Oxford study finds 'extraordinary' tremors caused by tsunamis
The research's lead author Thomas Monahan, from the University of Oxford, said: "Climate change is giving rise to new, unseen extremes."These extremes are changing the fastest in remote areas, such as the Arctic, where our ability to measure them using physical sensors is limited."
To conduct the study into what researchers called the "extraordinary" tremors , scientists used new techniques to interpret data recorded by satellites orbiting the globe.This altimetry data measures the height of the Earth's surface by recording how long it takes for a radar pulse to travel from a satellite to the surface and back again.Conventional altimeters were unable to record evidence of the Greenland tsunamis, but a satellite launched in December 2022 had the equipment capable of doing so - allowing researchers to observe the trapped waves."This study shows how we can leverage the next generation of satellite earth observation technologies to study these processes," Mr Monahan said.Co-author of the study Prof Thomas Adcock added: "This study is an example of how the next generation of satellite data can resolve phenomena that has remained a mystery in the past."We will be able to get new insights into ocean extremes such as tsunamis, storm surges, and freak waves."
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Exact date 'hostile alien probe' could strike Earth revealed as Harvard scientist issues chilling warning
A Harvard scientist has issued a chilling warning about a mysterious interstellar object hurtling through our solar system, and says it could spell disaster for Earth. Professor Avi Loeb, who is well-known for pushing bold and often polarizing theories about extraterrestrial life, has been tracking the object, named 3I/ATLAS, since it was first spotted on July 1. If the object is an alien craft, Loeb warned it could be carrying a probe or even a weapon. He predicted that such an intercept vehicle would reach Earth between November 21 and December 5, 2025. The timeline is based on calculations that 3I/ATLAS will pass behind the sun from Earth's perspective this October, a time he ominously suggested could be used to prepare the attack. Referring to the object as a 'mothership,' he explained that its position would be an efficient way to seed habitable planets with probes. This strategy would allow the devices to 'intercept the planets while the mothership continues on its journey to the next star.' 'It may come to save us or destroy us. We'd better be ready for both options and check whether all interstellar objects are rocks,' said Loeb. Chris Lintott, an astronomer at the University of Oxford, has dismissed Loeb's claims as 'nonsense on stilts,' telling Live Science that the alien probe theory is an 'insult to the exciting work going on to understand this object.' Loeb has remained adamant that something about 3I/ATLAS does not add up. He said its retrograde orbit, meaning it's moving against the flow of the solar system, is oddly aligned with Earth's path. '3I/ATLAS might be an alien probe,' he said, citing its 'unusually rare trajectory,' which just so happens to align closely with the orbital plane of the inner planets, including Earth. He puts the odds of that happening naturally at just 0.2 percent. 'At its closest point to the sun on October 29, fears of an alien invasion could send stock markets crashing,' Loeb said. 'In that scenario, citizens would lose their trust in governments to protect them.' He went so far as to compare the potential chaos to a military ambush, saying: 'Facing a high-tech alien visitor could feel like Iran's air defenses when US B-2 bombers appeared, silent, unstoppable, and overwhelmingly powerful.' The object, believed to be about 12 miles wide, is unusually large for something hurtling in from outside the solar system. According to Loeb, if it were natural, we would have already spotted millions of similar objects. 'But we haven't,' he said. He has published three pre-print papers laying out the case and has even suggested that NASA attempt an interception using its Juno spacecraft when the object passes near Jupiter. 'In my view, we need a risk scale for interstellar objects,' Loeb said. 'A zero would be a natural comet. 'A 10 would be a verified technological object, possibly powered by an engine or emitting artificial light.' He also believes governments should already be forming task forces, including scientists, policymakers and even psychologists, to determine how to respond and how to break the news to the public without triggering panic. Loeb's warnings have grown increasingly urgent, culminating in one dramatic statement: 'It may come to save us or destroy us. We'd better be ready for both options.' If 3I/ATLAS is more than just a rock, he said Earth is woefully unprepared. 'The visitor,' he warned, 'is already in our backyard.' Even if the object turns out to be artificial, Loeb admitted there's little humanity could do. At nearly 60 miles per second relative to Earth, it's moving far too fast for any of our current rockets to reach. 'If the hypothesis that 3I/ATLAS is a technological artifact proves correct, there are two possible implications: either its intentions are entirely benign, or they are malign, said Loeb. 'In the first case, humanity need only wait and welcome this interstellar messenger with open arms. It is the second scenario that causes serious concern.' He added that because the second possibility has serious consequences, we can use the idea behind Pascal's wager. 'Blaise Pascal argued that it's smarter to believe in God because the possible benefits of believing are much greater than the losses if you're wrong,' Loeb explained. 'Similarly, in our case, it makes sense to warn humanity about the risk from 3I/ATLAS, even if it turns out to be just a theory.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Scientists slam Trump administration climate report as a ‘farce' full of misinformation
