Berkshire takes swig of Modelo maker Constellation; cuts BofA, Citigroup
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway on Friday disclosed a new investment in alcoholic beverages producer Constellation Brands, and said it has reduced its holdings in four banks, including Citigroup and Bank of America.
In a regulatory filing detailing its U.S.-listed stock holdings as of December 31, Berkshire also disclosed it has stopped selling shares of Apple, which remained its largest common stock investment at $75.1 billion.
The filing nonetheless suggests that Berkshire remains concerned about valuations, after selling $133.2 billion of stock--primarily 490 million Apple shares--between January and September 2024, and letting its cash stake grow to $325.2 billion.
Berkshire owned $1.24 billion of Constellation stock at year end, after purchasing 5.62 million shares in the fourth quarter.
In after-hours trading, Constellation's share price rose 6.7%, reflecting what investors view as Buffett's seal of approval regardless of whether the revered billionaire investor personally did the buying.
Constellation did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Its beer brands include Corona and Modelo Especial, which in 2023 surpassed Bud Light as the top-selling beer in the United States, while its wine portfolio include Meiomi, Robert Mondavi and Kim Crawford.
Berkshire also owns a small stake in Diageo, whose brands include Guinness beer, Johnnie Walker Scotch and Smirnoff vodka.
To go with the alcohol, Berkshire also invests in Domino's Pizza, and boosted its stake by 86% in the quarter.
In Friday's filing, Berkshire said it lowered its Citigroup stake 74% to 14.6 million shares, and its Bank of America stake, until recently its second-largest common stock holding, 15% to 680.2 million shares.
Berkshire has reduced its Bank of America stake by one-third since July, when it owned 1.03 billion shares.
It has also unwound a small portion of the 700 million Bank of America shares it bought in 2017, when it redeemed $5 billion of preferred stock acquired six years earlier and used proceeds to exercise warrants at $7.14 per share.
Bank of America shares have since risen more than sixfold.
During the fourth quarter, Berkshire also reduced its stakes in Capital One and Brazilian fintech lender Nu Holdings.
It exited one stock altogether, cosmetics store chain Ulta Beauty, which it owned for less than a year.
Friday's filing does not say which investments are Buffett's and which are from Berkshire portfolio managers Todd Combs and Ted Weschler, who typically handle smaller Berkshire investments.
Berkshire also owns dozens of companies including the BNSF railroad and Geico car insurance, and its annual report expected on February 22 will include its year-end financial results.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Constellation Energy Stock (CEG) Eyes Atomic Expansion to Empower AI Boom
Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) and Meta Platforms (META) are forming an unlikely partnership. The large-cap energy provider struck what's known as a 'power purchase agreement' with Meta, granting the tech conglomerate the entire 1.1 gigawatt output from Constellation's Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois for 20 years starting in mid-2027. Constellation's stock surged around 10% following the news, but has since given up its gains. Confident Investing Starts Here: The deal marks a shift in how hyperscale tech companies are addressing their AI-driven power needs, with nuclear energy emerging as a preferred solution due to its carbon-free baseload power. Constellation's fleet of nuclear power plants bodes well for future deals, leaving me cautiously optimistic despite a frothy valuation. Meta Partnership Marks Nuclear-AI Milestone Meta's 20-year power agreement marks the largest in a growing wave of partnerships between nuclear energy providers and major tech companies. Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), and Google (GOOGL) have all secured nuclear energy to meet the surging power demands driven by their AI initiatives. Nuclear power offers several key advantages over other energy sources, including around-the-clock availability, scalability, and zero carbon emissions. These attributes make it especially appealing to energy-intensive data centers that operate continuously. To put this into perspective, a single ChatGPT query is estimated to consume roughly 10 times more energy than a standard Google search. Why Tech Giants Go Nuclear to Tap AI Nuclear energy remains somewhat misunderstood. While rare nuclear accidents tend to dominate headlines and shape public perception, support for nuclear power is growing. A recent Pew Research Center poll found that 56% of Americans now favor expanding atomic energy. Regulatory momentum is also shifting in its favor, creating a supportive environment for companies like Constellation Energy. The ADVANCE Act of 2024, for example, reduced regulatory review fees for advanced reactor applicants and imposed an 18-month deadline for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to make decisions. Earlier this year, the Trump administration issued executive orders aimed at quadrupling U.S. nuclear capacity by 2050. Constellation, which operates the largest nuclear fleet in the country with 21 reactors across 15 sites, is well-positioned to benefit. When you combine favorable policy shifts with rising demand for energy, particularly from AI infrastructure, it's clear why Constellation is increasingly optimistic about the road ahead Constellation's Earnings Power Up In its first quarter earnings, Constellation highlighted the demand for power from data centers. Constellation is just beginning to monetize AI-driven energy demand. Its adjusted operating earnings grew 17.6% in the first quarter to $2.14 per share. Nuclear production maintained an impressive 94.1% capacity factor and continues to remain stable across all geographies. Due to recent deals, Constellation now projects adjusted operating earnings growth of 13% or more through 2030, up from 10%. Valuation Concerns