‘Silent man' convicted 12 times for standing in middle of road
David Hampson, 54, has refused to explain why he has blocked traffic on Grove Place Road outside Swansea Central Police station since 2014.
Hampson has been convicted of the same offence 12 times and has been repeatedly jailed.
He refuses to explain himself to police, judges, or psychiatrists and will not speak to confirm his name in court.
Swansea Magistrates' Court heard he was jailed for six months in April of this year but was freed from prison early.
Just 28 days after his sentence Hampson carried out the same crime at the same location and was arrested on June 19.
Hampson again refused to speak to anyone and was jailed again for six months.
A court previously placed him under a criminal behaviour order banning him from blocking the highway without lawful authority, but he carried on.
At his previous hearing for his April crimes Hampson refused to speak in Swansea magistrates court when accused of two counts of wilfully obstructing the highway.
He refused legal advice or a solicitor and did not plea in his continuing campaign of silence.
Sam Jenkins, prosecuting, said firearms officers spoke to the defendant when he was seen on April 8.
He said: 'The officers escorted the defendant off the road and warned him that if he repeated the behaviour he would be arrested.'
Just minutes later he was seen again and was arrested before being bailed.
Hampson returned the next day to do the same thing and was arrested to be kept in custody.
District judge Christopher James said Hampson had returned to the road after the first warning by firearms officers so his behaviour was 'clearly wilful'.
Hampson, of no fixed abode, was found guilty of wilfully obstructing the highway contrary to section 137 of the Highways Act 1980.
The district judge asked Hampson if there was anything he wanted to say. But he stared at the floor of the dock and remained silent.
Hampson was sentenced to six months in prison for his 11th conviction.
'Spoilt brat'
After an earlier conviction his brother John reportedly said: 'He's not really mute. He never stops talking. It is quite simple really. He's a spoilt brat.
'There is nothing like a protest going on. He just does it to have a comfy life inside prison.'
John, from Swansea, added: 'There is nothing wrong with him. He acts dumb but I can tell you that he is not.'
He was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison in 2021 after a jury found he was 'mute of malice' not 'mute by visitation of God'.
His first conviction was in 2014 – then others in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021 and 2025 with 11. He speaks to prison officers but refuses with police, court and doctors.
A judge even ordered a psychiatric report be made into Hampson's behaviour, but he refused to speak to the doctors.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
Nigel Farage and Reform UK risk 'failing a generation of young women' if they scrap online safety laws aimed at preventing revenge porn, Angela Rayner has said. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet, after Reform vowed to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row
Angela Rayner has warned Nigel Farage and Reform UK that their plan to scrap online safety laws could "fail a generation of young women" by removing protections against issues such as revenge porn. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would ensure young women's online safety, given Reform's vow to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest in a series of interventions by senior Labour figures regarding the Act. Under rules introduced in late July, the legislation requires online platforms, including social media and search engines, to prevent children from accessing harmful content like pornography or material encouraging suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk
TECH Secretary Peter Kyle has reignited his war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk. He claims the Reform leader's vow to repeal online safety laws would 'rip up' protections against violent misogyny and revenge porn. 2 Mr Kyle sparked a row last month when he alleged Nigel was 'on the side' of paedos like Jimmy Savile. Furious Mr Farage branded the comments 'disgusting' and demanded an apology. But Labour has launched a fresh assault on Mr Farage as he soars in the polls. Both Deputy PM Angela Rayner and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips are attacking him over women's safety. Writing in today's Sun on Sunday, Mr Kyle says: 'When Nigel Farage boasts that he would scrap the Online Safety Act, he's admitting he's happy to leave the internet as a wild west and put women and girls at risk. 'He'd rip up protections that crack down on revenge porn, violent misogynistic content, and posts encouraging self-harm or suicide. 'He would tear down the defences we've built to hold back dangerous content and that would make the police's job much harder.' Zia Yusuf, head of the party's Department of Government Efficiency, said: 'This law is the biggest assault on freedom of expression in this country in our lifetimes. Since the Act came into force what has been censored? "Footage of a protest in Leeds, comments demanding the end of illegal migration, and even biographies of Richard the Lionheart have been removed from social media. Reform party leader Nigel Farage discusses immigration at Westminster press conference 'If this was really about protecting children from predators, why did this law result in the censorship of a speech in Parliament on the grooming gangs?' Mr Yusuf said Reform would pass a law 'fit for purpose'. It comes after Donald Trump's US administration attacked Britain for 'serious restrictions' on free speech. 2 Strangle porn 'rife for kids' By Sophia Sleigh MORE than half of kids have seen strangling in online porn, a shock poll will show this week. Some 58 per cent of 16 to 21-year-olds said they witnessed it when they were younger. Most had it served up to them on their feeds without looking for it. Stronger protections were introduced by Ofcom in July as part of the Online Safety Act. The Government aims to ban strangling porn through its Crime and Policing Bill. Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza, who ordered the research, said: 'Pornography is warping children's views of themselves, of each other and of their expectations of sex. 'They are seeing, often by accident, things which are illegal in real life.'
