2025 TVS Apache RTR 160 and RTR 180 teased ahead of launch
The teaser that the brand released shows the LED Daytime Running Lamps of the upcoming motorcycles. Check Offers
TVS Motor Company is gearing up to launch updated versions of two of its most iconic streetfighters—the Apache RTR 160 2V and Apache RTR 180 2V. A recent teaser released on the brand's official social media channels hints at an imminent launch, fueling anticipation among enthusiasts and loyalists of the Apache series.
While the teaser keeps specifics under wraps, industry expectations suggest that both models will receive significant updates to comply with the latest OBD-2B norms (On-Board Diagnostics), which will help them meet the newer emission regulations.
Aesthetic enhancements are also on the cards. The Apache RTR 160 and 180 may sport new color schemes and revised graphics that align with current trends and appeal to younger riders. TVS has historically paid attention to design detail, and a visual refresh could help the Apache twins maintain their street presence in a highly competitive segment.
Also Read : 2025 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V: Five price-wise rivals that you can buy
In terms of mechanical specifications, the Apache RTR 160 is powered by a 159.7 cc single-cylinder air-cooled engine producing 15.82 bhp at 8,750 rpm and 13.85 Nm of torque at 7,000 rpm. The slightly more powerful Apache RTR 180 features a 177.4 cc air/oil-cooled motor that delivers 16.78 bhp at 9,000 rpm and 15.5 Nm of torque at 7,000 rpm. Both bikes are paired with a five-speed manual gearbox. Despite being long-standing models in the market, these specifications remain relevant for everyday urban riding and occasional performance thrills.
Also Read : TVS Orbiter nameplate patented, could launch later this year
Although these bikes haven't seen a major update in years, they continue to enjoy popularity, especially in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Moreover, the Apache series has a cult following among stunt riders, thanks to its short wheelbase and strong low-end torque—characteristics that lend themselves well to tricks and wheelies.
With these updates, TVS is looking to rejuvenate interest in the Apache RTR 160 and 180 models and strengthen its foothold in the entry-level performance motorcycle segment. An official launch is expected soon, and more details are likely to follow in the coming weeks.
Check out Upcoming Bikes In India.
First Published Date: 24 Jun 2025, 15:27 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
CM urges Centre to roll back fare hike; passengers flag concerns
Chennai: Calling Indian Railways "an integral part" of daily life for the poor and middle class, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin on Wednesday urged the Union govt not to hike passenger fares or reduce general class coaches. "The Indian Railway isn't just a service – it's family," Stalin said in a post on X. "To increase the number of AC coaches, don't cut down general class coaches. Don't raise fares." He added that the hike, set to take effect from July, already dampened public mood and would worsen the burden on households already struggling with rising prices and fuel costs. Passenger associations also voiced concern the same day, warning that reducing affordable travel options would drive more people to unsafe or overcrowded modes of transport. AIADMK leader Edappadi K Palaniswami also opposed the Centre's proposed railway fare hike, calling it unacceptable and demanding its immediate withdrawal. However, he criticised CM Stalin's stance as hypocritical, pointing out that the DMK-led Tamil Nadu govt already burdened middle-class families with multiple tax and tariff hikes. T Sadagopan, a commuter rights activist from Pattabiram, said demand far exceeds supply. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 월 2만원으로 아이들의 한끼 선물하기 굿네이버스 더 알아보기 Undo "The demand for trains is very high, but they haven't increased the number of trains. It's okay to raise fares if services improve," he said. He pointed out that many travellers are forced to book last-minute tickets at higher tatkal or premium tatkal rates and, failing that, turn to costly road transport. However, some felt the hike was minor and justified. "It was revised only five years ago. The increase is very minimum," said K Baskar of the Railway Passengers' Welfare Association. "Even Chennai–Madurai may not be affected, as the proposal only covers routes above 500 km at one paisa per km." You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
'Appeals in DGGI-led multi-state cases must be filed where CAA is posted'
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that appeals against orders passed by Common Adjudicating Authorities (CAAs) in multi-state GST investigations by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) must be filed in the jurisdiction where the CAA is posted. The clarification, issued through a circular dated 24 June, addresses a key procedural gap in the earlier December 2024 circular, which had designated CAAs for adjudicating show-cause notices issued by DGGI but did not specify where appeals, reviews or revisions of such orders should be filed. 'This had led to confusion in cases where investigations were conducted across multiple states. For example, if the DGGI investigated a company in Mumbai, Kolkata and New Delhi, and the CAA was posted in New Delhi, it was unclear whether the appeal should be filed in Maharashtra, West Bengal or Delhi,' said Vivek Jalan, partner, Tax Connect Advisory Services. The new circular brings clarity by stating that all legal follow-up actions — including appeals, reviews and revisions — must be carried out within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner or Principal Commissioner under whom the CAA functions. Appeals will lie with the Commissioner (Appeals) of the same jurisdiction, and the department's representation will also come from that Commissionerate. Further, the reviewing or revisional authority may seek inputs from the relevant DGGI formation before deciding on the order. The clarification is aimed at ensuring consistency and avoiding jurisdictional disputes in DGGI-led proceedings where a CAA has been appointed. Field officers have been instructed to issue trade notices to disseminate the circular, and any challenges in its implementation are to be reported to the Board.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
