
Why teaching digital etiquette is urgent amid rising WhatsApp harassment
But things took a grim turn when Athai did not respond to the advances of a classmate. He began mocking her, using a derogatory term for people from the northeast, and soon influenced others to join in. Within a day, the group was flooded with comments about her hairstyle, appearance, and more. Athai exited the group, and within two days, she dropped out of the college altogether.
'I chose to return and study in Nagaland, where I'm not seen as an outsider,' said Athai, recalling the incident, which occurred a year ago.
What stood out was how none of her classmates intervened. Two of them admitted to The Hindu that they knew the trolling was wrong, but didn't know how to react. That hesitation, that silence, speaks to a deeper gap: the absence of digital etiquette.
Digital etiquette in Indian colleges
Digital etiquette, in this context, is about knowing how to behave online—what's acceptable, what crosses the line, and when to speak up. Students step into college with complete control over their mobile phones, but little to no understanding of how to use them responsibly in shared digital spaces. Colleges in India often go all out during orientation week—celebrating institutional rankings, showcasing alumni success, and highlighting placement records. Yet, in all this grandeur, there's little effort to initiate students into the basics of digital etiquette.
Digital etiquette or 'netiquette,' is the code of respectful and appropriate behaviour within the digital learning environment. In the educational context, it includes good practices, from maintaining academic integrity by not plagiarizing content to exhibiting respect toward instructors and peers in online communications, as per Lincoln Learning Solutions, a non-profit education provider that partners with schools and educators to deliver digital curriculum.
In light of the University Grants Commission's recent directive asking colleges to monitor informal WhatsApp groups that harass juniors, the need to teach digital etiquette becomes even more urgent. 'When there is such an instruction, there will be some control—even if not complete control,' said Rajan Gurukkal, Vice-Chairman of the Kerala State Higher Education Council. 'In just a couple of years, we'll have 'screen-age' students entering colleges—young people who are already deeply accustomed to digital media. Unlike their previous generations who developed sensibility through reading and writing, screen-age students are adept with digital tools. That's precisely why it's important to teach digital etiquette early,' Mr. Rajan said.
While the need for monitoring informal WhatsApp groups risks pushing into sensitive territory of invading the right to privacy, it is a direct response to the UGC's acknowledgement of rising ragging complaints online. Dr. Saumya Sisodia, political science professor at GB University, Noida, said, 'We've never done a session or made a PowerPoint on digital etiquette but while teaching about digital governance, I teach them the art and science of using social media.' She added that the faculty members try to stay present in informal WhatsApp groups to keep an eye on conversations, but acknowledged the limitations of this approach.
'How can we monitor the informal whatsapp groups? It interferes with an individual's fundamental right and their right to privacy,' Prof. Sisodia said, stressing that the problem is more behavioral than structural and the mobile phone merely becomes a tool for such issues to surface because it offers ease and anonymity.
If colleges choose to monitor WhatsApp groups to curb ragging, they must do so without violating students' privacy. 'At a time when the latest version of Gemini says that it can access WhatsApp messages, it is not impossible to monitor whatsapp groups with Artificial Intelligence tools. But, college administration should present a clear case, inform students, seek permission from WhatsApp and then monitor the groups,' said Jayaprakash Gandhi, career consultant and education analyst.
Way forward
Digital etiquette should ideally begin in schools, so that by the time they enter college, students are ethically aware, say experts. In the online world, there is a possibility of creating anonymous accounts and it is easy to troll, cyberbully and rag. That's why teenagers and young adults become a little more uninhibited, said Dr. Geetanjali Jha, Digital Parenting expert and Cyberpsychology researcher, iMature EdTech, a platform in India dedicated to educating students, parents, schools and colleges on Digital Citizenship and Internet Maturity (DCIM).
Acknowledging that parental controls and blanket bans by teachers have little to no lasting impact on mobile usage among school and college students, Dr. Geetanjali Jha said the real solution lies in awareness and guidance. 'At the school level, students are already using mobiles—probably switching them off and hiding them during class and using them during breaks or after school to update parents about their safety. By the time they reach college, it's not just mobile phones—they use smart rings and smartwatches too, making it even easier to scroll during lectures without being noticed,' she said.
The best thing is to teach the students 'Cyber Sanskar' or Internet Maturity - a 21st-century life skill,' said Geetanjali Jha. iMature EdTech designed The Digital Citizenship and Internet Maturity Club (DCIM) Toolkit, a free of cost, self-paced school curriculum designed with activities and training for healthy Internet behaviour, for both students and staff. It helps build awareness through practical, scenario-based learning, making Internet Maturity a lived, everyday skill.
It is already being implemented in several schools, including BITS Pilani (School), Bhavan's Bharati School in Bhopal, and New Era School in Jhansi. 'They need to learn responsible and mature internet behavior,' said Ms. Jha. 'Teenagers are naturally rebellious, so we don't preach—we explain with empathy and real-world examples that show the magnitude of the problem. For instance, many foreign universities conduct background checks. If you've abused someone on Facebook, it can reflect poorly on your Online Reputation and hurt future prospects,' she said.
