New Zealand government sued over climate plan
The Environmental Law Initiative (ELI) and Lawyers for Climate Action NZ filed legal proceedings against minister, Simon Watts, alleging that the government's emissions reduction plan fails to fulfil the law.
The government must legally put in place an emissions reduction plan for the country every five years, with the ultimate goal to reduce emissions to net zero by 2050.
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ executive director Jessica Palairet said the latest plan missed the mark.
"It takes a high-risk, forestry-led approach to emissions reductions. Our law requires more," Palairet said.
"As it stands, the government's emissions reduction plan will carry huge consequences for our country. We don't take this step lightly, but the plan needs to be challenged."
ELI's director, research and legal, Matt Hall said the current government had cancelled 35 policies and actions that were part of the first plan, without consultation as required by the law.
"It then put in place a second emissions reduction plan which is almost devoid of actions or policies for reducing emissions at their source."
The group said it believed in fairness and the rule of law.
"As a wealthy country, we need to meet our climate targets with real action, as part of the global effort to limit warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius this century," a joint statement said.
Mr Watts, who is the Minister for Climate Change, declined to comment on the judicial review as the matter was before the courts.
A group of environmental lawyers is suing New Zealand's government for allegedly failing to act on climate targets.
The Environmental Law Initiative (ELI) and Lawyers for Climate Action NZ filed legal proceedings against minister, Simon Watts, alleging that the government's emissions reduction plan fails to fulfil the law.
The government must legally put in place an emissions reduction plan for the country every five years, with the ultimate goal to reduce emissions to net zero by 2050.
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ executive director Jessica Palairet said the latest plan missed the mark.
"It takes a high-risk, forestry-led approach to emissions reductions. Our law requires more," Palairet said.
"As it stands, the government's emissions reduction plan will carry huge consequences for our country. We don't take this step lightly, but the plan needs to be challenged."
ELI's director, research and legal, Matt Hall said the current government had cancelled 35 policies and actions that were part of the first plan, without consultation as required by the law.
"It then put in place a second emissions reduction plan which is almost devoid of actions or policies for reducing emissions at their source."
The group said it believed in fairness and the rule of law.
"As a wealthy country, we need to meet our climate targets with real action, as part of the global effort to limit warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius this century," a joint statement said.
Mr Watts, who is the Minister for Climate Change, declined to comment on the judicial review as the matter was before the courts.
A group of environmental lawyers is suing New Zealand's government for allegedly failing to act on climate targets.
The Environmental Law Initiative (ELI) and Lawyers for Climate Action NZ filed legal proceedings against minister, Simon Watts, alleging that the government's emissions reduction plan fails to fulfil the law.
The government must legally put in place an emissions reduction plan for the country every five years, with the ultimate goal to reduce emissions to net zero by 2050.
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ executive director Jessica Palairet said the latest plan missed the mark.
"It takes a high-risk, forestry-led approach to emissions reductions. Our law requires more," Palairet said.
"As it stands, the government's emissions reduction plan will carry huge consequences for our country. We don't take this step lightly, but the plan needs to be challenged."
ELI's director, research and legal, Matt Hall said the current government had cancelled 35 policies and actions that were part of the first plan, without consultation as required by the law.
"It then put in place a second emissions reduction plan which is almost devoid of actions or policies for reducing emissions at their source."
The group said it believed in fairness and the rule of law.
"As a wealthy country, we need to meet our climate targets with real action, as part of the global effort to limit warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius this century," a joint statement said.
Mr Watts, who is the Minister for Climate Change, declined to comment on the judicial review as the matter was before the courts.
A group of environmental lawyers is suing New Zealand's government for allegedly failing to act on climate targets.
The Environmental Law Initiative (ELI) and Lawyers for Climate Action NZ filed legal proceedings against minister, Simon Watts, alleging that the government's emissions reduction plan fails to fulfil the law.
The government must legally put in place an emissions reduction plan for the country every five years, with the ultimate goal to reduce emissions to net zero by 2050.
Lawyers for Climate Action NZ executive director Jessica Palairet said the latest plan missed the mark.
"It takes a high-risk, forestry-led approach to emissions reductions. Our law requires more," Palairet said.
"As it stands, the government's emissions reduction plan will carry huge consequences for our country. We don't take this step lightly, but the plan needs to be challenged."
ELI's director, research and legal, Matt Hall said the current government had cancelled 35 policies and actions that were part of the first plan, without consultation as required by the law.
"It then put in place a second emissions reduction plan which is almost devoid of actions or policies for reducing emissions at their source."
The group said it believed in fairness and the rule of law.
"As a wealthy country, we need to meet our climate targets with real action, as part of the global effort to limit warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius this century," a joint statement said.
