Social media campaign by GCC featuring a girl child adorned with garbage draws flak
After the civic body featured a girl child with garbage on the head alongside actor Yogi Babu on social media, many residents lodged a complaint on the system to redress grievances, demanding that the civic body delete such posts, and scrap the campaign.
Madipakkam resident and Madras High Court Advocate G.M.Shankar filed a complaint online on Thursday against what he claimed was an insensitive portrayal of a girl child. He shared the information on social media alleging that it was an offence against women and children.
'I filed a complaint on Thursday with the number 2025 - 614GHE after I saw a girl child portrayed with garbage on the head with the words Ithu Kuppai Matter Illa. However, on Friday, the civic body changed it and carried a similar template with actor Yogi Babu standing while the girl child crowned herself with garbage. I have asked GCC to delete all such templates for civic campaigns from X and Facebook. Even if the girl child is AI generated, it will offend residents.'
Advocate Sudha Ramalingam said it seems to be an insensitive way of depicting the girl child, a sort of stereotyping of the role of women. 'The man stands without the burden of the garbage while the girl child is burdened with the garbage. This depicts our deep-rooted stereotyped ideas of females being responsible for cleaning. Gender neutral advertisements and not gender specific advertisements should be done,' she said.
Geetha Ganesh, secretary of AGS Colony RWA, Velachery West, said: 'It's unfair representation. It could have been shown as, in her mind within the cloud as if she is thinking.' Jamalia resident Ahmed Sirajuddin asked: 'What do they mean by dumping garbage on a child's head ? Whatever message GCC wants to communicate to the citizens, this is not the way to communicate.'
N.Mathavan, former GCC engineer, said it was quite wrong. T. Nagar resident V. S. Jayaraman said the campaign was insensitive. 'Does any person dump garbage on anybody's head, more so on any child. This is an insult to the children,' he said.
MDMK councillor S.Jeevan said: 'Even though we cannot accept such a campaign depicting a girl child with garbage on the head, the picture also evokes a sense of concern about the probable impact of the waste to energy plant on the younger generation.'
Chennai Corporation officials said the civic body will launch a campaign to sensitise all the people about various civic issues without hurting the sentiments of residents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Was the fight for H-1B visa or Green Card worth it? Viral Reddit post gets surprising reactions
Amid the Donald Trump administration's major overhaul of US visa rules, a post has gone viral on Reddit asking people if they ever fought hard to obtain an H-1B visa or a green card, only to realize later on that happiness lies in the home country. The social media post has resonated well with several people, who shared that priorities for individuals change as they age. US visa rules have witnessed significant changes under the Donald Trump administration. (Unsplash) Viral Reddit post on H-1B visa: What to know? Posting on the popular subreddit r/h1b, one user by the name thth0001 asked, "Did anyone fight so hard to get an H1B and a green card just to realize they got happier after returning to home country?" The post soon gained significant attention as several people shared their personal experiences and thoughts on the matter. One user stated that a lot of people realize this "as they age". Another one added, "As they age, they would have gained significant wealth and return to a warmer place with comfortable life". A user went on to highlight that by the time people get their green card, they get old and have good wealth. The situation was "...like people retiring and moving to Florida or warmer places, Indians move back to India," read the comment. Few of them even shared their personal experiences, with one individual highlighting that they were part of a Facebook group of expats in the US, where the most common question was 'How long can I stay in India after getting my green card?" "You can imagine now. Most of the Indians are out there for money, their heart lies in India only," the person added. A person even compared the situation with the Pixar movie Soul, writing that the character of Joe always wanted to perform with his idol in the fantasy drama, but "once he got to do it, he still felt empty and he began to realise it was the little things in life he actually enjoyed, that he previously took for granted." Another person claimed that retirement life in the US "seems to be impossible" even when people have their own homes. "...maintaining quality of life is hard. There is a reason why some Americans are moving to South American countries for cheaper and better retirement," the individual added. Recently, the US Embassy in New Delhi stated that it will not allow third-party or representative passport collection from August 1 onwards. The move was aimed at enhancing the safety and security of applicants' documents. Moreover, it announced a paid home or office delivery service, which can be availed at the cost of ₹1,200 per applicant. FAQs What was the latest notice from the US Department of State? In the US, a 12-month-long visa bond pilot program is all set to roll out, wherein select immigrants applying for tourist or business B1, B2 visas may be subject to a pilot program. When will the new US visa interview waiver rules come into effect? Most of the non-immigrant visa applicants, including children and the elderly, will have to attend in-person interviews from September 2. How much is the visa integrity fee? Last month, the US came out with a new $250 visa integrity fee, which will start in 2026.
