logo
Iwi boss accuses MPs of 'scaremongering' with Waitākere Ranges claims

Iwi boss accuses MPs of 'scaremongering' with Waitākere Ranges claims

1News29-04-2025
NZ First and ACT MPs Shane Jones and David Seymour need to "learn to read", the chief executive of a West Auckland iwi says, after they criticised a proposal by Auckland Council to work more closely with the iwi as "co-governance".
Edward Ashby said the central government MPs were up to "mischief", spreading "misinformation" and "scaremongering".
Jones and Seymour are concerned about the potential for iwi Te Kawerau ā Maki to be part of a committee overseeing the Waitākere Ranges, but Auckland councillor Richard Hill said the proposal simply progresses something that was agreed to 17 years ago.
In 2008, the Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act recognised the area as nationally significant and specified it needed to be protected.
It also said it would progress a Deed of Acknowledgement that the Auckland Council, the Crown and the nominated iwi would enter into. Now the council is moving forward to create that deed, with consultation on the proposal closing yesterday.
Auckland councillor Richard Hills explained the deed would "in practice" acknowledge the relationship and interest a range of parties have in the Waitākere Ranges.
That could be to "invest in it, do trapping, do planting, do pest control, enable more recreation and protection of the ranges into the future".
"This was asked for unanimously by the local boards and also unanimously by the Auckland Council."
Part of the proposal is to establish a joint committee under the Local Government Act with equal representation from Auckland Council, the Crown and tangata whenua - in this case Te Kawerau ā Maki.
NZ First MP Shane Jones has condemned the idea, saying his party will never agree to an iwi having "50% sovereignty over the Waitakere forest".
"We campaigned, we negotiated, and we agreed, in our coalition agreement, there would be no more co-sovereignty, no more co-governance of these public service-orientated outcomes."
He said the moment you have a "50/50 committee set up as part of the Supercity", it will "morph in no time whatsoever into shared sovereignty over the Waitākere".
"What about the trampers? What about the runners? What about the walkers? That is an asset that primarily must serve all the interests and all the needs of Auckland."
Coalition partner and Epsom electorate MP David Seymour agreed, saying the Waitākere Ranges is a "very special area to many Aucklanders".
"The idea it should be governed half by people whose ancestors arrived 800 years ago, and half by people whose ancestors arrived more recently, is an anathema to the Kiwi spirit."
He was also concerned about decisions being made to close tracks, saying those needed to be made "according to the best science".
"And the people with the best science are the people who have the skills, experience and qualifications to make the decision.
"Being born Māori, while a wonderful thing to be proud of, is not actually a scientific qualification."
Chief executive of Te Kawerau ā Maki Edward Ashby suggested the MPs "learn to read" because "that's not what the information out there says".
Ashby pointed out it had taken 17 years to act on what the legislation had promised, "which is a deed to be progressed". That was all the iwi was doing, he said.
He explained the deed would do two things, "acknowledges our association" and "identifies opportunities for us to contribute to the management of the public land".
"And so one of the ways we wanted to do that was basically set up a forum or a table for us and the Crown and Council to talk."
He said that it would be a "non-statutory" body, and would be used to coordinate a plan for the area. Ashby maintained the proposal was not co-governance and said the MPs were up to "mischief".
"I think it's scaremongering. I think it's misinformation. It's obviously on trend for some members of this Government, and politics in general, at the moment, to beat up on iwi."
He said he thought Te Kawerau ā Maki were being used as a "political football', and the idea that the proposal was co-governance was "misinformation".
"If it was co-governance, there would be land in a different structure, a different entity, there'd be decision making over money and things like that. And none of those things are on the table.
"Land isn't changing title. Money isn't changing hands.
"Power isn't being taken away from anyone."
He explained the council would still make final decisions over land it manages, as would the Department of Conservation, as would Te Kawerau ā Maki.
He said the idea that there'll be "Kawerau police" telling people what they can and can't do on the property was an "absolute fairytale".
Councillor Hills echoed this, saying "there's no change of ownership or change of decision making," and that it was simply about "doing what we're already doing in disparate ways", but bringing local boards, council, mana whenua together to "improve the future of the Waitākere Ranges and ensure the investment is going in the right places".
He said this is "nothing like" the co-governance the government approved a couple of months ago for Taranaki.
Seymour acknowledged it was ultimately a decision for the local council, and said that is why ACT plans to stand candidates in the local body elections for the first time.
"The legislation in question is actually a local bill, which is quite difficult for Parliament to change without the local council asking for it to happen.
"Hence, we're standing local candidates so precisely that can happen."
Jones said he would be taking the issue to caucus, and he will be taking it up with the Minister of Conservation, Tama Potaka. RNZ approached the minister for comment, but he declined because it is a local government issue.
By Lillian Hanly of rnz.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Takapuna Golf Course v Auckland Council: ‘Misinformation is causing a lot of stress'
Takapuna Golf Course v Auckland Council: ‘Misinformation is causing a lot of stress'

