Gillian Taylforth says EastEnders made her who she is today
Gillian Taylforth says EastEnders made her who she is today
Taylforth, 69, is best known for playing cafe owner Kathy in the BBC soap and first appeared in its debut episode in February 1985.
Gillian Taylforth
(Image: PA )
EastEnders star Gillian Taylforth has said the soap is always in her heart because it made her who she is today.
Taylforth, 69, is best known for playing cafe owner Kathy in the BBC soap and first appeared in its debut episode in February 1985.
The character was killed off in 2006 only to make a shock return – after faking her own death – for the 30th anniversary live episodes in 2015.
Fronting the August edition of Prima, the actress told the magazine: "EastEnders has always been my favourite place to work.
"I loved The Bill, Footballers' Wives and Hollyoaks. I got to do plays and a musical and other things that were lovely. But EastEnders has always been in my heart, because that's where I feel I became who I am.
"This wonderful character, Kathy, was always a big part of me. So when I was invited back for the 30th anniversary I was overjoyed to have Kathy back in my life."
Article continues below
The character was most recently revealed as the assailant who attacked her former daughter-in-law Cindy Beale, played by Michelle Collins, on Christmas Day.
The festive episode ended with Cindy being struck with a shovel as she was walking through Walford after her affair with Junior Knight (Micah Balfour) had been revealed at a party in the Queen Vic.
Cindy had been hoping to return to France with her former husband and her son Ian, played by Adam Woodyatt, before the affair was exposed.
Before the 40th anniversary episode, Cindy went to Ian's home with a gun believing him to be the assailant, but he insisted it was not him and turned the blame on his son Peter (Thomas Law).
Kathy then arrived at the house and told her to leave Ian alone, before confessing to the attack.
Speaking about the cast and crew, Taylforth added: "I have amazing relationships with everyone at EastEnders, but there's something special with Adam (Woodyatt). He's played my son for 40 years, and he never calls me by my name, it's always 'Mum', even when we're not on set, and he's 'Son' to me.
"We've got a close bond – he can see if I've forgotten my lines, and he'll say them to remind me. The moment we reunited when Kathy came back, there were tears everywhere – it was a magical moment."
Taylforth also spoke about her self-care routine, saying it makes her "feel good" about herself.
She said: "It's very nice if people say lovely comments about how I look, but I don't do it for anyone other than myself. Self-care helps me feel good about myself.
Article continues below
"I am getting older, and I do notice changes, but for me, I just want to maintain my appearance for as long as can. And if it all falls flat very soon, there's not much I could do about it."
The full interview is in the August issue of Prima which is now on sale.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How releasing his father's soul left British journalist high as a kite: ROLAND WHITE reviews Amol Rajan Goes To The Ganges
Television people famously worry about working with children and animals. But that's nothing compared with the dangers of a presenter's mum loose in front of the camera. Minutes into Amol Rajan Goes To The Ganges (BBC1), his mother was gleefully recalling: 'You were very chubby, Amol. Pleasantly plump, I would say.' Thanks, Mum. As a child, Amol's role models were all white: people like cricketer Shane Warne and philosopher Bertrand Russell. (Oh come on, which teenager doesn't have a picture of Bertrand on their bedroom wall?) The only Indian who inspired him was his father, a bank official who died three years ago. Since then, the Radio 4 Today presenter and University Challenge host hasn't been quite the same: 'I've been in a bit of a funk.' In part to heal his grief, but mainly because the BBC suggested it, Amol flew to India to attend the Hindu festival of Kumbh Mela, a huge gathering of pilgrims on the banks of the Ganges. And I mean huge. During one day, around 70 million people — roughly the population of the UK — squeezed into just 15 square miles. They included what is surely the world's largest collection of thin, old men with very long beards. Not to mention sacred warriors, naked apart from a coating of ash, and lots of people dressed in orange, which represents fire. As Amol pushed his way through crowds, he was greeted with shouts of 'Praise be to the Lord Ram!' and 'Victory to Lord Shiva'. It was like watching a good-natured football crowd heading for the world's biggest cup final. The idea was that Amol would join pilgrims in bathing in the sacred river. He would connect with his religious heritage, even though he describes himself as an atheist, and somehow heal his grief. Unfortunately, events got in the way. He and his party were stopped before they could reach the holiest point of the river, the confluence of the Ganges and the Yamuna river. There had been a stampede, just 800m away. Ninety people were injured, and 30 were killed. So Amol had to improvise. This might sound odd if you're not a Hindu, but he took part in a ceremony in which oatmeal balls represented the souls of his ancestors. He mixed the balls into a mash, and took this to the river. 'I am now going to release the sacred oatmeal into the water,' he said solemnly. In the river, he ritually released his father's soul before immersing himself in the water. 'I'm as high as a kite,' he admitted. 'I can feel the cosmic energy flowing through me right now.' It was rather moving, but I couldn't help thinking that if anybody had told tough-talking interviewer Amol that they were full of cosmic energy, he would have rolled his eyes to camera.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: The 'Strictly Super Spoiler' earns £5,000 a MONTH revealing the results and ruin it for fans
