has served us very well for a long time, to the new, widely distributed renewable energy generation and storage.
That transition is already under way. In 2024, 40 per cent of the grid's annual electricity supply came from renewables. This changeover is now progressing at around 5 per cent per year meaning that we will be close to 90 to 100 per cent renewable energy in the next 10 years.
With this change comes tremendous opportunities. As we know, Australia has world-class renewable resources of solar and wind and vast areas of land on which to build them. We no longer rely on the electricity generators concentrated on a handful of coal deposits around the country.
Today, from Tasmania to Cooktown and across to Port Augusta, renewable energy generators can be built and connected to the grid. Unlike the large coal deposits which are in specific locations, the sun and the wind is everywhere.
This opens up a new window for rural communities. We all know how tough farming can be. One year they have too much rain. The next year, not enough. Even in the good years, international markets and supply chain issues can undermine profits. People in the cities probably don't understand that being a farmer is more than just a job. It's a lifestyle commitment. Farmers will do just about anything to stay on the farm.
Now, we have a renewable energy revolution on our hands. It has been driven by the need to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions globally but, as it turns out, there are huge side benefits - especially for rural communities.
We are on track to spend hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade or two on renewable energy projects, much of it in rural areas.
There is a jobs boom already under way and it is estimated that between 20,000 and 60,000 jobs will be created by 2030.
If a region has very cheap renewable electricity, all kinds of new business opportunities are created.
Instead of transporting raw materials to the cities, or overseas, for processing, having cheap, local power means processing can be done locally. This also massively reduces transport costs and the emissions associated with it.
There are renewable energy zones or hubs proposed right across the nation, among farms and mining areas.
Locally produced, cheap, clean electricity creates all kinds of new business opportunities in those areas.
So, my question is a simple one. Why aren't the Nationals, the champions of the bush, going into bat for renewables?
Clearly, the opportunity to increase farm security is real. Diversifying farm income is a gift. The opportunity to improve services in rural areas is also real. New, well-paid, skilled jobs in rural areas are available rather than forcing people to go to a city for work.
The rollout of renewables is enabling people to move to the country, get a decent job and buy a reasonably priced house. That is an opportunity we haven't seen in decades and yet the Nationals are rejecting it.
For sure, we don't want to see landholders' rights abused by developers. We don't want to see inappropriate development in sensitive areas. We don't want to see farming operations compromised by a lack of planning on the developer's behalf.
But that's where the Nationals can play a significant role. They can support farmers and ensure that sensible compromises between developers and local communities are secured. They can hold Canberra to account and force the transition to be managed well. They can fight for infrastructure upgrades that communities can use for decades.
MORE OPINION:
Renewable energy is here today. It's proven and reliable. It's not an idea off in the distance decades away. We are already witnessing existing coal power stations become unreliable and fail more often.
The Nationals talk about having reliable power. Renewables replacing old baseload today is how you get there.
The Nationals claim that nuclear power is the answer. But a nuclear power solution for the cities, let alone for rural areas, is decades away. What do they propose that we do in the interim?
The Nationals also claim that renewable energy can't power the grid fully and yet they have never provided the evidence. They have only made empty statements with no engineering reasoning to support such a claim.
To the contrary, the power industry has shown that renewables can power the grid. Through modelling from experts such as the CSIRO and from the actions of our largest electricity suppliers such as AGL, Energy Australia, Engie and Origin, we are already moving to a renewable grid today.
So the Nationals need to explain to their supporters why they aren't promoting the concept of significant economic growth in rural communities via renewable energy when the opportunity is being offered to them.
At the same time, they need to provide the engineering data to confirm their view that renewables can't power the grid 24/7 and why leading energy industry experts in Australia are all wrong.
The Nationals are supposed to be the champions of the bush. Not just farmers, but also for the people in country towns across Australia.
I grew up on a dairy farm in Gippsland. I have witnessed small country towns shrinking over my lifetime as technology has improved. Mechanisation has reduced the number of people required on farms.
The opportunity to get a skilled, well-paid job in the country has reduced over time and so, instead, young people have moved to the cities. Many rural towns are dying. As the towns shrink, services are removed in a kind of a death spiral, if you will.