NZ Herald

time9 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Takapuna Golf Course v Auckland Council: ‘Misinformation is causing a lot of stress'

The pipe and canal would carry floodwater to Shoal Bay, the large tidal inlet between the motorway just north of the bridge and the suburbs of Takapuna, Belmont and Bayswater. Hills told the Herald the council has known for some time that this option is not workable. It adopted its own plan in April, following public consultation and extensive engineering studies, and confirmed in July. It was reconfirmed last Friday following an analysis of the Shoal Bay Solution. Barry Potter, the council's director of resilience and infrastructure, says the council analysis has been peer-reviewed by independent consultants. Auckland Council officials Tom Mansell (left) and Barry Potter, with councillor Richard Hills (right), at a public meeting in the Wairau Valley to discuss the future of the park. Photo / Corey Fleming 'Whether Councillor Wayne Walker gave the golfing community false hope on purpose I'll never know,' Hills told the Herald. 'But as this was discounted as part of the original 100 options looked at, the misinformation is causing a lot of stress.' Mayor Wayne Brown used similar language. Walker, he said, 'is a great provider of false hopes'. The Herald asked Walker to respond. He replied: 'I believe their solution [the Shoal Bay Solution] is workable.' He described it as 'far more resilient', although he added he had not seen the report or supporting papers on which the council based its final decision. He also said, 'The community has been given significant 'false hope' by Auckland Council,' and, 'The mayor's fixit proposals are those promoting false hope.' Officials are now proceeding with the council plan. The golf course will close, although Hills says the driving range is likely to remain open. The council will establish a wetland environmental and recreational area on about half the area, able to hold 550 million litres of water. The whole park is zoned for recreational use and there is no proposal to change that. The Kaipātiki Local Board will decide what recreational purposes to enable on the rest of the land. Local board deputy chair Danielle Grant says public consultation on this will open in October 2025. That means the decision will be made by the incoming board, following council elections that month. Grant, who is standing for the ward in the election, says her own position is, 'I support golf, and I support the need to mitigate the significant flooding in our Wairau catchment.' Hills says he thinks a driving range and nine-hole golf course are likely. Golf Warehouse founder Eric Faesenkloet has already proposed this and Brown told the Herald he is meeting with Faesenkloet this week. Auckland councillor Wayne Walker. Photo / Supplied Some of the strongest opposition to the Shoal Bay Solution comes from the New Zealand Transport Agency, which has legal responsibility for maintaining the efficient operation and resilience of all state highways, including the motorway. 'We don't support any option that would negatively impact the state highway given its nationally significant function,' said NZTA in its report to council. 'Modelling indicates it would increase flooding risk to critical transport infrastructure,' and could 'potentially impact any future additional harbour crossing'. Mayor Brown put that into his own words. 'They want to put a 13m pressurised pipe under the motorway, just so someone can play golf.' He said it would likely be more expensive and it was the 'fourth effort' by the golf course, which has 'descended through the ranks of engineers'. 'It's haywire stuff. There is plenty of evidence that this is not a serious suggestion. People should take it with the same degree of confidence as my advice to [professional golfer] Ryan Fox about how to play golf.' Iwi are also opposed. Edward Ashby from Te Kawerau ā Maki, one of three iwi with direct links to the area, said they have 'always been open to any option', but this one doesn't measure up. 'We don't agree in principle that taking a water source from one catchment (draining to Hauraki Gulf via Milford), and artificially redirecting it via pipes to another catchment (direct to Waitemata) is tikanga,' he said. He explained that Wairau means 'abundance of water' and the water from that catchment has been directed into the Hauraki Gulf by volcanic rock 'for a very long time'. 'Tikanga means we tend to go with the flow,' he said. He added that the expert advice rejecting the engineering proposals of the Shoal Bay Solution was also important. Brian Blake from the Eventfinda Stadium said the council had 'made the best, and very tough, decision'. He pointed out that when it came to considering 'community' interest, they had 448,122 visitors in the year to June last year. That's considerably more than the tens of thousands who use the golf course each year. The floods during that 2023 storm caused $6 million in damages and loss to the stadium. 'If we flood again,' said Blake, 'it's very possible the insurers will walk away.' That would force the stadium to close. Flooding on Porana Rd in Wairau Valley, Auckland. Photo / Brett Phibbs Debbie Dunsford of the Milford Residents Association also welcomed the decision. 'We're pleased Wairau flood prevention work will proceed without delay,' she said. 'We think the council and its consultants have explained the various reasons why the golf club's Shoal Bay Solution is not viable. There will still be nine holes available.' Dunsford also welcomed the council's decision to review golf facilities across the city. Walker told the Herald there are only two public courses in Auckland. But a report by consultancy Martin Jenkins in 2018 listed 12, of which eight had low fees for casual players, the same or very similar to those at Takapuna. With the election looming, the council's decision might be 'final' but it won't be the last we hear of it. Simon Wilson is an award-winning senior writer covering politics, the climate crisis, transport, housing, urban design and social issues, with a focus on Auckland. He joined the Herald in 2018.

