Nebraska lawmakers hear support for opening unemployment insurance to immigrant ‘Dreamers'
The Nebraska Alliance for Thriving Communities, a coalition of labor unions, hospitals, banks, cattlemen and pork producers gather in September at the Capitol to proclaim that certain immigration policies and laws should be updated, partly to help address Nebraska's workforce shortage. The alliance supported Legislative Bill 299, which was the topic of a public hearing Monday. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — Nebraska lawmakers are considering a legislative proposal that would put the state in sync with nearly all states, if not all, in allowing access to unemployment insurance benefits to immigrants who have permission to work in the U.S. but who lack permanent residency.
The state's current prohibition on the benefits applies to certain authorized immigrant workers despite the fact their employers pay unemployment insurance taxes on their behalf.
So-called 'Dreamers,' who grew up in the U.S. after being brought here illegally as minors by their parents, are a primary population excluded from such benefits.
Nebraska Dreamers, those legally in the country as recipients of the Obama administration's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, were among the 10 people in the majority that testified Monday in support of Legislative Bill 299 at the Nebraska Capitol.
LB 299, the topic of a public hearing before the Legislature's Business and Labor Committee, has bipartisan sponsorship. It was introduced by State Sen. Teresa Ibach of Sumner, a Republican, and co-sponsored by State Sen. Margo Juarez of Omaha, a Democrat.
We're talking about Nebraska's workforce shortage, and these individuals have been essential to filling in that workforce shortage and are in compliance with the federal laws.
– State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln
Zayra Navarrete, who has had DACA status since 2013 and works as a financial advisor in Hastings, told the committee she contributes to a pension, life insurance and unemployment benefits. She said she lives in fear that if unforeseen circumstances led to a job loss, she would not have the same lifeline as co-workers.
'I am constantly preparing alternatives for an emergency crisis,' Navarrete said, figuring out backup strategies that include taking out loans or selling personal assets.
She said the question of unemployment benefits for workers in her situation came to the forefront during COVID- 19 — when some workers who were laid-off were not provided the same help to get by during the crescendo of the pandemic.
Said Navarrete: 'Why is a state that is benefiting over $14 million in state and local taxes from DACA recipients not allowing us to access those funds?'
The National Immigration Law Center did not have a current comprehensive inventory of states with policies akin to LB 299. But Tanya Broder, senior counsel, said that most, if not all states, offer unemployment insurance benefits to immigrants in similar situations.
Nick Grandgenett, an attorney with Nebraska Appleseed, said the proposed legislation would benefit DACA recipients as well as asylum-seekers who have been granted work authorization while their requests are reviewed and others with Temporary Protected Status that is granted when returning to a person's home country is unsafe due to natural disaster, extraordinary conditions or war.
The only person to testify in opposition to LB 299 on Monday was interim Labor Commissioner Katie Thurber, who noted that the measure essentially creates a new state definition for 'eligible alien.'
She said that more than $400 million in federal funds is at stake.
For Nebraska to receive federal funds to help administer its unemployment program, the state must meet certain federal conformity requirements, Thurber said.
She said Nebraska has been given an advanced warning by the U.S. Department of Labor that, as drafted, LB 299 likely creates a conformity issue. She said her understanding is that the language is too broad, allowing benefits even if the immigrant lost legal authorization to work in the U.S.
Maintaining conformity under LB 299, she said, 'becomes particularly concerning' given the uncertain future of DACA, depending on the results of an ongoing court battle.
Thurber's objections prompted a firm challenge from committee member State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln.
'You know, Nebraska does have a conformity issue — a nonconformity issue,' Raybould said. 'We were the very last state in the entire United States to allow our DACA qualified people to have a driver's license. … We were the last state in the entire union to recognize the degrees they have achieved through their hard work at our own universities.'
Raybould said it is her understanding that Nebraska is the only state that does not allow DACA and certain other authorized immigrant workers access to unemployment benefits that their employers contribute to.
Thurber said she was not saying there aren't 'ways around' the nonconformity issue, and noted that the Labor Department worked with State Sen. Mike McDonnell of Omaha on similar 2021 legislation that was never enacted.
She said, however, that as currently drafted, LB 299 could cost Nebraska employers more than $400 million in federal tax credits unless conformity questions are resolved.
Backing the proposed legislation Monday were groups such as the Nebraska Alliance for Thriving Communities and business organizations including the statewide Nebraska Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Omaha and Lincoln Chambers of Commerce.
'We're talking about Nebraska's workforce shortage, and these individuals have been essential to filling in that workforce shortage and are in compliance with the federal laws,' said Raybould. 'I find it really hard to believe that we in the state of Nebraska can not get it right like all the other 49 states have done to make sure we are in conformity … What are we doing wrong?'
Thurber, at the end of the back-and-forth, said she has offered assistance to Ibach to address the conformity issue.
State Sen. Kathleen Kauth, chair of the Business and Labor Committee, said 46 people wrote in support of the proposed legislation and eight were opposed.
The committee took no action on whether to advance the bill to debate by the full Legislature.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.' 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end,' said Carey.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas' GOP congressional delegation meets to discuss redrawing districts ahead of midterms
Republicans from Texas' congressional delegation met at the U.S. Capitol Monday night to discuss a proposal to redraw the lines of their House districts, GOP Rep. Pete Sessions said. Emerging from a meeting attended by most of the 25-member GOP delegation, Sessions said there was 'a lot we don't know,' including whether Gov. Greg Abbott would be in favor of the idea. Abbott has the lone authority to call members of the Texas Legislature back to Austin for a special session, which would be required to carry out the rare and extraordinary move of reshaping the state's political boundaries in the middle of the decade, years before the next census in 2030. Sessions, a Waco Republican, told reporters the delegation has scheduled another meeting to discuss the issue further and 'share data,' but declined to give further details beyond confirming that President Donald Trump would not be attending. The meeting came shortly after The New York Times first reported that Trump's political team has been urging Texas political leaders to examine how they could redraw some of the state's 38 U.S. House districts to help preserve the GOP's narrow majority in the lower chamber in the 2026 midterms. Sessions emphasized that Republicans, in weighing whether to push for a mid-decade redistricting battle, should consider how it would impact 'the entire delegation.' 'We want to make sure all of our members, even those that are brand new, have an opportunity to see this for what it is,' Sessions said, declining to say whether he was concerned specifically about stretching Republican districts too thin by moving voters around to maximize the GOP's advantage. Other Republicans exiting the meeting — including Reps. Chip Roy, Michael McCaul, Beth Van Duyne and Dan Crenshaw — did not directly answer any questions about the meeting. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Disclosure: The New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.