
Canada's Elections Will Be The First Verdict On Trump's Tariffs
EDMONTON, CANADA - JANUARY 30: A person prepares to fill up a fuel tank at a pay-at-the-pump ... More gasoline station in Edmonton, on January 30, 2025, in Edmonton, AB, Canada. U.S. President Donald Trump announced today that he would proceed with his plan to impose a 25% tariff on imports from Canada, a decision that could significantly disrupt Canada's economy, given the close economic ties between the two nations, with daily exports to the U.S. totaling $1.9 billion in goods and services. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Canada will elect a national leader on April 28, 2025, an election heavily influenced by Donald Trump's decision to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports and his remarks about making it the 51st state. Now, Canada is examining the relationship.
Trump will ostensibly implement his tariffs on Canada to curb illegal immigration and the flow of fentanyl into this country, although the numbers on both counts are nominal. While the neo-colonial comments have enraged our northern neighbors, the tariffs threaten the livelihoods of both Americans and Canadians and, specifically, those tied to the energy sector.
The election's outcome will have profound implications for both countries. If the current prime minister, Mark Carney, wins, he has promised severe economic retaliations—effectively restructuring their domestic economy and international trade partnerships to minimize American ties. Conversely, if the conservative candidate Pierre Poilievre wins, we can expect a more conciliatory approach.
'Economists almost universally support free trade,' which means 'no tariffs, quotas, or any other restrictions on the domestic or international flow of goods and services," says Kevin Brancato, an economist and senior vice president for TechnoMile, which serves industry and provides cloud platforms. He adds that the tariffs may be a negotiating tactic, not a substitute for the roughly $2.14 trillion collected from income taxes.
His comments came during a virtual press event held by the United States Energy Association, where I participated as a panelist.
The tariffs would adversely affect both Canada and the United States. According to the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, a 25% tariff could reduce Canada's gross domestic product by 2.6% and cost Canadians $2,000 annually. Inflation could rise to 7.2%, and unemployment rates might reach 7.9%.
The same measures will hurt this country, too, including price hikes, lost jobs, and potentially higher interest rates to dampen inflation—now expected to rise by at least 0.8% and 2.2% over time. Meanwhile, investors are now demanding higher interest rates on Treasury notes, which have long been viewed as safe investments but are now considered risky. All of this could lead to a recession later this year.
Mark Carney, Canada's prime minister, speaks during a news conference in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, on ... More Thursday, March 27, 2025. Carney says Canada will fight back against President Donald Trump's trade war and his tariffs on the auto sector, but he did not outline any new retaliatory measures against the US on Thursday. Photographer: David Kawai/Bloomberg
Trump wants to deal with this mess by pressuring the U.S. Federal Reserve—the central bank—to lower interest rates. He's previously questioned whether Chairman Jerome Powell or Chinese Premier Xi is the 'bigger enemy' of the United States, and now says he has the right to fire to Powell. However, tariffs mean higher prices, so the central bank would be hard-pressed to lower interest rates.
Rather than blaming the fed chair for our economic issues, Trump should consider canceling the tariffs. That would require the president to swallow his pride; he can't ever admit defeat because it is not befitting of his brand. However, The Atlantic points out, Trump loses either way. If he appoints a crony to run the Federal Reserve, investors will flock to the Euro, raising borrowing costs and creating financial chaos in this country.
"The only thing worse than tariffs is uncertainty. Canada's mood is clear: This is a different era," and we can't trust the American government, says Marcum Hislop, CEO of Energi Media, Canada, during the virtual press event. "There's a sense that this is a rupture. Our products have natural markets in Asia and Europe.'
Manitoba's Premier Wab Kinew recently announced the utility, Manitoba Hydro, will not renew two contracts with Minnesota for the export of 500 megawatts of electricity. This decision is part of a larger strategy to decrease Canada's reliance on the United States and to enhance its energy infrastructure.
