New Texas Laws Boost Homestead Exemptions For Homeowners
The Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 4, Senate Bill 23, House Bill 9, Senate Joint Resolution 2, Senate Joint Resolution 85, and House Joint Resolution 1, which, if approved by voters in November, will increase homestead exemptions and business property tax exemptions.
'Never before has the Texas Legislature allocated more funds to provide property tax relief than they did this session,' Abbott said in a press release. 'I will sign these bills into law to deliver lasting relief for Texans and their families, and I urge Texans to approve the new increases in the homestead and business property tax exemptions this November.'
Senate Bill 4 raises the homestead exemption to $140,000 for all homeowners, while Senate Bill 23 increases it to $200,000 for seniors and disabled individuals. House Bill 9 enhances tax exemptions for business inventory, a move small businesses have pushed to eliminate.
The joint resolutions propose constitutional amendments to make these exemptions permanent, pending voter approval.
'When I became Lieutenant Governor in 2015, the homestead exemption was a tiny $15,000,' Patrick said in the press release. 'Since then, we have increased it to $100,000, and with the passage of Senate Bill 4 and Senate Bill 23, it is now $200,000 for seniors and $140,000 for non-seniors. The average senior homeowner will no longer pay any school property taxes for the rest of their life as long as they live in their home.'
Speaker Burrows added, 'With the Legislature's overwhelming passage of additional property tax relief, Texas home and business owners are on their way to keeping more of their hard-earned money.'
Abbott declared property tax relief an emergency item in his 2025 State of the State Address, following a 2023 session in which Patrick called that year's relief package 'the largest property tax relief package in Texas history, and likely the world.'
Despite these claims, property taxes rose by $5.4 billion in 2024, a 6.6% increase from 2023, according to state comptroller data cited by economist Bill Peacock, per Center Square. Counties raised taxes by 10.4%, school districts by 6.4%, special districts by 6.1%, and cities by 3.9%.
Critics, including economist Vance Ginn, argue that the Legislature's approach of temporarily compressing rates and increasing exemptions merely shifts the tax burden without reducing it.
'Texans want to own their homes – not rent them from the government forever,' Ginn said, according to Center Square. 'They want a government that lives within its means, just like they do. And they want honesty – not headlines – from their elected officials.'
Ginn advocates capping state and local spending growth to population growth plus inflation, requiring a two-thirds vote for increases, and using the state's surplus to eliminate school district maintenance and operations taxes.
Fiscal conservatives have criticized the current budget as 'a bloated, big-government plan masquerading as conservative reform,' warning, as Ginn did, 'If we continue down this path, Texas won't just resemble California – we'll become it.'
Taxpayers on social media have echoed these concerns, arguing the Legislature's spending habits undermine relief efforts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
California Republicans sue to pause Newsom's redistricting effort
California Republicans asked the state Supreme Court to pause Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) redistricting legislation to give the public time to review the proposal. Why it matters: The Monday lawsuit escalates the nationwide partisan redistricting battle, kicked off by President Trump pushing for redistricting in Texas. Newsom's office did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. Driving the news: The lawsuit argues that the legislation's timeline undermines the state constitution's 30-day rule for public review. "Instead of a months-long transparent and participatory process overseen by an independent citizens redistricting commission for such a sensitive matter, the public would be presented with an up or down vote on maps unilaterally prepared in secret by the Legislature," the lawsuit said. The legislators are represented by Dhillon Law Group, a conservative law firm. State of play: Democratic lawmakers planned to pass a package of bills in the "Election Rigging Response Act" on Thursday, ahead of a Nov. 4 special election. The lawsuit argues that the legislature can't act on the bills until Sept. 18.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrats poised to end standoff: 5 things to know
Texas House Democrats who fled the state to stall a Republican redistricting plan have signaled they're ready to return to the Lone Star State in the coming days. The Texas state legislature wrapped up its first special session on Friday, one of the conditions the Democrats gave for ending their quorum break. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) quickly called a second special session, with Democrats' anticipated return set to clear the way for the Texas House to move forward with an aggressive gerrymander that could net five more House seats for the GOP in the midterms. But the quorum-breaking Texas Democrats are touting the national attention they've brought to the redistricting fight and looking for hope from California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has vowed to move forward with his own new map. Here's what to know as Democrats plan to end the standoff: Why now? It was always highly unlikely that Texas Democrats would be able to permanently thwart the GOP's redistricting effort. But by fleeing the state, they hoped to raise national attention over the issue and inspire Democrat-led states to move forward with their own new maps. In both cases, they succeeded. The Texas Democrats' decision to leave made the redistricting battle a national story. And now California is moving forward with its own effort to rewrite its congressional lines in the hopes of counteracting the Texas GOP. Other blue states may soon follow. The Texas Democrats also wanted to hold out until the first special session came to an end, which it did on Friday. They cited both that and California's decision to move forward with redistricting as its preconditions