logo
Canada's Elections Will Be The First Verdict On Trump's Tariffs

Canada's Elections Will Be The First Verdict On Trump's Tariffs

Forbes23-04-2025

EDMONTON, CANADA - JANUARY 30: A person prepares to fill up a fuel tank at a pay-at-the-pump ... More gasoline station in Edmonton, on January 30, 2025, in Edmonton, AB, Canada. U.S. President Donald Trump announced today that he would proceed with his plan to impose a 25% tariff on imports from Canada, a decision that could significantly disrupt Canada's economy, given the close economic ties between the two nations, with daily exports to the U.S. totaling $1.9 billion in goods and services. (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Canada will elect a national leader on April 28, 2025, an election heavily influenced by Donald Trump's decision to impose a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports and his remarks about making it the 51st state. Now, Canada is examining the relationship.
Trump will ostensibly implement his tariffs on Canada to curb illegal immigration and the flow of fentanyl into this country, although the numbers on both counts are nominal. While the neo-colonial comments have enraged our northern neighbors, the tariffs threaten the livelihoods of both Americans and Canadians and, specifically, those tied to the energy sector.
The election's outcome will have profound implications for both countries. If the current prime minister, Mark Carney, wins, he has promised severe economic retaliations—effectively restructuring their domestic economy and international trade partnerships to minimize American ties. Conversely, if the conservative candidate Pierre Poilievre wins, we can expect a more conciliatory approach.
'Economists almost universally support free trade,' which means 'no tariffs, quotas, or any other restrictions on the domestic or international flow of goods and services," says Kevin Brancato, an economist and senior vice president for TechnoMile, which serves industry and provides cloud platforms. He adds that the tariffs may be a negotiating tactic, not a substitute for the roughly $2.14 trillion collected from income taxes.
His comments came during a virtual press event held by the United States Energy Association, where I participated as a panelist.
The tariffs would adversely affect both Canada and the United States. According to the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, a 25% tariff could reduce Canada's gross domestic product by 2.6% and cost Canadians $2,000 annually. Inflation could rise to 7.2%, and unemployment rates might reach 7.9%.
The same measures will hurt this country, too, including price hikes, lost jobs, and potentially higher interest rates to dampen inflation—now expected to rise by at least 0.8% and 2.2% over time. Meanwhile, investors are now demanding higher interest rates on Treasury notes, which have long been viewed as safe investments but are now considered risky. All of this could lead to a recession later this year.
Mark Carney, Canada's prime minister, speaks during a news conference in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, on ... More Thursday, March 27, 2025. Carney says Canada will fight back against President Donald Trump's trade war and his tariffs on the auto sector, but he did not outline any new retaliatory measures against the US on Thursday. Photographer: David Kawai/Bloomberg
Trump wants to deal with this mess by pressuring the U.S. Federal Reserve—the central bank—to lower interest rates. He's previously questioned whether Chairman Jerome Powell or Chinese Premier Xi is the 'bigger enemy' of the United States, and now says he has the right to fire to Powell. However, tariffs mean higher prices, so the central bank would be hard-pressed to lower interest rates.
Rather than blaming the fed chair for our economic issues, Trump should consider canceling the tariffs. That would require the president to swallow his pride; he can't ever admit defeat because it is not befitting of his brand. However, The Atlantic points out, Trump loses either way. If he appoints a crony to run the Federal Reserve, investors will flock to the Euro, raising borrowing costs and creating financial chaos in this country.