Furthermore, Canadian leaders are emphasizing the need to build an east-west energy transition system—not one that goes north-south, which is into the United States. Prime Minister Carney has said that the traditional relationship between the United States and Canada is "over," noting that the east-west integration of his nation's grid is vital and will allow hydroelectricity, wind, and solar power to flow more easily across Canada.
The tariff regime leaves this country worse off. Beyond those levies, Trump threatens to cut funding for clean-tech research—a move that will hinder American leadership, slow domestic innovation, and reduce export potential. Moreover, Europe and China will step in and fill the void. Major clean-tech producers in Europe, such as Siemens, Gamesa, Northvolt, and Vestas, are scaling up and preparing to meet global demand.
Welder making boilers for a ship, Combustion Engineering Co., Chattanooga, Tenn. Artist Alfred T ... More Palmer. (Photo by Heritage Art/Heritage Images via Getty Images)
Economies evolve, and we're currently in a green revolution, with digital technologies facilitating this transition. The old factory jobs are gone. The 21st-century economy is here—and it's not going away, creating jobs in renewable energy, data centers, and artificial intelligence. Fanning the flames of resentment is shortsighted, as is trying to dodge change.
"We're not talking about enough about this question—where we're losing the economic innovation we have had in clean-tech for the last 10 years. If that happens, it will shift to Europe," says Jason Rodriguez, CEO and Co-Founder of Zpryme and Froliq.
'And, the pain in Europe is way higher than in the U.S. to come up with new solutions because of their dependency on Russian natural gas—even the potential dependency on U.S. LNG,' adds Jan Vrins, partner Partner, Clarum Advisors.
The threat of tariffs has already done significant damage to the U.S. economy: The S&P 500 has lost more than 12% in value since Trump first introduced them, while the Dow Jones has fallen by 10%, and the Nasdaq has declined by 19%. That equates to nearly $6 trillion in lost market value. A Bank of America survey of fund managers shows record pessimism toward U.S. assets at 30-year lows.
This begs the question of whether trade surpluses and deficits are a matter of national security or whether Trump should be able to unilaterally enact tariffs because we buy more from other countries than they buy from us. Most economists, not to mention our allies, call this a smokescreen for protectionism.
Economists also say a trade deficit is not inherently harmful and certainly not a threat to national security. The United States is the wealthiest country in the world and, thus, has more money to buy things. It also suggests a strong dollar and more purchasing power. In any case, it generates prosperity wherever the money is spent—dollars that return to the United States when they purchase our goods. However, the language of the statutes is vague, which compels the courts to defer to the executive branch. As a result, Trump can bypass Congress.
But the president can't ignore the reality—that his policies are creating pain both at home and worldwide. Canada's national election is a test case, and the outcome will speak volumes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
Declining Birthrates Are Breaking The Economy. Can We Fix It In Time?
