logo
Cervical Cancer: 5 Things to Know

Cervical Cancer: 5 Things to Know

Medscapea day ago
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health concern, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, with an estimated 660,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths in 2022. The burden is unevenly distributed, with over 85% of cases occurring in low- and middle-income countries, where access to preventive care and treatment is limited. In contrast, the incidence and mortality rates in the United States have declined substantially due to widespread implementation of cervical cancer screening programs and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, with an estimated 13,820 new cases and 4,360 deaths expected in the US in 2024.
Cervical cancer develops from a multistep transformation process triggered by persistent infection with high-risk types of HPV, most notably HPV 16 and 18. These oncogenic strains integrate into host DNA, expressing viral proteins E6 and E7, which inactivate the tumor suppressors p53 and retinoblastoma protein (Rb), respectively, and promote genomic instability. The progression from infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and eventually invasive carcinoma may take 15-20 years after initial HPV infection, providing a window for early detection and prevention.
Histologically, the majority of cervical cancers are squamous cell carcinomas (~80%), followed by adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas. The World Health Organization now distinguishes between HPV-associated and HPV-independent tumors, with the latter comprising roughly 5% of cases — often displaying worse outcomes and distinct molecular profiles — although current treatment strategies do not yet differ based on HPV status.
Here are five things to know about Cervical Cancer.
1. HPV vaccination and screening remain the most powerful tools for prevention.
Persistent infection with oncogenic HPV types, particularly HPV 16 and 18, is responsible for over 95% of cervical cancers. Screening and vaccination efforts have significantly reduced cervical cancer incidence in countries with established programs.
According to 2018 recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force, women aged 21-29 should undergo cervical cytology (Pap smear) every 3 years, while those aged 30-65 may choose between cytology every 3 years, high-risk HPV testing every 5 years, or cotesting every 5 years.
In contrast, the American Cancer Society's 2020 guidelines recommend beginning screening at age 25 with HPV testing as the preferred method. No routine screening is recommended for women younger than 21, older than 65, or those who have undergone a hysterectomy for benign reasons.
HPV vaccination has transformed cervical cancer prevention. Vaccination before the age of 17 has been shown to reduce cervical cancer incidence by nearly 90%, and growing evidence supports that a single dose may be as effective as a full series, which could simplify implementation in low-resource settings.
2. At-home HPV testing is a breakthrough in improving access.
To expand screening to underserved populations, the FDA approved clinician-supervised self-collected HPV testing in 2024 and fully at-home HPV testing in 2025. These regulatory changes represent a major shift in cervical cancer screening accessibility. Clinical trials have demonstrated that the sensitivity of at-home HPV testing of ~95% is equivalent to that of clinician-collected samples.
This development is especially important for increasing screening rates in medically underserved communities, including individuals with limited access to healthcare, cultural stigma surrounding pelvic exams, or logistical barriers to in-person visits. By reducing these obstacles, at-home HPV testing has the potential to improve early detection, narrow disparities, and prevent progression to advanced cervical cancer among those most at risk.
3. HPV is the primary risk factor, but others contribute to disease development.
While infection with high-risk HPV is a necessary precursor to most cervical cancers, not all women with HPV will develop cancer. Additional factors can influence progression from transient infection to persistent infection, dysplasia, and ultimately malignancy.
Tobacco use is among the most well-established risk factors, doubling the risk of squamous cell carcinoma by impairing local immune defenses in the cervix.
Immunosuppression, especially in individuals with the human immunodeficiency virus, markedly increases the risk of persistent HPV infection and cervical dysplasia.
Other contributing factors include chronic chlamydia infection, long-term use of oral contraceptives, having three or more full-term pregnancies, early age at first childbirth, poor diet lacking in fruits and vegetables, and exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero. Lower socioeconomic status is consistently associated with higher cervical cancer incidence and worse outcomes, largely due to reduced access to screening and timely care.
Though uncommon, a subset of cervical cancers (3%-8%) are not associated with HPV and tend to present at older ages, potentially with more aggressive biology.
4. Symptoms often appear late, making screening critical.
Most early cervical cancers and pre-cancerous lesions are asymptomatic, which is why regular screening is vital for early detection. When symptoms do occur, they often include abnormal vaginal bleeding, such as post-coital or intermenstrual bleeding, watery or malodorous vaginal discharge, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. As the disease advances, more severe symptoms may develop, including urinary symptoms, lower abdominal pressure, hematuria, and hematochezia depending on the site of metastasis.
Diagnosis is initiated with colposcopy and biopsy following abnormal screening results. Biopsies may include punch biopsy, endocervical curettage, or cone biopsy depending on lesion size and location.
Once cancer is confirmed, staging typically involves pelvic examination, imaging such as MRI or PET-CT, and sometimes examination under anesthesia. Cervical cancer is staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics system, which incorporates clinical and radiologic findings to guide treatment decisions. Lack of participation in cervical cancer screening is a key reason for late-stage diagnosis, highlighting the critical need to improve screening uptake and address missed opportunities for early detection.
5. Treatment is stage-specific and increasingly personalized.
Treatment of cervical cancer depends on disease stage, type of cervical cancer, patient comorbidities and age, desire for fertility preservation, and whether the cancer has just been diagnosed or has recurred.
For patients with microinvasive disease (stage IA1), options include cold knife conization if the depth of invasion is < 3 mm or total hysterectomy.
Stages IA2-IB2 are typically managed with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, although fertility-sparing surgery such as radical trachelectomy may be considered in select patients; intracavitary radiation therapy may be considered as a palliative option for women who are not eligible for surgery or have medical contraindications to other treatments.
Locally advanced disease (stages IB3-IVA) is treated with definitive chemoradiation, usually consisting of external beam radiation therapy combined with weekly cisplatin. Brachytherapy is an essential component of treatment for curative intent. Recent data suggest that induction chemotherapy before chemoradiation may improve survival outcomes in some patients, although this approach is still under investigation.
For recurrent or metastatic disease, systemic therapy with or without palliative radiation is the mainstay. First-line therapy often includes a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy, paclitaxel, and the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab. For patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, the addition of pembrolizumab, with or without bevacizumab, to chemotherapy has become standard of care based on the KEYNOTE-826 trial. In the second-line setting, options expand to include other cytotoxic agents such as topotecan, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine, as well as immunotherapy and targeted agents.
In pregnancy, treatment strategies depend on cancer stage and gestational age, often balancing maternal prognosis with fetal viability.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cardinal Health expands urology focus with $1.9bn Solaris Health deal
Cardinal Health expands urology focus with $1.9bn Solaris Health deal

