
Is the centre right doomed?
For this reason – plus the fact that other things in the world were happening over the weekend – Saturday's Ipsos poll, showing Reform on 34 per cent and the Conservatives on just 15 per cent, has created less excitement than it might. Caution here is sensible – it might turn out to be an outlier – but it does highlight the fact that even the less surprising, less remarkable polls – in which the Tories poll in the high teens and Reform polls in the high 20s – not to mention May's dismal local election results, still reveal a situation that is extraordinary. The Conservative Party appears to have been relegated from the top tier of British politics.
It is of no comfort to the Tories that this decline is not an isolated example for the mainstream centre right. As Sam Freedman recently pointed out, only two of the G20 countries are currently led by centre-right parties (US Republicans no longer count as mainstream centre right). Whereas once the centre right was the dominant political force in many countries, it is now in structural decline and, in some cases, close to extinction.
This theme is looked at in some detail in a report published last week by Bright Blue. It begins by trying to define and identify the centre right, and argues that, first, a centre-right party needs to be a centrist party, in that – unlike populist parties – it recognises the value of political institutions and seeks to develop policies based on evidence. Second, to distinguish the centre right from the centre left, a centre-right party will have at least two out of three attributes: a caution about change; what they describe as 'valuing the culture of the people local to it' (or 'non-cosmopolitanism'); and a belief in economic liberalism.
Looking specifically at the UK, Germany, France, Poland and the Republic of Ireland, the paper argues that the nature of the centre-right varies depending upon that nation's history and culture. Nor is the way in which the centre right is represented in the party political system always the same. Nonetheless, there are sufficient similarities for comparisons to be worthwhile.
In each case, with the exception of Ireland, the centre right has been diminished by the rise of the populist right – competing for an element of the centre right's traditional support. The response of the centre right has been either to try to delegitimise the populists (which has aggravated the anti-establishment feeling held by some voters), or imitate it (which alienates other parts of their electoral coalition and is often inconsistent with traditional beliefs).
The paper also argues that centre-right parties have often been unable to differentiate themselves from parties of the centre left on economic policy. This was a big problem for the centre right in the 1990s when the end of the Cold War and the emergence of a generation of moderate centre-left leaders meant that the centre right had nowhere to go. In recent years, however, political convergence has been driven more by the centre right moving leftwards on economic policy than the centre left moving rightwards. Economic statism, driven by the need to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic and a desire to appeal to both older and more economically left-wing populist voters, saw centre-right governments deliver higher levels of public spending which, in a period of low economic growth, inevitably resulted in higher taxes.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
The temptation in these circumstances is to try to change the subject and focus on cultural issues, such as opposing wokeness and multiculturalism. But, as the report dryly notes, for those most concerned about these issues, 'the centre right is not the obvious outlet for these sentiments'.
Does this leave the centre right doomed? The UK polling certainly suggests that it might be. But this may not so much reveal that the centre-right electorate no longer exists, rather that the Conservative Party is currently incapable of articulating a persuasive centre-right case. Tarnished by its recent history in office, it struggles to argue that it can deliver competent government and too often presents to the public an agenda that is indistinguishable from right-wing populism.
In France, the party of the centre right, the Republicans, has become something of an irrelevance, even though a poll in 2021 showed that 31 per cent of French people identified as centre right, compared to just 19 per cent as centre left, and 17 per cent as centrist. The risk for the Tories is that something similar might happen here.
What is needed, in contrast, is a confident assertion of centre-right values that distinguishes them from both the centre left and the populist right. Of course, there is plenty of criticism of the Labour government from the Tory frontbench, but it frequently lacks nuance or self-awareness. In response to the rise of the populist right, however, the approach is too often to give the impression that Conservatives think that Reform is right, but that people should not vote for them. That has started to change on the economy as Nigel Farage moves his party to the left economically, but a clear and forthright critique of right-wing populism is lacking.
There is little prospect of that happening. Within the Tory party, the fear is that criticism of the populists would only increase divisions on the right. Reform voters, it is argued, are like Conservative voters, only more so. This view is preventing the Tories from occupying unashamedly the territory that is neither centre left nor populist. Until it does so, the centre right will remain a diminished force in the UK.