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Mint Snapview: India must flex its digital-market muscle to counter Trump tariffs
Yesterday, on the Vande Bharat Express from Mysuru to Bengaluru, I watched a fellow passenger—a young woman in her late twenties, working at a financial global capability centre (GCC) in the city—hunched over her laptop, feverishly using GPT-5 barely hours after its midnight release. She told me she makes about ₹1 lakh a month, yet spends $200 every month on her ChatGPT Pro subscription. Many of her colleagues, too, she added, are on different paid plans. In a country where per-capita income hovers at around $2,700 a year, here was a professional willing to spend nearly 10% of her monthly salary on a single AI tool—not as a luxury, but as a competitive necessity. Multiply that by the millions of Indians engaging with these systems daily, and you begin to see the invisible export: billions of unpaid, unpriced data points—prompts, clicks, scrolls—training the algorithms that will run tomorrow's AI-driven economy. India now has more ChatGPT users than any other country. And OpenAI isn't alone. From Google to Meta, dozens of the world's largest tech platforms have their biggest user bases here. Even if per-user revenue is lower than in the US, the volume and intensity of Indian usage make this market central to the global AI learning loop. It doesn't stop with consumer use. In Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune, and Gurugram, American and European multinationals have quietly concentrated 40-50% of their global engineering, R&D, and operational headcount inside Indian GCCs. Nvidia's CEO admits nearly half of its R&D staff is here. Cisco calls India its 'second global headquarters". JPMorgan's Indian offices are among its largest globally. This is not outsourcing in the 1990s sense—this is embedded capability, built over 25 years, that no other country can replicate quickly. And yet, we blink first On 7 August, Mint reported how New Delhi's first reaction to US President Donald Trump's unilateral 50% tariff hike on Indian exports was to frame it as 'a phase we have to overcome" and speak vaguely of finding new markets. Missing entirely was a plan to use the leverage we already hold. The retreat began months earlier. On 28 March, as the Financial Times reported, the government quietly scrapped the 6% 'Google tax" on online ads —one of the few tools designed to make Big Tech pay for extracting value from India without a physical presence here. This followed 2024's repeal of a separate 2% equalization levy after US complaints that it was 'discriminatory and unreasonable". The timing was deliberate: a pre-emptive signal of goodwill days before Trump's tariffs took effect. FT even noted that 'Trump loves to hear that his pressure is working". The real-world effect: Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, AWS, SAP, PwC, and KPMG all get a cheaper ride in the world's largest open digital market, with the costs of market access dropping to zero. Reciprocity, not concession This is exactly backwards. In a moment of tariff escalation, the logic should be reciprocity, not concession. If the US can double duties on our textiles and seafood overnight, India can and should consider: • A 20-25% minimum tax on US tech, consulting, cloud, and IP-licensing revenues earned here. • Transfer pricing reform for GCCs: if 40-50% of the work happens in India, we should extract fair value—not the token 'cost + 5%" that many firms record today, but 'cost + 50%". That's the difference between accepting a service-centred mark-up and pricing India's role as a core profit centre in these companies' global operations. The reflexive fear is that American companies will 'unplug" Indian IT services if we push back. That is a myth. Two decades of operational maturity, scale, and cost advantage mean there is no readymade Poland, Israel, or Midwestern US waiting to absorb those millions of engineer-hours. The contrast with China is stark: Beijing buys ' ₹0 worth" of these services and locks its market down; India's openness is the prize. We act as if this makes us vulnerable; in reality, it makes us indispensable. The levers we refuse to pull The market. The talent. The daily, unpaid contribution of hundreds of millions of Indian users to the training of global AI models. These are assets no tariff can touch—unless we choose not to use them. Right now, our negotiation posture is defensive, even apologetic. We dismantle taxes meant to make Big Tech pay its share and hope it buys goodwill. Washington plays hardball; we play nice. That is not a recipe for parity. A different playbook Trade talks are not charity auctions. The willingness to walk away is often the most powerful tool in the room. When we remove a tax to please Washington, we should ask: What are we getting in return? If the answer is 'nothing yet", we have already lost. India's digital market, engineering workforce, and user-generated data are as strategic as its pharmaceuticals or textiles. The day we start treating them that way—pricing them fairly, taxing them reciprocally, and putting them squarely on the negotiating table—is the day we stop negotiating from a position of weakness. Until then, we'll keep watching our fellow passengers on the Vande Bharat Express train the world's AI for free, while the bill for their value creation is paid somewhere else. Pankaj Mishra is a journalist and co-founder of FactorDaily. He has spent over two decades reporting on technology, startups, and work in India with a focus on the people and places often left out of the spotlight.
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Sanitary workers' stir outside Ripon Building enters Day eight
CHENNAI: The protest by hundreds of sanitary workers urging authorities to drop the plan to outsource solid waste management in Royapuram and Thiru-Vi-Ka Nagar zones and regularisation of their employment entered eighth day on Friday, with former IAS officer P Sivakami visiting the protest site outside the Ripon Buildings to express solidarity with them. Sivakami noted that the government had assured job regularisation when the workers, during Covid-19 and subsequent natural disasters, toiled hard to keep the city clean, and urged the state government to hold talks with them. Though the DMK had assured to regularise their jobs, it failed to keep its promise, Sivakami said. 'While the government is pushing for privatisation, it should, at least, ensure that the workers receive salary on a par with their present earnings, which is around Rs 23,000 per month,' she said. Meanwhile, the police have issued a notice to the protesters not to assemble at the site. 'Such notice, when we are holding a peaceful sit-in protest, is an act of intimidation,' the workers said. Meanwhile, garbage collection and transportation in Royapuram and Thiru-Vi-Ka Nagar zones, which took a hit for the past few days, are being managed now by deploying workers from other zones and making them work overtime, said a senior official. The official added that the new contractor is in the process of hiring new workers. 'We have assured the workers that their current salaries will be retained by the contractor, but they are not willing to join, demanding permanent employment.' GCC said on Friday that between July 21 and August 7, 9,696 metric tonnes (MT) and 7,451 MT of waste were collected from Royapuram and Thiru-Vi-Ka Nagar zones respectively, to indicate that garbage collection has not been affected. While the average collection per day was around 620 MT from July 21 to 31, this dropped to about 400 MT from August when the protest began.