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cardinal Health expands urology focus with $1.9bn Solaris Health deal

US drug distributor Cardinal Health has signed a $1.9bn agreement to acquire a majority stake in Solaris Health from Lee Equity Partners. The deal aims to expand the Specialty Alliance, the distributor's multi-speciality management services organisation (MSO) platform, in which Cardinal will gain a stake of around 75%. The acquisition will also create the Urology Alliance, comprising a collaborative network of urology providers within Cardinal's Specialty Alliance MSO, as well as resonate with plans to expand the delivery of urological patient care. Cardinal's Solaris buyout complements its recent acquisitions of Urology America, Potomac Urology, and Academic Urology & Urogynaecology, signalling its urologic strategy. The transaction is expected to be completed by the end of this year, pending customary closing conditions. Cardinal Health CEO Jason Hollar stated that growing the Speciality Alliance is a 'top priority' for the company, with the latest urology purchase leaving it 'well-positioned to meet the comprehensive needs of community urologists through the robust combined capabilities of the Specialty Alliance, Specialty Networks and Cardinal Health'. Research indicates there is a shortage of urologists in the US, with 62% of US counties lacking a practising urologist and just one new urologist entering the field for every ten retiring. The figures lead to challenges in the broader field, including delayed diagnoses, increased rates of advanced-stage conditions, and significant health disparities, with these particularly pronounced in rural communities. GlobalData's senior medical analyst Selena Yu foresees Cardinal's acquisition as reflecting a shift from drug distribution with a 'lower profit margin, towards higher margin speciality care in urology'. Yu said: 'MSOs help streamline backend work like billing and staffing to allow for physicians to focus on care. 'Additionally, with a large network of specialists, patients can receive care in the same region by different care specialists, which will reduce wait times and improve care continuity. Additionally, the Cardinal Health Alliance has other specialities like oncology specialists, which makes referrals more streamlined.' Cardinal's acquisition coincided with the release of its Q4 2025 financials. The company's profits per share came in at $2.08, beating the forecasted $2.03, yet profits for the quarter came in at $60.2bn, below the $60.92bn forecast, prompting a pre-market stock drop of more than 11% on 12 August. Cardinal's share price has since recovered to a drop of around 6% to $147.05 per share, down from $157.66 per share at market close on 11 August. "Cardinal Health expands urology focus with $1.9bn Solaris Health deal" was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio

Texas sues Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing providers to prescribe its medications
Texas sues Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing providers to prescribe its medications

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas sues Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing providers to prescribe its medications

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday sued U.S. drugmaker Eli Lilly for allegedly "bribing" providers to prescribe its medications. The attorney general's office said in a statement that the company bribed and illegally induced medical providers to prescribe its most profitable drugs, including the GLP-1 medications Mounjaro and Zepbound, used for weight loss and diabetes treatment. "Big Pharma compromised medical decision-making by engaging in an illegal kickback scheme," Attorney General Paxton said. The lawsuit builds upon Attorney General's previous legal action to hold drug manufacturers accountable for fraud and abuse, the statement added. Last year, Paxton had sued insulin manufacturers, including Lilly and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), alleging that manufacturers artificially raised the prices of insulin and then paid a significant, undisclosed portion back to the PBMs for preferential treatment in return. Eli Lilly did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What's Really Inside Your Supplements? This Founder Is Uncovering the Truth Behind the $180 Billion Industry
What's Really Inside Your Supplements? This Founder Is Uncovering the Truth Behind the $180 Billion Industry

Entrepreneur

time29 minutes ago

  • Entrepreneur

What's Really Inside Your Supplements? This Founder Is Uncovering the Truth Behind the $180 Billion Industry