[See more: Labour is heading for war over welfare cuts]
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Pakistan to create new force in military to supervise missiles after India conflict
ISLAMABAD, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Pakistan will create a new force in the military to supervise missile combat capabilities in a conventional conflict, apparently a move to match the neighbouring arch-rival India. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the creation of the Army Rocket Force late Wednesday at a ceremony held in Islamabad to commemorate the worst conflict in decades with India in May. The ceremony was held a day ahead of Pakistan's 78th Independence Day. "It will be equipped with modern technology," Sharif said in a statement from his office, adding that the force will prove to be a milestone in strengthening the combat capability of Pakistan's army. He did not give any further details. A senior security official, however, said that the force will have its own command in the military which will be dedicated to handling and deployment of missiles in any event of a conventional war. "It is obvious that it is meant for India," he said. The two nuclear-armed nations keep upgrading their military capabilities in the wake of a longstanding rivalry since their independence from British rule in 1947. The latest tension between the two countries soared in April over the killing of 26 civilians in Indian Kashmir, an attack New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denied involvement. A conflict then erupted in May, the most serious fighting between the two countries in decades, which saw both sides using missiles, drones and fighter jets before it ended with a cease-fire announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump. Islamabad acknowledges the U.S. role, but India denies it, saying it was agreed directly between the two militaries.


Daily Record
43 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Boost for Rachel Reeves after surprising UK economic growth in three months to June
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product grew by 0.3 per cent after 0.7 per cent growth in the first three months of the year. Rachel Reeves has been given a boost after the UK economy grew faster than expected in the three months to June. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product grew by 0.3 per cent after 0.7 per cent growth in the first three months of the year. But the figure was stronger than expected 0.1 per cent after a strong showing in June. Labour Chancellor Reeves said: 'Today's economic figures are positive with a strong start to the year and continued growth in the second quarter. 'But there is more to do to deliver an economy that works for working people. 'I know that the British economy has the key ingredients for success but has felt stuck for too long. 'That is why we're investing to rebuild our national infrastructure, cutting back on red tape to get Britain building again and boosting the national minimum wage to make work pay. 'There's more to do and today's figures only fuel my ambition to deliver on our plan for change.' Reeves faces a difficult autumn budget as reports have suggested she is considering tax rises. High debt interest payments and U-turns on welfare cuts mean that there is an estimated gap in the public finances of more than £40 billion. ONS director of economic statistics Liz McKeown said: 'Growth slowed in the second quarter after a strong start to the year. 'The economy was weak across April and May, with some activity having been brought forward to February and March ahead of stamp duty and tariff changes, but then recovered strongly in June. 'Across the second quarter as a whole, growth was led by services, with computer programming, health and vehicle leasing growing.' Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'As GDP growth slows again, it is clear the chancellor's fiscal rules are shackling the economy. "Workers can't wait forever for investment in our public services and industry. We need real improvements in wages and living standards now.'


