logo
Mideast studies in US in crossfire of Trump-Harvard fight

Mideast studies in US in crossfire of Trump-Harvard fight

Jordan Times31-07-2025
By Guillaume Lavallée
NEW YORK — The issue of academic research on the Middle East has become a political flashpoint in the United States, where critics of Israel allege a "Palestine exception" exists when it comes to free speech rights.
Case in point, recently a special edition of the prestigious Harvard Educational Review (HER) was in the works, entirely dedicated to the hot-button issue of the Palestinians -- the articles had been painstakingly written, edited and approved.
But authors said they received an unusual demand for a final readout by lawyers, which soon derailed their efforts.
The publisher's stunning late-stage decision to scrap the entire edition reflects the overheated political climate in the US where academic research on the Middle East has attracted accusations of so-called "wokeism" and "anti-Semitism" from President Donald Trump, as conflict rages in the region.
The edition began taking shape when, in March 2024 -- six months after the deadly October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and the Israeli reprisals in the Gaza Strip -- the renowned Harvard publication called for papers for a special issue on "Education and Palestine."
Anthropologist Thea Abu El Haj and her colleagues submitted a paper on "scholasticide," a term describing the destruction of an education system, like in Gaza, with reference to the experience of Palestinian teachers during the Lebanese Civil War between 1975 and 1990.
But then the authors received phone calls informing them that the text would have to be submitted to Harvard's Office of the General Counsel for a "risk assessment."
"I have been publishing for decades in academic journals -- including HER twice --and I have never been asked for this kind of review," said El Haj, a professor at Columbia University's Barnard College.
After the authors objected to "censorship," the director of Harvard Education Press Jessica Fiorillo, told the authors the special issue had been cancelled in its entirety.
'Censorship'?
Fiorillo denied "censorship" in a memo to the authors, seen by AFP, blaming inadequate review because the editors insisted on limiting the publisher's involvement to copyediting -- without touching the "politically charged content."
"The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is another instance of what has been called the 'Palestine exception' to free speech," said El Haj, accusing Harvard of not upholding free speech while proclaiming to champion it amid its fight with Trump.
Since returning to power, Trump has accused prestigious US universities of anti-Semitism for failing to protect Jewish students during protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
In an escalating war of attrition against Harvard, Trump sought to cut more than $2.6 billion of funding to the Ivy League university, while seeking to block entry of international students -- a quarter of its enrolment.
Harvard said it had strengthened measures to protect Jewish and Israeli students while fighting the government's measures in court.
"The chilling climate for scholarly inquiry about Palestine at Harvard (and beyond) has been difficult for some time. Faculty, staff, and students have understandably felt a generalized cloud of fear and anxiety," Margaret Litvin, an Arabic literature professor at Boston University, told AFP.
At the start of the year, Harvard also adopted a definition of anti-Semitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).
That definition is contested, however, as critics argue it may prevent criticism of Israel.
That distinction appears to be at the heart of the furore over the "education and Palestine" edition of the HER, said Chandni Desai, a University of Toronto professor, who was supposed to pen an article for the journal.
Harvard University did not comment.
The submitted articles would "likely fail" to have passed the IHRA definition test because "all the pieces are critical of Israel," Desai said.
"We've never seen an entire special issue collection being canceled -- especially after... contracts have been signed and reviews and revisions done."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel attacks Haziz power station in Yemen
Israel attacks Haziz power station in Yemen

Al Bawaba

time2 hours ago

  • Al Bawaba

Israel attacks Haziz power station in Yemen

Published August 17th, 2025 - 05:55 GMT ALBAWABA - At least twin blasts were reported near Haziz power plant in Yemen's Sana, local sources revealed on Sunday morning. According to the media, the explosions caused temporary outages, and the Yemeni government accused Israel of carrying out the attacks. Shortly after being accused, an Israeli military source confirmed the attack, saying the army hit an "energy infrastructure site" in Yemen used by the Houthis. Houthi civil defense teams were dispatched to the location of the explosions, the Haziz power plant, and are working to put out the flames at the generators. Houthi media said that the explosion had halted operations in the southern part of the city. Ynet news reported, citing Mashal al-Rifi, the CEO of the Sanaa Electric Corporation, who confirmed the facility "was under attack, causing a temporary power outage." © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (

'Israeli' negotiators weigh partial agreement to secure captives
'Israeli' negotiators weigh partial agreement to secure captives

Roya News

time18 hours ago

  • Roya News

'Israeli' negotiators weigh partial agreement to secure captives

'Israeli' negotiation team has shown readiness on Saturday to agree to a partial deal with Gaza, according to Hebrew media. Reports alleged that the team believes any opportunity for a partial agreement should be accepted if it results in the release of the largest possible number of captives held in the enclave. International mediators are attempting to accelerate talks between 'Israel' and Hamas in hopes of reaching an agreement soon. However, the current progress suggests that such a deal may still take time. A senior official in the 'Israeli' security cabinet was quoted as saying the difference between a comprehensive deal and a partial one is 'just a matter of terminology,' noting that the proposals already involve several phases. Mediating states are pushing for a swift agreement to halt 'Israeli' military operations planned in Gaza City. Meanwhile, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich demanded a clear decision from the cabinet not to halt the ground maneuver in exchange for any deal.

Political storm in Texas as redistricting fight sparks accusations against Trump
Political storm in Texas as redistricting fight sparks accusations against Trump

Al Bawaba

time19 hours ago

  • Al Bawaba

Political storm in Texas as redistricting fight sparks accusations against Trump

Published August 16th, 2025 - 12:47 GMT ALBAWABA - Texas has once again become the center of political confrontation after Democratic lawmakers left the state in a bid to block a redistricting plan backed by former U.S. President Donald Trump. Also Read Trump signals he may walk out of Alaska summit with Putin The move, which Republicans describe as a necessary correction to demographic changes, is being condemned by Democrats as a direct attack on fair representation and minority voices. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a second special session to push through the proposed congressional map, according to Politico. Analysts warn the clash could become a pivotal moment in U.S. electoral history, turning redistricting into a tool for undermining voter choice rather than reflecting it. Republicans insist the changes are needed to reflect population shifts, but Democrats argue they amount to voter suppression, particularly against African American and Latino communities. The debate has revived widespread concerns about 'gerrymandering,' the manipulation of electoral boundaries to secure partisan advantage. Critics say such practices distort democracy from within, ensuring pre-determined outcomes instead of competitive elections. Rights groups fear Texas could become a model for similar strategies in other states, further eroding electoral fairness. Trump's gerrymandering scheme is a threat to the entire country, not just Texas — but we're fighting back together. No matter where you are, visit to find a rally near you — and in CHICAGO, join us at 11am @ Millennium Park!#txlege — Texas House Democrats (@TexasHDC) August 16, 2025 The dispute is not confined to Texas. Democratic leaders in states like California and New York have hinted at possible retaliatory moves, including their own redistricting efforts, escalating the fight into a nationwide partisan battle. While Republicans see the redistricting plan as a political necessity, Democrats contend it is a deliberate strategy to preserve shrinking influence by reshaping maps instead of winning voter support. What Lies Ahead The upcoming special session in Texas is expected to feature intense efforts by Republicans to pass the plan quickly, while Democrats prepare for more drastic countermeasures. Regardless of the outcome, analysts say the debate raises a deeper question: not just who gets represented, but who has the power to decide where representation begins and ends. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store