CGTN: Why the Chu Silk Manuscripts should be returned to China
CGTN published an article on the repatriation of the Chu Silk Manuscripts, an over 2,000-year-old Chinese cultural treasure currently held in the United States. Tracing the artifact's journey from its 1942 discovery in an ancient tomb to its 1946 smuggling to America by collector John Hadley Cox, the article presents compelling evidence from both Chinese and American scholars proving China's rightful ownership.
The Chu Silk Manuscripts date to around 300 B.C. /CMG
BEIJING, April 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In the winter of 1942, Several grave robbers in Changsha, Hunan Province, Central China, targeted an ancient tomb from the Warring States period (475–221 B.C.), breaking into this Chu-state burial site and stealing a trove of artifacts, including lacquerware, bronze swords, and silk manuscripts.
When selling the loot to tailor turned antiquities dealer Tang Jianquan, the robbers casually threw in a bamboo container with a silk piece they called a 'handkerchief' as a free bonus. This 'handkerchief' would later be identified as the renowned Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku, the only known silk text from China's Warring States period. Zidanku, literally 'the bullet storehouse,' refers to the excavation site, an ammunition depot in the city's suburbs.
Dating back approximately 2,300 years—over a century older than the Dead Sea Scrolls—the Chu Silk Manuscripts record early Chinese cosmology and rituals. Their intricate text, illustrations and exquisite craftsmanship make them an unparalleled relic.
A cultural tragedy
At the time, Tang didn't recognize the silk's significance. Local dealer Cai Jixiang purchased the manuscripts along with other artifacts. Cai treasured them deeply, carrying them even while fleeing wartime chaos.
In 1946, Cai brought the manuscripts to Shanghai, hoping to have infrared photographs taken to clarify the faded text. There, American collector John Hadley Cox, who was actively acquiring Chinese artifacts in Shanghai, approached Cai. Under the pretense of assisting with photography, Cox obtained and smuggled the manuscripts to the United States.
Sensing he had been duped, Cai could only sign a powerless contract with Cox, valuing the manuscripts at $10,000, with $1,000 paid upfront and the remainder promised if they were not returned from America. Thus began the manuscripts' near 80-year exile.
Consensus between Chinese and American scholars
Professor Li Ling of Peking University has spent over four decades tracing the tumultuous journey of this artifact. His exhaustive research has reconstructed a complete chain of evidence, proving that the manuscripts currently housed in the Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art are in fact the Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku.
Additional letters between Cai and Cox further exposed the deception behind the manuscripts' removal. In the correspondence, Cai implored Cox to come to Shanghai and demanded the remaining $9,000 payment for the manuscripts, yet to no avail.
At the International Conference on the Protection and Return of Cultural Objects Removed from Colonial Contexts held in June 2024 in Qingdao, UChicago Professor Donald Harper handed over a crucial piece of evidence: the original lid of the box used by Cox to store the manuscript in 1946. The lid bears original labels and receipt records that align with Li's timeline of the manuscripts' storage between 1946 and 1969.
Harper states, 'It should be obvious to museum curators and to cultural authorities and to governments that the Zidanku Silk Manuscripts belong to China, and should be returned to China.'
A 2018 New York Times article, 'How a Chinese Manuscript Written 2,300 Years Ago Ended Up in Washington,' corroborates this conclusion.
A homecoming deferred
In 1966, American physician and art collector Arthur M. Sackler purchased a portion of the manuscripts and had, in fact, attempted to return it to China on multiple occasions. In 1976, he planned to hand it to Chinese scholar Guo Moruo, but their meeting never took place due to Guo's illness. In the 1980s, he hoped to donate it to the new Sackler Museum at Peking University, but passed away before the museum opened.
Following Dr. Sackler's death in 1987, the manuscript was placed in the Sackler Gallery in Washington, D.C., now part of the National Museum of Asian Art. The museum's website lists the artifact as an 'anonymous gift' with 'provenance research underway.' It also references Li Ling's book, acknowledging the legitimacy of his research.
From Cai's contract to his correspondence with Cox, from Li's documentation of the manuscripts' journey in America to Sackler's unfulfilled wishes—all evidence confirms the Chu Silk Manuscripts rightfully belong to China and should be repatriated without delay.
