Opinion - Democrats must do this to get the GOP on board for immigration and border reform
'We don't have to choose between border security and immigration reform,' Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) recently said. 'We can and should do both.' And he has unveiled a five-pillar plan for doing so.
I am encouraged by the fact that a Democratic senator is making a genuine effort to put together an immigration reform bill that would appeal to both parties, but I think he needs to go a little further if he wants his proposal to have real appeal for Republicans.
Pillar 1. Border security and interior enforcement
The first pillar calls for more resources at the border; building more barriers; improving port infrastructure; and other changes that would make it easier to apprehend illegal border crossers. It also would prioritize Immigration and Customs Enforcement's 'finite resources on identifying, arresting, and deporting convicted criminals, known gang members, and other violent individuals who jeopardize Americans' safety.'
The border resources Gallego is offering would certainly make it easier to apprehend illegal border crossers, but he also needs to do something about the magnets that attract illegal immigration. The main one is the job magnet.
Forty years ago, Congress established employer sanctions for knowingly hiring unauthorized foreign employees; yet even today, the sanctions still haven't been fully implemented.
Former Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman Prakash Khatri and I have proposed a different approach: Require the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division to fine employers who are violating labor laws in industries known to hire unauthorized foreign workers. This division enforces federal labor laws that were enacted to curb such abuses, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, which established a minimum wage, overtime pay and more.
This should discourage employers who currently hire unauthorized foreign workers because they tend to work for lower wages and under less desirable conditions than American workers.
Additionally, the interior enforcement guidelines in Gallego's plan would create what I call the 'home-free magnet.' Illegal border crossers who reach the interior of the country would not have to worry about being deported unless they appear to jeopardize Americans' safety. This encourages illegal border crossers who think they can avoid problems with the law to to keep on trying until they succeed in reaching the interior of the country. For when they succeed, which is likely if they are persistent, they will be home-free.
Pillar 2. Reform the asylum system
This pillar would take asylum applications away from the immigration court and have asylum officers adjudicate them. It also would limit access to asylum during serious border emergencies to prevent the border and nearby communities from being overwhelmed.
But asylum officers are not a magic bullet for eliminating backlogs. The Citizenship and Immigration Services use asylum officers to adjudicate affirmative asylum applications, and it had a 1.3 million case backlog at the end of fiscal 2024. The estimated wait time for a decision was more than six years.
Part of the problem is not having enough asylum officers. The plan can facilitate hiring more officers by providing congressional funding. The Asylum Division currently is funded entirely by fees collected from operations in other parts of the agency.
And some asylum applications do need the additional expertise of an immigration judge.
The proposal to limit access to asylum is a good idea, but it should be based on whether the court backlog is at a manageable level. It was at 3,629,627 cases as of the end of March. And there are only 700 immigration judges. This is an average of 5,185 cases per judge; the average wait-time for a hearing is 658 days.
Pillar 3. Increase visa availability
Pillar 3 would increase annual visa quotas, ease per-country caps and create new visa categories. It also would increase refugee admissions and expedite the naturalization process for immigrants who have served in the U.S. armed forces.
I would expect President Trump to veto a bill that has the increases Gallego's plan proposes. Trump reduced legal immigration during his first term, and he is doing it again now. Gallego should probably consider less ambitious increases.
Pillar 4. DREAM Act
This pillar would provide DREAMers — immigrants who were brought here by their parents when they were young children — with a pathway to citizenship. Democrats already have introduced 20 versions of a DREAM Act, but none has gotten the support needed from Republicans to get through the legislative process.
Gallego should consider substituting a modified version of the bill Trump offered in his first term to help DREAMers who are participating in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which, among other things, includes legal status for DREAMers who are DACA participants and limiting family-based visas to spouses and children. I would expect Trump to be receptive to such an approach; he said in a recent 'Meet the Press' interview that he still wants to help the participants in that program. The plight of the DREAMers is sympathetic because they didn't intentionally violate our immigration laws. Their parents brought them here illegally.