A new Trump administration report which attempts to justify a mass rollback of environmental regulations is chock-full of climate misinformation, experts say. On Tuesday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposal to undo the 2009 'endangerment finding', which allows the agency to limit planet-heating pollution from cars and trucks, power plants and other industrial sources. Hours later, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a 150-page report defending the proposal, claiming scientific concern about the climate crisis is overblown. 'Climate change is a challenge – not a catastrophe,' wrote the energy secretary, Chris Wright, in the report's introduction. Esteemed climate scientist Michael Mann said the report was akin to the result he would expect 'if you took a chat bot and you trained it on the top 10 fossil fuel industry-funded climate denier websites'. The DOE published the report hours after the EPA announced a plan to roll back 2009's 'endangerment finding', a seminal ruling that provided the legal basis for the agency to regulate climate-heating pollution under the Clean Air Act. If finalized, the move would topple virtually all US climate regulation. In a Fox News interview, Wright claimed the report pushes back on the 'cancel culture Orwellian squelching of science'. But Naomi Oreskes, a history of science professor at Harvard University and expert in climate misinformation, said its true purpose is to 'justify what is a scientifically unjustifiable failure to regulate fossil fuels'. 'Science is the basis for climate regulation, so now they are trying to replace legitimate science with pseudoscience,' she said. The attack on the research underpinning the endangerment finding – which says greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare – comes as part of Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' agenda to boost fossil fuels, which are the primary cause of global warming. 'This is an agenda to promote fossil fuels, not to protect public health and welfare or the environment,' said Rachel Cleetus, a director at climate and science non-profit Union of Concerned Scientists who was an author on the sixth US national climate assessment. Asked about scientists' assertions that the new report is rife with misinformation, a DOE spokesperson Ben Dietderich, said: 'This report critically assesses many areas of ongoing scientific inquiry that are frequently assigned high levels of confidence – not by the scientists themselves but by the political bodies involved, such as the United Nations or previous presidential administrations.' But the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) produces what is widely considered the gold standard compendium of climate science, compiled by a huge multinational team of scientists, peer reviewed and agreed to by every national government. The latest IPCC synthesis report, released two years ago, was a vast undertaking involving 721 volunteer scientists around the world. It states that it is 'unequivocal' that human activity has heated the planet, which has 'led to widespread adverse impacts and related losses and damages to nature and people'. By contrast, the Trump administration report was crafted by five handpicked scientists who are seen as having fringe or contrarian views by mainstream climate scientists, with no peer review. The experts behind the report have previously denied being climate deniers. The DOE did not respond to a question about the authors. 'This report had five authors and was rushed over four months, and would not pass muster in any traditional scientific peer review process,' said Zeke Hausfather, a research scientist at the climate non-profit Berkeley Earth, who called the paper a 'farce'. Wright, the energy secretary, insisted he had not steered the report's conclusions, while Judith Curry, one of the report authors, said in a blog post she hoped the document will push climate science 'away from alarmism and advocacy'. Mainstream climate scientists, however, condemned the findings as distorted and inaccurate. 'This is a report written by a couple of scientists who are outliers in their arguments for climate change,' said Natalie Mahowald, a climate scientist at Cornell University. 'This document does in no way depreciate the value of previous assessments, but rather just cherrypicks the literature to pretend to create a new review.' Mahowald said the lack of peer review means it's 'obviously not as robust' as the IPCC report or the US government's periodic national climate assessment, which the Trump administration recently took offline. The latest national climate assessment, compiled by a dozen government agencies and outside scientists in 2023, concluded that the 'effects of human-caused climate change are already far-reaching and worsening across every region of the United States' 'If almost any other group of scientists had been chosen, the report would have been dramatically different,' Andrew Dessler, a climate researcher at Texas A&M University, said of the new report. 'The only way to get this report was to pick these authors.' Hausfather agreed that the authors' work 'might represent their views but is not consistent with the broader scientific literature on climate change'. He was among the scientists whose work the authors cited. The new paper includes a chart from a 2019 report which he led, claiming it demonstrates how climate models 'consistently overestimated observations' of atmospheric carbon. But Hausfather's research actually showed that climate models have performed well. 'They appear to have discarded the whole paper as not fitting their narrative, and instead picked a single figure that was in the supplementary materials to cast doubt on models when the whole paper actually confirmed how well they have performed in the years after they were published,' he said. The DOE did not respond to a request for comment about Hausfather's concerns. That approach to research seems to underpin the entire paper, said Hausfather, who is also the climate research lead at tech company Stripe. 'This is a general theme in the report; they cherrypick data points that suit their narrative and exclude the vast majority of the scientific literature that does not,' he said. Dessler said scientists are obliged to engage with the full range of evidence, even if it contradicts their initial assumptions. Ignoring this principle 'can rise to the level of scientific misconduct', he said. 