Dublin Airport hits out at council's enforcement notice
Describing the airport as the most vital piece of transport infrastructure in Ireland, a DAA spokesman said: 'The system is quite simply broken and needs to be overhauled.'
The airport is limited to handling a maximum of 32 million passengers a year under a condition of the planning permission granted in 2007 for Terminal 2. Dublin Airport. Pic: Getty Images
However, the DAA and many airlines have challenged that limit, saying it is limiting the country's economic growth and could result in higher fares for passengers.
Earlier this month, Dublin Airport said it was expecting more than ten million passengers to pass through during the peak months.
A High Court-imposed pause on the cap, won by the airlines, means more than 36 million people could use the airport this year. Last year, the airport handled 33.3million passengers. Dublin Airport. Pic: Getty Images
Fingal County Council confirmed yesterday it had issued a planning enforcement notice to DAA for breaching the cap.
The council is reported to have received complaints from 60 individuals about the alleged planning breach.
In a statement, the council said its enforcement notice included a two-year period to comply with planning conditions imposed by An Bord Pleanála over passenger capacity at Dublin Airport. Pic: Mark Gusev/Shutterstock
A council spokesman said: 'The two-year period provides an opportunity for DAA to progress their planning applications to increase passenger capacity at Dublin Airport or take such other steps as they consider appropriate to achieve compliance.'
Mayor of Fingal Tom O'Leary, a Fine Gael councillor, said the county council had to follow the legal process.
He continued: 'This makes it even more urgent for the Government to assist in any way that they can to try and sort out the capacity issue at Dublin Airport.
They need to do whatever they can to ensure that the airport can grow in an orderly manner and that the residents around it are looked after.'
However, the DAA said that until changes were made to the cap, Ireland's national airport was 'hamstrung' and could not get on with its mandate to grow Ireland's connectivity.
'The airport needs to be reclassified as national strategic infrastructure, with decisions made by a national planning body and not a local authority,' a spokesman said
The High Court pause on the cap is likely to continue for a year while certain matters related to aircraft take-off and landing slot allocations are examined by the European Court of Justice.
The Government plans to remove the cap through legislation, starting in autumn.
Ryanair has called for urgent action from the Government, stating that local authorities should not oversee national transport infrastructure.
A Department of Transport spokesman said it was aware of the enforcement notice.
They continued: 'The minister has recently reiterated the importance of DAA continuing to engage proactively with the planning authority and the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority to facilitate progress on the two planning applications DAA has lodged.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
An Coimisiún Pleanála reopens appeal over Phoenix Park apartments plan
An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) has reopened an appeal over a 106-home development next to the Phoenix Park after the High Court quashed its decision to grant planning permission for the complex. The proposed development, which has been sought by Linders of Smithfield Limited, is made up of 96 apartments in two blocks and 10 duplex apartments in a third block, at Quadrant House on Chapelizod Road. The large residential development (LRD) application was made in July 2023, seeking permission to level the Chapelizod Road site and to construct three residential blocks ranging from three to five storeys. The development, which was proposed to have a gross floor area of 9,786.5sq m, was to include a residents' gym, a cafe, a communal work space and a basement car park with 84 parking spaces. The development was not set to include any childcare facilities. Despite a series of objections from local residents, the Chapelizod Residents Association and Friends of the Phoenix Park, Dublin City Council granted permission. READ MORE Four separate appeals were lodged, with Chapelizod Tidy Towns' appeal being brought to ACP, which noted that 'particular concerns [were] raised about childcare provision and lack thereof', but planning permission for the development was affirmed after ACP found it to be in line with the Dublin City Development Plan. The case against ACP was brought before the High Court in early 2024 by Friends of the Phoenix Park, a group of local parents that noted their concerns that the development will further overload childcare provision in the area. The group is made up of parents whose children attended a childcare centre which was located on the site of the proposed development until it closed in June 2023. The childcare centre, which was described as 'integral' in an affidavit submitted by the group, was said to provide a significant number of care spaces. The national planning body conceded the case in January 2025. Its representatives admitted it had 'failed to give adequate reasons for its conclusion that the development was in compliance with the density provisions of the Development Plan with specific reference to the issue of public transport capacity'. Acting on behalf of ACP, Byrne Wallace Shields LLP suggested the court quash the order granting the planning application and issue an order that it pay the costs of the applicant, Friends of the Phoenix Park, and the costs of the court. Mr Justice Richard Humphreys quashed the decision in March, sending the case back to ACP. The planning commission is set to make a decision on the matter by December 4th.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