In 2025, we are experiencing a technological revolution in electricity generation - a once in a century change to a critical service. We are moving from the old, very large baseload generation model, which has served us very well for a long time, to the new, widely distributed renewable energy generation and storage.
That transition is already under way. In 2024, 40 per cent of the grid's annual electricity supply came from renewables. This changeover is now progressing at around 5 per cent per year meaning that we will be close to 90 to 100 per cent renewable energy in the next 10 years.
With this change comes tremendous opportunities. As we know, Australia has world-class renewable resources of solar and wind and vast areas of land on which to build them. We no longer rely on the electricity generators concentrated on a handful of coal deposits around the country.
Today, from Tasmania to Cooktown and across to Port Augusta, renewable energy generators can be built and connected to the grid. Unlike the large coal deposits which are in specific locations, the sun and the wind is everywhere.
This opens up a new window for rural communities. We all know how tough farming can be. One year they have too much rain. The next year, not enough. Even in the good years, international markets and supply chain issues can undermine profits. People in the cities probably don't understand that being a farmer is more than just a job. It's a lifestyle commitment. Farmers will do just about anything to stay on the farm.
Now, we have a renewable energy revolution on our hands. It has been driven by the need to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions globally but, as it turns out, there are huge side benefits - especially for rural communities.
We are on track to spend hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade or two on renewable energy projects, much of it in rural areas.
There is a jobs boom already under way and it is estimated that between 20,000 and 60,000 jobs will be created by 2030.
If a region has very cheap renewable electricity, all kinds of new business opportunities are created.
Instead of transporting raw materials to the cities, or overseas, for processing, having cheap, local power means processing can be done locally. This also massively reduces transport costs and the emissions associated with it.
There are renewable energy zones or hubs proposed right across the nation, among farms and mining areas.
Locally produced, cheap, clean electricity creates all kinds of new business opportunities in those areas.
So, my question is a simple one. Why aren't the Nationals, the champions of the bush, going into bat for renewables?
Clearly, the opportunity to increase farm security is real. Diversifying farm income is a gift. The opportunity to improve services in rural areas is also real. New, well-paid, skilled jobs in rural areas are available rather than forcing people to go to a city for work.
The rollout of renewables is enabling people to move to the country, get a decent job and buy a reasonably priced house. That is an opportunity we haven't seen in decades and yet the Nationals are rejecting it.
For sure, we don't want to see landholders' rights abused by developers. We don't want to see inappropriate development in sensitive areas. We don't want to see farming operations compromised by a lack of planning on the developer's behalf.
But that's where the Nationals can play a significant role. They can support farmers and ensure that sensible compromises between developers and local communities are secured. They can hold Canberra to account and force the transition to be managed well. They can fight for infrastructure upgrades that communities can use for decades.
MORE OPINION:
Renewable energy is here today. It's proven and reliable. It's not an idea off in the distance decades away. We are already witnessing existing coal power stations become unreliable and fail more often.
The Nationals talk about having reliable power. Renewables replacing old baseload today is how you get there.
The Nationals claim that nuclear power is the answer. But a nuclear power solution for the cities, let alone for rural areas, is decades away. What do they propose that we do in the interim?
The Nationals also claim that renewable energy can't power the grid fully and yet they have never provided the evidence. They have only made empty statements with no engineering reasoning to support such a claim.
To the contrary, the power industry has shown that renewables can power the grid. Through modelling from experts such as the CSIRO and from the actions of our largest electricity suppliers such as AGL, Energy Australia, Engie and Origin, we are already moving to a renewable grid today.
So the Nationals need to explain to their supporters why they aren't promoting the concept of significant economic growth in rural communities via renewable energy when the opportunity is being offered to them.
At the same time, they need to provide the engineering data to confirm their view that renewables can't power the grid 24/7 and why leading energy industry experts in Australia are all wrong.
The Nationals are supposed to be the champions of the bush. Not just farmers, but also for the people in country towns across Australia.
I grew up on a dairy farm in Gippsland. I have witnessed small country towns shrinking over my lifetime as technology has improved. Mechanisation has reduced the number of people required on farms.