Mr Watts, who is the Minister for Climate Change, declined to comment on the judicial review as the matter was before the courts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
23-07-2025
- AU Financial Review
Top UN court says countries can be sued on climate change
The International Court of Justice issued a strongly worded opinion Wednesday (Thursday AEST) saying that states must protect people from the 'urgent and existential threat' of climate change, a major moment for the global environmental movement and for the countries at greatest risk of harm. It was the first time that the court, which is the United Nations' highest judicial body, has weighed in on climate change. The unanimous opinion said that the failure of nations to take action to protect the climate system may constitute 'an internationally wrongful act.' It also found that protection of the environment is 'a precondition' for ensuring human rights and cited government support of fossil-fuel production as a potential violation of these principles. Although the International Court of Justice has no mechanism to enforce an advisory opinion like this on nations, as a statement of legal principles the findings nevertheless could have far-reaching influence on litigation in courts around the world as well as on international negotiations over climate policy and funding. The United Nations General Assembly requested the opinion after a spirited, yearslong campaign organised by law students from Vanuatu and other Pacific islands. That led to a two-week hearing in December at which more than 100 countries, organisations and experts addressed the court. The court's 15 judges were asked to address two main questions, including what countries are obliged to do, under existing international laws and treaties, to protect the climate system and environment from greenhouse gases; and what the legal consequences are if, by their acts or omissions, they have caused significant harm. The panel is based in The Hague. Powerful fossil fuel producers, including the United States and Saudi Arabia, argued before the court that the 2015 Paris accord, in which nearly all countries agreed to limit greenhouse gases, was sufficient to address climate change. Since then, President Donald Trump has withdrawn the United States from the Paris Agreement. The court's opinion went further than many lawyers had expected. The judges found that all states have the obligation to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial times, a threshold laid out in the Paris Agreement. Environmental groups hailed the decision. 'This decision gives moral and legal heft to all of us around the world fighting for the swift transition off fossil fuels,' said Jean Su, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's energy justice program.
Perth Now
17-07-2025
- Perth Now
NZ weather events prompt rethink of housing protections
The New Zealand government is considering ending bailouts for homeowners affected by floods and landslides as it develops a framework to address the impact of climate change. The government has often stepped in after natural disasters to buy properties, spending billions of dollars in recent years as climate change-driven severe weather events increase in intensity and frequency. The government "won't be able to keep bailing out people in this way", New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told Radio New Zealand this week. "We need to find a way to manage these events going forward and who takes responsibility and is there a shared responsibility." Policymakers, researchers and property experts both in New Zealand and Australia have for some time warned climate change is a risk that home buyers have not priced in. His comments come as parts of the South Island start cleaning up after floods this month, which affected roughly 800 homes, according to local authorities. The government on Wednesday announced $NZ600,000 ($A550,403) in compensation for flood-affected farmers, growers and forestry owners. By 2060 at least 14,500 homes worth approximately $NZ12.5 billion ($A11.42 billion) could suffer at least one damaging flood, around 300 to 400 homes annually, according to Climate Sigma research. Climate Minister Simon Watts said in an email that the government has been working to get bipartisan support on a national adaptation framework to give New Zealand certainty. "This is a complex and challenging work," he said. "It is important that any change is enduring." Any policy changes would likely be introduced slowly. A recent independent report released by the Ministry of Environment suggested a transition over 20 years to allow pricing to adjust as expectations of government bailouts are tempered. The independent report released by the Ministry of the Environment recommended including the need for more information about the potential impact of natural hazards so owners can make their own decisions about whether to move or stay and bear the costs of that decision. Property records in New Zealand increasingly note whether there is a flood or landslide risk or history of either and homeowners in vulnerable areas are worried their houses will become less valuable.
