Latest news with #ChuSilkManuscripts
Bahrain News Gazette
30-04-2025
- General
- Bahrain News Gazette
CGTN: Why the Chu Silk Manuscripts should be returned to China
CGTN published an article on the repatriation of the Chu Silk Manuscripts, an over 2,000-year-old Chinese cultural treasure currently held in the United States. Tracing the artifact's journey from its 1942 discovery in an ancient tomb to its 1946 smuggling to America by collector John Hadley Cox, the article presents compelling evidence from both Chinese and American scholars proving China's rightful ownership. The Chu Silk Manuscripts date to around 300 B.C. The Chu Silk Manuscripts date to around 300 B.C. /CMG BEIJING, April 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — In the winter of 1942, Several grave robbers in Changsha, Hunan Province, Central China, targeted an ancient tomb from the Warring States period (475–221 B.C.), breaking into this Chu-state burial site and stealing a trove of artifacts, including lacquerware, bronze swords, and silk manuscripts. When selling the loot to tailor turned antiquities dealer Tang Jianquan, the robbers casually threw in a bamboo container with a silk piece they called a 'handkerchief' as a free bonus. This 'handkerchief' would later be identified as the renowned Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku, the only known silk text from China's Warring States period. Zidanku, literally 'the bullet storehouse,' refers to the excavation site, an ammunition depot in the city's suburbs. Dating back approximately 2,300 years—over a century older than the Dead Sea Scrolls—the Chu Silk Manuscripts record early Chinese cosmology and rituals. Their intricate text, illustrations and exquisite craftsmanship make them an unparalleled relic. A cultural tragedy At the time, Tang didn't recognize the silk's significance. Local dealer Cai Jixiang purchased the manuscripts along with other artifacts. Cai treasured them deeply, carrying them even while fleeing wartime chaos. In 1946, Cai brought the manuscripts to Shanghai, hoping to have infrared photographs taken to clarify the faded text. There, American collector John Hadley Cox, who was actively acquiring Chinese artifacts in Shanghai, approached Cai. Under the pretense of assisting with photography, Cox obtained and smuggled the manuscripts to the United States. Sensing he had been duped, Cai could only sign a powerless contract with Cox, valuing the manuscripts at $10,000, with $1,000 paid upfront and the remainder promised if they were not returned from America. Thus began the manuscripts' near 80-year exile. Consensus between Chinese and American scholars Professor Li Ling of Peking University has spent over four decades tracing the tumultuous journey of this artifact. His exhaustive research has reconstructed a complete chain of evidence, proving that the manuscripts currently housed in the Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art are in fact the Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku. Additional letters between Cai and Cox further exposed the deception behind the manuscripts' removal. In the correspondence, Cai implored Cox to come to Shanghai and demanded the remaining $9,000 payment for the manuscripts, yet to no avail. At the International Conference on the Protection and Return of Cultural Objects Removed from Colonial Contexts held in June 2024 in Qingdao, UChicago Professor Donald Harper handed over a crucial piece of evidence: the original lid of the box used by Cox to store the manuscript in 1946. The lid bears original labels and receipt records that align with Li's timeline of the manuscripts' storage between 1946 and 1969. Harper states, 'It should be obvious to museum curators and to cultural authorities and to governments that the Zidanku Silk Manuscripts belong to China, and should be returned to China.' A 2018 New York Times article, 'How a Chinese Manuscript Written 2,300 Years Ago Ended Up in Washington,' corroborates this conclusion. A homecoming deferred In 1966, American physician and art collector Arthur M. Sackler purchased a portion of the manuscripts and had, in fact, attempted to return it to China on multiple occasions. In 1976, he planned to hand it to Chinese scholar Guo Moruo, but their meeting never took place due to Guo's illness. In the 1980s, he hoped to donate it to the new Sackler Museum at Peking University, but passed away before the museum opened. Following Dr. Sackler's death in 1987, the manuscript was placed in the Sackler Gallery in Washington, D.C., now part of the National Museum of Asian Art. The museum's website lists the artifact as an 'anonymous gift' with 'provenance research underway.' It also references Li Ling's book, acknowledging the legitimacy of his research. From Cai's contract to his correspondence with Cox, from Li's documentation of the manuscripts' journey in America to Sackler's unfulfilled wishes—all evidence confirms the Chu Silk Manuscripts rightfully belong to China and should be repatriated without delay. After nearly eight decades in exile, this national treasure must finally come home. For more information, please click: A photo accompanying this announcement is available at: CGTN [email protected] GlobeNewswire Distribution ID 9441682
Barnama
30-04-2025
- Science
- Barnama
CGTN: Call Grows For Repatriation Of Ancient Chinese Manuscripts
KUALA LUMPUR, April 30 (Bernama) -- Renewed calls for the repatriation of the Chu Silk Manuscripts, an over 2,000-year-old Chinese cultural artefact currently held in the United States (US), have drawn international attention following new evidence presented by Chinese and American scholars. The manuscripts, believed to be the only known silk texts from China's Warring States period (475 to 221 BC), were reportedly looted from an ancient tomb in Changsha, Hunan Province, in 1942. The artefact was later smuggled to the US in 1946 by American collector John Hadley Cox, following its acquisition under contentious circumstances in Shanghai. In a report published by China Global Television Network (CGTN), researchers traced the full journey of the manuscripts—from their discovery at a site known as Zidanku to their current location at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art in Washington, D.C. Chinese scholar Professor Li Ling of Peking University, who has spent over four decades researching the manuscripts, presented a detailed chain of evidence confirming their origin and ownership, according to a statement. His findings were supported by Professor Donald Harper of the University of Chicago, who in 2024 submitted a crucial artefact—an original storage box lid used by Cox—which helped corroborate the timeline. "The Zidanku Silk Manuscripts clearly belong to China and should be returned," said Prof Harper during the International Conference on the Protection and Return of Cultural Objects Removed from Colonial Contexts, held in Qingdao last year. The manuscripts, which date back approximately 2,300 years, are considered a unique record of ancient Chinese cosmology and ritual practices, predating the Dead Sea Scrolls by over a century. Attempts to return the manuscript were previously made by American physician and art collector Dr Arthur M. Sackler, who acquired the artefact in 1966. Although he made multiple efforts to repatriate it to China, they were ultimately unfulfilled due to logistical and personal circumstances. Currently housed in the Sackler Gallery, the manuscript is listed on the museum's website as an "anonymous gift" with 'provenance research underway'.