Known as the notorious 'Strictly Super Spoiler', he has ruining the family favourite BBC dance show for over a decade by revealing the outcome of the dreaded 'dance-off' before Sunday night's results show. Despite calls to stop spoiling the fun for Strictly's loyal fanbase, 45-year-old David Thorp remains undeterred and is set to continue sabotaging the 2025 series, which starts in September. But now MailOnline can reveal exactly why the software engineer student, who lives in a £70,000 semi-detached home in Preston, Lancs, won't stop sharing the results on his website anytime soon - and it's all down to money. Thorp is earning an astonishing £5,000 per month leaking results from the BBC1 show - which is more than some of the celebrity contestants are being paid to take part in the TV juggernaut. Sources close to Thorp have told Mailonline he has a mole within the Strictly camp who secretly informs him of the outcome of the results show, which is filmed after the live main show on Saturday evening, but airs 24 hours later. Cast, crew and audience members are sworn to secrecy not to reveal the result before the show airs, but Thorp's insider continues to tell him which celebrity and dance partner is going home. The insider also revealed Thorp's money-making scheme looks set to continue as Strictly have not made any moves to shut his websites down - or threaten any sort of retribution for spoiling the show. A friend told Mailonline: 'The money Thorp is making from giving away the Strictly results is ridiculous. Thorp is earning an astonishing £5,000 per month leaking results from the BBC1 show - which is more than some of the celebrity contestants are being paid to take part in the TV juggernaut. Pictured: Dianne Buswell and Chris McCausland on the show 'He can sometimes earn up to £5,000 a month when the show is airing. On a bad month it's around £3,000, but that's not bad money for simply revealing a result and writing a bit of text around it.' The source continued: 'He has someone involved on the show leaking him the results and Strictly have no clue who it is. 'They used to think it was audience members but Thorp still found out which celebrities had been voted out during the lockdown series, which was filmed at Elstree Studios without an audience.' 'But bosses don't seem too concerned as they haven't tried to stop him. 'He's had no legal threats or even just a polite request to stop spoiling the result. 'So I imagine he'll just keep on going.' The BBC declined to comment when asked by MailOnline if they have attempted to stop him from leaking the result. But a show insider admitted the weekly spoiler is incredibly infuriating for all those concerned with the show. The insider said: 'It just ruins it for everyone. 'It's obviously a huge part of Strictly, the actual competition aspect, and viewers love the jeopardy of whether or not their favourite dancers will remain on the show. 'And the BBC appreciate it also affects the viewing figures, as some fans won't tune it if they already know who's leaving. 'But they seem powerless in stopping the Strictly super spoiler - and clearly have no idea who the leak is. 'So this is going to run and run unfortunately.' The insider added: 'Changing the format to just one big show would end the result being ruined but there's not a change that will be happening. 'Strictly is so huge it would leave a gapping hole in Sunday's schedule if they didn't have a dedicated results episode. 'That's why bosses insist on having a big music act performing to ensure so the Sunday show remains a big spectacle - hoping those who know the outcome may still tune it.' MailOnline revealed in 2022 the identity of the 'Strictly super spoiler', who has been publishing the identity of the axed pairings on his website Strictly Spoiler every Saturday evening since 2012. Thorp, who's married to wife Angie, 31, insists he's not taking the fun out of the show, saying there's 'appetite' for viewers to know the result as soon as it's available. And he also blames the BBC for not doing two live shows, to prevent leaks from happening. Thorp told MailOnline: 'I'm just providing a service and am not spoiling anyone's enjoyment. 'I don't put the results for everyone to see and they have to search for my site to find out the results. 'There is an appetite from people who want to know the results before Sunday. 'It could be argued that the BBC is to blame for recording something which is of massive interest the day before.' Thorp claims he doesn't have one ''source' and he learns the result each week from various audience members, despite what insiders say. He explains: 'I find out the result by audience members there on the night contacting me or from the other strictly spoiler sites around.' Thorp has also garnered over 50,000 followers on X and over 7,000 on Instagram. His website is now being used for advertisement, which is how he pulls in the money, and fans that interact with him about the show have a chance of winning a £20 Amazon voucher. He said: 'People would contact me, and I would direct message them the results but so many people began asking I had to put it on a website I was operating. 'It just got bigger and bigger, and I have around 400,000 people viewing the website each week. 'I send out a link on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram and people have to actively click on the link.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Celebrities are not putting enough care into their children's books, says author
Impossible Creatures author Katherine Rundell has said celebrities who use ghost-writers are not giving 'sufficient care' to the children's books they have published in their name. The novelist, who won Waterstones Book Of The Year in 2023, said that 'a high percentage' of books published by famous people could have been ghost-written, estimating that the figure could fall just below 50%. 'I think the thing that frustrates me most would be where people are publishing books that they have not themselves written,' she told BBC Radio 4's This Cultural Life. 'Because, of course, there are many great comedians who could write great children's fiction, I'm sure, but if you are creating a children's book in the same way you would create a perfume or a series of steak knives, you are not giving it sufficient care.' She added: 'I think ghost-writing makes perfect sense for memoir, for non-fiction, but for fiction, when a child opens a story they should be entering a pact with you, that you will have thought of them and what they need, their desires, their drive. 'And if you break that pact, and if you flood the market with books that break that pact, you risk turning children off books. 'And to turn children off books is to turn them off the great history of ideas. Books are the place we have gone to set down our most bold and ambitious thought and to risk turning children off that, I think, is a stupidity for which we shouldn't be forgiven.' Asked, anecdotally, if she knows the proportion of children's books that are ghost-written, she said: 'I don't know. A high percentage, probably less than half, but not that much less.' Rundell won the Costa Children's Book Award in 2017 for her book The Explorer and the Blue Peter Best Story Award in 2014 for Rooftoppers. Her other children's books include One Christmas Wish (2017), Skysteppers (2021), and her forthcoming book The Poisoned King, a follow-up to Impossible Creatures (2023).