After nearly eight decades in exile, this national treasure must finally come home.
For more information, please click:
https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-04-29/Why-the-Chu-Silk-Manuscripts-should-be-returned-to-China-1CYkLmp3luM/p.html
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/c6dd904d-7e88-4ba9-b83c-fa3e465d93a5
CGTN [email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
An ally took control of live bombs dropped by US Air Force planes. That's never been done before.
The US Air Force recently allowed another country to take control of American bombs in flight for the first time, with F-15 Strike Eagle pilots passing control of their glide bombs over to Norwegian forces. The Norwegian Armed Forces announced the successful weapons test last week, describing it as a test of networked weapons, "weapons you can communicate with after they're fired," that delivered a "groundbreaking" result. "For the first time, the Americans have allowed another country to take control of an American bomb on its way to the target," the armed forces said. The Norwegians said that two US Air Force F-15E fighter jets flew toward Norway's coast with two American GBU-53/B glide bombs in the exercise, called Jotun Strike. Using data provided by various sensors, including those on a deployed P-8 maritime patrol aircraft, Norwegian soldiers took control of the bombs when they dropped and used a network to direct them toward targets they had selected. With the data support, the soldiers adjusted the bomb's course. Chief of the Norwegian Armed Forces' Operational Headquarters, Vice Adm. Rune Andersen, called the result of the test key to Norway maintaining a "technological lead." He added that the test highlighted the "good relationship" between the US and Norway, saying that the test was "based on a high degree of trust and integration between close allies." Capt. Brett Stell, from the 494th Fighter Squadron, US Air Force, explained that the recent exercise was "a demonstration of what warfighting looks like in the future." It proved that "a weapon launched from a US platform can be guided by a Norwegian sensor across domains and distances," he said, adding that "this level of integration shows our shared ability to conduct complex, network-enabled engagements-even in contested environments." The unprecedented exercise was not just about Europe, "it's about homeland defense forward," Stell said. "Threats to the US can originate beyond the Western Hemisphere, and our forward capabilities in the European theater are essential for early warning, rapid response, and deterrence," he said, explaining that "exercises like Jotun Strike make our collective force more lethal, more integrated, and ready to fight and win together." A new kind of weapons test Network-enabled weapons are ones that can be guided and redirected as they fly using communications networks. The armed forces said that "via a built-in radio transmitter, military personnel can communicate with the weapon after it has been fired, change its course, change the target it is going to attack, and await or abort an attack. All based on updates they receive in real time." The concept tested last month was developed in Norway with Norwegian industry, the armed forces said. Specifically, the Norwegian Battle Lab & Experimentation had been working on its concept for network weapons since 2019, with a 2025 deadline. NOBLE is a group in the Norwegian Armed Forces that is affiliated with the operational headquarters and tasked with concept development and experimentation for the military. Its network weapons concept had only previously been tested in simulations, and Col. Roger Samuelsen, the head of NOBLE, said "this was the big test." He said that "it was fantastic that this worked." "It is the first time this weapon has been released in a live version. And it was also the first time someone from the Norwegian Armed Forces tested a live network weapon." The test took place on May 14 at Andøya, a large island in Norway's northwest. The system had already been tested in the US against other simulators, Samuelsen said. He said Norway was repeatedly told it was ahead of others on this technology and that he believed that was why the US wanted to provide weapons and planes for this test. He added that he was "very excited to see if the software we have developed would work as intended, even though we have done all the preparations and tests that were possible in advance." He said the outcome means Norway "now can both plan, lead, coordinate and carry out an engagement with network weapons." Network weapons can get real-time data from external sensors, making them more likely to hit their targets. And they can be made to change course after they are fired. The Norwegian Armed Forces said the network weapons have "increased range and safety" since they don't need to see the target. Instead, they can be launched from further away and controlled, so they "can be fired at a safe distance without the platform supplying the weapon having to expose itself." It also means the target can be changed depending on what's happening and what the military wants to hit. The technology is key for Norway, a smaller country that needs to use its resources efficiently and make the most of recent acquisitions like the P-8 and F-35 fighter jets, but there's also interest from allies. Samuelsen said that people who work in "concept development in NATO have already shown interest in the Norwegian concept." And he said allies are interested in the control software that it has developed with Norwegian software company Teleplan. "There are not many nations that have this weapon or the technology within reach," the armed forces said.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Pictures Show US Minuteman III Nuclear-Capable Missile Hardware in Depot