IPO-candidate Klarna registers new Irish financing vehicle
The new entity, Klarna Warehouse Funding Trust I Designated Activity Company, was incorporated last month, according to CRO filings. Its address is registered at the Dublin offices of company formations and corporate administration specialists CSC, rather than the Swedish financial technology firm's own Irish office – the two companies do not share any directors. However, Klarna Group confirmed that the new Irish entity is a Klarna-controlled entity. The role of Klarna Warehouse Funding within the group is related to a structured financial arrangement, to support the lender's diverse funding base, a spokesman said. In recent days Spanish banking giant Banco Santander registered a charge over the assets of the new entity, a standard action where a company has taken on a loan. Klarna provides a growing number of financial services to consumers and retailers but its core business is so-called buy-now-pay-later loans to shoppers that allow them to spread the cost of purchases over fixed, generally short, periods. It charges retailers a fee for arranging and providing credit to consumers, whose loans are usually interest fee unless they miss a repayment. In April, Klarna paused plans for a stock-market flotation in the US, as markets were rocked by Donald Trump's then bombshell tariff announcements, but a listing that would value the business at around €15bn is reportedly still in the works. Last Thursday, the company reported that its second-quarter revenue was up 20pc from a year earlier, on a like-for-like basis, while adjusted profits increased slightly. Klarna's April-June revenue grew to $823m, while its adjusted operating profit stood at $29m, an increase of $1m from the same quarter of last year, its earnings report showed. The number of active Klarna customers rose to 111 million in the quarter, an increase of 31pc year-on-year, the company said. The company has previously indicated it has around one million active users in Ireland. Klarna did not say when it might resume an initial public offering. Bloomberg, citing unnamed sources, last month reported that the company's IPO could take place as soon as this coming September.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
China extends EU dairy probe into 2026, citing case ‘complexity'
When the investigation was first launched in the second half of last year, it was widely feared to be part of a tit-for-tat reciprocation in response to EU countries voting to impose tariffs on electric vehicle (EV) imports from China. Yesterday, China extended its investigation into whether EU members are illegally subsidising dairy that is then sold for export. The Ministry of Commerce said it had prolonged the investigation period to February 21, 2026, citing the case's complexity. In June, an investigation into European pork was similarly extended, leaving exporters on tenterhooks at a time of heightened global trade tensions and a push within the EU to expand into new non-US markets. Trade tensions between China and the EU erupted in 2023 when the European Commission launched an anti-subsidy probe into Chinese-made electric vehicles, accusing Beijing of flooding the market with state-backed exports. In April this year, a European Commission spokesperson said the EU and China had agreed to look into setting minimum prices of Chinese-made EVs instead of tariffs imposed by the EU last year. The two sides have yet to reach a deal. China's move in relation to food imports means its response to barriers against its EVs hits EU member states, including Ireland, that do not produce cars that compete with Chinese-made models, but do value access to Chinese consumers. So far, Irish farmers and producers have largely escaped the backlash. The Chinese complaint relates to a sub-sector of dairy products, including cheeses. Most Irish cheese exports are directed to the UK and EU markets. Irish exports are skewed more to butter and milk-derived dairy ingredients used in baby powders and other whey-based products. However, the case highlights the growing trend away from market access across the globe, not just in the US where a tariff regime is now becoming firmly entrenched. 'Beijing is still hoping to come to terms with the EU on a long list of trade conflicts,' said Even Rogers Pay, an analyst at Beijing-based Trivium China, who specialises in agriculture. 'This investigation – along with the investigation into EU pork, which was extended in June – are significant bargaining chips in the ongoing negotiations around the EU's tariffs on Chinese new energy vehicles,' she said.