Associated Press
30-04-2025
- General
- Associated Press
CGTN: Why the Chu Silk Manuscripts should be returned to China
CGTN published an article on the repatriation of the Chu Silk Manuscripts, an over 2,000-year-old Chinese cultural treasure currently held in the United States. Tracing the artifact's journey from its 1942 discovery in an ancient tomb to its 1946 smuggling to America by collector John Hadley Cox, the article presents compelling evidence from both Chinese and American scholars proving China's rightful ownership. The Chu Silk Manuscripts date to around 300 B.C. /CMG BEIJING, April 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In the winter of 1942, Several grave robbers in Changsha, Hunan Province, Central China, targeted an ancient tomb from the Warring States period (475–221 B.C.), breaking into this Chu-state burial site and stealing a trove of artifacts, including lacquerware, bronze swords, and silk manuscripts. When selling the loot to tailor turned antiquities dealer Tang Jianquan, the robbers casually threw in a bamboo container with a silk piece they called a 'handkerchief' as a free bonus. This 'handkerchief' would later be identified as the renowned Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku, the only known silk text from China's Warring States period. Zidanku, literally 'the bullet storehouse,' refers to the excavation site, an ammunition depot in the city's suburbs. Dating back approximately 2,300 years—over a century older than the Dead Sea Scrolls—the Chu Silk Manuscripts record early Chinese cosmology and rituals. Their intricate text, illustrations and exquisite craftsmanship make them an unparalleled relic. A cultural tragedy At the time, Tang didn't recognize the silk's significance. Local dealer Cai Jixiang purchased the manuscripts along with other artifacts. Cai treasured them deeply, carrying them even while fleeing wartime chaos. In 1946, Cai brought the manuscripts to Shanghai, hoping to have infrared photographs taken to clarify the faded text. There, American collector John Hadley Cox, who was actively acquiring Chinese artifacts in Shanghai, approached Cai. Under the pretense of assisting with photography, Cox obtained and smuggled the manuscripts to the United States. Sensing he had been duped, Cai could only sign a powerless contract with Cox, valuing the manuscripts at $10,000, with $1,000 paid upfront and the remainder promised if they were not returned from America. Thus began the manuscripts' near 80-year exile. Consensus between Chinese and American scholars Professor Li Ling of Peking University has spent over four decades tracing the tumultuous journey of this artifact. His exhaustive research has reconstructed a complete chain of evidence, proving that the manuscripts currently housed in the Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art are in fact the Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku. Additional letters between Cai and Cox further exposed the deception behind the manuscripts' removal. In the correspondence, Cai implored Cox to come to Shanghai and demanded the remaining $9,000 payment for the manuscripts, yet to no avail. At the International Conference on the Protection and Return of Cultural Objects Removed from Colonial Contexts held in June 2024 in Qingdao, UChicago Professor Donald Harper handed over a crucial piece of evidence: the original lid of the box used by Cox to store the manuscript in 1946. The lid bears original labels and receipt records that align with Li's timeline of the manuscripts' storage between 1946 and 1969. Harper states, 'It should be obvious to museum curators and to cultural authorities and to governments that the Zidanku Silk Manuscripts belong to China, and should be returned to China.' A 2018 New York Times article, 'How a Chinese Manuscript Written 2,300 Years Ago Ended Up in Washington,' corroborates this conclusion. A homecoming deferred In 1966, American physician and art collector Arthur M. Sackler purchased a portion of the manuscripts and had, in fact, attempted to return it to China on multiple occasions. In 1976, he planned to hand it to Chinese scholar Guo Moruo, but their meeting never took place due to Guo's illness. In the 1980s, he hoped to donate it to the new Sackler Museum at Peking University, but passed away before the museum opened. Following Dr. Sackler's death in 1987, the manuscript was placed in the Sackler Gallery in Washington, D.C., now part of the National Museum of Asian Art. The museum's website lists the artifact as an 'anonymous gift' with 'provenance research underway.' It also references Li Ling's book, acknowledging the legitimacy of his research. From Cai's contract to his correspondence with Cox, from Li's documentation of the manuscripts' journey in America to Sackler's unfulfilled wishes—all evidence confirms the Chu Silk Manuscripts rightfully belong to China and should be repatriated without delay. After nearly eight decades in exile, this national treasure must finally come home. For more information, please click: A photo accompanying this announcement is available at: CGTN [email protected]