"The only thing worse than tariffs is uncertainty. Canada's mood is clear: This is a different era," and we can't trust the American government, says Marcum Hislop, CEO of Energi Media, Canada, during the virtual press event. "There's a sense that this is a rupture. Our products have natural markets in Asia and Europe.'
Manitoba's Premier Wab Kinew recently announced the utility, Manitoba Hydro, will not renew two contracts with Minnesota for the export of 500 megawatts of electricity. This decision is part of a larger strategy to decrease Canada's reliance on the United States and to enhance its energy infrastructure.
Furthermore, Canadian leaders are emphasizing the need to build an east-west energy transition system—not one that goes north-south, which is into the United States. Prime Minister Carney has said that the traditional relationship between the United States and Canada is "over," noting that the east-west integration of his nation's grid is vital and will allow hydroelectricity, wind, and solar power to flow more easily across Canada.
The tariff regime leaves this country worse off. Beyond those levies, Trump threatens to cut funding for clean-tech research—a move that will hinder American leadership, slow domestic innovation, and reduce export potential. Moreover, Europe and China will step in and fill the void. Major clean-tech producers in Europe, such as Siemens, Gamesa, Northvolt, and Vestas, are scaling up and preparing to meet global demand.
Welder making boilers for a ship, Combustion Engineering Co., Chattanooga, Tenn. Artist Alfred T ... More Palmer. (Photo by Heritage Art/Heritage Images via Getty Images)
Economies evolve, and we're currently in a green revolution, with digital technologies facilitating this transition. The old factory jobs are gone. The 21st-century economy is here—and it's not going away, creating jobs in renewable energy, data centers, and artificial intelligence. Fanning the flames of resentment is shortsighted, as is trying to dodge change.
"We're not talking about enough about this question—where we're losing the economic innovation we have had in clean-tech for the last 10 years. If that happens, it will shift to Europe," says Jason Rodriguez, CEO and Co-Founder of Zpryme and Froliq.
'And, the pain in Europe is way higher than in the U.S. to come up with new solutions because of their dependency on Russian natural gas—even the potential dependency on U.S. LNG,' adds Jan Vrins, partner Partner, Clarum Advisors.
The threat of tariffs has already done significant damage to the U.S. economy: The S&P 500 has lost more than 12% in value since Trump first introduced them, while the Dow Jones has fallen by 10%, and the Nasdaq has declined by 19%. That equates to nearly $6 trillion in lost market value. A Bank of America survey of fund managers shows record pessimism toward U.S. assets at 30-year lows.
This begs the question of whether trade surpluses and deficits are a matter of national security or whether Trump should be able to unilaterally enact tariffs because we buy more from other countries than they buy from us. Most economists, not to mention our allies, call this a smokescreen for protectionism.
Economists also say a trade deficit is not inherently harmful and certainly not a threat to national security. The United States is the wealthiest country in the world and, thus, has more money to buy things. It also suggests a strong dollar and more purchasing power. In any case, it generates prosperity wherever the money is spent—dollars that return to the United States when they purchase our goods. However, the language of the statutes is vague, which compels the courts to defer to the executive branch. As a result, Trump can bypass Congress.
But the president can't ignore the reality—that his policies are creating pain both at home and worldwide. Canada's national election is a test case, and the outcome will speak volumes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fetterman rips ‘anarchy and true chaos' in LA, warns Dems not to cede ‘moral high ground'
Fetterman rips ‘anarchy and true chaos' in LA, warns Dems not to cede ‘moral high ground'