for coming home. The developments allow Democrats to frame the outcome as a victory, even if Republicans will also tout their return as a win. There were also other financial and political risks for the Democrats. They've been forced to parry Republican criticism that they're holding up other legislative business — including disaster relief for Texas affected by recent floods — by staying out-of-state. And each quorum breaker has been racking up $500-a-day fines for their absence, on top of threats of removal and arrest, as well as the logistical cost of living away from their homes. What does it mean for the new Texas maps? The new GOP-friendly maps are almost certain to pass once the Democrats return to the state. Even as they remained out of state, a set of new congressional lines passed in the state Senate, while an identical set of lines were also approved by a state House committee. House Republicans couldn't bring the new map to a floor vote in the lower chamber, however, until the Democrats returned. With the Democrats expected to return to the state, Republicans will have the quorum needed to hold a vote on and pass their map. The map would go next to Abbott for his signature before the new congressional lines are enacted. Texas Democrats knew they would inevitably return to the state since Abbott had threatened to call special session after special session until they returned. Democrats had no options available for blocking the new map from passing, since Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of the state legislature and the GOP also has a Republican governor. How are both sides spinning it? Republicans are touting their return as a win, since it means they will be able to move forward with passing new congressional lines. But Democrats are celebrating the outcome as a political victory too. 'Abbott thought he could silence Black and Latino Texans with his redistricting scheme. He was wrong. We fought back — now other states, starting with California, will neutralize their power grab,' the Texas House Democrats said in a statement posted on X. National Democrats also hailed it as a win that Republicans were unable to pass their new House map during the first special session. 'Under threats to their safety and livelihood, Texas Democrats have continued to deny Republicans a quorum to enact their rigged maps and ignited a national Democratic movement,' Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. 'From California to Washington, D.C, Democrats will continue to stand with the American people and the people of Texas as we battle against Trump and Republicans' anti-democratic attacks,' he added. But the White House is also pushing other states like Indiana and Missouri to redraw their maps as well – raising questions over how many states will ultimately get involved in the fight and have the upper hand. What does it mean for the wider redistricting battle? The redistricting battle in Texas has turned into a nationwide war, and that's unlikely to change anytime soon. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) wants to hold a special election in November to ask voters to weigh in on a ballot measure allowing the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps for the rest of the decade. 'I hope we are waking up to this reality. Wake up, America. Wake up to what Donald Trump is doing,' Newsom said at a Thursday event on the effort. 'Wake up to his assault, wake up to the assault on institutions and knowledge and history. Wake up to his war on science, public health and his war on the American people.' California Democrats released their proposed new map, which targets five Republican incumbents, on Friday night. Other states are also considering jumping into the fray. Ohio is already set to redistrict due to state requirements, and Republicans in Florida and Missouri have suggested they'll be revisiting their maps, too. Other blue states like New York and Illinois are also weighing redistricting now. Is it really the end of the fight in Texas? The next front in the Texas redistricting battle is likely to play out in the courts. As the Democrats' statement noted on Thursday, their legal counsel has advised them to 'return to Texas to build a strong public legislative record for the upcoming legal battle against a map that violates both the current Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.' 'We will return to the House floor and to the courthouse with a clear message: the fight to protect voting rights has only just begun,' it added. Democratic groups are likely to file a lawsuit once Texas passes its new map. If that battle plays out in state courts, it will almost certainly fail since the Texas Supreme Court has a conservative majority. If it were to somehow play out in federal court, it's not as clear-cut, given the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled favorably for Democrats in the past over the Voting Rights Act. At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court still enjoys a conservative majority. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's redistricting push meets local GOP resistance in Indiana
Indiana Republicans are casting doubt on whether they will move forward with a plan to redraw its congressional district lines despite pressure from the White House. Several GOP state lawmakers have come out against the effort, expressing concern about the precedent it could set for the future and possible backlash against the party. With Republican supermajorities dominating both chambers of the state Legislature, stopping the effort would require a significant number of Republicans to oppose it and ignore the Trump administration's call for it. But Indiana is already appearing to be a rare exception to most other GOP-led states much more enthusiastic about redistricting. 'I have tremendous respect for President Trump and love what he's doing,' said state Sen. Jim Lucas (R), who is one of a few on record against redistricting. 'But for Hoosiers, Indiana Republicans, to abandon their principles and basically take away the rules, that sets such a dangerous precedent moving forward and for our children.' 