Alleged laptop procurement graft puts ex-minister Nadiem in spotlight
JAKARTA: After finishing his term as former president Joko 'Jokowi' Widodo's education minister, Nadiem Makarim is back in the public spotlight in the Attorney General's Office's (AGO) investigation into alleged corruption pertaining to a procurement project during his ministerial tenure.
Investigators with the Office of the Assistant Attorney General for Extraordinary Crimes (Jampidsus) launched an investigation in May into alleged graft related to the procurement of Google Chromebook laptops by the then-education, culture, research and technology ministry between 2019 and 2022.
Investigators interrogated at least 28 witnesses. Among them was Fiona Handayani, one of Nadiem's special staffers, who was summoned by the AGO on Tuesday (June 10) for an interrogation session. The AGO previously confiscated her laptop and mobile phones during a raid last month.
AGO spokesperson Harli Siregar said that investigators planned to call in two of Nadiem's other former special staffers, identified as Jurist Tan and Ibrahim Arief, for questioning this week
Investigators also seized their phones and computers as well as other documents from their houses during a recent raid. The AGO also slapped the three former special staffers with a travel ban on June 4, as they failed to fulfil a summons for an interrogation.
According to the AGO, the procurement cost around Rp 9.9 trillion (US$607 million), around two-thirds of which was taken from a special allocated fund originally earmarked to be transferred by the central government to regional administrations.
Harli said that investigators found indications of collusion to procure Chromebook laptops to be distributed to schools around the country. The Google-based laptops were picked despite initial tests in 2018 by the ministries' research team that discouraged the use of laptops because of their lack of effectiveness in regions without internet connections.
He added that investigators also probed an allegation of price markup for the laptop. While Jampidsus investigators already had the name of five vendors allegedly involved in the case, Harli did not elaborate further on Google's role in the illicit practice. A representative of Google Indonesia was not immediately available to respond to The Jakarta Post's request for comment.
The Jampidsus investigators were still looking for the people managing the procurement project as well as the mastermind who first proposed the idea.
During a press briefing on Tuesday, Nadiem denied allegations of collusion to favour the Chromebook over other laptops. He also rebuked claims that his ministry dismissed the 2018 study outlining the laptop's disadvantage, claiming that the research was done before he took office in October 2024 and focussed on gadgets for schools in less developed and remote areas.
'Meanwhile, the laptop procurement during my term of office was not targeted for remote and less developed areas,' Nadiem said in the televised press conference. He added that the gadgets were intended to prevent 'learning loss' among students in areas with established digital infrastructure and internet connections during the Covid-19 pandemic as well as to help educators in their teaching process.
Nadiem picked famed lawyer Hotman Paris Hutapea to represent him in the matter. The lawyer argued that allegations made by AGO investigators missed the mark.
'Nadiem never veered [from the study's results] because the study [and Nadiem's Chromebook procurement] were two different projects. They cannot be linked to each other,' Hotman said.
The former education minister further claimed the programme was a success, with 97 per cent of the 1.1 million Chromebook laptops procured during his term delivered to 77,000 schools by 2023. He also claimed that his ministry undertook a 'periodic census' to count the laptops.
Despite dismissing the allegations of involvement in the case, Nadiem said that he was 'ready to cooperate' and support investigators by providing needed information or clarification on the investigation. - The Jakarta Post/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
The risk of nuclear war waned after the Cold War. It's back with a vengeance
WHEN the first nuclear bomb test took place 80 years ago, the scientists who gathered to observe the explosion in the New Mexico desert recognised they were playing with fire. Physicist Enrico Fermi tried to break the tension by taking bets on whether the bomb would ignite the atmosphere and destroy the world. J. Robert Oppenheimer wagered US$10 the bomb wouldn't work at all, and Edward Teller conspicuously applied sunscreen in the predawn darkness, offering to pass it around. The bomb exploded in a fireball hotter than the surface of the sun, producing far more destructive power than the scientists anticipated. Within weeks, the United States nuked the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hastening the end of World War II while killing more than 200,000 civilians. The bomb hasn't been used since, apart from test blasts, and after the Cold War ended in 1991, the risk of nuclear war mercifully declined. Now the risk is back on the rise, as an alarming new nuclear age dawns. Today, we are in a 'uniquely dangerous moment'. The nuclear landscape is changing for the worse. For starters, the main players are no longer two global superpowers. During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union largely controlled the potential for conflict, which made the risks relatively straightforward to analyse. These days, the politics of nuclear arms have become more complicated and unpredictable. Nine nations are said to possess the weapons today, including the rogue state of North Korea, and others could build them quickly. Most people have forgotten that South Africa once developed a bomb but gave up its programme voluntarily. Iraq and Libya also had active nuclear-weapon programmes that were stopped under intense international pressure. At the moment, the focus is on Iran's nuclear programme, which the US bombed on June 22, alongside Israel. The US launched its attack even though Iran continued to pursue diplomacy about its nuclear ambitions. Iran may conclude that it needs a nuclear capability for self-defence, to deter future attacks. The same could be said for other states threatened by nuclear- armed rivals. Consider Ukraine, which voluntarily gave up the nuclear arms based on its soil after the fall of the Soviet Union. Would Russia's 2022 invasion still have occurred against a Ukraine bristling with doomsday weapons? Doubtful. Besides the chilling political calculations, the weapons used to deliver nuclear warheads have become more dangerous. Hyper-sonic glide missiles could elude defence systems before striking their targets with practically no warning, while smaller, low-yield nukes threaten to blur the lines between conventional and nuclear warfare, making all-out war more likely. Defence