New York Post

time7 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Fetterman rips ‘anarchy and true chaos' in LA, warns Dems not to cede ‘moral high ground'

Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman has denounced the riots in Los Angeles and warned his party about the pitfalls of failing to adequately condemn the 'anarchy and true chaos. 'I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that,' Fetterman (D-Pa.) wrote on X on Monday evening. 'This is anarchy and true chaos. My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.' Advertisement The Keystone State Dem included a photo of cars being scorched in a fiery blaze with a shirtless masked man waving a Mexican flag in the background. 3 President Trump has deployed several thousand National Guard troops to Los Angeles to try to help quell the violent protests over his illegal-immigration crackdown. Toby Canham for NY Post Advertisement 3 Sen. John Fetterman, a Dem from Pennsylvania, isn't mincing words about his condemnation of the riots in Los Angeles. Getty Images Around the time of his post, Fetterman was spotted at Butterworth's, a top MAGA hangout in Washington, DC — dining with Trump ally Steve Bannon and Breitbart's Matt Boyle, Politico Playbook reported. Tech mogul Elon Musk commended Fetterman's condemnation of the 'anarchy and true chaos' unfolding in LA, replying with an American flag emoji. Fetterman's post came amid a feud between President Trump and top California Democrats over the prez's decision to federalize the California National Guard and bring in troops to tame the unrest in Los Angeles. Advertisement Protesters had flooded the streets in droves Friday to demonstrate against the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts in the city. The ICE agents' targets have included a Home Depot in Paramount. 3 Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has stressed that the violent destructive rioting has largely been limited to downtown. Toby Canham for NY Post By Saturday, some of the demonstrations devolved into violent clashes with federal authorities in Compton and Paramount. The Trump administration mobilized another 2,000 troops to respond to the mayhem, after previously ordering an initial 2,000 troops to the region over the weekend. Trump's secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, said Monday he also was deploying 700 Marines to the area to help try to contain the chaos. Advertisement Top leadership in California, including Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass — both Democrats — slammed the GOP White House for the troop mobilization and pleaded with the public not to turn to violence to protest Trump's immigration policies. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta, also a Dem, filed a lawsuit Monday against the Trump administration seeking to void the president's memo to federalize the state's National Guard. Fetterman hasn't been afraid to punch the left in his own party, particularly when it comes to Israel. Near the end of the Biden administration, he had also favored measures to strengthen border security.

This Is Not What the National Guard Is For
This Is Not What the National Guard Is For

Atlantic

time8 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

This Is Not What the National Guard Is For

Donald Trump just did what no other president has ever done in the context of urban unrest: He sent federal troops to a state without a request from the governor. By federalizing California National Guard members on Saturday, the president abrogated Governor Gavin Newsom's authority over his own Guard. During both previous instances of a presidential order to deploy National Guardsmen to American cities—the Los Angeles riots in 1992 and the Hurricane Katrina response in 2005—the state's governor was overseeing a public-safety apparatus that had been overwhelmed. Trump, seizing on unlawful behavior that included vandalism, violence, and refusing to disperse during protests against ICE raids in L.A., announced that 2,000 reservists would be deployed to the city, unilaterally and contra Newsom's advice. Trump's decision—to exercise his Title 10 authority to federalize the National Guard under his command—was not based on a careful assessment of the operational needs on the streets of Los Angeles. Even if the White