logo
After the Eaton fire, Altadena dirt was sent to Tujunga. Then came the backlash

After the Eaton fire, Altadena dirt was sent to Tujunga. Then came the backlash

Yahoo28-04-2025

Residents in the rugged enclave of Tujunga became suspicious in January after dirt-filled trucks began inundating their neighborhood streets, dumping their loads on nearby county-owned property.
Their inquiries revealed that the trucks carried winter storm sediment dredged from catch basins that were quickly inundated with runoff in and around fire-scarred Altadena.
The basins, essential to flood control in the San Gabriel Mountains, are largely located above residential burns areas, according to the county.
But the hauling and dumping operation has led to a dramatic fallout between county officials and Tujunga residents and is another example of a community fearful of accepting debris related to the Eaton and Palisades fires.
The residents say noxious dirt is being trucked in. At least one local sneaked onto the site earlier this year to collect and later privately test the catch basin soil. The results found selenium and arsenic, according to the community.
'I'm scared and I'm angry,' said Tujunga resident Karen von Gunten, who lives within about 150 yards of the county site. She no longer feels comfortable gardening for long periods of time because of a noxious odor she attributes to the site.
County officials contend the soil is safe.
At the same time, Tujunga locals — who relish their relative isolation living against the rugged backdrop of the San Gabriel Mountains — say they are tormented by the noise, vibrations and dust caused by the hauling trucks, which traverse along homes in this semirural area.
Read more: As heavy as 100 Eiffel Towers: Monumental L.A. County fire debris removal could finish by June
It's all anathema to Tujunga's history and reputation as a clean air community. Starting in the 1920s, the area began attracting people who have asthma. Today, the neighborhood still draws residents looking to escape the pollutants and noise of city life. And on the fringe of the mountains, the area is home to bears, deer and rabbits.
Caroline Kim Palacios said she was forced to temporarily move her 70-year-old mother, Suki Kim, out of her mother's home next to the county site after she complained about a sore throat, burning in her eyes and lungs, and nausea in March. Her mother believes those issues are linked to the hauling operations, Kim Palacios said.
She also pointed to the wildlife, including deer, that come through the area and the nearby wash. "I'm worried about the ecosystem," Kim Palacios said.
County officials acknowledged at a March meeting with Tujunga locals that they didn't warn residents about the operation at the 17.5-acre site.
'I'm sorry for not handling it better,' said county engineer Laren Bunker, according to a recording of the meeting. "I think we could have been a little bit better in our communication with the community."
The county began trucking debris to its lot off Sevenhills Drive in January after not using the site for 15 years, according to county officials. The lot was activated because of the magnitude of storm debris that had to be removed from the basins.
Although operations stopped earlier this month, hauling is likely to resume after future rainstorms, the county said.
The lot, known as Zachau sediment placement site, is bounded by a tall fence and next to several homes.
County Public Works spokesperson Elizabeth Vazquez said the sediment brought to Tujunga came from the West Ravine and Fern basins at the edge of a mountainous area. Some homes that burned in the hills are above the basins.
Photos taken in February by Altadena residents show the basin filled with dark sludge-like debris.
The debris includes "vegetative matter," said Vazquez, who said operators scraped off the top layer and sent it to a Simi Valley landfill, with dirt and rocks going to Zachau.
Read more: 'We don't want it!' San Gabriel Valley rages against shipment of Eaton fire hazardous waste
Some ash from the undeveloped hillsides may have ended up in the basin, the underground storm drain system and the landfill, Vazquez said. She said Phos-chek, a flame retardant, was not observed in the debris basins.
Vazquez also said that crews took measures, including installing a type of berm, to prevent burned home debris from washing off properties.
Colin Sweeney, a spokesperson for L.A.'s Department of Transportation, told The Times that the county isn't required to clear its truck routes with the city.
In Tujunga, residents living along the route described trucks rumbling past their homes. The screech of truck brakes was particularly torturous, they said.
Ara Khatchadourian lives at the corner of Commerce Avenue and Summitrose Street, and moved to Tujunga two and a half years ago because he and his wife wanted a quiet neighborhood after living next to a high school in Glendale.
The trucks began in the morning and went all day, six days a week. Seven tiles in his dining room floor cracked in March, which he blames on vibration from the trucks.
'It's been a very stressful time,' Khatchadourian said.
Read more: EPA plans to truck Eaton fire debris to a San Gabriel Valley park. Four cities lodge protest
Karen von Gunten and her husband, Jon, who live near the Zachau site, moved to Tujunga in 1987 and enjoy the owls and other wildlife that flock to their backyard.
Today, she said, she can't always keep her windows open without an odor wafting into their home. After the trucks first arrived in January, there was a strong 'burnt rubber' smell that eventually diminished but is still bothersome, she said. Her husband described the odor as akin to an 'old car engine.'
A representative for the South Coast Air Quality Management District said the agency has received 23 complaints alleging traffic concerns, odors and dust from soil related to Zachau since Jan. 7.
'South Coast AQMD responded to each complaint and conducted on-site inspections on nine different days," said spokesperson Nahal Mogharabi. "Our inspectors did not detect odors in the area and did not observe any air quality violations during any of those in-person visits."
Dirt collected by a resident at the site showed selenium, a trace element that can be harmful in heavy concentrations, according to the results, which were reviewed by The Times.
The lab results also showed arsenic in amounts higher than federal and state levels, but below another common level used in California.
The county did its own testing of Zachau and the two storm basins, and those results showed no selenium and generally the same levels of arsenic, according to the tests, which The Times reviewed.
'You could take two scoops and get two different results,' said Joe Sevrean, the lab director at 1 Laboratories, which handled the community's test.
Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents the area, told The Times in an email that 'the toxicologist reviewed the samples collected by residents and their tests indicate that the soil is clean and well within the state's safety standards."
Los Angeles City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez has demanded that the county fix roads in Tujunga that she said were damaged by the trucks.
Rodriguez, whose district includes Tujunga, said in a March letter to Mark Pestrella, director of Los Angeles County Public Works, that she is 'deeply concerned' about the county's use of the site.
The Tujunga community wants the county to do more testing. Residents are also bracing for the next storm and another round of trucks.
One county official told residents to consider removing the speed bumps along part of the truck route, so the trucks don't have to brake and make a screeching sound.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Little-known hack to get your suitcase off the plane first revealed
Little-known hack to get your suitcase off the plane first revealed