New Statesman
43 minutes ago
- New Statesman
What Bridget Phillipson can learn from Conservative education policy
Photo byIt's fitting that the new book by former Conservative schools minister Nick Gibb reads like a textbook. Part memoir, part manual, Reforming Lessons is both a guide to implementing the policies Gibb introduced under his tenure; and a defence of those policies. For me, reading it is personal. As a new maths teacher in 2009, I watched his reforms roll through the school gates. A few years later, as a Labour education advisor, I spent my time critiquing them. Now, as a parent, I am teaching my son to read with the very literacy strategies he promoted. If international league tables are the yardstick – and the Conservatives said they would be – it's little wonder they view their record on schools as a success. Since 2009, England's performance in literacy and numeracy has markedly improved. Throughout the book, Gibb repeatedly cites England's rise in Pisa (the programme for international student assessment) and Pirls (the progress in international reading literacy study) rankings. The reform that takes much of the credit is the one most closely associated with Gibb: the drive for teaching children to read by systematic synthetic phonics. If you work in schools, early years, or are a parent of a young child, you've likely encountered phonics. This highly structured method teaches reading by blending letter sounds. Though the approach has existed for centuries, it fell out of favour in the 20th century, when some derided it as too rigid or 'teacher-led'. Instead, more 'child-centered' strategies became popular, such as memorising 'whole-words' or using picture cues to identify words. But while these approaches gained ground in classrooms, cognitive scientists were running experiments to better understand how humans learn to read. Their findings revealed that skilled readers don't rely on contextual cues but instead recognise words as sequences of letters. Over time, a substantial body of evidence built up pointing to phonics as the most effective method for teaching reading. Gibb recounts how he first encountered the so-called 'reading wars' in 2003 when he joined the Education Select Committee. The chapter is a case study in how to drive reform from the backbenches. The then-Labour government began embedding phonics in all primary schools in 2007. When Gibb became schools minister in 2010, he put rocket boosters under the policy, providing funding for approved programmes and accountability via the phonics reading check, which nearly 90 per cent now pass by the end of Year 2. The success of the phonics reform is hard to dispute. Gibb doesn't mention PIAAC (the programme for the international assessment of adult competencies), perhaps reflecting a blind spot on further education. If he had, he could have drawn attention to the notable improvement in the literacy and numeracy skills of 16- to 24-year-olds in the 2023 results. England is now one of only three countries to show gains in literacy over the past decade. These are the young people who began school after phonics became mainstream. My nephew attends a nursery in Canada, which proudly told my sister they were adopting the 'English approach' to early reading. In a public sector where much feels broken, it's refreshing to be world-leading in something. England's gains are not limited to literacy. International data also shows a sharp improvement in maths. Gibb attributes this to another of his flagship reforms: the introduction of a 'knowledge-rich' national curriculum. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The knowledge vs skills debate during his tenure was even more heated than the reading wars. Yet the evidence he presents is hard to ignore. Cognitive psychology suggests that so-called 'generic skills', like critical thinking, cannot be developed in isolation without a strong foundation of knowledge. To persuade readers further, Gibb introduces concepts such as 'working memory' and 'cognitive overload', explaining that higher-order thinking skills emerge from domain-specific knowledge. He points to two 'natural experiments' created by the devolved education systems of Scotland and Wales, where governments pursued skills-based curricula. In contrast to England's results, Scotland and Wales have declined. A central theme in Reforming Lessons is that these reforms are not inherently conservative. They are informed by modern cognitive science and go well beyond the idea of traditional teaching. Gibb argues that equalising access to knowledge has a natural home on the political left, among those committed to social justice and closing the attainment gap. But he is also overly critical of the current government. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has shown she understands these principles, announcing Labour's plan for a core curriculum that is 'knowledge-rich down to its bones' and committing to finding a phonics equivalent for maths. The book has other tensions. Gibb's attempt to reconcile granting schools freedom over their own curriculum, while prescribing specific pedagogies, doesn't quite convince. In one chapter, he praises a former chief inspector of Ofsted for insisting that the inspectorate has no preferred teaching style; in another, he commends their successor for steering schools towards a knowledge-rich curriculum. Nor does he dwell on what his government got wrong. Yet mistakes were serious. His department missed initial teacher training targets during a pupil population boom. Gibb tries to blame Covid, but Labour had been warning about teacher shortfalls as early as 2015. Recruitment is now beginning to improve under the new government. None of these errors compares to the legacy left on Send (special educational needs and disabilities). The Department for Education's own accounts now define the Send cost pressures as a major and worsening risk. Addressing this will likely dominate Labour's education agenda. It's the book's most glaring omission. It's not the purpose of Reforming Lessons to set out what should come next – but it's a shame there isn't more guidance on how the government might build on his reforms. Labour's opportunity mission offers ready vehicles. The new best start hubs could help parents reinforce early reading at home. At the other end of the system, technical excellence colleges could demonstrate that vocational education also benefits from pedagogical principles developed from cognitive science: strong foundations, careful modelling, and deliberate practice. Despite its gaps, the book offers a valuable lesson for politicians and advisors: mastery of a brief matters. Over the same period that Gibb was in post, there were 15 different housing ministers. His knowledge of education and the schools system is vast. He ends the book reflecting on how much time he spent reading and thinking about education. Ministers today – and their opposition shadows – would be wise to take note. [See more: The British public aren't who you think they are] Related