House's escalating rhetoric and threats of full military deployment were justified by circumstances that merited overruling a governor, the notion that the armed services will stop protests and quiet widespread outrage about Trump's immigration-enforcement policies in California is naive and flawed. Implicated in Trump's decision was a lot of prior controversy—immigration and deportation, ICE raids, tension between blue states and the White House, a personal beef with Newsom—but the president's assertion that a troop presence is the answer to public unrest is particularly dubious. Historically, these deployments have proved of limited value even when the president and governor agree on goals. Sending in the military as a hostile force is a recipe for trouble. During the 1992 L.A. riots, after four white police officers were acquitted of assaulting Rodney King, 63 people were killed amid widespread arson and looting as rioting spread through the city. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina killed nearly 1,000 people in Louisiana and left New Orleans with no functioning government and little law enforcement. In each case, National Guard deployment was essentially a response to the incapacity of the local police force—either because the cops had become the focus of hostility or because they simply could not meet the demands of the crisis. And in both instances, the governor requested the federal intervention. David Frum: For Trump, this is a dress rehearsal One key lesson of the L.A. deployment was that a failure to define command-and-control responsibilities resulted in operational problems and delays. The National Guard under Governor Pete Wilson's authority was supposed to protect first responders (especially firefighters) and emergency work crews trying to fix critical infrastructure. Trained to help with crowd control, these troops also supported police patrols—to protect shopping centers from looting, for example. The soldiers' initial deployment was slow, and they were not fully prepared for the mission. But in the days that followed, the rioting subsided and the National Guard was able to perform much of its mission and provide relief to the overstretched police forces. By then, however, Wilson had lost confidence in the National Guard's leadership and was unnerved by the scale of disorder. He asked the White House for help, and President George H. W. Bush sent in 3,500 federalized troops. Despite deploying in a less demanding situation, these federalized soldiers were unable to provide the effective support required on the ground. In the end, the state Guard proved the more flexible and adaptable force. The new military task force formed by the federal deployment never satisfactorily resolved issues with its mission, its communications, and its rules of engagement. The problems of this uneasy collaboration with local and state police agencies filtered down, hampering the street-level response. The events of L.A. in 1992—and the explicit lessons that state, federal, and military authorities took from them—are why, until now, the task of dealing with civil unrest or natural disasters has remained largely with the National Guard acting under state jurisdiction. The National Guard has also been integrated into homeland-security efforts on the same basis. If one Guard force encounters a situation that exceeds its capacity, it can turn to another state's Guard under mutual-aid agreements. Mutual aid does not seem to have been on Trump's mind last weekend. The National Guard exists to provide governors with additional power to protect their citizens, and to do so in support of local first responders. Trump's hasty federalization of troops is unwise and unhelpful, before we even consider what malign political motive may lie behind the order. Right now, the Pentagon appears not even to have arranged sleeping arrangements for its troops, let alone determined the rules of engagement on the streets; the San Francisco Chronicle reports that the deployment was so 'wildly underprepared' that troops are sleeping in cramped quarters on the floor. At best, this deployment will be completely unnecessary. At worst, it will be deeply counterproductive. But Trump's motive is transparent—and he will surely engineer an occasion to keep escalating his power plays, until they seem normal.