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Officially released photos show special weapons system mechanics conducting maintenance on nuclear-capable Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBMs) boosters. This comes after U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command test-fired an unarmed Minuteman III missile from California on May 21. The missile traveled 4,200 miles across the Pacific Ocean to a test site in the Marshall Islands, demonstrating America's nuclear deterrent capability. Why It Matters The American ICBM force, consisting of 400 armed Minuteman III missiles deployed in silos and ready to execute nuclear strike missions, forms part of the country's nuclear triad, alongside ballistic missile-armed submarines and nuclear-armed bombers and fighter jets. The Minuteman III fleet, which has been on alert since 1970, has an official stated range of "6,000-plus" miles. Each missile is equipped with a single nuclear warhead, according to the Federation of American Scientists, but is capable of carrying two or three if necessary. The U.S. Air Force is replacing the decades-old Minuteman III missile system with the next-generation Sentinel ICBM on a one-for-one basis. The new system is expected to provide a "safe, secure, and effective" land-based leg of the nuclear triad through 2075. What To Know Hill Air Force Base in Utah released photos on Wednesday showing Minuteman III missile boosters undergoing maintenance at the base on Monday. The work was carried out by mechanics from the 582nd Missile Maintenance Squadron, according to photo captions. Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile boosters undergo maintenance at Hill Air Force Base in Utah on June 2, 2025. Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile boosters undergo maintenance at Hill Air Force Base in Utah on June 2, 2025. R. Nial Bradshaw/U.S. Air Force The base plays a central role in supporting the ICBM force by providing "programmed depot maintenance," one of the photo captions reads. The 582nd Missile Maintenance Squadron is responsible for maintenance, repair, overhaul, and modification of the Minuteman III fleet. Programmed depot maintenance is defined as the "inspection and correction of defects that require skills, equipment, or facilities not normally possessed by operating locations." Minuteman III missiles are deployed in silos across Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota and Wyoming. They are assigned to three operational units known as missile wings. The Minuteman III missile features a three-stage booster design that propels it from its silo into space to release its nuclear warheads. Each booster stage separates and falls away sequentially after burning out, the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation explained. The 582nd Missile Maintenance Squadron is also part of the 309th Missile Maintenance Group, a unit that provides storage for Minuteman III boosters and performs static firing and depot-level maintenance for the ICBM fleet, according to the website of Hill Air Force Base. Mechanics perform maintenance on a Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile booster at Hill Air Force Base in Utah on June 2, 2025. Mechanics perform maintenance on a Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile booster at Hill Air Force Base in Utah on June 2, 2025. R. Nial Bradshaw/U.S. Air Force What People Are Saying The U.S. Air Force said in a fact sheet on the Minuteman III missile: "Missiles are dispersed in hardened silos to protect against attack and connected to an underground launch control center through a system of hardened cables. Launch crews, consisting of two officers, perform around-the-clock alert in the launch control center." The Federation of American Scientists commented in its report on U.S. nuclear weapons on January 13: "Although the Minuteman III was initially deployed in 1970, it has been modernized several times, including in 2015, when the missiles completed a multibillion-dollar, decade-long modernization program to extend their service life until 2030." What Happens Next It remains to be seen when the U.S. will conduct its next test launch of the Minuteman III ICBM. In April, a simulated electronic launch was conducted at a base in Nebraska.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