It wouldn't make sense to let parents profit from the legalization of the children they brought here in violation of our laws. But chain migration doesn't have to be eliminated to prevent this from happening — just include DREAMers in the Special Immigrant Juvenile program instead of establishing a new legalization program for them. The provisions of the program already prohibit participants from conferring immigration benefits on their parents.
Pillar 5. Root causes
This pillar would create a Western Hemisphere engagement strategy; promote the sharing of refugee-asylum resettlement responsibility with other countries; fund regional enforcement efforts; and do other things that would make our refugee/asylum policies more desirable.
These are good ideas, but Pillar 5 also calls for eliminating the root causes of illegal migration. I think the Republicans would be more likely to support a program for eliminating the magnets that attract illegal migration.
The takeaway is that Gallego has developed an impressive plan for combining border security and immigration reform, but it needs a few changes to increase the likelihood that Republicans will support it.
Nolan Rappaport was detailed to the House Judiciary Committee as an Executive Branch Immigration Law Expert for three years. He subsequently served as an immigration counsel for the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims for four years. Prior to working on the Judiciary Committee, he wrote decisions for the Board of Immigration Appeals for 20 years.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Congress' fight over security erupts after Minnesota shootings
A long-simmering fight over congressional security roared back to the surface this weekend following a pair of shootings against Minnesota state legislators at their homes that left two dead and two others hospitalized. Why it matters: The shootings have deeply unnerved members of Congress, who feel that any one of them could be the subject of an unanticipated attack — particularly at home in their districts and while in transit. Personal security details are largely a privilege for top congressional leaders and — in some cases — other high-profile members facing specific, credible threats. Rank-and-file members are renewing a push for greater security, arguing for their own details, greater safety measures at their homes and at airports and more stringent measures to hide their sensitive details. Driving the news: Minnesota state House Democratic Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot and killed at their home early on Saturday. The suspect, identified by law enforcement officials as 57-year-old Vance Boelter, also allegedly shot Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife at their home, leaving both hospitalized. Boelter was allegedly dressed as a police officer and driving a vehicle similar to those used by local law enforcement. He also had what investigators described as a "manifesto" that listed other Democratic lawmakers, as well as prominent abortion rights advocates, officials allege. State of play: The shooting sent shockwaves through Capitol Hill, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) saying he asked for increased security for Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Tina Smith (D-Minn.). House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said he similarly asked security officials to "ensure the safety of our Minnesota delegation and Members of Congress across the country." The Capitol Police said in a statement Saturday it was "aware of the violence targeting state lawmakers in Minnesota" and had "been working with our federal, state and local partners," but declined to offer further details. What they're saying: "I call on the Capitol Police to assist in providing real solutions for increased security for members," said Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee. Thompson, who had a security detail in 2022 as chair of the Jan. 6 committee, said he expects "full cooperation and resources from Republican leadership." "We're just as exposed as [Hortman] was. We have no more security than she does. You know, Capitol Police is not equipped ... for 435 members, to keep them safe," Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) told Axios in an interview. "It's not their fault," he added. "Things have changed. And as Congress becomes less functional in general, we can't even function to keep ourselves safe." What we're hearing: House Republicans held a call on Saturday afternoon, in which lawmakers exhorted their leadership to provide more security resources to individual members. Specific proposals included increasing security measures at members' homes and at airports, as well as boosting security for meetings, according to three House Republicans who were on the call. One of the GOP lawmakers, asked if leadership was receptive to those pleas, told Axios they "don't think so" and that "nothing's changed." A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) did not respond to a request for comment. What's next: Jeffries will host a virtual briefing next Tuesday afternoon on members' security, according to invites viewed by Axios. A senior House Democrat told Axios that their colleagues are "scared" and want their addresses hidden — as well as regular security updates — and "won't be silenced." Another House Democrat said there is "heavy demand" in the party for rank-and-file members to have their own security details. The intrigue: Moskowitz told Axios he may force a House vote on holding what is called a " secret session" so members can have sensitive security discussions "if I have to." Such sessions, in which lawmakers can debate on the House floor away from public view, are typically used to discuss confidential information, as was the case the last time the House went into a secret session in 2008. Moskowitz can force a vote on his proposal unilaterally through what is called a privileged motion. "Maybe it also won't come to that," he told Axios. "Maybe we'll hear something from the speaker in the next week."
Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Inside Trump's backtrack on immigration
For months, Trump administration officials have been adamant about targeting all the millions of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally, regardless of their work or taxpaying status. But now Trump is making a huge exception: those working at hotels, farms, meatpacking plants and restaurants. Why it matters: He's bowing to pressure from businesses that have been warning of economic devastation — and is opening the door for potentially millions of workers who are here illegally to stay after all. Zoom in: The pressure — particularly from the agriculture and hospitality industries — had been building for months. But it ramped up in recent weeks, after top Trump aide Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem met with top ICE officials in late May and demanded that immigration agents dramatically boost their arrest goal to 3,000 people a day. That mandate helped drive many of the increasingly aggressive raids by masked, heavily armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents across the nation. It also helped inspire protests about ICE's tactics — most notably in Los Angeles, where Trump called in the National Guard and Marines over the objection of state and local officials. How it happened: Trump's pivot appears to have emerged Wednesday, sources with knowledge of the situation tell Axios. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins called Trump to say farm groups were increasingly concerned that the stepped-up immigration raids would lead many reliable workers to be arrested — or stop showing up for work, out of fear. Their conversation, the sources said, led Trump to post a message on Truth Social Thursday saying that immigrants in the agriculture and hospitality industries are "very good, long time workers." He hinted at exceptions for such workers who are here illegally, saying: "Changes are coming." Later Thursday, Tatum King, a senior ICE official, sent an email to agency officials nationwide, telling them to "please hold on all worksite enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meatpacking plants), restaurants, and operating hotels." The email added that "other case types/investigations such as human trafficking, money laundering, drug smuggling into these industries are ok, however we are not pursuing non-criminal collaterals." The intrigue: White House insiders insist this isn't a case of Trump flip-flopping — and that he still supports the hard line on immigration enforcement that Miller and Noem have pushed. But it's clear that the economic calamity that could result from mass deportations of unauthorized workers who do labor-intensive jobs most Americans won't, will lead to some changes in Trump's immigration plan. Undocumented workers and those with expired work visas can be difficult to track across sectors of the economy But some studies have given a glimpse of their presence: The American Immigration Council estimates that unauthorized immigrants make up about 4.6% of the nation's employed labor force — that would amount to more than 7 million people. A recent Department of Agriculture study estimated that about 42% of America's farmworkers were undocumented from 2020 to 2022. Trump previously floated the idea of creating exceptions for workers in crucial industries. In mid-April, he suggested a pathway to citizenship for "great" unauthorized immigrants who play key roles in the economy — a way to live in the U.S. legally if they'd self-deport and have an employer support their return.
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israel, Iran exchange strikes for third day
Israel and Iran exchanged strikes for the third day amid stalled U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks, according to The Associated Press. Iran has been facing Israeli airstrikes for the past three days, with Iran's own missiles hitting buildings in Israel and being able to make it past air defenses, the AP reported. Earlier Sunday, explosions rocked the Iranian capital of Tehran, with blasts also reported elsewhere in the country, according to the AP. A prior Iranian death toll of 78, with over 320 wounded, was not updated, the outlet reported Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service reported that Iranian strikes killed a minimum of 10 people in Israel from late Saturday to Sunday, according to the AP. Another round of U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks were scheduled in Muscat, Oman, on Sunday, but they were axed according to Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi. 'We remain committed to talks and hope the Iranians will come to the table soon,' a high-level American official told the AP. Iranian leaders announced on Friday that their country had no longer planned to engage in nuclear talks with the U.S. that had been scheduled to take place Sunday in Oman following deadly airstrikes from Israel, which said it targeted Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites. On Saturday, Iranian officials indicated they could reverse their decision not to attend upcoming nuclear talks. However, they said more negotiations were probably 'meaningless' as they exchanged fire with Israel. 'The other side [the U.S.] acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory,' Esmaeil Baghaei, a spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry previously said. The Associated Press contributed.
