logo
In milestone, L.A. approves first permits for rebuilding homes after Palisades fire

In milestone, L.A. approves first permits for rebuilding homes after Palisades fire

The city of Los Angeles has cleared the way for three Pacific Palisades homeowners to begin rebuilding on their properties.
The approval of the projects, one to repair a damaged home and two for full rebuilds, according to the Department of Building and Safety, represents a key milestone in the recovery from January's devastating wildfires. The first permit was issued March 5, less than two months after the Palisades Fire destroyed or majorly damaged more than 6,000 homes in Pacific Palisades and surrounding areas.
'We want this to be happening on your lot, too,' said Mayor Karen Bass at a news conference in the Palisades Friday.
Bass and L.A. County leaders have pledged to streamline permitting procedures for property owners who want to rebuild. The Eaton Fire, which ignited the same day, displaced an additional 6,900 households from Altadena and nearby communities. The city and county have opened one-stop permitting centers for fire victims and waived discretionary hearings and other zoning reviews for those who want to build new homes that are roughly the same size as they were before.
The first permit approved was for repairs to a fire-damaged primary bedroom, bathroom and garage of a split-level home near Rustic Canyon, according to city records and Paul Lobana, the structural engineer for the project. The homeowner submitted plans to city inspectors on Feb. 17.
'The process worked excellently,' said Lobana, who has been working on homes in Los Angeles for 40 years. 'The city was very courteous.'
Construction has already begun on the repairs, Lobana said.
Gary Lionelli, his wife and teenage daughter were living in a newly built home near the Palisades' main commercial strip for less than a year before the fire destroyed it. The longtime property owners decided to submit the exact blueprints as before.
'We're not going to do anything that would delay us,' said Lionelli, a film composer.
With the city approval in hand, Lionelli said he hoped to commence construction once debris clearing was finished on his property. He wanted to beat an expected rush of rebuilds and competition for labor and materials.
'My contractor said you guys should just go while the gettin's good because we don't know what's going to happen six months from now with everyone getting their plans approved,' Lionelli said.
Lionelli said that the previous teardown and rebuild of his home took more than three years and faced numerous delays. He said he was pleased the new permit came quickly but otherwise isn't enthusiastic about going through the process another time.
'To wrap my head around building this house again after we just did it, is not something I want to do,' Lionelli said. 'The first time I was very hands on. This time it's going to be, 'Wake me up when it's over.''
The Times was unable to reach the owner or representatives of the third property to receive a permit, a full rebuild of a home on bluffs overlooking Pacific Coast Highway.
As of last week, 72 property owners had submitted rebuilding applications to the city. Another 98 property owners submitted blueprints to the L.A. County Department of Public Works for rebuilding in unincorporated areas — 76 in the Eaton Fire zone and 22 in the Palisades Fire area. The county is not approving plans until all debris clearing is complete on the property, said Celeste Hampton, a department spokesperson.
State and local officials are still determining rebuilding rules, including if there will be any changes to building codes to incentivize or require more fire-resistant materials that might affect future permit approvals.
This week, Bass updated an existing executive order clarifying that new accessory dwelling units would qualify for streamlined permitting and issued another order with plans to further expedite reviews for homeowners who choose to rebuild with all-electric systems and appliances.
'Wildfires aren't going away,' said Bass. 'And climate-fueled disasters aren't going away, either.'
Kurt Krueger, the architect handling Lionelli's rebuilding project, said he's advising his clients not to wait before submitting applications to local authorities so they can get approved more quickly. He said that city reviewers have been reasonable in their requests to fire victims, but the lack of clarity on the regulations does present a risk.
'It makes it hard for homeowners because they want to get going but don't want to make the wrong decision,' Krueger said.
Bass said at Friday's news conference that there are more than 1,000 property owners who have not opted in or out of the federal government's free debris removal service. Owners could face liens if they don't clear their properties, Bass said.
Residents have ten days to fill out the right of entry form on L.A. County's website.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince Harry sparks outrage after lavish trip details go public: 'Hypocrisy'
Prince Harry sparks outrage after lavish trip details go public: 'Hypocrisy'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Prince Harry sparks outrage after lavish trip details go public: 'Hypocrisy'