The opportunity to get a skilled, well-paid job in the country has reduced over time and so, instead, young people have moved to the cities. Many rural towns are dying. As the towns shrink, services are removed in a kind of a death spiral, if you will.
In 2025, we are experiencing a technological revolution in electricity generation - a once in a century change to a critical service. We are moving from the old, very large baseload generation model, which has served us very well for a long time, to the new, widely distributed renewable energy generation and storage.
That transition is already under way. In 2024, 40 per cent of the grid's annual electricity supply came from renewables. This changeover is now progressing at around 5 per cent per year meaning that we will be close to 90 to 100 per cent renewable energy in the next 10 years.
With this change comes tremendous opportunities. As we know, Australia has world-class renewable resources of solar and wind and vast areas of land on which to build them. We no longer rely on the electricity generators concentrated on a handful of coal deposits around the country.
Today, from Tasmania to Cooktown and across to Port Augusta, renewable energy generators can be built and connected to the grid. Unlike the large coal deposits which are in specific locations, the sun and the wind is everywhere.
This opens up a new window for rural communities. We all know how tough farming can be. One year they have too much rain. The next year, not enough. Even in the good years, international markets and supply chain issues can undermine profits. People in the cities probably don't understand that being a farmer is more than just a job. It's a lifestyle commitment. Farmers will do just about anything to stay on the farm.
Now, we have a renewable energy revolution on our hands. It has been driven by the need to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions globally but, as it turns out, there are huge side benefits - especially for rural communities.
We are on track to spend hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade or two on renewable energy projects, much of it in rural areas.
There is a jobs boom already under way and it is estimated that between 20,000 and 60,000 jobs will be created by 2030.
If a region has very cheap renewable electricity, all kinds of new business opportunities are created.
Instead of transporting raw materials to the cities, or overseas, for processing, having cheap, local power means processing can be done locally. This also massively reduces transport costs and the emissions associated with it.
There are renewable energy zones or hubs proposed right across the nation, among farms and mining areas.
Locally produced, cheap, clean electricity creates all kinds of new business opportunities in those areas.
So, my question is a simple one. Why aren't the Nationals, the champions of the bush, going into bat for renewables?
Clearly, the opportunity to increase farm security is real. Diversifying farm income is a gift. The opportunity to improve services in rural areas is also real. New, well-paid, skilled jobs in rural areas are available rather than forcing people to go to a city for work.
The rollout of renewables is enabling people to move to the country, get a decent job and buy a reasonably priced house. That is an opportunity we haven't seen in decades and yet the Nationals are rejecting it.
For sure, we don't want to see landholders' rights abused by developers. We don't want to see inappropriate development in sensitive areas. We don't want to see farming operations compromised by a lack of planning on the developer's behalf.
But that's where the Nationals can play a significant role. They can support farmers and ensure that sensible compromises between developers and local communities are secured. They can hold Canberra to account and force the transition to be managed well. They can fight for infrastructure upgrades that communities can use for decades.
MORE OPINION:
Renewable energy is here today. It's proven and reliable. It's not an idea off in the distance decades away. We are already witnessing existing coal power stations become unreliable and fail more often.
The Nationals talk about having reliable power. Renewables replacing old baseload today is how you get there.
The Nationals claim that nuclear power is the answer. But a nuclear power solution for the cities, let alone for rural areas, is decades away. What do they propose that we do in the interim?
The Nationals also claim that renewable energy can't power the grid fully and yet they have never provided the evidence. They have only made empty statements with no engineering reasoning to support such a claim.
To the contrary, the power industry has shown that renewables can power the grid. Through modelling from experts such as the CSIRO and from the actions of our largest electricity suppliers such as AGL, Energy Australia, Engie and Origin, we are already moving to a renewable grid today.
So the Nationals need to explain to their supporters why they aren't promoting the concept of significant economic growth in rural communities via renewable energy when the opportunity is being offered to them.