'The report they produced should be thought of as a law brief from attorneys defending their client, carbon dioxide,' Dessler said. 'Their goal is not to weigh the evidence fairly but to build the strongest possible case for CO2's innocence.' The lack of peer review in the administration's report led to conclusions that deviated, sometimes wildly, from the scientific literature. Many of its claims are based on long-debunked research long promoted by climate deniers, said Mann. 'It is shop worn, decades-old, discredited climate denier talking points, dressed up in the clothing of some sensible new set of revelations,' he said. 'What's different is that it has the imprimatur of the EPA and the federal government now.' The report, for instance claims that warming trends have been overstated, despite evidence to the contrary. It was published as extreme heat is affecting millions of Americans. 'They're literally trying to tell us not to believe what we see with our own two eyes … and instead buy into their denialist framing that rejects not just the science, but what is plainly evident if you look out your window,' said Mann. The authors also write that ocean acidification is occurring 'within the range of natural variability' and beneficial for marine life despite the ocean's acidic levels currently being the highest since 14m years ago, a time when a major extinction event was occurring. And the report references the apparent health of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, which it says 'has shown considerable growth in recent years'. The reef was recently hit by its sixth mass bleaching event since 2016, a devastating phenomena for corals where they whiten and sometimes die due to high sea temperatures. No widespread bleaching events were recorded on the reef prior to 1998. The report is 'tedious' and at times 'truly wearisome', according to Bob Kopp, a climate scientist at Rutgers University. Kopp recently worked on a paper showing how rising temperatures and drought will worsen crop yields, counter to the report's claims that crops will flourish with extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. 'Carbon dioxide fertilization is largely irrelevant to how increasingly extreme heat and intense drought will impact crop yields,' Kopp said. 'As a former department of energy fellow, I'm embarrassed by this report.'
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
The world is getting hotter – this is what it is doing to our brains
As heatwaves become more intense with climate change, scientists are racing to understand how extreme heat changes the way our brains work. When Jake was five months old, he had his first tonic-clonic seizure, his little body stiffening and then jerking rapidly. "It was extremely hot, he had overheated and we witnessed what we thought would be the scariest thing we would ever see," says his mother, Stephanie Smith. "Unfortunately, it wasn't." Seizures began to crop up often in hot weather. As soon as the stifling, humid days of summer would arrive, the family would resort to all kinds of cooling methods and a fierce battle to keep the seizures at bay would ensue. Following a genetic test at the age of 18 months, Jake was diagnosed with Dravet Syndrome, a neurological condition that includes a form of epilepsy and affects around one in 15,000 children. Seizures are often accompanied by intellectual disability and a range of comorbidities such as autism and ADHD, as well as difficulties with speech, mobility, eating and sleep. Heat and sudden temperature changes can bring on a seizure. Jake is now 13 years old, but has endured countless seizures with the turn of the weather, his mother says. "Increasingly hot summers and heatwaves are adding to the burden of living with this already devastating condition," says Smith. Dravet Syndrome is just one of many neurological diseases that are exacerbated by higher temperatures, says Sanjay Sisodiya of University College London and a pioneer in the field of climate change's impact on the brain. A neurologist who specialises in epilepsy, he frequently heard from patients' families that they had more troubles during heatwaves. "And I thought to myself, of course, why shouldn't climate change also affect the brain? After all, so many processes in the brain are involved in how the body copes with heat." As he dug into the scientific literature, he discovered a range of neurological conditions that are made worse by rising heat and humidity, including epilepsy, stroke, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, migraine, along with a number of others. He also discovered that the effects of climate change on our brains are already becoming visible. During the 2003 European heatwave, for example, about 7% of the excess deaths involved direct neurological problems. Similar figures were also seen during the 2022 UK heatwave. So, as the world warms due to climate change, what can we expect the effect on our brains to be? The human brain is, on average, rarely more than 1C (1.8F) higher, on average, than our core body temperature. Yet our brains – as one of the more energy-hungry organs in our bodies – produce a fair amount of their own heat when we think, remember and respond to the world around us. This means our bodies have to work hard to keep it cool. Blood circulating through a network of blood vessels helps to maintain its temperature, whisking away excess heat. This is necessary because our brain cells are also extremely heat sensitive. And the function of some of the molecules that pass messages between them are also thought to be temperature dependent, meaning they stop working efficiently if our brains get too hot or too cold. "We don't fully understand how the different elements of this complicated picture are affected," says Sisodiya. "But we can imagine it like a clock, where all the components are no longer working together properly." Although extreme heat alters how everyone's brains work – it can, for example, adversely