Fertility rates are in free fall, with no clear solutions having emerged as of yet. A handful of ... More CEOs are up for the challenged. Look closely and you'll notice it. The subtle pull of gravity after a long sprint towards the edge, the tiny tremor in our economic step as it fails to find solid ground underneath, the mounting silence where there used to be the noise of new life. We are on what animators call Coyote Time: the few fleeting seconds between sprinting off the cliff and looking down, when gravity hasn't quite caught up but the fall is inevitable. The global economy, led by the aging West and now followed by much of East Asia, has sprinted confidently into the abyss of demographic collapse like Wile E. Coyote in pursuit of our very own roadrunner that Emile Durkheim presciently described a century ago as the 'malady of infinite aspiration.' Birthrates are in freefall, and while we're saying the words out loud more often, we've yet to process what this means for our societies, our businesses, or the very survival of the economic model our current form of civilization depends on. Toby Ord and others in the longtermist camp have been sounding the alarm for years. In The Precipice, he outlines a spectrum of existential risks facing humanity, from engineered pandemics to unaligned AI, but undergirding many of these is the quieter collapse of our demographic engine. If there are no people, there is no future to protect. While longtermism has found its home in academic circles and a handful of venture capital firms thinking centuries ahead, the population crisis hasn't yet pierced the mainstream with the same urgency. But Ord's insight remains prescient: if humanity fails to invest in the conditions that allow it to continue, reproduction among them, then even the most sophisticated civilisations will eventually be reduced to footnotes in someone else's survival story. This is the abyss we are levitating over, still in chase of greater affluence regardless of how sternly Galbraith and others have warned us to still our all-consuming hearts. The demographic cliff will end us, unless we act quickly. As Cole Napper, VP of Research at Lightcast puts it, 'You can't have an economy without people, and right now, we're losing both.' According to Lightcast's latest report, the U.S. population is growing four times faster than its labor force. That gap is barely held together by immigration, and increasingly, by duct tape. The prime-age male labor force is eroding particularly fast, lost to disillusionment, systemic failures, substance abuse, and in many cases, sheer hopelessness. And it's not just an American problem. Japan is decades into its population contraction. China's demographic decline has officially begun. Even the Nordic countries, long viewed as social policy success stories, are struggling to reverse the trend. The demographic future isn't looming. It's here, even if our earlier momentum still keeps us going. 'This isn't hyperbole,' Napper adds. 'It's not that we're all going to die. But your needs are not going to be met in the ways they are today. The expectations we've built into every institution, every business model—they just won't hold any more.' We have not faced an existential threat with such clear implications for our economy before. There's no precedent for what happens when an entire economic system built on constant growth finds itself with fewer hands to work, fewer children to teach, fewer buyers for the homes, and fewer taxpayers to sustain the state. Faced with a future as bleak as this, it's only natural to ask what is driving it, and what could we do about it? There's no singular villain here. The decline in birthrates isn't the result of one policy or one cultural shift; it's a slow-motion trainwreck caused by everything, everywhere, all at once. 'We've tried paying people,' Napper says. 'But money doesn't fix this. It's not just an economic decision or a transaction the government or employer can influence with just money. It's personal. People are making very deliberate choices about the kind of life they want, and many are deciding not to replicate the one they've lived.' In part, we've overoptimized for affluence. Modern life is a relentless treadmill of degrees, performance reviews, debt, and the promise that things will get better if you just stick it out. But what if better never comes? What if the very structure of our success makes having children feel like a selfish, impossible luxury? And yet, some make it all happen. Dr. Dara Spearman had her twins during residency, a time most physicians would call the peak of professional chaos. 'It was insane,' she says, not with regret, but clarity. 'I was seeing patients, studying, and barely sleeping. There were no policies that accounted for women like me. I just had to make it work.' She did more than make it work. Spearman went on to have another child, build a thriving dermatology practice, and become a role model for the kind of life that dares to exist because of work, not in spite of it. 'I didn't have the luxury of waiting for things to be perfect,' she reflects. 'If I had waited until my career said I was 'ready,' I'd probably still be waiting, and my life wouldn't be half of what it is today. ' What sets those like Spearman apart is not that she balanced motherhood and medicine, it's that she refused to treat one as the cost of the other. 