Hollywood Power Agent's Home Smeared With ‘Bloody' Handprints in Student Protests
The home of United Talent Agency Vice Chairman Jay Sures was vandalized Wednesday by protesters who left red handprints on his garage door among other wreckage.
Sures is an influential figure with an impressive client list. He is vice chairman and one of the four managing directors of the firm, which is known as one of the entertainment industry's premier agencies with some of the world's biggest names in film, comedy, music and sports.
According to his biography, he is also a University of California Regent 'where he chairs the audit and compliance committee.' He also serves on the Los Angeles Police Department Foundation Board as well as other various chairman roles for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory Board of Governors/Directors.
A Los Angeles Police Department report cited by Deadline indicates that officers were called to Sures' Brentwood home at 6:15 a.m. PT in response to a 'large group blocking the street and driveway.' A law enforcement official additionally told Deadline that there were around 50 masked protesters 'banging on drums, making loud noises, and causing disturbance.'
Alongside 'bloody' red handprints on his garage door–an apparent reference to the saying, 'blood on your hands'–protesters also placed caution tape throughout Sures' front yard and a sign that read 'divest now or you will pay.'
Sures told the Daily Beast Wednesday night that the 'whole situation is unfortunate' and that 'threatening my family is so disappointing.' He added that the protesters' behavior was 'inexcusable' and 'scared the living s***' out of his wife.
The protest was organized by the Graduate Students for Justice in Palestine group at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), according to the university's student newspaper The Daily Bruin.
In an Instagram post Wednesday, the group alleged that Sures 'has attempted to intimidate students and faculty who spoke out against the genocide in Gaza' and they refused to 'stay silent.'
Six months ago, University of California (UC) regents voted to ban political statements from university homepages which, per Deadline, Sures largely supported and drove forward. The move sparked criticism, however, for allegedly stifling pro-Palestinian expression and views.
Sures, who was appointed by Governors Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom to serve on the UC Board of Regents from 2019, is an outspoken supporter of Israel. In 2023, he described a letter from the UC Ethnic Studies Faculty Council reprimanding a UC statement on the Oct. 7 Hamas attack as 'appalling and repugnant' and 'rife with falsehoods.' UTA also represents the Anti-Defamation League, an antisemitism organization that is a staunch advocate of Israel.
Sures earlier told Deadline he believes they are the reasons why he was targeted Wednesday. 'I'm Jewish. There are 18 Regents, and I've been outspoken; you can Google me about what I've written, what I've done in the world of the University of California. I've been pretty outspoken about the cause, about protecting our Jewish students, and they don't like it,' Sures said.
'It's one thing to peacefully protest, but to go to an administrator or a Regent's house to violate the hundred foot rule, which is what it is in Los Angeles, to disturb the entire neighborhood by pounding on drums, to surround my wife's car and prevent her from free movement, and to put up signs, threatening my family and my life and vandalize the house, that is a big escalation,' he continued.
An LAPD source told Deadline that no arrests were made Wednesday, however if police are able to identify masked protesters, Sures told the outlet he will press changes.
A few weeks ago, the 15 months of conflict between Palestine and Israel that killed at least 46,000 Palestinians and displaced over a million, and killed over 1,000 Israelis, according to the Associated Press, ended with a ceasefire deal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
27 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk defends his centrist government ahead of a vote of confidence
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Prime Minister Donald Tusk defended his centrist, pro-European government before parliament on Wednesday, seeking to reassert control and rally his fractured coalition after suffering a bitter political defeat. Tusk requested a vote of confidence in the wake of the June 1 loss of Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski — his close ally — to nationalist historian Karol Nawrocki. Backed by U.S. President Donald Trump, Nawrocki is set to replace outgoing President Andrzej Duda, another conservative who repeatedly blocked Tusk's reform efforts. 'I am asking for a vote of confidence with full conviction that we have a mandate to govern, to take full responsibility for what is happening in Poland,' Tusk said. Most of the power in Poland's parliamentary system rests with an elected parliament and a government chosen by the parliament. However, the president can veto legislation and represents the country abroad. 'Anyone who is ready to move forward with me, with the government, and above all with our voters, regardless of these momentary emotions, and build a better Poland, should vote today for a vote of confidence in our government,' Tusk said. The vote, scheduled for Wednesday afternoon, is widely expected to go in Tusk's favor. His four-party coalition holds a narrow but stable majority in the 460-seat Sejm, Poland's lower house. A loss would trigger the formation of a caretaker government and may open the door for an early parliamentary election. That could potentially returning power to the conservative Law and Justice party, in coalition with the far-right Confederation party, whose candidate placed third in the presidential race. Tusk had long counted on a Trzaskowski victory to break the institutional deadlock created by Duda's vetoes. Instead, he now faces an incoming president aligned with the nationalist opposition and openly hostile to his government's legislative priorities. 'We cannot close our eyes to reality,' he said. 'A president who was reluctant to accept the changes we proposed for Poland and our voters is being replaced by a president who is at least equally reluctant to those changes and proposals.' But he also argued that Trzaskowski's narrow defeat indicates that there is continued strong support for those who share his views. The election result has rattled the already uneasy governing coalition, which spans from center-left to center-right and has struggled to deliver on key campaign pledges, including liberalizing Poland's abortion law and legalizing same-sex civil unions. Tusk acknowledged the growing strains in Wednesday's address. Many are also blaming Tusk for contributing to Trzaskowski's loss. Much of the criticism has come from within his coalition, as his partners examine whether they are better off sticking with him or risking a collapse of the coalition. Some are calling for a new prime minister to be selected. There are questions about what Tusk can realistically achieve before the next parliamentary election, scheduled for late 2027, and whether the coalition will even survive that long amid a surge in popularity for the far right. Polish media and political analysts are debating whether this might be the 68-year-old Tusk's political twilight. 'I know the bitterness of defeat, but I do not know such a word as 'capitulation,' Tusk told lawmakers. As part of his fresh start, he announced plans for a government reconstruction in July that will include 'new faces.' He said a government spokesman would be appointed in June — an acknowledgement that the coalition needs a way to present a unified message. So far Tusk has sought to communicate his policies to the public himself on social media and in news conferences. Tusk served as Polish prime minister from 2007 to 2014 and then as president of the European Council from 2014 to 2019. He became Poland's prime minister again in December 2023 in a country exhausted by the pandemic and inflation, and with political divisions deep and bitter. In a sign of those divisions, half of the parliament hall was empty on Wednesday, with lawmakers from the right-wing Law and Justice party boycotting his speech. Tusk said their absence showed disrespect to the nation. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