The ‘Axis of Upheaval' in the West Asia conflict
As the war between Israel and Iran has resulted in a ceasefire after being layered with America's bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, the narrative of the world being divided into power blocs like those during the Cold War era stands punctured. With Iran having suffered a political and military decapitation of leadership and capacity alike, its main partners, China and Russia, have maintained a distance. Before the conflict, Iran had been central to the narrative of the global order's perceived fracturing between palatable West-led alliances against a Moscow- and Beijing-knitted axis, dubbed as the 'Axis of Upheaval' by American scholars Richard Fontaine and Andrea Kendall-Taylor. In Russia's war against Ukraine, Iranian drone technologies have played a critical role, while Moscow and Tehran, despite certain regional differences, once joined hands to stabilise the government of the now ousted Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad. Meanwhile, as sanctions have gnawed at Iran's economic depth over the years, China has gained much by continuing to buy cheap oil from the country. This has been helpful to Beijing in powering its stagnating growth while giving Tehran much needed cash inflows in a polity and society that is starved of steady financial streams. No treaties However, all this balancing has strategic limitations as well. The axes, at best, are a narrative construct. There are no treaties that bind these states into military blocs, where charters can be mobilised to push the others to join a war if a partner country is attacked. The underpinnings of these partnerships nonetheless go deeper, spilling over into a reconstruction of institutions, currencies, multilateralism and how the world operates today. They want de-dollarisation, alternatives to western payments gateways such as SWIFT, and a strengthening of organisations such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) as well as fundamental anti-West ecosystems. But there is no military treaty to anchor all these, which marks a critical gap in taking on western influence which is pinned using both treaties and understandings. Russia and China, nonetheless, have made statements in favour of Iran as a way of support. Moscow has criticised those backing Israel's actions, including the ambiguity of positions taken by the International Atomic Energy Agency and attempts to manipulate international non-proliferation regimes. Russia's President Vladimir Putin in a telephone call offered mediation, which was sidelined by United States President Donald Trump. The noticeable part was this: it was not that Mr. Putin wanted to mediate, but political and diplomatic support may be the only thing Russia may be able to offer Iran at this stage. Tehran has comprehensive strategic partnerships that it signed with Mr. Putin (2025) and China's President Xi Jinping (2021), which are almost exclusively economic in nature. While aligning with Iran as part of an axis in the long term makes sense if one considers the country's vast energy reserves (many of which remain untapped due to technology-led roadblocks aided by international sanctions), the fact is that neither Russia nor China have the intent or the bandwidth to come to Tehran's aid in a military sense even though the suitability of the current political system under Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is critical to their own individual interests. Where Russia stands For Moscow, its war against Ukraine has tied down most of its political and military capabilities. The other opaque member of the axis, North Korea, is already providing soldiers to Russia to arrest its depleting military depth. This denies it any capabilities to tactically help Tehran. Previously, with its bases and assets in Syria, providing some air power assistance could have been possible, at least theoretically. However, with the fall of the Assad regime, which has now been replaced by former al-Qaeda leader Ahmed Al Sharaa — ironically, he is prioritising relations with the West pushed by Arab partners — Moscow has lost the only military footing it had in West Asia. China too has come out in support of Iran. While its Foreign Minister Wang Yi in a call with his Israeli counterpart highlighted how Israeli strikes were violating international law, a readout after a call between Mr. Xi and Mr. Putin interestingly demanded that the U.S. (without referencing it directly) orchestrate a de-escalation. While both Russia and China are worried about the wider implications of this conflict, it benefits their strategic postures in many ways. With the U.S. now having joined Israel in attacking Iran, a decision Mr. Trump took while keeping even his closest advisers in the dark, it would bog the White House down once again in West Asia, potentially relocating critical military assets away from the Indo-Pacific and from Ukraine. This would free-up space in both Beijing and Moscow's immediate geographies of interest while also potentially sowing self-inflicted discord within the Trump administration. For now, a brittle U.S.-backed ceasefire is holding Tehran and Tel Aviv at bay. The outlook For Iran, the news on any of the axes front is not good. While Russia and China may prioritise their own positions, the proverbial 'Axis of Resistance' made up of Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis among others is down for the count as Iran's first line of defence and offence in the region. Finally, the future of Iran, irrespective of what kind of political reality prevails, even in a moderate system, may be shaped by the point that only nuclear power can hereon guarantee sovereignty. Kabir Taneja is Deputy Director and Fellow, Strategic Studies Programme, Observer Research Foundation
