
'I survived the Tunisia terror attack by swimming out to sea'
It had taken him a few days to settle into his sunshine break in Sousse, Tunisia, with his wife Chris, but as he sprawled on a sun lounger in front of the ocean on his penultimate day, he finally felt thoroughly relaxed.
Then, at around noon, terrorist Seifeddine Rezgui stormed the beach armed with an automatic rifle that he'd hidden in a beach umbrella and opened fire.
'I remember vividly an hour before it happened, I looked out directly at the ocean and thought to myself: 'This is the life. This is wonderful.' I'm a bit of a fidgety person; I'm not the best at lying down and relaxing, but I was trying hard that holiday to zone out,' the painter and decorator from Windlesham, Surrey, tells Metro.
'You'd never think it was going to happen.'
At first, Colin thought the 'pops' he heard were fireworks, until he saw his terrified wife heading towards the hotel, urging him to run. He felt the bullets ricochet off the sand as he sprinted to hide behind an upturned boat.
'It was pure shock, right to the core. I wouldn't wish it on anybody. There was the gunfire going on, and I thought that was it. That he was coming down, finishing everybody off. I prayed for my life, and then I looked up and saw the sea in front of me.
'I thought: 'I could die here, or I could die running'. So I ran down the beach and swam out as far as I could,' Colin, 60, recalls.
When he thought it was safe, he stopped and started to tread water. 'Then I got tired, and the panic set in. That's when I prayed again. I don't know how I did it, but I pointed my toe and found a rock sticking up. I managed to get my breath. And then luckily, [local man] Mohammed saw me and picked me up in the boat. He told me I'd been bitten by a fish.'
The bleeding was in fact where Colin had been grazed twice by Rezgui's bullets, but the adrenaline had blanked out the pain. Mohammed dropped him off at a nearby hotel where he thought he'd be safe.
'I knew the area. So I thought I'd go from the hotel to a mobile police station at the end of the road. But I jumped over a wall and there he was.'
Rezgui had left the beach and was inland, having entered the nearby five-star Riu Imperial Marhaba Hotel and shooting at anyone who crossed his path.
Colin lowered himself behind the wall so he wouldn't be seen, and then he heard a commotion as another local came to his rescue. Moncef Mayel, who lived nearby, was watching everything from a nearby balcony and started throwing ceramic tiles down to distract Rezgui. Moments later, it would all be over.
Police opened fire, and the 23-year-old attacker was shot dead. Rezgui had killed 38 tourists, 30 of them from the UK. It was the greatest British loss of life in a terror attack since the London bombings in 2005. ISIS later claimed responsibility.
As soon as he could, Colin headed down to the beach to see if any of the bodies, now covered with beach towels, belonged to Chris – making his final prayer that he would find her alive.
'Then I saw her in the hotel, in her yellow bikini. We ran to each other and held each other. It was an amazing thing because we'd survived.
'I'm not a deeply religious guy, but I'm now a great believer in the power of prayer. I prayed that day three times, and I survived,' he explains.
Colin doesn't like to talk about the attack, partly because it is traumatic but mainly because he is acutely aware that while the pair of them made it out alive, many others didn't.
The couple returned to the UK, where they suffered from the aftereffects. Chris would repeatedly check that the doors were closed and locked. Sometimes she struggled to leave the house, panicking in the car, and to this day, she has to know where the exits are when they go to a restaurant.
Meanwhile, Colin would unexpectedly taste salt in his mouth – perhaps as a result of the panic while treading water – and they were both jumpy around Fireworks Night.
'Your awareness is dialled up to 11. You think everybody around you could be a threat. You don't feel safe. You never think something like this is going to happen to you, and when it does, you can't help but think it's going to happen again,'he says.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
As the impact of the trauma started to subside, Colin was eager to make sense of what he'd been through, so he decided to go to the local mosque.
'I was a stereotypical guy who worked on construction sites. I was very ignorant when it came to other religions. When I went to the mosque, I was watching people with backpacks and thinking: 'Is he going in there with that?' I didn't cope well with it.'
But after meeting the Imam and his wife, Colin learned that the attack wasn't religious, but political.
'I came to understand that you can take things literally in the Quran that can be completely misinterpreted. And I learned that understanding more about people's faiths might help to stop something like this happening again.'
A year after the attack, Colin made the difficult decision to return to Sousse to thank Mohammed, Moncef and the hotel staff who had helped, and to find peace.