Globe and Mail
30-04-2025
- General
- Globe and Mail
CGTN: Why the Chu Silk Manuscripts should be returned to China
CGTN published an article on the repatriation of the Chu Silk Manuscripts, an over 2,000-year-old Chinese cultural treasure currently held in the United States. Tracing the artifact's journey from its 1942 discovery in an ancient tomb to its 1946 smuggling to America by collector John Hadley Cox, the article presents compelling evidence from both Chinese and American scholars proving China's rightful ownership. The Chu Silk Manuscripts date to around 300 B.C. /CMG BEIJING, April 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In the winter of 1942, Several grave robbers in Changsha, Hunan Province, Central China, targeted an ancient tomb from the Warring States period (475–221 B.C.), breaking into this Chu-state burial site and stealing a trove of artifacts, including lacquerware, bronze swords, and silk manuscripts. When selling the loot to tailor turned antiquities dealer Tang Jianquan, the robbers casually threw in a bamboo container with a silk piece they called a "handkerchief" as a free bonus. This "handkerchief" would later be identified as the renowned Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku, the only known silk text from China's Warring States period. Zidanku, literally "the bullet storehouse," refers to the excavation site, an ammunition depot in the city's suburbs. Dating back approximately 2,300 years—over a century older than the Dead Sea Scrolls—the Chu Silk Manuscripts record early Chinese cosmology and rituals. Their intricate text, illustrations and exquisite craftsmanship make them an unparalleled relic. A cultural tragedy At the time, Tang didn't recognize the silk's significance. Local dealer Cai Jixiang purchased the manuscripts along with other artifacts. Cai treasured them deeply, carrying them even while fleeing wartime chaos. In 1946, Cai brought the manuscripts to Shanghai, hoping to have infrared photographs taken to clarify the faded text. There, American collector John Hadley Cox, who was actively acquiring Chinese artifacts in Shanghai, approached Cai. Under the pretense of assisting with photography, Cox obtained and smuggled the manuscripts to the United States. Sensing he had been duped, Cai could only sign a powerless contract with Cox, valuing the manuscripts at $10,000, with $1,000 paid upfront and the remainder promised if they were not returned from America. Thus began the manuscripts' near 80-year exile. Consensus between Chinese and American scholars Professor Li Ling of Peking University has spent over four decades tracing the tumultuous journey of this artifact. His exhaustive research has reconstructed a complete chain of evidence, proving that the manuscripts currently housed in the Smithsonian's National Museum of Asian Art are in fact the Chu Silk Manuscripts from Zidanku. Additional letters between Cai and Cox further exposed the deception behind the manuscripts' removal. In the correspondence, Cai implored Cox to come to Shanghai and demanded the remaining $9,000 payment for the manuscripts, yet to no avail. At the International Conference on the Protection and Return of Cultural Objects Removed from Colonial Contexts held in June 2024 in Qingdao, UChicago Professor Donald Harper handed over a crucial piece of evidence: the original lid of the box used by Cox to store the manuscript in 1946. The lid bears original labels and receipt records that align with Li's timeline of the manuscripts' storage between 1946 and 1969. Harper states, "It should be obvious to museum curators and to cultural authorities and to governments that the Zidanku Silk Manuscripts belong to China, and should be returned to China." A 2018 New York Times article, "How a Chinese Manuscript Written 2,300 Years Ago Ended Up in Washington," corroborates this conclusion. A homecoming deferred In 1966, American physician and art collector Arthur M. Sackler purchased a portion of the manuscripts and had, in fact, attempted to return it to China on multiple occasions. In 1976, he planned to hand it to Chinese scholar Guo Moruo, but their meeting never took place due to Guo's illness. In the 1980s, he hoped to donate it to the new Sackler Museum at Peking University, but passed away before the museum opened. Following Dr. Sackler's death in 1987, the manuscript was placed in the Sackler Gallery in Washington, D.C., now part of the National Museum of Asian Art. The museum's website lists the artifact as an "anonymous gift" with "provenance research underway." It also references Li Ling's book, acknowledging the legitimacy of his research. From Cai's contract to his correspondence with Cox, from Li's documentation of the manuscripts' journey in America to Sackler's unfulfilled wishes—all evidence confirms the Chu Silk Manuscripts rightfully belong to China and should be repatriated without delay. After nearly eight decades in exile, this national treasure must finally come home.