'Women are often asked to delay, to sacrifice, to optimize every aspect of life before they consider becoming a parent. But that logic folds in on itself. You wake up one day and realize the thing you were waiting for might never come.' Now, as the owner of Radiant Dermatology Associates she's doing things differently. Spearman intentionally built her clinic around flexibility and sustainability, for her patients, yes, but also for her staff. 'I want people who work with me to feel like they can live a life, take time with their families, show up at school plays, go on vacation without guilt. Otherwise, what are we even doing this for?' She's right. In the U.S., puppies legally get more time with their mothers before they can be separated than most newborns. In a world where everything demands 110%, parenting often feels like subtraction from a life you've worked hard to build. And for many, it's not just a question of whether they want to add kids to that equation, it's whether they can afford the tradeoffs. In a sense, declining fertility rates are only the tip of the iceberg where rising maternal health risks, lack of access to basic reproductive education are what drives the trends underneath. As usual, where institutions lag, entrepreneurs leap, with many having found productive niches in addressing the underpinnings of the demographic cliff. It's no surprise, then, that some of the most compelling responses to our demographic dilemma are coming from founders who saw a problem not because they studied it, but because they lived it. Ayla Barmmer's company, FullWell, was born out of personal frustration and professional observation. A reproductive health expert and maternal nutritionist by training, she was struck by how disconnected the journey to pregnancy still is from what we know about health and biology. 'We treat conception like a light switch,' she says. 'You flip it on when you're ready and expect everything to work. But that's not how the body works. There's a whole ecosystem that has to be nurtured long before someone takes a pregnancy test.' Her own path to pregnancy revealed something sobering: even well-informed, resourced women were navigating it blindly. 'I was shocked by how many gaps there still are in basic education. Most OBs don't talk about preconception health. And men? Men don't even get mentioned. But they're half the equation by design.' Barmmer and her team is building an evidence-based reproductive health company that flips the model by tackling the cohesive whole of the experience instead of offering a point solution. 'We've got apps for hydration and step-counting,' she says, 'but nothing that helps you prepare for the most biologically complex, emotionally taxing, socially transformative experience of your life? That's absurd. We need a new standard where preparing for pregnancy is just as normalized as preparing for a marathon.' Where Barmmer tackles the front end of the journey, Shaker Rawan is focused on what comes after: the parenting spiral where joy, exhaustion, and panic blur together in real time. As co-founder of Woddle, Rawan wants to rebuild the village that modern parenthood has lost. 'We expect parents today to carry more weight than any generation before them, with less help, more judgment, and higher stakes,' he says. 'It's a cruel setup that can turn many off from the experience just by witnessing others go through it.' He's not exaggerating. In many developed countries, the average number of caregivers per child has dropped drastically in just two generations. What once was a multigenerational web of care is now two exhausted adults, often in nuclear households far from extended family, juggling careers and survival. 'People look at new parents and they don't see inspiration, they see burnout,' Rawan adds. 'They see the stress, the anxiety, sometimes even tragedy. And they think, 'Why would I sign up for that?'' Woddle offers a digital scaffolding: evidence-based resources, mental health support, and community features that connect parents in real time. But Rawan is adamant that solving this will need more than just high-tech products. 'We can't solve this with gadgets. What people need is permission to not be perfect. They need community, emotional safety, and to be told that it's okay to ask for help. Because the alternative is watching future generations opt out before they even opt in.' He's also acutely aware of the modern cognitive burden. 'Our parents raised us with Dr. Spock and a pediatrician. Today's parents are drowning in TikTok experts, Reddit forums, and ten thousand parenting philosophies. They're expected to have encyclopedic knowledge and zero margin for error.' Which brings us to Omri Stivi, who's trying to turn the flood of chaotic information into a navigable system. His new company, EraBorn, aims to do for fertility and parenting what GPS did for navigation: offer clear, contextual, step-by-step guidance through an overwhelming journey to parenthood . 'Right now, we raise kids with vibes and Google searches,' he says. 'We trust data to decide our ad spend, our workouts, our business models, but not our parenting or fertility journeys?' Stivi is building a platform draws on clinical research, pediatric consensus, machine learning, large language models and behavioral science to help parents make informed decisions. Instead of replacing parental instinct, he strives to support it. 'We've heard heartbreaking cases of individuals and couples who arrived at a clinic only to be told it was too late-, they would never become parents,' Omri shares. 