'Both my grandfathers, who were in World War II, played a huge part in my life. One was in Dunkirk, and the other was behind the lines in Burma. I remember both of them saying that they wished they had gone back sooner – that they could cope better afterwards. It was one of the hardest things I've ever done, but one of the best things I've ever done, because it was healing,' he explains.
Following the attack, Colin found a deep appreciation of life and became more in touch with himself. He had what he described as a 'spiritual awakening' and decided that, as he had been spared, he wanted to be the best person he could be.
When he was approached by the Institute of Strategic Dialogue, a think tank that aims to conquer extremism, and was asked to talk to people who were being radicalised, he jumped at the chance.
'We're all here for a purpose, and I think mine was just to become a better person. If we all have a bit of that, there'd be a lot more peace in the world,' he adds.
'It was around the time when there were a lot of beheadings being put out on social media, and the Institute found that if you reached out early to some of these people that were either posting this or were the contributors to the original filming, they would think more carefully about what they would do next.
'I would try to talk to these people over Facebook, and over time, I started making headway. There were a couple that I spoke to over quite a long period of time, and I think I made a difference. I was doing a couple of hours every night, telling people that I was a survivor and challenging their beliefs.' More Trending
Ten years since the attack, Colin has made his peace with the human world, but has a way to go with the natural world. He used to love the ocean, but after fearing he might drown at sea during the attack, he has yet to return to the waves. He holidays on the Isle of Wight, or if he goes abroad, the couple stay in villas inland.
'Recovering from the trauma is an ongoing process,' he explains.
'You learn to live with it. You can't let it bring you down or live your life in fear. I will go out and swim like I used to. I know I'm going to make my peace with it, sooner or later.'
Surviving the Tunisia Beach Attack is out now on Prime Video, produced by Yeti Television.
MORE: The jacket potato's unstoppable rise – and the Preston brothers leading the revolution
MORE: I couldn't train my deaf puppy so I taught him sign language
MORE: I live in a 'murder house' – this is what it's really like

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh International Book Festival round-up: Paul French Mark Watson
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Paul French's 2012 book Midnight in Peking, effectively solving a young British girl's gruesome murder there in 1937, was true crime at its most spellbinding. I remember the way he talked about it - in pithy tabloidese, each sentence like a movie pitch. He knows China backwards, having made his money as a marketing expert predicting the country's future while all the time fascinated by its wild, pre-communist, 20th century past. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mark Watson Which is where Wallis Simpson comes in. In French's new book, Her Lotus Year, she arrives in Shanghai because she's heard she'll be able to get a divorce there from her abusive US Navy pilot husband Win ('He's America's first Top Gun. Taller and more handsome than Tom Cruise but with worse planes'). 'Shanghai back then was the maddest place in the world,' said French. 'Whatever you can imagine, times it by ten.' It's a city of warlords, brothels, drugs, famine, and jazz. We know about its degeneracy, because that's what the so-called China Dossier - the one that accused Wallis of sexual practices so outré that when she read it the Queen Mother is reputed to have required smelling salts - spelled out. Yet all that is all fake news, says French. Wallis might have been good at holding her drink, but that's about it. She's an abused woman fleeing a violent husband. She has an independent streak, and finds happiness in Peking, where she gets a sense of style, is taken in by rich friends and becomes more confidently cosmopolitan. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The subtitle of your book is 'China, The Roaring Twenties and the Making of Wallis Simpson',' said journalist Isabel Hilton (another China expert), chairing the event. 'A big claim. Are you sure you can stand it up?' Sure he can. And so to the making of another grande dame forced to flee an abusive husband. Dan Gunn has spent the last seven years editing the first volume of Muriel Spark's letters, from 1944 to 1963, and is hard at work on the second, which takes the story up to her death in 2006. But it's the first volume, he emphasised, where Spark changes the most: from unknown poet to acclaimed writer, where she has the only true love affair in her life (though it ended in betrayal and bitterness), where she suffered real hardship, a miscarriage and attempted rape, had a serious breakdown and two conversions (first to Anglicanism, then Catholicism). Asked why the project had taken so long, Gunn pointed out reasonably enough that working with 40 different archives (half public, half private) took time and, considering that editing Samuel Beckett's letters took him a quarter of a century, 'deciphering the most difficult handwriting in the 20th century in five languages', the Spark letters were a comparative doddle. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The hour sped by for two main reasons. The first was the way in which Gunn communicated the joys of following a trail of writer's letters rather than writing a biography. Instead of telling a linear story arcing towards success, he said, the letters make clear how contingent the whole process is: how much depends on the luck of finding the right publisher at the right time and having supportive patrons and friends – how easily, in other words, everything could go wrong. The second reason was Spark herself, and the delight in seeing her try out her writing wings. I went along later to comedian Mark Watson's sparsely-attended event later on, hoping for laughs, but not for a second did he come close to just one letter Muriel Spark wrote (20 January 1955: look it up) in which she describes a talkative neighbour with a verve only the truly comic writers - Victoria Wood, say, or Alan Bennett - could match. David Robinson


Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Menendez brothers parole hearing: Everything you need to know about the case
Two brothers at the centre of one of the most famous murder cases in the 20th century could be free after spending 35 years behind bars for killing their parents. The Menendez brothers are set to make their cases for parole marking the closest they've been to winning freedom from prison. A California judge has dramatically reduced the Menendez brothers' sentences, now aged 54 and 57. Erik and Lyle Menendez were at the centre of a media firestorm in the 1990s when their case went to trial, and attention has refocused on the pair after multiple documentaries. 'I came to a place where I believe, under the law, resentencing is appropriate,' Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón said last year. Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. 'I believe they have paid their debt to society.' This means the brothers, at the centre of one of America's worst true crime sagas, could soon be free. The brothers are up for parole because they were under 26 years old when they committed the crimes, Gascón said. The Menendez brothers' parents were found shot dead with a shotgun in August 1989. Jose was shot point-blank in the back of the head with a 12-gauge shotgun. He was killed instantly but his wife Kitty Menendez tried to run but slipped. She was shot in the leg as she tried to escape. She was shot multiple times in the chest, face, and arm with the facial shot making her nearly unrecognisable. Lyle Menendez dialled 911 to report the shotgun killings of their parents inside their home. Both brothers initially told detectives that the murders were related to the Mafia or had something to do with their father's business dealings. Suspicions were raised after Lyle Menendez told his therapist, Jerome Oziel, that he and his brother were the killers. While this isn't normally admissible evidence in court, it was allowed in a trial because Menendez allegedly threatened the therapist, voiding patient-doctor confidentiality. In 1992, the brothers were tried separately, in trials that were broadcast on TV. The brothers plead guilty to the murders, but said it was in self-defence as they claimed their father had been abusing them for years. The prosecution pointed to the pair's spending habits after the deaths to suggest that inheriting their family's wealth was the motivation. A witness testified that Lyle and Erik both bought Rolex watches and expensive clothes the day before their parents' funerals, which aroused suspicion. The juries were deadlocked, and so a second trial was ordered – with Lyle and Erik tried together. They were found guilty, and in 1996 started life sentences with no possibility of parole. Both appealed, but those were denied by the US District Court. Initially in separate prisons, they were reunited in the same facility 2018, after over 20 years apart. In May 2023, attorneys for the brothers asked courts to reconsider their conviction after a man came forward and said he was raped by Jose Menendez when he was 14. Then Netflix released Monsters, a drama series about the murders. The series sparked further debate and conversation over the case. Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón announced on October 4, 2024, that his office was 'reviewing' new evidence for the case. On October 24, the LA prosecutor's office announced they are petitioning courts to resentence the brothers. The brothers were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in 1996. Their extended family members have called for their release, stressing that if the brothers were tried today with sexual abuse weighing in differently than decades ago, their conviction would not be the same. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Their case sparked worldwide interest, and was featured in the Netflix series, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story. The nine episodes released renewed public interest in the matter, while also drawing some backlash. Gascón said the brothers undoubtedly killed their parents, but that there is new evidence including a letter Erik apparently wrote to a cousin eight months before the killings in which he detailed the abuse. He said the evidence could have produced a different outcome from the jury had it been shown at the time. The state parole board must now decide whether to release the brothers from prison – and prosecutors must prove that they still pose a risk of committing violent crime again. A panel or two or three parole hearing officers from a board of commissioners appointed by the governor will evaluate the brothers individually. Erik Menendez will have his hearing followed by Lyle Menendez on Friday, over videoconference from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego. Even if the board grants their parole, it could still be months before the brothers walk free — if at all. If the board grants each brother's parole, the chief legal counsel has 120 days to review