spending is soaring across the globe, and with it, faster and deadlier weapons are likely to be deployed. At the same time, treaties restricting nuclear arms are in decline. The most impactful of them – the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – was undermined in 2003 when North Korea withdrew from it and built an atomic arsenal. It's time for the targets of these terrible weapons – us, that is – to rise up and say, 'No!' The 1980s witnessed mass demonstrations demanding a nuclear freeze. Today, the threat of nuclear war is beginning to enter the public consciousness again. The movie Oppenheimer about the Trinity bomb test 80 years ago was a boxoffice hit. The 2024 book by journalist Annie Jacobsen, Nuclear War: A Scenario, became a bestseller. Star movie director James Cameron has committed to making Ghosts of Hiroshima , a Japan-set movie said to be a nightmarish look at the A-bomb blasts. During the Cold War, pop culture helped convince everyday people to stand against the march towards Armageddon, and here's hoping it can do so again. For 80 years, the world has lived with the threat of nuclear destruction. Let's act now to curb it, before it's too late. — Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
90-day extension of US-China tariff truce is likely, US commerce secretary says
A 90-day extension of a US-China tariff truce is likely, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday, the most concrete signal from the US side about moving the deadline since bilateral talks concluded in Stockholm last week. 'I think we're going to leave that to the trade team and to the president to make those decisions, but it feels like likely that they're going to come to an agreement and extend that for another 90 days,' he said on Fox News when asked if the truce, which is set to expire on Tuesday, would be extended. Lutnick made similar comments last week while the talks were under way July 28 and 29, noting that a 90-day extension was a likely outcome of negotiations. But after the talks, only the Chinese side declared a consensus on extending the pause on tariff increases. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a CBS interview last Friday that the two sides were 'working towards' an extension. The commerce secretary spoke hours after US President Donald Trump's sweeping worldwide tariffs came into effect on Thursday, imposing at least 10 per cent on imports from about 90 countries, after multiple rounds of delays since they were first announced in April. Since April, the US has gradually increased tariffs on Chinese imports to as much as 145 per cent. In retaliation, Beijing imposed tariffs of up to 125 per cent and introduced export controls on strategic raw materials. In May, both sides agreed in Geneva to a 90-day suspension of new tariffs. A second round of talks followed in June in London, where an understanding to ease export controls on US semiconductors and Chinese rare earth minerals was struck, before the most recent round in Stockholm. Still, much appears in flux. On Wednesday Trump floated the idea that China could be subject to punitive tariffs for purchasing Russian oil, hours after he imposed 25 per cent tariffs on India for doing so. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro suggested on the same day that such action was unlikely because the higher duties might hurt the US. On Thursday, Lutnick also elaborated on Trump's Wednesday announcement that companies that manufacture semiconductors within the US would be exempt from 100 per cent tariffs on the chips they import, emphasising the role of an auditor in the process. 'If you commit to build in America during his term, and if you file it with the Commerce Department, and if your auditor oversees you building it all the way through, then he will allow you to import your chips while you're building without a tariff,' Lutnick said on Fox. Lutnick's remarks came as Trump continues his pressure on the semiconductor industry, posting on Truth Social on Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, the chief of California-based Intel, should resign due to being 'highly conflicted'. Earlier in the week, US Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, sent a letter to the chair of Intel's board contending that Tan's ties to Chinese companies could pose a national security threat. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Borneo Post
7 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Shafie: Unite, reject outside political influence
Shafie addressing the 300-strong crowd who attended the event on Saturday. PENAMPANG (Aug 9): Parti Warisan President Datuk Seri Shafie Apdal has reiterated that the upcoming state election is crucial for reshaping Sabah's political landscape, warning against the illusion of a 'local victory' if the winning party remains beholden to peninsula-based partners. 'The slogan we have been using all this while is 'In God we trust, unite we must',' he told reporters after meeting members of the Chinese community in the Kapayan constituency on Saturday. 'And then, is it wrong for us to unite the Sabahan people under one roof? No. This is in line with how we can unite the Sabahan people. Do not tell me that we can only be united using political parties,' he said. Shafie stressed that Sabahans should be united by their shared needs, not just political affiliations, citing better education, healthcare, infrastructure, and basic necessities as key priorities. On health reforms, he called for the establishment of a Sabah Ministry of Health to produce generic medicines locally, cut costs, and reduce poverty. 'Most pharmaceutical plants are in Melaka and Selangor. They can produce, why can't we? Costs will be lower if we produce our own products,' he said. He emphasised that a state ministry would complement, not overlap, the federal Health Ministry. 'Can you imagine, like in my hometown, there's no operating theatre? I have been asking for it since Chua Jui Ming was Health Minister. We are saving human lives,' he added. Addressing recent bullying cases in schools and the medical sector, Shafie called for swift and firm law enforcement. 'The law is there, and when incidents happen, immediate action must be taken. That will deter people from repeating such acts,' he said, warning that delays fuel speculation and misinformation. He also urged Sabahans to reject the entry of parties from Sarawak and the peninsula, warning it could further divide the state's political scene. 'Enough is enough. They see a vacuum here for us to be even further divided,' he said, in reference to Sarawak-based Parti Bumi Kenyalang's (PBK) plans to contest in the 17th state election. Shafie stressed that Sabahans themselves have the power to stop the encroachment by refusing to join or vote for such parties. He concluded by reaffirming that solving Sabah's challenges requires genuine cooperation between the federal and state governments, though such advice often goes unheeded.