At the same time, they need to provide the engineering data to confirm their view that renewables can't power the grid 24/7 and why leading energy industry experts in Australia are all wrong.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
New TNFA president Shanmugam sets forth his agenda to revive the sport in the State
Former Tamil Nadu football team captain S. Shanmugam, who was elected president of the Tamil Nadu Football Association (TNFA) last Saturday in an election held for the first time since 2014, spoke about his agenda over a phone call on Saturday. 'Every year, the association's registration is to be renewed with the Registrar of Societies under the Societies Registration Act (1860). This hasn't been done for a few years. Thus, the association is unable to receive grants from the SDAT and AIFF. So, my foremost task is to renew our registration,' he said. Claiming that the State championships for all age categories, including the senior category, have been discontinued for several years now, he said that he aims to revive them. 'The probables for the Nationals were selected from those tournaments. Around 40 would be selected first, and 20 would then be shortlisted for a 10-15 day camp for the Nationals. I intend to bring that back into practice. 'For instance, the junior (boys and girls) National football championship is to be held from July 10 to 25. For that, the State championships have been planned to be held for boys in Virudhunagar and for girls in Dindigul from June 20 to 27,' he said. The 62-year-old said that he wants to make it mandatory for the District associations to conduct their annual league, like the Chennai Football Association's senior division league. 'There was this Champions Club Trophy for the District league champions, which has been discontinued for around nine years now. The event helped clubs earn points for entry into the I-League. Consequently, the possibility of our (TN) clubs getting into the I-League has reduced. So, it is to be revived as well,' he added. Saying that he also intends to revive the premier National tournaments of the past across the State — like the Vittal Trophy and TFA Shield in Chennai and the Rockfort Trophy in Tiruchi — by getting into talks with the original sponsors, he added that there is a Super League Kerala-type 'Tamil Nadu Premier Football League' in the pipeline. 'It will have eight teams and will be played in the home-and-away format.' He further stated that a four- or five-member advisory committee will be formed, naming two members: the former CFA senior division league club and I-League champion Chennai City FC owner, Rohit Ramesh, and the Viva Chennai FC (CFA senior division) and Gokulam Kerala FC (I-League) owner, Praveen. Rohit currently also owns a minority stake of the Cambodian Club Angkor Tiger FC.
Yomiuri Shimbun
16 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
At Nats Park, a Tradition Continues and a Ballpark Becomes a ‘Safe Space'
Hannah Foslien/For The Washington Post Mari Con Carne performs during a drag show before the Nationals-Cubs game on Thursday. Sasha Colby got the invite, then got to work. The first trans woman of color to win the reality TV competition 'RuPaul's Drag Race,' Colby said she had been practicing for her ceremonial first pitch at Nationals Park, and – as she toed the rubber Thursday – felt pretty good about her chances of throwing a strike. But it turned out there was a minor oversight in her preparation. 'I didn't do it in heels when I practiced,' Colby, who wore a custom, unbuttoned Nationals jersey over a hot pink dress, said after bouncing her pitch to Nationals mascot Screech, who sported a rainbow jersey for the Nationals' Night Out, the team's annual Pride night. 'But I've heard that I did better than some people in flats.' (Colby heard right.) The errant toss didn't put a damper on a festive and meaningful evening. Colby wasn't the first drag queen to take the mound at Nationals Park – another former 'RuPaul's Drag Race' winner, Bianca Del Rio, did the honors at last year's Night Out, but there was a bit of Night Out history made before Washington's 7-1 loss to the Chicago Cubs. Shortly after the gates opened, the stage on the Budweiser Terrace, which typically plays host to cover bands, featured a 30-minute drag show, a first for Washington's Pride night. 'On the count of three, I want you to pretend this is a Beyoncé concert,' host Inita D said before opening the show. Three other performers in sparkly, sequined costumes followed, dancing their way through the gathering crowd, lip-synching and even breaking out an occasional cartwheel while collecting tips from smiling fans. Team DC, a nonprofit that educates the LGBTQ+ community on the benefits of team and individual sports participation, booked the pregame entertainment for Thursday's game. The volunteer organization's president, Miguel Ayala, said he was thrilled to have Colby take part given her track record as a transgender advocate, including during an appearance at a White House reception in 2023. Team DC has partnered with the Nationals to host Night Out since the inaugural event at RFK Stadium in 2005, when staffers worried they wouldn't be able to sell their allotment of 200 tickets. This year, the number of special tickets sold, which came with a Pride-themed Nationals jersey and benefited Team DC's student-athlete scholarship fund, exceeded last year's record total of roughly 7,500. The prevailing message among those in attendance was one of support. 