'We strive to prevent that. Era provides smart, informed navigation and timely decision-making, along with personalized referrals to relevant professionals and resources, before and during pregnancy, so no one misses their window of opportunity.' 'We're not here to tell parents what to do,' Stivi clarifies. 'I'm here to give them the same tools and transparency they expect everywhere else in life. If you can benchmark a company, you should be able to benchmark a fertility protocol, pregnancy plan or feeding schedule.' He also challenges the cultural assumption that parenting is just 'natural.' 'It's the most complex thing we do as humans. It's also the least supported, least structured, and somehow the least personalized and professionalized. That has to change.' Like Rawan, he sees this lack of structure as a deterrent for would-be parents. 'If you saw what your friends went through, and all you have is guesswork ahead of you, why would you do it?' All three of these founders circle the same core insight: parenting doesn't need to be easy. But it should be less opaque, less isolating, and less punishing. 'We built a society that treats children like private decisions instead of public investments,' Barmmer says. 'And now we're surprised people are opting out.' Whether through better preconception health, richer support networks, or clearer information systems, each of these entrepreneurs is laying a stone on the path back from the cliff. Not because they have all the answers, but because they refuse to accept the current default. As Rawan puts it: 'We talk about population collapse like it's inevitable. It's not. But we have to make having kids make sense again. Not as sacrifice, but as fulfillment. Not as martyrdom, but as meaning.' If you're one of those who believes the birthrate panic is overblown, you're right. Humanity is not going extinct. Within every country, every culture, there are subgroups having 2.1 or more children per woman. In the U.S., that might be Orthodox Jews or certain Mormon communities. In the Middle East, the Taliban is outpacing the liberal West demographically. In Africa, the birthrate remains high, even if the economies haven't yet caught up. As Napper puts it: 'All of this is individual decisions, playing out at scale. And it's not distributed evenly. Some groups are growing. Others are vanishing. The future will belong to the ones who choose to build it.' What's changing is the composition of those who will inherit the Earth. And maybe that's the part that should give us pause. The future belongs not to the smartest or the richest, but to those who are willing to invest in it through children, communities, and sacrifice. Demographics do not have to be destiny. What we do now, how we support families, how we shift work, how we make room for joy and rest and generational care, will determine what kind of civilization makes it through this bottleneck. The abyss is real. But so is the ledge on the other side. The question is, will we build a bridge? Or wait until we run out of Coyote Time and fall?

Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
US-China trade, inflation, Apple's big event: Here's what the stock market is watching this week
Investors will be monitoring a host of potentially market-moving events this week, with updates due on trade and inflation, while Apple kicks off a highly anticipated product event. Recession fears have edged down after the turmoil that racked markets earlier in the spring, but the market is still struggling with uncertainty regarding President Donald Trump's trade policies and their implications for the economy. While last week's jobs report showed a solid labor market, investors are monitoring how the inflation side of the Federal Reserve's dual mandate fares this week, and how it will influence the rate-cut outlook for the year. Meanwhile, Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference will provide insight into not only new software updates but also the future of the AI race among mega-cap tech companies. Here's what investors are watching this week. US-China trade talks After last week's phone call between Trump and Chinese president Xi Jinping, China and US trade officials are meeting in London on Monday for two days of trade negotiations. Last month's trade talks were key to calming recession fears and helped propel the S&P 500 to its highest levels since February, but concerns still remain. The biggest negotiation topic will be over China's exports of rare earth metals, which are critical components in manufacturing semiconductors, smartphones, and other technologies. Continued improvements in trade relations between the two countries will be critical to reducing volatility in the market and could shed clarity on the direction of tariff rates. CPI data The consumer price index for May will be released on Wednesday. Last month 's reading of 2.3% was fairly benign, but investors will continue to watch for signs of Trump's tariffs showing up in the hard data. Importantly, the reading will be key in determining the Fed's next move. The median forecast is for annual consumer inflation to have risen 2.5% last month. Meanwhile, expectations for the June 17 Fed meeting are for officials to keep interest rates unchanged. "The big surprise could be how little Trump's tariffs are boosting inflation despite upward pressures on prices-paid and prices-received indexes in the Fed's regional business surveys," wrote on Sunday. Yet, some strategists have predicted that inflation will pick up in the back half of this year, spurring stagflation concerns. Meanwhile, consumer sentiment will get a fresh reading on Friday. Sentiment has been low as Americans feel pessimistic about tariffs, though hard data that the Fed looks at has held up. Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference All eyes will be on Apple this week as it kicks off its annual Worldwide Developers Conference, where the company is expected to unveil new AI features embedded in iOS 19. The conference will be an opportunity for Apple to address several headwinds it has faced this year. "In a nutshell WWDC is a pivotal moment in Apple's future as the developers are the hearts and lungs of the Cupertino growth story with the Street being laser-focused on Apple today," Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote. The tech giant has trailed peers like Microsoft and Google in the AI race, and its stock has taken a beating this year as the worst-performing Magnificent Seven member, largely due to concerns about tariffs and iPhone production. Last month, Trump threatened a tariff of at least 25% on iPhones not made in the US. Investors will be looking for updates on Apple Intelligence as well, as the company's AI offering has been underwhelming to Wall Street. A key bond auction The US Treasury sells a lot of bonds, and usually the sale is unremarkable for markets. However, with deficit concerns running high as the GOP budget bill moves through Congress, a $22 billion auction of 30-year bonds on Thursday could move the market if demand appears weak. A weak sale of 20-year bonds last month rattled markets and sent yields surging, and all eyes are on this week's sale as a potential investor referendum on the sweeping tax and spending bill.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arya Resources Ltd. (RBZ) Upsizes Flow-Through Financing Amid Surging Investor Demand
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - June 9, 2025) - Arya Resources Ltd. (TSXV: RBZ) ("Arya" or the "Company") is pleased to announce upsizing of its previously announced flow-through financing, driven by growing investor interest. The Company will now issue 4,873,146 flow-through shares (the "FT Shares"), up from the originally planned 3,846,154 shares. The FT Shares are priced at $0.13 per share and qualify as "flow-through shares" as defined in subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The increase brings the total gross proceeds from the financing-including the non-flow-through tranche closed on June 3, 2025-to $1,143,509. This funding supports Arya's aggressive exploration and growth plans in one of Canada's most prospective mining jurisdictions. Use of Proceeds Flow-through proceeds will directly fund exploration work on Arya's Saskatchewan-based mineral projects, including its flagship Wedge Lake Gold Project, where the Company holds full permits to commence drilling as announced in its March 19, 2025 news release -see March 19, 2025 News Release. Non-flow-through proceeds will be allocated to general working capital, supporting ongoing corporate development and strategic initiatives. Finder's Fees In accordance with applicable securities laws and subject to TSX Venture Exchange approval, Arya may pay finder's fees to eligible parties as follows: 7% cash commission on subscription proceeds raised from introduced investors. Finder warrants equal to 7% of the securities sold to these investors, with terms identical to those of the investor warrants. About Arya Resources Ltd. (TSXV: RBZ)Arya Resources Ltd. is a Canadian-based mineral exploration company focused on unlocking the value of high-potential gold, silver, copper, nickel, and cobalt projects in mining-friendly jurisdictions. As a Tier-2 issuer on the TSX Venture Exchange, Arya is committed to building shareholder value through strategic acquisitions, targeted exploration, and sustainable development. On behalf of the Board of Directors: Rasool Mohammad, CEOEmail: rasool@ (604) 868-7737https:// Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. This news release includes "forward looking statements" that are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Statements in this news release which are not purely historical are forward looking statements, including without limitation any statements concerning the Company's intentions, plans, estimates, expectations or beliefs. Although the Company believes that any forward looking statements in this news release are reasonable, there can be no assurance that any such forward looking statements will prove to be accurate. The Company cautions readers that all forward looking statements, including without limitation those relating to the Company's future operations and business prospects, are based on assumptions, none of which can be assured, and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward looking statements. Readers are advised to rely on their own evaluation of such risks and uncertainties and should not place undue reliance on forward looking statements. Any forward looking statements are made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update the forward looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual events or results could or do differ from those projected in the forward looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. To view the source version of this press release, please visit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data