Kiwi mum and son, 6, freed from US immigration detention
Kiwi mum and son, 6, freed from US immigration detention

1News

timea day ago

  • 1News

Kiwi mum and son, 6, freed from US immigration detention

A young Kiwi mum and her six-year-old son, who were detained at the US-Canada border and held for weeks, have been released from ICE custody. A friend of Sarah Shaw told 1News she had landed in Washington state and was now home safely. They said she intended to speak about her experiences at a later date. Shaw and her son, Isaac, who flew home from a Texas facility, were detained three weeks ago after dropping her other children off in Vancouver to catch a flight. On July 24, the mother had taken her two older children to the Canadian city so they could catch a direct flight back to New Zealand to visit family. It was previously reported that she then planned to travel back to her home in Washington with her younger son. Both were then stopped at the border by immigration agents, who said there was a problem with her documents. The pair were immediately detained. ADVERTISEMENT Shaw's lawyer, Minda Thorward, told local media at the time that she had a temporary immigration document that allowed her to travel and re-enter the US, but there had been an "administrative error" with it. Sarah Shaw and her six-year-old son have been detained by US immigration officials after she tried to return to America from a trip to Canada. (Source: 1News) Shaw and her son were then transferred to a facility in South Texas – one of only two that can house families together. She and her son shared a room with four other families, and were among the only detainees who spoke English. Her detainment came as immigration officials in the US ramped up their efforts under President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. This has led to people being detained who typically were not detained under previous administrations. 'Terrifying' experience with US immigration authorities A friend previously told 1News Shaw was "absolutely terrified" when she and her son were bundled into a giant white van with no markings on it at the Canadian border. "I remember her on the phone being absolutely panicked. She originally thought she was being kidnapped, she didn't even realise she was being detained originally." ADVERTISEMENT The conditions she was being held in were "very similar to a prison," they said. "She is in a locked room with five bunk beds, she's allowed to walk around the facility from 8am to 8pm, but outside of that, she is locked in a cell with other families." A graduate student working towards her master's degree and working for the state in corrections, Shaw had lived in the US for the past three years. Shaw was working at a juvenile care facility run by Washington state.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store