the case. Then, Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has 30 days to affirm or deny the parole. Only then, if Newsom affirms the parole, would the Menendez brothers be able to leave prison. LA County Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic said: 'I am not saying they should be released, it's not for me to decide. More Trending 'I do believe they've done enough in the past 35 years that they should get that chance.' Erik and Lyle did not show any emotion during most of the testimony as they appeared via livestream video. But they chuckled when one of their cousins, Diane Hernandez, told the court that Erik received A+ grades in all of his classes during his most recent semester in college. A version of this article was originally published on October 24, 2024 Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Iconic rock band warn they'll 'never play many cities again' in devastating tour update MORE: Daughter heard mum beg for life before killer beat her to death on Ring doorbell MORE: Netflix fans 'already hooked' on new Suranne Jones thriller as all episodes drop


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Haunting moment Iran hangs murderer from crane in front of ghoulish crowd including kids in latest grim public execution
It comes amid a surge in public executions and sham trials REGIME OF DEATH Haunting moment Iran hangs murderer from crane in front of ghoulish crowd including kids in latest grim public execution Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the chilling moment Iran's tyrants hang a murderer from a crane in front of a grim, cheering crowd of locals and children. Sajad Molayi Hakani was killed in the city of Kordkuy, Golestan after being found guilty of robbery and murdering a mum and her three kids in October. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 This is the haunting moment a man is hanged in front of a cheering crowd 3 He is seen attached to a crane by a noose around his neck 3 Crowds of locals and children gathered to watch the horrific event unfold He was sentenced to qisas, which means retaliation in kind in Islamic law, with his wife also due to be executed in prison at a later date. Haunting footage shows the man standing on a platform with a noose around his neck as crowds gather to watch the horrific event. The rope is attached to the crane, which appears to be controlled by a member of the execution team. It comes as rattled supreme leader Ali Khamenei ordered a surge in executions - turning hangings into public spectacles in a chilling warning to dissidents. Read more on World SEA OF STEEL Iran helicopter faces off with US warship in Gulf in pathetic show of force Iran has repeatedly unleashed lethal force on its own people - especially at times of crisis - in a sickening bid to stamp out rebellion. Executions and arrests are weaponised to scare dissidents, and it is feared panicked Ayatollah Khamenei is planning a similar plot to the 1988 massacre of 30,000 political prisoners. The regime was also in turmoil that year after accepting a ceasefire with Iraq. Chillingly, state-run Fars News Agency - a mouthpiece of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps - last month issued a public call to repeat 1998's inhumane massacre as the regime fears for its survival. British politicians and leading human rights lawyers have urged the UK government to intervene to prevent such an atrocity. Alongside the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), they also criticised the focus on Tehran's nuclear programme, warning that it has overshadowed the worsening human rights crisis. Iran Executes Nuclear Scientist Accused of Spying for Mossad Amid Escalating Espionage Crackdown Baroness O'Loan DBE said: "Those threatening our national security are the same individuals planning atrocities in Iran's prisons. So, we must act, now." Dowlat Nowrouzi, the NCRI's UK representative, told The Sun: "The international community's failure to hold the regime accountable for its atrocities, including crimes against humanity and genocide, has allowed the regime to enjoy impunity. "It is long overdue to hold Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, and others accountable for committing these crimes." Earlier this year, Saeed Masouri, who spent 25 years behind bars, also revealed how the execution rate has spiralled. In June alone, the regime's merciless killing spree saw at least 176 inmates sent to the gallows. Masouri, who was arrested for his affiliation with the resistance unit People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, revealed the secret process behind executions. Psychological torture, threats against family and sham trials are all used as tools by the regime to condemn its enemies to death on trumped-up charges. Defendants - and their lawyers - are often even denied access to their own files, making it near impossible to be cleared. Hossein Abedini, deputy director of the NCRI offices in the UK, said paranoid rules were hellbent on stamping out repression. He told The Sun: "Executions under the clerical regime contravene all internationally recognised standards and norms of due process and are fundamentally used as a political instrument of repression. "Faced with deep-rooted crises stemming from illegitimacy, corruption, and incompetence, and driven by fear of popular uprisings and nationwide protests, this regime has resorted to increasing executions. "It employs inhumane pressures on political prisoners, torturing and harassing them and their families. "As a result, the rate of executions in Iran is rising at an unprecedented level in recent decades, with death sentences issued even for political prisoners arrested during the September 2022 uprising."