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Little-known hack to get your suitcase off the plane first revealed

After touching down from a flight, the last thing you need is to be stuck at baggage reclaim waiting for your luggage to arrive. With delays previously documented at UK airports by frustrated passengers, one handy hack has been revealed by an employee. Taking to Quora, the staffer, who works at a regional US airport, explained how being one of the last to drop your bags off is key. He said: 'Bags will always be loaded front to back on the bag carts so if you check in last your bags will be in the last bag cart.' This method could be considered risky though, as you run the chance of accidentally missing your flight's check-in closing time. But another tip is to ask the check-in or bag-drop agent to tag your bag with a priority or fragile sticker. Bags identified as fragile are often loaded last, and on top of other bags. They're also usually the first to be removed after landing. Travel expert Katy Nastro, from website Going, says becoming a frequent flier and earning status with an airline can help ensure your bag is one of the first to be offloaded. Katy explained how some airlines tag checked bags of elite passengers differently, making it clear to the system and staff to separate them. Jesse Neugarten, who is also an airline expert from Dollar Flight Club, said the guaranteed way to ensure your bag is the first off is to travel in First Class. He simply explains: 'Baggage for first-class passengers often travels on a separate cart and is sorted for fast delivery. 'It's one of the few consistent perks airlines still prioritise—and yes, it often works.'

Max Homa Ditches Caddie amid Carrying Own Bag at Painful US Open Qualifier
Max Homa Ditches Caddie amid Carrying Own Bag at Painful US Open Qualifier

Newsweek

time6 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Max Homa Ditches Caddie amid Carrying Own Bag at Painful US Open Qualifier

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Max Homa was the talk of the town during 'Golf's Longest Day,' but not precisely for his results. The six-time PGA Tour winner was seen carrying his own golf bag during the qualifying event at the Kinsale Golf & Fitness Club in Columbus, Ohio. It is a highly unusual situation, because caddies are allowed at these events, and Homa has had a successful enough career to afford hiring one. He was reportedly the only player in the field huffing his own bag around the course. This is what Golf's Longest Day is all about! 6x @PGATOUR winner Max Homa out here grinding 36 holes with his own bag on his back in an effort to play in his sixth-consecutive U.S. Open. — U.S. Open (@usopengolf) June 2, 2025 This led to the obvious question: Why was he carrying his own bag? Homa didn't say much about it. "I'd much rather talk about the golf instead of all the questions about the caddie," he said, according to Associated Press. "I'm good. Just hoofed it 36." However, AP reported that Homa and his caddie, Bill Harke, parted ways after only two months of working together. Ergo, Homa had to carry his own bag at Columbus. "I haven't carried my bag 36 holes in a while so I'm a little tired," he said. As for golf, Homa's performance in the final qualifier was very dramatic. He lost his chance to earn a spot in the US Open literally on the last hole. A par or better on the 36th hole would have secured his spot among the six qualifiers. However, he three-putted for bogey and finished at 5-under, tying with four other players. Therefore, a playoff was necessary to determine the final qualifier. Max Homa of the United States pulls his club from his bag on the 15th hole during the third round of the RBC Heritage 2025 at Harbour Town Golf Links on April 19, 2025 in... Max Homa of the United States pulls his club from his bag on the 15th hole during the third round of the RBC Heritage 2025 at Harbour Town Golf Links on April 19, 2025 in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. More Jared C. Tilton/Getty Images Cameron Young earned the final spot at Oakmont by birdieing the first playoff hole. Another sudden-death hole was then played to determine the two alternates for the event, and Chase Johnson and Eric Cole defeated Max Homa and Rickie Fowler in this instance. Erik van Rooyen won the Columbus qualifier comfortably with a 36-hole score of 13-under. PGA Tour players Bud Cauley, Lanto Griffin, and Justin Lower tied for second place at 7-under, and Harrison Ott earned fifth place at 6-under. Max Homa's US Open dream isn't completely over, as he's in the field for this week's RBC Canadian Open at TPC Toronto's North Course. Homa, currently ranked 87th in the world, needs a strong finish to move into the top 60 and earn the very last ticket to Oakmont. More Golf: Rockies fans will be left crying at this insane Scottie Scheffler stat

Are the Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks Going Anywhere?
Are the Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks Going Anywhere?