'Sometimes the sports world is not as friendly to the LGBTQ community as I would like,' Nationals fan Younger Oliver said after the Gay Men's Chorus of Washington sang the national anthem. 'So it feels important for me to come and show my support as an ally and be part of it, and spend my money and show MLB and the Nats that this is something that I care about.' 'This feels like an easy way to stand up, show up and be around community, which is really nice, because things are really depressing right now,' Oliver's friend, Hannah Cook, said, referencing the current political climate. 'You don't always take time to experience the joy, and I think that's more important than ever.' With D.C. hosting WorldPride, the world's largest LGBTQ+ festival, it's perhaps no surprise that the 20th edition of one of the longest-running Pride events in professional sports was the biggest version yet. But it was also held against the backdrop of the Trump administration's attack on transgender rights and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, which has led some brands to distance themselves from Pride events. Within Major League Baseball, Pride nights have drawn attention in recent years, often because of players pushing back on the celebrations for religious reasons. In 2022, five Tampa Bay Rays players refused to wear the team's Pride night uniform, which featured rainbow colors on the jerseys and caps. In 2023, MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred, citing a 'desire to protect players,' said the league told its teams to avoid putting Pride logos on uniforms. That year, Nationals pitcher Trevor Williams invoked his Catholic faith when he voiced his opposition to the Los Angeles Dodgers' decision to honor the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, a group whose members dress in colored habits and cloaks, on Pride night. Every MLB team except the Texas Rangers will celebrate Pride in some fashion this month. The Nationals, in partnership with Team DC, leaned into their celebration. 'From our end, it's a no-brainer that we're going to continue having a Night Out again and again, because our philosophy is that baseball is for everyone,' said Betsy Philpott, chief legal officer for the Nationals and a member of the organization's Pride employee resource group. 'It feels right, it feels like it's needed and like a good time to do it,' said D.C.-based drag queen Mari Con Carne, who wore black thigh-high boots and a flower-print top for her pregame performance. 'It's beautiful, it's love, and it's part of the resistance we're trying to show in any political climate. It's not just the past few months. It's been here forever, and celebration is a part of the resistance.' 'For the Nationals to really put themselves out there and make themselves an ally – not just saying things and not just having one Pride night, but doing things throughout the year – it's special, and it makes you feel safe as a queer person walking around,' said Colby, who will host a party at Atlantis on Friday and perform on the main stage at the WorldPride street festival on Saturday. 'Who would've thought that [a baseball stadium] would be a safe space for us?' While Night Out is among the Nationals' most successful special-ticket events, Philpott noted that the team holds various theme nights to celebrate many other cross-sections of the community throughout the season. 'We want to make sure that everyone in the DMV area feels comfortable coming to games and that they can be part of this experience of watching the Nationals with us,' Philpott said. On Thursday, a Pride flag flew beyond left field as a crowd of 30,402 filled the stands. Tom held up a Pride flag after winning the Presidents' Race, which featured Team DC scholarship winners at the finish line. The stadium lights and scoreboards featured rainbow colors and imagery throughout the night. Colby said the Nationals' latest celebration of the LGBTQ+ community came at an important time. 'It just seems so pertinent right now, especially for a lot of queer people, a lot of people of color,' she said after her ceremonial pitch and a pregame meet-and-greet with fans. 'We're feeling oppressed. Pride is a protest, so this is a perfect time to really just protest with absolute queer strength and celebration. That's our weapon of choice.'
Herald Sun
16 hours ago
- Herald Sun
‘We should not take a backwards step': Littleproud on Australian biosecurity laws
The National Party says Australia's biosecurity should not be used as a bargaining tool for the removal of US tariffs. The Albanese Government is reportedly considering amending rules, making it easier for the US to export beef to Australia, as long as it can be done safely. Last year, Australia sent almost 400,000 tonnes of beef to America, worth more than $4 billion. Nationals Leader David Littleproud says "we should not take a backwards step and concede biosecurity protocols that are protecting the agricultural industry".