affect decision making and lead to people taking greater risks – those with neurological conditions are often the most severely affected. This is for many reasons. For example, in some diseases, perspiration may be impaired. "Thermoregulation is a brain function and can be disrupted, if certain parts of the brain are not functioning properly," says Sisodiya. In some forms of multiple sclerosis, for instance, the core body temperature appears to be altered. In addition, some drugs that treat neurological and psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia affect temperature regulation, leaving those taking them more vulnerable to heatstroke, or hyperthermia as it is known medically, and at a greater risk of heat-related death. Heatwaves – and elevated nighttime temperatures especially – can affect people's sleep, affecting our mood and potentially worsening the symptoms of some conditions. "For many people with epilepsy, poor sleep can increase the risk of having seizures," says Sisodiya. Evidence suggests that hospital admissions and mortality rates among people with dementia also increase during heatwaves. Part of this may be due to age – older people are less able to regulate their body temperature – but their cognitive impairment may also mean they are less able to adapt to extreme heat. They may not drink enough, for example, or forget to close the windows, or go out into the heat when they shouldn't. Rising temperatures have also been linked to an increase in stroke incidents and mortality. In one study that analysed stroke mortality data from 25 countries, researchers found that out of 1,000 deaths from ischemic stroke, the hottest days contributed two excess deaths. "That may not seem like a lot," says Bethan Davies, a geriatrician at University Hospitals Sussex, in the UK. "But given that there are seven million deaths from strokes a year worldwide, heat may well be contributing to over 10,000 additional stroke deaths per year." She and her co-authors warned that climate change is likely to exacerbate this in years to come. A disproportionate share of the burden of heat-related stroke will be in middle- and low-income countries, which are already most affected by climate change and experience the highest rates of stroke. "Rising temperatures will exacerbate health inequalities both between and within countries and social groups," says Davies. A growing body of evidence suggests that older people as well as those with a low socioeconomic position are at an increased risk for heat-related mortality. A hotter world is also harming the neurodevelopment of the very youngest. "There is a link between extreme heat and bad pregnancy outcomes such as premature births," says Jane Hirst, professor of global women's health at Imperial College London in the UK. One recent systematic review of the scientific research found that heatwaves are associated with a 26% increase in preterm births, which can lead to neurodevelopmental delays and cognitive impairments. "However, there is a lot we do not know," adds Hirst. "Who is most vulnerable and why? Because clearly, there are 130 million women who have babies every year, a lot of them in hot countries, and this does not happen to them." Excessive heat due to climate change may also put additional strain on the brain, leaving it more vulnerable to damage that can lead to neurodegenerative diseases. Heat also affects the barrier that normally protects the brain, making it more permeable and increasing the risk that toxins, bacteria and viruses can cross over into our brain tissue. This could become more important as temperatures increase, as so too will the spread of mosquitos that transmit viruses that can cause neurological disease, such as Zika, chikungunya and dengue. "The Zika virus can affect foetuses and cause microcephaly," says Tobias Suter, a medical entomologist at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. "Rising temperatures and milder winters mean that the mosquito breeding season begins earlier in the year and ends later." (Read David Cox's story on how the US's mosquito season is already changing.) Heatwaves are capable of influencing a whole range of factors, from the electrical firings of the nerve cells to suicide risk, climate anxiety and even the stability of medication for neurological conditions. But exactly how rising temperatures affect our brains are still being investigated by scientists. Heat affects people in very different ways – some thrive in hot weather, others find it unbearable. "Different factors might be relevant for this differential sensitivity, and one of them may be genetic susceptibility," says Sisodiya. Genetic variants could influence the structures of proteins that might render some people more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. "There may be thermo-latent phenotypes that will only become apparent when those environmental pressures are sufficient to bring them out," he says. "What we're seeing today in people with neurological disorders could become relevant for people without neurological disorders as climate change progresses." There are still other questions that remain to be answered too. For example, is it the maximum temperature, is it the length of a heatwave or the nighttime temperature that has the greatest impact? It may well differ for each person or by neurological condition. But identifying who is at risk and why will be crucial to developing strategies to protect the most vulnerable. These could include early warning systems or insurance to compensate day labourers for lost wages due to extreme heat. "The era of global warming has ended, the era of global boiling has arrived," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres announced, when July 2023 was confirmed to be the hottest month on record. Climate change is here and it is intensifying. The era of the hot brain is just beginning. -- For trusted insights into better health and wellbeing rooted in science, sign up to the Health Fix newsletter, while The Essential List delivers a handpicked selection of features and insights. For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram.