The Advertiser
25-06-2025
- The Advertiser
New Zealand departs climate action group
New Zealand has left the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a group of governments advocating a shift to cleaner energy sources, becoming the first nation to do so. In a decision that confirms the coalition government's embrace of fossil fuels, Climate Minister Simon Watts told parliament on Wednesday he had written to the alliance to signal their departure. Since taking office in November 2023, Chris Luxon's government has repealed a Jacinda Ardern-era ban on exploration for offshore oil and gas, and fast-tracked mining projects, including for coal. Mr Watts said those acts meant New Zealand no longer sat comfortably inside the grouping. "The New Zealand government made the decision to withdraw, in good faith, our associate membership, and informed the alliance of this decision on 21 June, 2025," he said. New Zealand was approached to join the alliance by co-founders Costa Rica and Denmark and did so in late 2021 alongside COP26, the UN climate conference of that year held in Glasgow. A released cabinet paper showed Kiwi officials believed joining would be a "useful vehicle for advancing effective global climate action" and also "does not involve binding legal commitments". Greenpeace Aotearoa spokesperson Amanda Larson was scathing of the government's embrace of both mining and agriculture through "intensive livestock", which she said were two of the world's most polluting industries. In May, the government was also named by the Financial Times for accounting practices which downplay the impact of methane from agriculture. "It is the first time in Luxon's political or business career that he has made the front page of the Financial Times - and it was humiliating. He should expect more international criticism to come," Ms Larson said. New Zealand was an associate member, alongside California and Belize, but as of Wednesday, was scrubbed from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance website. Resources minister Shane Jones called the grouping "an indulgent, vanity-belief community". New Zealand has left the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a group of governments advocating a shift to cleaner energy sources, becoming the first nation to do so. In a decision that confirms the coalition government's embrace of fossil fuels, Climate Minister Simon Watts told parliament on Wednesday he had written to the alliance to signal their departure. Since taking office in November 2023, Chris Luxon's government has repealed a Jacinda Ardern-era ban on exploration for offshore oil and gas, and fast-tracked mining projects, including for coal. Mr Watts said those acts meant New Zealand no longer sat comfortably inside the grouping. "The New Zealand government made the decision to withdraw, in good faith, our associate membership, and informed the alliance of this decision on 21 June, 2025," he said. New Zealand was approached to join the alliance by co-founders Costa Rica and Denmark and did so in late 2021 alongside COP26, the UN climate conference of that year held in Glasgow. A released cabinet paper showed Kiwi officials believed joining would be a "useful vehicle for advancing effective global climate action" and also "does not involve binding legal commitments". Greenpeace Aotearoa spokesperson Amanda Larson was scathing of the government's embrace of both mining and agriculture through "intensive livestock", which she said were two of the world's most polluting industries. In May, the government was also named by the Financial Times for accounting practices which downplay the impact of methane from agriculture. "It is the first time in Luxon's political or business career that he has made the front page of the Financial Times - and it was humiliating. He should expect more international criticism to come," Ms Larson said. New Zealand was an associate member, alongside California and Belize, but as of Wednesday, was scrubbed from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance website. Resources minister Shane Jones called the grouping "an indulgent, vanity-belief community". New Zealand has left the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a group of governments advocating a shift to cleaner energy sources, becoming the first nation to do so. In a decision that confirms the coalition government's embrace of fossil fuels, Climate Minister Simon Watts told parliament on Wednesday he had written to the alliance to signal their departure. Since taking office in November 2023, Chris Luxon's government has repealed a Jacinda Ardern-era ban on exploration for offshore oil and gas, and fast-tracked mining projects, including for coal. Mr Watts said those acts meant New Zealand no longer sat comfortably inside the grouping. "The New Zealand government made the decision to withdraw, in good faith, our associate membership, and informed the alliance of this decision on 21 June, 2025," he said. New Zealand was approached to join the alliance by co-founders Costa Rica and Denmark and did so in late 2021 alongside COP26, the UN climate conference of that year held in Glasgow. A released cabinet paper showed Kiwi officials believed joining would be a "useful vehicle for advancing effective global climate action" and also "does not involve binding legal commitments". Greenpeace Aotearoa spokesperson Amanda Larson was scathing of the government's embrace of both mining and agriculture through "intensive livestock", which she said were two of the world's most polluting industries. In May, the government was also named by the Financial Times for accounting practices which downplay the impact of methane from agriculture. "It is the first time in Luxon's political or business career that he has made the front page of the Financial Times - and it was humiliating. He should expect more international criticism to come," Ms Larson said. New Zealand was an associate member, alongside California and Belize, but as of Wednesday, was scrubbed from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance website. Resources minister Shane Jones called the grouping "an indulgent, vanity-belief community". New Zealand has left the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a group of governments advocating a shift to cleaner energy sources, becoming the first nation to do so. In a decision that confirms the coalition government's embrace of fossil fuels, Climate Minister Simon Watts told parliament on Wednesday he had written to the alliance to signal their departure. Since taking office in November 2023, Chris Luxon's government has repealed a Jacinda Ardern-era ban on exploration for offshore oil and gas, and fast-tracked mining projects, including for coal. Mr Watts said those acts meant New Zealand no longer sat comfortably inside the grouping. "The New Zealand government made the decision to withdraw, in good faith, our associate membership, and informed the alliance of this decision on 21 June, 2025," he said. New Zealand was approached to join the alliance by co-founders Costa Rica and Denmark and did so in late 2021 alongside COP26, the UN climate conference of that year held in Glasgow. A released cabinet paper showed Kiwi officials believed joining would be a "useful vehicle for advancing effective global climate action" and also "does not involve binding legal commitments". Greenpeace Aotearoa spokesperson Amanda Larson was scathing of the government's embrace of both mining and agriculture through "intensive livestock", which she said were two of the world's most polluting industries. In May, the government was also named by the Financial Times for accounting practices which downplay the impact of methane from agriculture. "It is the first time in Luxon's political or business career that he has made the front page of the Financial Times - and it was humiliating. He should expect more international criticism to come," Ms Larson said. New Zealand was an associate member, alongside California and Belize, but as of Wednesday, was scrubbed from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance website. Resources minister Shane Jones called the grouping "an indulgent, vanity-belief community".