European Employee Blasts US Work Culture in Viral Post: 'Dystopia'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A European employee has ignited a viral conversation after criticizing U.S. work culture in a Reddit post that resonated with thousands. The post, shared by user u/Disastrous_Bench_763 in the subreddit r/antiwork," quickly amassed more than 24,000 upvotes and widespread attention. "I seriously don't know how you guys do it. Watching U.S. work culture from Europe feels like watching a never-ending episode of Black Mirror, but everyone's been gaslit into thinking it's 'just how things are'," they wrote. In a detailed critique, the Reddit user pointed to the lack of federally mandated paid vacation days in the U.S., contrasting it with Europe's legal guarantee of at least 20 to 25 paid days off annually—excluding public holidays. They noted that, in Europe, disappearing for most of August is expected, while Americans feel pressured for taking even a week off. Stock image: An unhappy American worker waits on a train platform. Stock image: An unhappy American worker waits on a train platform. kieferpix/iStock / Getty Images Plus The poster also expressed disbelief over the U.S. approach to health care, noting that losing employment often means losing access to health insurance. Maternity and paternity leave were also scrutinized. The poster criticized the U.S. for forcing mothers back to work within weeks of giving birth, while Europe often offers months—sometimes up to a year—of paid leave for both parents. "Hustle. Grind. 'If you're not working 60 hours a week, you don't want it bad enough.' No thanks." The poster cited France's laws against contacting employees after hours and condemned the American glorification of burnout. Touching on job security, the user described at-will employment as "not freedom—that's instability," and concluded with a striking summary: "You've normalized corporate feudalism and called it 'the American dream.'" Experts' Insight Patrice Williams Lindo, CEO of Career Nomad, told Newsweek that U.S. work culture didn't accidentally turn dystopian—it was "built this way." After decades leading organizational change at major firms like Accenture and Deloitte, Lindo now coaches professionals on reclaiming their power in the workplace. She said American work culture is sustained by corporate lobbying, a myth of meritocracy, and a legal system that offers minimal worker protections. "Employer-tied health care ensures dependence. At-will employment ensures silence. And when hustle is marketed as identity, people fear opting out will cost them everything," Lindo added. In response to whether Europeans are right to view U.S. labor norms as exploitative, Lindo was unequivocal: "Absolutely." She added that, in most of the industrialized world, things such as rest, health care, and paid parental leave are seen as rights—not luxuries. "We've normalized exploitation so thoroughly that people thank their boss for letting them log off at 6 p.m. This isn't hustle—it's harm wrapped in a motivational quote." As for why change is so difficult in the U.S., Lindo pointed to cultural values that prize grind culture, legal frameworks such as at-will employment, and economic inequality that leaves workers too burned out or fearful to resist. Still, Lindo said she sees hope. She noted growing support for reforms like four-day workweek pilots, state-level paid leave, and a surge of interest from Gen Z and professionals recovering from layoffs. "The shift isn't just policy—it's psychological," Lindo said. "People are realizing they were never lazy—they were surviving a rigged system." When asked how workers can advocate for better conditions without risking their livelihoods, Lindo added, "Visibility is the first act of resistance." She encouraged workers to document their achievements, build community, and approach advocacy as a strategy, not just a protest. "We don't need more gratitude for crumbs. We need systems that honor our brilliance without burning us alive." Reddit Reacts Many Reddit users echoed the original post's sentiments, sharing personal stories and reflections on the perceived dysfunction of U.S. labor systems. One user recalled how admiration for the U.S. has faded over time: "I'm British and 52 years old—we grew up admiring the U.S. … My then girlfriend even investigated moving but now? I'd think twice about even visiting." Another wrote that, while American wages are sometimes higher, they come with poor value: "I can get a pretty good life in Spain for less money … and I get a much better quality of life thrown in 'for free.'" Some reflected on regrets. "I'm 55 and realizing I squandered my whole life as a creative working 'stable' jobs that provide insurance coverage … It's so depressing," said one. Others were more direct: "100% correct. And we do not have universal health care, free college, or any other European style benefits." One commenter, working for a global company, highlighted the disparity in benefits among international co-workers: "I encounter those 9 month maternity leaves, all the vacation time … the way their labor rules vary … all these benefits none of us stateside folks get." The viral Reddit post and the chorus of agreement it sparked suggest a growing awareness—and exhaustion—with the current state of American labor. From both inside and outside the system, the message is clear: while the U.S. remains a global economic force, many workers are wondering at what cost. Newsweek reached out to u/Disastrous_Bench_763 for comment via Reddit. We could not verify the details of the case. Newsweek's "What Should I Do?" offers expert advice to readers. If you have a personal dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice on relationships, family, friends, money and work, and your story could be featured on WSID at Newsweek.