37 minutes ago
As Trump escalates immigration fight, Democrats face high-stakes test: ANALYSIS
The standoff between Democratic leadership in deep-blue California and the Trump administration amid protests of immigration raids in Los Angeles lays bare bitter political divisions and sets the stage for the high-stakes fight at the ballot box as the midterm elections inch closer, with the 2028 presidential contest to follow not long after that. From the Oval Office, President Donald Trump promised that more cities could see raids from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. With that, the possibility of a sustained protest movement grows, along with the possibility of more federal intervention -- whether Democratic officials want it or not. The way Democrats proceed in this moment could affect enthusiasm for the party's candidates come midterms time, when the party is trying to reclaim power in a Washington where it has very little. For Democrats, anti-Trump sentiment is undoubtedly a mobilizing factor, and polling has suggested Democrats want their leaders to fight harder against the Republican Party. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, widely considered to be a possible 2028 presidential candidate, has positioned himself as the most prominent foil to an administration he's accused of encroaching on his state's autonomy by deploying federal troops to Los Angeles without an ask from California authorities. Newsom was also emboldened in his criticism of Trump after the president told reporters Monday it would be a "great thing" if Newsom were arrested. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor," Newsom posted on Instagram, along with a video of Trump's comments. "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation -- this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Still, later Monday, Newsom condemned the violence in his state while appearing to place blame on the president, saying, "Have no doubt -- Violent criminals who take advantage of Trump's chaos WILL be held accountable. Our number one priority has been and will be keeping LA safe." Democratic governors stood by Newsom in a carefully worded statement that both condemned the violence that took place in Los Angeles and called Trump's actions "ineffective and dangerous." "It's important we respect the executive authority of our country's governors to manage their National Guards -- and we stand with Governor Newsom who has made it clear that violence is unacceptable and that local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation," they said in the statement. Similarly, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass urged peaceful protest and condemned Trump's actions, telling reporters on Sunday, "What we're seeing in Los Angeles is chaos that is provoked by the administration." The optics of violence in the streets of a major American city -- though the most destructive protests have been in a relatively small, isolated area -- with Democrats pushing back on militarized force on protesters is a fight the Trump White House, and Republicans more broadly, are willing to wage. "I think it's another reason why you're seeing the demise of the Democrat brand around the country," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said Tuesday. "You got a city on fire," he added. "You got people marching with foreign flags, people marching with a Mexican flag in LA, resisting federal law, interfering with federal law. You have the governor and the mayor, both Democrats, saying they will interfere and will not uphold federal law." And while many elected Democrats will take a head-on Newsom-esque approach to confronting moves by the Trump administration, others will likely try to find less combative ways to do so. In San Francisco, which saw protests of its own related to ICE raids, Mayor Daniel Lurie centered public safety in his message about protests and has avoided mentioning Trump by name. "Everyone in this country has a right to make their voice heard peacefully," Lurie said Sunday. "But we will never tolerate violent and destructive behavior." Lurie has drawn some criticism from some corners of San Francisco for his relative silence on Trump, but others argue it allows him to stay above the fray. It remains to be seen which strategy -- Newsom's defiance or Lurie's restraint -- will resonate with voters.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Head of Germany's Greens urges country to sanction Israeli minister
The head of Germany's Green Party has called for Berlin to join other countries in sanctioning Israeli far-right ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir over accusations of inciting violence against Palestinians. Franziska Brantner, who co-leads Germany's second-largest opposition party, accused the two ministers of "openly calling for violence against the Palestinian population and long having propagated a policy of annexation and displacement." "This costs human lives, displaces entire communities and poses enormous hurdles on the path to a peace process," Brantner told dpa. Her comments came after the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway on Tuesday announced they have sanctioned Ben-Givr, the security minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, and Smotrich, the finance minister. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich actively support the expansion of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank and condone violence by militant settlers against the Palestinian population. Smotrich recently threatened the "total destruction" of the Gaza Strip, while Ben-Gvir has spoken out strongly against resuming humanitarian aid deliveries to the embattled Palestinian territory. In a joint statement, the foreign ministers of the five countries accused Smotrich and Ben-Gvir of inciting "extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights." The British government said that the UK sanctions involve a travel ban as well as the freezing of assets. Norway also imposed a travel ban. Brantner said if the German government was serious about its proclaimed responsibility for the security of the State of Israel - a policy known in Germany as "reason of state" - as well as for international law, Berlin needed to act in lockstep with its European partners. "This is the only way a two-state solution can ever have a chance – as a way to ensure a life in security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians."