Newsweek

time6 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Are the Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks Going Anywhere?

On June 2, Russian and Ukrainian representatives met in Istanbul, Turkey, for the second round of peace talks in about two weeks. The initial round last month ended after 90 minutes with little progress outside of an agreement to release prisoners on both sides. All of the major political issues, such as establishing a ceasefire, Ukraine's future foreign policy trajectory, and the disposition of Russian military forces inside Ukraine were kicked down the road to a later date. This week's talks ended in a similar fashion. Again, no movement was detected on the major issues that have fueled the war into a fourth year. Coming a day after Kyiv conducted its most impressive drone attack inside Russia since the war began, one that took out as much as a third of Moscow's cruise missile carriers (one Russian commentator called the attack Russia's version of Pearl Harbor), Moscow was in no mood to compromise. Much like the first round, the Ukrainians and Russians walked away pledging to work toward the release of all wounded prisoners of war and those under 25 years old. The timeline to actually achieve this, however, wasn't spelled out. Ukrainian Minister of Defense Rustem Umerov speaks to the media after the second round of Ukraine-Russia peace talks at the Ciragan Palace on June 2, 2025, in Istanbul, Turkey. Ukrainian Minister of Defense Rustem Umerov speaks to the media after the second round of Ukraine-Russia peace talks at the Ciragan Palace on June 2, 2025, in Istanbul, anybody was anticipating movement on the big disputes, then you were asking for too much. Merely getting to a point where Ukrainian and Russian officials could sit at the same table took an excruciating amount of time and effort, including an Oval Office dressing down of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and bilateral conversations between the Americans and the Russians. Even then, it wasn't easy; after Zelensky committed to talks, he and Russian President Vladimir Putin went back and forth about who they were going to send. In the end, Putin chose to skip the proceedings and ordered a lower-level Russian delegation to travel to Turkey, a snub to the Ukrainians, who viewed the presence of mid-level officials as a reflection of Moscow's disinterest in diplomacy. It only stands to reason that the substance of the negotiations would be just as complicated as entering the room in the first place—and in all likelihood more so. The Ukrainian and Russian delegations handed over their respective positions in writing, which is good news. But the bad news overpowers the good in this situation: the two sides are keeping to their maximalist objectives and don't seem particularly interested in finding any overlap. This may change as the talks go on. Or it won't, in which case the entire diplomatic edifice comes crumbling down and the war will enter a more feverish pace. The pessimism is hard to shake. According to Reuters, the peace blueprint Ukraine delivered to Russia started off with a full ceasefire of 30 days, monitored by the United States and other third parties. Confidence-building steps, like prisoner exchanges and the repatriation of Ukrainian children taken during the war, would be the next step. The final peace deal would give Ukraine assurances that future Russian aggression would cease, namely through "robust" foreign-backed security guarantees. And Kyiv would have the freedom to join whatever political, economic, and military alliances it desires. While sanctions against the Russian economy would be lifted in the event of successful implementation, frozen Russian assets would still be earmarked for Ukraine's post-conflict reconstruction. The Russians have their own terms, and they couldn't be any more different from Kyiv's. The Russian term-sheet demands a full Ukrainian military withdrawal from Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia before a ceasefire takes place, which can only be interpreted as a ploy by Moscow to get the territorial concessions it hasn't been able to achieve through force. Ukraine would be prohibited from joining military alliances, and foreign troops and infrastructure would be barred from the country as well. Ukrainian military power would be capped, all western sanctions against Russia would be lifted, and both sides would drop claims to financial restitution. None of this is surprising because Russian officials have talked about these demands previously. But Zelensky and his allies in Europe, and likely some of the more transatlantic-friendly members of the Trump administration, will find all of this unhelpful and a bad omen for future talks. The big mystery now is where diplomacy goes from here. The answer depends on whether the initial proposals tabled by Ukraine and Russia are the typical opening offers we often see during high-stakes negotiations or ultimatums geared for public consumption. In other words, are the combatants at the first stage of genuine diplomacy? Or are they using the current bilateral talks as a way to embarrass each other, influence the court of world opinion to their advantage, and convince the elephant in the room, President Donald Trump, that it's the other side obstructing his dreams of a Nobel Peace Prize? If it's the former, then we at least open the possibility of a conflict-ending solution—although a positive end-state still isn't guaranteed. But if it's the latter, then Trump will eventually grow tired of the charade, throw in the towel, and move on. The most frustrating aspect of this entire saga is that none of us truly know where this is all headed. Daniel R. DePetris is a fellow at Defense Priorities and a syndicated foreign affairs columnist at the Chicago Tribune. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store