Cloud the Nuclear Renaissance That said, much of Constellation's potential appears to be priced in. The stock has surged 380% over the past three years and now trades at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 33, nearly double the average for the Utilities sector. This premium valuation leaves little room for error; any operational setbacks could trigger a sharp pullback. While signing long-term agreements with companies like Meta is a positive step, the real challenge lies in execution—building infrastructure, scaling capacity, and navigating regulatory approvals. Time is a critical factor, and delays could have material consequences. Although Constellation currently enjoys a first-mover advantage, it won't be alone for long. Other utility providers are beginning to adopt similar strategies, and competitive pressures in the space are likely to intensify going forward. Is CEG Stock a Good Buy? On Wall Street, CEG sports a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on eight Buy, five Hold, and zero Sell ratings in the past three months. CEG's average stock price target of $318.36 implies an upside potential of approximately 6.5% over the next twelve months. Following the Meta deal, analyst Ryan Levine from Citi downgraded CEG to Hold with a price target of $318. He noted that the stock's rally following the Meta announcement prompted a reevaluation of its value. He added, 'The Meta deal introduces a new framework where nuclear license extensions are considered additive generation, potentially impacting future deals for other plants in CEG's portfolio.' So, Levine sees both positives (a validated business model and premium pricing) and negatives (high valuation, execution risks, and market uncertainty). Premium-Priced Nuclear Powerhouse Poised to Ride the AI Boom Technological advancements—particularly in artificial intelligence—present a significant opportunity for utility companies, and Constellation is well-positioned to capitalize. Its extensive fleet of nuclear power plants gives it a strategic edge, and its recent agreement with Meta could serve as a blueprint for future partnerships with other tech giants. Regulatory momentum is also working in Constellation's favor, further strengthening its long-term prospects. That said, the stock is already trading at a premium, reflecting high investor expectations. While Constellation's growth profile justifies a higher valuation—it's far from a traditional, slow-growth utility—there are still meaningful execution risks tied to complex nuclear infrastructure projects. Given this backdrop, a cautiously optimistic outlook, like the one expressed by analyst Levine, may be the most prudent approach. Still, Constellation appears well-positioned to benefit from the broader resurgence of nuclear energy, particularly as AI continues to drive up demand for reliable, carbon-free power, making it a compelling speculative opportunity.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Orica (ASX:ORI) have seen returns of 27% over the past three years
Investors can buy low cost index fund if they want to receive the average market return. But across the board there are plenty of stocks that underperform the market. Unfortunately for shareholders, while the Orica Limited (ASX:ORI) share price is up 17% in the last three years, that falls short of the market return. In the last year the stock price gained, albeit only 3.3%. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Orica became profitable within the last three years. That would generally be considered a positive, so we'd expect the share price to be up. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Orica has improved its bottom line over the last three years, but what does the future have in store? You can see how its balance sheet has strengthened (or weakened) over time in this free interactive graphic. When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Orica's TSR for the last 3 years was 27%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence! Orica shareholders gained a total return of 6.3% during the year. But that return falls short of the market. The silver lining is that the gain was actually better than the average annual return of 5% per year over five year. It is possible that returns will improve along with the business fundamentals. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Orica better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks, for example - Orica has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Recently "Came Pretty Close" to Spending $10 Billion On an Acquisition, and I Strongly Believe One of These 2 Companies Was the Target
During Berkshire Hathaway's annual shareholder meeting. Warren Buffett noted that he and his team nearly pulled the trigger on a $10 billion deal. One potential buyout target is a legal monopoly that Buffett's company already holds a 35% stake in. Meanwhile, the other possible acquisition target is a time-tested business that has the second longest consecutive annual dividend streak of any U.S. public company. 10 stocks we like better than Sirius XM › There's not a billionaire investor on Wall Street who captivates the attention of professional and everyday investors like Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B) CEO Warren Buffett. He earned his nickname, the "Oracle of Omaha," by absolutely crushing the broad-based S&P 500 in the return column over the last 60 years. No event is more special than Berkshire Hathaway's annual shareholder meeting, which typically draws in the neighborhood of 40,000 people. This meeting features a question-and-answer (Q&A) session that extends hours and allows investors to pick the brain of one of Wall Street's most successful asset managers. While the headline takeaway of Berkshire Hathaway's latest annual meeting is that the 94-year-old Buffett will be stepping aside as CEO by the end of the year and handing the reins to predetermined successor Greg Abel, this was far from the only meaningful announcement. Berkshire's chief also mentioned during the Q&A session that he and his team nearly pulled the