One year from World Cup opener, FIFA leaves questions unanswered on tickets and security
One year from World Cup opener, FIFA leaves questions unanswered on tickets and security

Hamilton Spectator

time10 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

One year from World Cup opener, FIFA leaves questions unanswered on tickets and security

NEW YORK (AP) — A year from the largest World Cup ever, there has been no announcement on general ticket sales, prices for most seats, location of a draw or security arrangements as FIFA has mostly avoided disclosing details of an event set for 16 stadiums across the United States, Mexico and Canada. There is uncertainty about whether fans from some nations will be welcome — 11 of the venues are located in the U.S., where all matches will be played from the quarterfinals on. Security is a concern, too. At the last major soccer tournament in the U.S., the 2024 Copa America final at Miami Gardens, Florida, started 82 minutes late after spectators breached security gates. 'That was certainly a reminder and a wake-up call if anybody needed it that those types of things are going to be used in terms of the ultimate assessment of whether this World Cup is successful,' said former U.S. defender Alexi Lalas, now Fox's lead soccer analyst. U.S. President Donald Trump's travel ban on citizens from 12 nations exempted athletes, coaches, staff and relatives while not mentioning fans. Vice President JD Vance made what could be interpreted as a warning on May 6. 'Of course everybody is welcome to come and see this incredible event. I know we'll have visitors probably from close to 100 countries. We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game,' he said. 'But when the time is up they'll have to go home. Otherwise they'll have to talk to Secretary Noem,' he added, speaking alongside Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. Back in U.S. for first time in 32 years The 1994 World Cup sparked the launch of Major League Soccer with 12 teams in 1996, and $50 million in World Cup profits seeded the U.S. Soccer Foundation, tasked with developing the sport's growth. MLS now has 30 teams, plays in 22 soccer specific stadiums and has club academies to grow the sport and improve talent. Next year's tournament will include 104 games , up from 64 from 1998 through 2022, and the 11 U.S. stadiums are all NFL homes with lucrative luxury suites and club seating. It also will be the first World Cup run by FIFA without a local organizing committee. 'The legacy initiative of 2026 is around how we ensure that soccer is everywhere in this county,' U.S. Soccer Federation CEO JT Batson said. 'How do we ensure that every American can walk, ride their bike or take public transit to a safe place to play soccer? How do we make it to where every school in America has soccer accessible to their students? And how do we make it to wherever every American can truly see themselves in the game?' Interest in soccer has vastly increased in the U.S., with England's Premier League averaging 510,000 viewers per match window on NBC's networks last season and the European Champions League final drawing more than 2 million viewers in each of the past five years on CBS. However, CBS broadcast just 26 of 189 Champions League matches on TV in 2024-25 and streamed the rest. MLS drew about 12.2 million fans last year, second to 14.7 million in 2023-24 for the Premier League's 20 teams, but MLS has largely disappeared from broadcast TV since starting a 10-year contract with Apple TV+ in 2023 . Apple spokesman Sam Citron said the company does not release viewer figures. In a fractured television landscape, different deals were negotiated by FIFA, UEFA, MLS, the NWSL, the USSF and the five major European leagues. 'You basically have over 2,800 game windows per season aired in the United States and so that requires distribution largely on streaming platforms like Paramount+ or ESPN+, but it's difficult for new fan adoption and it makes reach kind of challenging,' said Gerry Cardinale, managing partner of RedBird Capital Partners, which holds controlling interests in AC Milan and Toulouse and owns a non-controlling stake of Fenway Sports Group, parent of Liverpool. 'Kids today are getting weaned on Premier League football and Serie A football, and when you watch that as a product, it's hard for MLS to compete.' 1994 World Cup set attendance record The 1994 World Cup, a 24-nation tournament, drew a record 3.58 million fans for 52 matches. Ticket prices ranged from $25-$75 for most first round games and $180-$475 for the final at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. FIFA, which has about 800 people working at an office in Coral Gables, Florida, says it will announce information on general tickets in the third quarter. It wouldn't say whether prices will be fixed or variable. Hospitality packages are available on FIFA's website through On Location. For the eight matches at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, including the final on July 19, prices range from $25,800 to $73,200 per person. Variable ticket pricing possible FIFA appears to be using variable pricing for this year's Club World Cup , played at 12 U.S. stadiums from June 14 to July 13, and some prices repeatedly have been slashed. Marriott Bonvoy, a U.S. Soccer Federation partner, has been offering free tickets to some of its elite members. Asked about Club World Cup ticket sales and team base camp arrangements, Manolo Zubiria, the World Cup's chief tournament officer, hung up four minutes and five questions into a telephone interview with The Associated Press. Brendan O'Connell, the publicist who arranged the interview, wrote in an email to the AP: 'The guest was not prepared for those questions.' FIFA's media relations staff would not make FIFA president Gianni Infantino available to discuss the tournament. Ahead of the 1994 World Cup, FIFA announced in May 1992 the draw would take place at Las Vegas on Dec. 18 or 19, 1993. FIFA has not revealed plans for this year's draw but appears to be planning for Las Vegas on Dec. 5. Regular ticket sales began in February 1993 for the U.S. soccer family and general first- and second-round sales started that June. Fans submitted lottery applications in October 1993 for games from the quarterfinals on. Teams could train away from World Cup cities While not detailing ticketing plans for next year's tournament, FIFA is spreading it beyond the host cites and lists about 60 possible base camps for teams to use, paired with hotels. Some are fancy — The Greenbrier Resort in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia — and some more Spartan — the Courtyard by Marriott Mesa at Wrigleyville West in Arizona. Thousands of arrangements must be coordinated. Major League Baseball is drawing up its schedule to ensure that the four teams whose ballparks share parking lots with World Cup stadiums — in Arlington, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; Philadelphia; and Seattle — won't play home games on the dates of tournament matches. Boris Gartner, CEO of La Liga North America, a joint venture of the Spanish soccer league and Relevent Sports, said the 2026 World Cup should be viewed as just another step in the sport's long-term growth in the United States. 'If you have a clear understanding of the market and the audience, a clear understanding of the value that these properties bring to media companies, and you mix content with a commercial strategy, with the right media distribution strategy, this is something that will continue to grow over the next two decades,' he said. 'If more people are watching the NWSL, more people are going to be interested in soccer that could potentially end up watching a Bundesliga game or La Liga game.' ___ AP soccer:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store