From creatine to NAD+, this company is uncovering the truth behind mislabeled, underdosed and overhyped products. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. I recently wrote about creatine and profiled Jeff Byers, co-founder of Momentous, for a reason: integrity matters. When it comes to what we put in our bodies, especially for entrepreneurs aiming to optimize energy, recovery and longevity, founders and consumers deserve transparency and truth. And yet, the supplement industry is booming with very little of either. We're in the middle of a health optimization gold rush. Creatine gummies, NAD+ capsules, sleep pills and brain-boosting stacks are everywhere. Scroll Instagram, walk into Erewhon or search Amazon, and you'll find thousands of options. The global supplement industry is growing fast and is expected to top $240 billion by 2028, yet many of these products do not contain what they claim to. You may be spending $30, $50 or $90 on a supplement and getting barely a trace of the active ingredient, or in some cases, nothing at all. Unlike pharmaceuticals, supplements don't require FDA approval before hitting the market. That creates a loophole where products can launch quickly, and claims, unless dangerously false, go largely unchecked. And it's not just obscure or small brands. Some of the top-selling supplements on Amazon are underdelivering, misleading or worse. That's where Steve Martocci and SuppCo come in. Martocci, best known for founding the music-tech platform Splice, is now on a mission to fix one of the most frustrating problems in wellness: a lack of transparency. SuppCo is a health tech startup that independently tests supplements and publishes public reports that give consumers one thing the industry often avoids: truth. CEO and Co-Founder, Martocci, struggled with his health for most of his life, reaching nearly 300 pounds despite playing three sports and training consistently. Martocci said to me, "Traditional medicine failed me. I remember being told my labs were on the 'low end of normal' and that nothing could be done. It was completely disheartening." After selling GroupMe to Skype, Martocci discovered functional medicine and began working with a doctor on a tailored supplement stack. He lost nearly 100 pounds over the next year and realized that even though supplements had become mainstream, there was no software actually to help people navigate this space. The supplement industry is a $180 billion market, yet it's filled with confusion, noise and a multitude of products that don't deliver what they promise. With SuppCo, Martocci is on a mission to transform how people discover, manage and optimize their supplement routines. Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success. I was introduced to SuppCo's work through their recent Creatine Gummies Report. Creatine, which I personally take and have written about, is one of the most well-researched supplements for both brain and physical performance. But not all products are created equal. SuppCo tested five popular creatine gummy brands sold on Amazon. Only two passed. One contained less than 25% of the labeled amount. SuppCo recently published a report on NAD+ supplements, a trending ingredient in the longevity and cellular energy space, which tested nine products and was even more revealing. 4 passed (Double Wood, Rho Nutrition Liposomal, NatureBell and Thinbi), with Thinbi exceeding its claim at 103%. 5 failed, including Maripolio, which showed 0% of its claimed NAD+. Others tested at less than 3% of the listed amount on the label. NAD+ was the perfect follow-up to the creatine testing series because it represents everything confusing about the supplement space right now. Martocci explained that NAD+ is one of the fastest-rising compounds in longevity and biohacking, endorsed by scientists and influencers, but it's also one of the most confusing for consumers. Martocci said, "You can supplement with NAD+ itself or its precursors like NR and NMN, and most consumers don't understand the bioavailability differences between the three and that one of them is distinctly worse." When we see brands cutting corners on things we can measure, like certifications and testing transparency, they're usually cutting corners on things we can't see too, like what's actually in the bottle. As NAD+ continues to trend for its role in cellular repair and longevity, the gap between marketing and reality becomes even more concerning. Related: Why Top Entrepreneurs Are Swapping Beach Vacations for Longevity Retreats If you're a wellness founder, product integrity is not just a checkbox. It is the heartbeat of your brand. Jeff Byers' company, Momentous, invests in clinical research and testing not because it is required, but because it is what builds lasting trust. Byers told me, "That means showing the science, backing it up with testing, and being radically transparent with our consumers." The next generation of wellness brands will not win on hype. They'll win on data. Consumers are becoming smarter and more demanding, and they want to see the data. SuppCo has already rated over 700 brands and 22,000+ products, and their TrustScore has become remarkably predictive of testing. Now, quality brands are reaching out not just to request a TrustScore, but to get feedback on how to improve their quality practices. When choosing supplements, most people go wrong by treating supplements as if they were all the same. For example, they'll buy the cheapest magnesium without realizing that magnesium oxide has terrible bioavailability compared to magnesium glycinate. Or they'll choose a multivitamin based on how many vitamins are crammed into it, not whether those forms and doses actually work together. Jenna Stangland, co-founder of A4 health and Dietitian for the Minnesota Timberwolves and Minnesota Wild, explains how important it is to ensure that a supplement is tested and validated, as most likely, the dose on the label may not match what is in the bottle and even worse, it could be contaminated. Stangland personally takes NAD+ regularly to support her own energy and help her body adapt to stress and inflammation as she's on airplanes and traveling with teams multiple times per week. Having only tested the creatine and NAD+ categories, SuppCo is just getting started. The company plans to test every major supplement category where there's confusion or questionable quality. This includes protein, magnesium, pre-workouts and nootropics — anywhere consumers are making decisions based on incomplete information, their aim is to bring transparency. Related: Are Your Employees Stressed? You Need to Embrace Transparency. A big milestone they hit recently is the launch of SuppCo Pro, a premium subscription that unlocks deep personalization features. They have received strong user response to their Personal Nutrient Plan, which creates tailored supplement recommendations based on a user's specific goals, as well as their Product Optimizer, which suggests higher-quality, better-value alternatives to what a user is currently taking. This is where the real magic happens, as they can offer truly personalized guidance. I personally appreciate how easy it is to understand their public reports. On the app, you can quickly see whether a product passed or failed, and why. They even launched a browser extension that flags whether the supplement you're browsing has been independently tested. For those of us who care deeply about healthspan, recovery and long-term performance, this kind of transparency is a game-changer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store