Parents play a crucial role in shaping digital etiquette, said Ms. Jha. But the approach matters. 'Parents shouldn't act like the internet is their child's enemy. They need to be conversant, easy, and relaxed while guiding children in their internet behaviour,' she said. She has developed a program to guide parents (and all adults who look after children), so that they can become Digital Leaders for their children.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Publicis sues India antitrust body for denying case files in ad agencies probe
Publicis has sued India's antitrust watchdog for denying access to case files in a high-profile price-fixing investigation of ad agencies, after the French group failed to get the probe stalled until it could review the documents, court filings show. Independence Day 2025 Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji gave India its own currency Swadeshi 2.0: India is no longer just a market, it's a maker The Competition Commission of India (CCI) shook India's near-$30 billion media and entertainment sector in March with dawn raids at WPP's GroupM, Dentsu, Publicis , Omnicom and many other agencies over suspected collusion over publicity rates and discounts. Details of cartel cases are kept confidential in India, but Reuters has reported that the CCI's initial assessment found the firms used a WhatsApp group to coordinate and agree on pricing, entered into secret pacts, and colluded with broadcasters to deny business to agencies that didn't comply. Concerned the CCI has not responded to its requests in recent months to provide access to case files, Publicis approached the Delhi High Court on August 11 asking judges to order the watchdog to accede to its requests, according to its non-public filing reviewed by Reuters on Thursday. Publicis and its employees in India are "unable to understand the allegations against them and prepare a defence in the absence of the case records", it said in the filing. Live Events The CCI did not respond to Reuters queries, and the court is likely to hear Publicis' case next week. The filing was made by TLG India, which its court papers said "is the legal entity that houses majority of the advertising business of the Publicis group in India". The antitrust investigation was triggered by Dentsu disclosing alleged industry malpractices to the CCI in February 2024 under the regulator's leniency program, which allows lesser penalties for firms that share evidence of malpractice. Publicis is the first company to file a lawsuit related to the high-profile CCI investigation in court. Filings showed the company urged the CCI in July that "further investigation remain in abeyance till" it is granted inspection of case records. CCI investigations typically take several months. The regulator has powers to impose financial penalties on the media agencies of up to three times their profit or 10% of an Indian entity's global turnover, whichever is higher, for each year of wrongdoing. Publicis' court filing also showed the CCI in July asked for a brief note from the company about its business model, and how operations are coordinated with the parent entity. On August 4, the CCI issued summons to Publicis' South Asia chief Anupriya Acharya to appear before investigators, and provide documents such as copies of key contracts involving Publicis and its Indian entities, including on revenue sharing. Acharya did not respond to Reuters queries, and Publicis has asked the court to quash the summon.


Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Panchkula: 2 held for duping ex-servicemen of ₹2.5 crore in investment fraud
In a significant crackdown on cybercrime, district police have arrested two individuals involved in two separate cases of cyber frauds targeting ex-army personnel. The colonel was contacted on WhatsApp and promised high returns. (HT Photo for representation) In the first case, police arrested Harjot Singh, alias Samar, from Ludhiana as the second accused in a case involving the duping of a 80-year-old retired army colonel of ₹2.34 crore. The colonel was contacted on WhatsApp and promised high returns. Harjot, who also faces cyber fraud charges in Gurugram and Ludhiana, was arrested on Tuesday and sent to a two-day police remand. Another accused, Govind Singh Randhawa, had been arrested earlier. In the second case, police arrested Mahendra Chaudhary for swindling a 60-year-old retired Indian Air Force sergeant of ₹31.05 lakh. According to the complaint, the victim was similarly lured into a WhatsApp group by an individual posing as a stock market teacher, who promised him quick profits. The accused was produced in court on Thursday and remanded to six-day police custody.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
ED freezes ₹110 crore linked to illegal betting platform Parimatch
MUMBAI: The Mumbai unit of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has frozen ₹110 crore lying in mule bank accounts in connection with a money-laundering probe into Cyprus-based illegal betting platform Parimatch. The action followed coordinated searches at 17 locations across the country on Tuesday, including Mumbai, Surat, Delhi, Noida, Kanpur, Madurai and Hyderabad. ED freezes ₹ 110 crore linked to illegal betting platform Parimatch The platform, owned by a Ukrainian national abroad, allegedly amassed nearly ₹3,000 crore from Indian users in 2023-24 alone, luring them with promises of high returns before defrauding them, ED officials said on Thursday. According to investigators, the frozen funds—proceeds of crime—were parked in multiple mule accounts used to layer and divert money to various recipients. Searches also led to the seizure of incriminating documents, digital devices and 1,200 credit cards linked to mule accounts. Complex laundering network The ED's probe, based on a complaint by the cyber police station in Mumbai, has uncovered a multi-layered laundering operation. In south India, user deposits were allegedly funnelled into mule accounts and withdrawn in cash in parts of Tamil Nadu, before being handed to hawala operators. These operators then recharged virtual wallets of a UK-based firm, which were used to buy USDT cryptocurrency in mule accounts run by Parimatch agents. In western India, Parimatch allegedly used Domestic Money Transfer agents to collect betting funds in mule accounts and channel them back through credit card transactions. Investigators have also flagged payment companies whose Payment Aggregator licence applications were rejected by the Reserve Bank of India. These firms allegedly provided backend services to Parimatch disguised as Technology Service Providers (TSPs), offering Application Programming Interface (API) access to integrate mule accounts—often opened in the names of e-commerce and payment service firms—into the platform. The funds were then 'masked' as e-commerce refunds, vendor payments and other routine expenses to obscure their origin and movement, officials said. Aggressive promotion in India To attract customers, Parimatch invested heavily in marketing, sponsoring sports tournaments and tying up with celebrities. Indian-registered entities—'Parimatch Sports' and 'Parimatch News'—were allegedly used for surrogate advertising, funded through foreign remittances. A city - based businessman, who is the complainant in the Mumbai police's case, alleged that he had lost around ₹12.22 crore at the accused illegal platform and its allied applications due to their 'non adherence to fairplay'. The businessman claimed he got attracted to the accused gaming platform's claims related to high returns, sometime in 2021, after noticing its advertisements and celebrity endorsements for it on a social media platform. 'All of us who have lost any money on the accused platform should be compensated,' the complainant told HT.