'What kind of political structure are we leaving for our children in the future if we all of a sudden, just because we can, decide to redistrict midcycle?' he said. Republicans appear to hold the advantage nationally in the redistricting battle. Though California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is moving forward with his own effort to rewrite his state's lines, the GOP, for multiple structural and practical reasons, has more realistic opportunities to add seats ahead of 2026. Texas Republicans seem likely to approve a new map shortly, while GOP leaders in Florida, Ohio and Missouri have shown a clear interest in trying to add seats to pad the party's House majority in 2026. But Indiana has been a question mark, with several Republicans preemptively releasing statements against updating the state's map. Republicans currently occupy seven of the state's nine seats in the U.S. House. Redrawn lines would likely have the biggest impact on Democratic Rep. Frank Mrvan, who represents the 1st Congressional District in the northwest and has already been named a national GOP target for 2026. 'It is no surprise that some believe redistricting is the only option to cling to power when they know the American people are rejecting the damage done by the House Republican Majority,' Mrvan said in a statement amid the speculation. But the political will may not be as strong in the Hoosier State as it appears to be in others. Along with Lucas, several other Republicans in the state Legislature said they don't support the redistricting effort, including state Reps. Danny Lopez and Craig Haggard, and state Sens. Jim Tomes and Spencer Deery. Lucas expressed concern that the move would damage the party's credibility, and he said he's received a lot of positive feedback from constituents in favor of standing on principle. 'There are some outliers … that think, 'Hey, we need to take the gloves off and do what the Democrats would be doing to us,' but I want to think we're better than that,' he said. 'I have faith in our policy and our principles and our ideology.' The positions of state legislators could be influential in whether Gov. Mike Braun (R) calls a special session to address redistricting. He has said he is 'considering it seriously' but would look to the results of Texas's efforts and the feelings of Indiana state lawmakers. With Republicans controlling 70 out of 100 seats in the state House and 40 out of 50 seats in the state Senate, many more Republicans would need to be opposed to redrawing the map to have enough votes, along with all Democrats, to block any change. But more Republican opposition might come out, said Republican strategist Pete Seat, a former communications director for the state GOP. 'We take great pride in how we draw our maps, and there's a lot of thought and effort that goes into it, into maintaining communities of interest and drawing districts that are compact,' Seat said. 'There are some states that come at it — despite what they might say — from a political perspective and trying to draw lines that achieve a political endgame, whereas we try to draw what makes sense and what keeps people with similar interests together.' 'What I've been hearing from the moment this conversation started is a lack of desire to go forward with re-redistricting, as I like to call it, for that reason, and for the reason that it's a lot of political capital to spend on one additional seat,' he added. Democrats said they appreciated the Republicans who have come out against redistricting and hope they can rally support to prevent any mid-decade change from occurring. State Senate Minority Leader Shelli Yoder (D) said the pushback has been bipartisan and represents Indiana's nature as being independent-minded. 'We are independent thinkers, and we can see this cheating behavior a mile away. So whether you are [a Republican, Democrat or independent] or go back and forth because you vote for the person, Hoosiers see this as a cheating agenda, as a cheating move,' Yoder said, adding that these Republicans recognize 'this isn't how we do things in Indiana, and we're going to do by right by the voters.' But even if the political will in Indiana is lacking, the push on the national level for the state to go forward is much stronger, with pressure appearing likely to build from the White House. Vice President Vance visited Indiana earlier this month for a private meeting with Braun and state legislative leaders as chatter built about redistricting possibilities. A source familiar with conversations between the White House and state leadership said they expect the state will ultimately go forward with redistricting with the urging from the president. They said the pressure from the administration will 'intensify' as time goes on, and they don't expect Braun, a Trump ally, to ignore it. 'There's certainly confidence that once the president really makes the case and leans into it, that you could convince and/or flip lawmakers to be supportive of the effort,' they said. The Hill has reached out to the White House and Braun's office for comment about the opposition to redistricting among the handful of Republicans. One key moment may be a meeting set to take place next Tuesday in which the White House invited all Republican Indiana state legislators to visit. The meeting was scheduled weeks prior, before Vance's visit, to discuss various issues, but Republicans said they could imagine the redistricting issue coming up. In another sign of the pressure mounting on GOP holdouts, Indiana's entire Republican delegation in the U.S. House released statements Monday declaring their support for the redistricting effort, saying it's necessary to overcome gerrymandering in Democratic-led states, while Sen. Todd Young (R) has previously raised some doubts about the idea. Meanwhile, some voters have received robocalls urging them to back redistricting to support Trump. Seat said he believes the calls are having the opposite effect, strengthening opposition to redistricting. But the source familiar with the White House's conversations said they don't see this letting up. 'In the conversations I've had with the White House, I don't see this slowing down at any point,' they said. If legislators and the governor say the political will isn't present to do this, 'I don't think the White House is going to consider that to be an acceptable answer,' they said. Julia Mueller contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