trigger on a sizable acquisition. Said Buffett: "We came pretty close to spending $10 billion, not that long ago, for example, but we'd spend $100 billion. I mean, those decisions are not tough to make when something is offered that makes sense to us and that we understand and offers good value." With Buffett being a net seller of stocks for 10 consecutive quarters and growing Berkshire Hathaway's cash pile to almost $348 billion amid a historically pricey stock market, "good value" has been tough to come by. Although Warren Buffett, ultimately, didn't pull the trigger on this teased $10 billion deal, there are two companies -- one of which is a legal monopoly -- which perfectly fit the bill as potential targets of a $10 billion acquisition. If there's one stock that makes for a logical acquisition target for Warren Buffett's company at a $10 billion price tag, its satellite-radio operator Sirius XM Holdings (NASDAQ: SIRI). Sirius XM has a market cap of nearly $7.4 billion. There are a couple of variables that make Sirius XM a potentially logical buyout target for Berkshire Hathaway. To begin with, Berkshire is its largest shareholder. As of the end of March, Buffett's company held 35.4% of Sirius XM's outstanding shares. Completing the purchase of the remaining shares at a premium price still wouldn't cost Berkshire $10 billion out of pocket. Secondly, Sirius XM provides a sustainable competitive advantage, which is something that Warren Buffett tends to seek out in the businesses he invests in. Although it's still competing for listeners with traditional radio providers, it's the only company with a satellite-radio license. Being a legal monopoly should afford Sirius XM a level of subscription pricing power that other companies can't match. The third factor that would have made Sirius XM an ideal $10 billion acquisition target for Buffett is its diversified revenue stream. Whereas terrestrial and online radio providers almost exclusively generate their revenue from advertising, Sirius XM brings in a little north of three-quarters of its net sales from subscriptions. The value of Sirius XM's approach is that its cash flow remains more predictable and consistent during inevitable economic downturns where ad spending can quickly dry up. It's also worth mentioning that Buffett has previously demonstrated a willingness to establish large investment holdings in media/broadcasting stocks. Sirius XM is well within the wheelhouse of Buffett's investment areas of focus. Lastly, Sirius XM Holdings provides a value proposition that's incredibly difficult to find in a historically expensive stock market. While economic uncertainty has weighed on its cumulative subscriber count in recent quarters, Sirius XM's shares are currently valued at a little over 7 times forecast earnings per share in 2025. There's an attractive risk-versus-reward profile. However, Sirius XM isn't the only company which checks all the right boxes that exhibited a price dislocation in recent months. Brand-name power tools and outdoor products company Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE: SWK) is the other possible stock I believe Buffett was eyeing with $10 billion in hand. As of this writing on June 5, Stanley Black & Decker is a $10 billion company. Usually, acquisitions require the buyer to pay a premium to get the nod of approval from shareholders. But during the tariff-related stock market plunge in early April, Stanley Black & Decker stock fell to around an $8.5 billion market cap. It was well within range for a $10 billion buyout at this point -- especially with tariff-related cost and margin uncertainty hovering over the company. Although Berkshire Hathaway doesn't own any shares of Stanley Black & Decker, this isn't reason enough to believe it wasn't the alluded acquisition target. For starters, Buffett's investment philosophy focuses more on consumer behaviors than it does on innovation. Stanley Black & Decker owns a laundry list of brand-name tool and outdoor brands, including DeWalt, Craftsman, Irwin, Cub Cadet, Lenox, and its namesakes Stanley and Black & Decker. These brands are easily identifiable by consumers and have helped to build trust in the company for more than a century. Additionally, Stanley Black & Decker is time-tested. This is a company founded in 1843 that's grown organically and through acquisitions of its own. It's increased its base annual dividend in each of the last 58 years, and offers the second-longest streak among U.S. public companies of paying a dividend for 149 consecutive years. Companies don't pay a dividend annually for nearly 150 years by accident. This is a testament that its operating model works. Despite tariff-related uncertainty clouding the company's near-term outlook, management has taken steps to improve margins over the long run. Its global cost reduction program has resulted in roughly $1.7 billion in pre-tax annual run-rate cost savings since being introduced in mid-2022. Further, its supply chain remains nimble enough that shifting production to Mexico and the U.S. will help it avoid potential tariffs tied to China over the next two years. Most importantly, Stanley Black & Decker offers a historically tempting valuation discount. Accounting for all the headwinds it's currently working through, shares of Stanley Black & Decker are priced at roughly 11 times forecast earnings per share in 2026. For context, this represents a 37% discount to its average forward-year earnings multiple over the trailing-five-year period. If there was a $10 billion acquisition to be made by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, either Sirius XM or Stanley Black & Decker perfectly fit the mold. Before you buy stock in Sirius XM, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Sirius XM wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Sean Williams has positions in Sirius XM. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett Recently "Came Pretty Close" to Spending $10 Billion On an Acquisition, and I Strongly Believe One of These 2 Companies Was the Target was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