Critics are lashing out at Prince Harry for his "hypocrisy" in traveling across the world, emitting tons of carbon in the process, all to promote sustainable travel. In late May, Harry made a surprise trip to Shanghai to speak at the Envision 2025 Global Partner Conference. The Royal Observer reported that he urged the travel industry to embrace eco-friendly travel and to reach previously set goals of halving carbon pollution by 2030. "Now is the moment for the industry to reaffirm its commitment to being a force for good," he said. "The true measure of our commitment is how we respond when the path becomes difficult." Harry spoke in his role as founder of Travalyst, a company that promotes sustainable travel by, among other things, helping to develop a tool that shows the carbon pollution of flights when people book travel online. Some have speculated that Harry took a private jet from Los Angeles to Shanghai for the conference, although many news sources couldn't confirm that. But The Times reported that, even if he flew first class on a commercial flight, Harry likely created the equivalent of 7 tons of carbon pollution. If he took a private jet — one of the most environmentally damaging methods of travel — the pollution likely was 10 to 100 times higher. But no matter what plane he took, many critics were aghast that he would cause so much pollution and travel more than 12,000 miles round-trip for a brief appearance to promote sustainability. "The irony of flying across the world to promote sustainable, environmentally friendly travel is hard to ignore," said royal correspondent Jennie Bond, per Sky News Australia. "Surely a video speech would have been more ethical?" Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, have been outspoken climate activists and have pledged that their Archewell Foundation will reach net zero by 2030. Markle has also become known for her sustainable fashion choices. However, this isn't the first time Harry has come under fire for his travel habits. When Travalyst launched in 2019, he defended his use of private jets, saying, per Time: "I spend 99% of my life traveling the world by commercial; occasionally there needs to be an opportunity based on a unique circumstance to ensure that my family are safe." Which of these factors would most effectively motivate you to buy a heat pump? Lower energy bills Better temperature control Helping the planet I'd never buy a heat pump Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. But that justification doesn't hold up for everyone. "In Harry's case, 'for thee, not for me,'" one commenter on X wrote. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Liverpool Reportedly Submit New £113M Bid for Bayer's Florian Wirtz
Liverpool Reportedly Submit New £113M Bid for Bayer's Florian Wirtz

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Liverpool Reportedly Submit New £113M Bid for Bayer's Florian Wirtz

Liverpool continue to work towards completing what is likely to go down as the biggest blockbuster transfer deal of the 2025 summer window, a deal almost certain to set a new record for a purchase by an English club. Any deal of that size, though, takes time. As such we find ourselves nearing the end of a second week of knowing Liverpool are pushing to sign Bayer Leverkusen and Germany 22-year-old attacker Florian Wirtz, waiting on news. Advertisement Significant news may have arrived, with The Times' Paul Joyce reporting that a new and improved bid—believed to be the third formally submitted—totalling £113M (€134M) with add-ons has been lodged today by the Reds. The offer would see a very significant £100M (€119M) paid as the guaranteed portion, with Wirtz having already agreed in principle to a five-year deal that will be signed when the two clubs reach a full agreement regarding the fee. While nothing is certain in transfers until everything is signed, the club allowing information of a third bid to be shared via one of the most reliable club-connected sources does suggest that full agreement may be close. Despite all that, it's worth noting the numbers remain short of the £126M (€150M) valuation Leverkusen have been widely reported as having placed on the player and it's not clear how willing they are to bargain on that point. Advertisement Until news of Liverpool's serious interest in Wirtz first broke two weeks ago, the assumption going back two years had been the player would end up at Bayern Munich—or if not there, perhaps Manchester City or Real Madrid. Assuming Liverpool get the deal across the line as everyone expects, Wirtz' signing will go down not just as a likely British record and Liverpool's club record but as an unexpected transfer coup and major statement of intent. More from

Michael Johnson cancels Grand Slam Track's LA meet amid financial concerns
Michael Johnson cancels Grand Slam Track's LA meet amid financial concerns

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Michael Johnson cancels Grand Slam Track's LA meet amid financial concerns

Michael Johnson will cancel the fourth and final meet of the inaugural Grand Slam Track season amid financial concerns. Athletes and their representatives will be updated in a Zoom call on Thursday amid silence in the build-up to the LA leg scheduled for 28-29 June, after competing 'challenger' athletes were not announced ahead of time as they were before the previous three meets. Some of the action has played out in front of half-empty stadiums, and The Independent understands that the economics of the LA event had become unviable. The LA leg will not be replaced with another host city, but organisers remain confident that Grand Slam Track will continue in 2026. Ahead of the opening event in Kingston, Jamaica, Johnson's co-founder Steve Gera told The Independent that they were 'maniacally focused on having the youngest fanbase of any sports league in the world in the next five years'. The competition was billed as a much-needed shot in the arm for the sport of athletics, although the decision to include only track events and omit field disciplines was met with criticism. 'I am going to save what I think I can save,' Johnson explained. 'I think I can save track, I don't think I can save track and field.' But ticket sales have been slow and sponsorship and broadcast revenues have not met ambitions expectations. The Times reports that organisers will save around £2.2m in prize money and travel expenses by cancelling the Los Angeles event. more to follow...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store