No verdict at Sean (Diddy) Combs' trial in first day of jury deliberations
The first day of deliberations saw a flurry of notes from the jury and Combs and his supporters bowing their heads in prayer in the courtroom – but no verdict.
The jury of eight men and four women are sifting through seven weeks of sometimes graphic and emotional testimony about the rap, fashion and reality TV impresario's propensity for violence and his sexual predilections, including drug-fueled sex marathons dubbed 'freak-offs' or 'hotel nights.'
Sean (Diddy) Combs thought 'fame, wealth and power' put him above the law, prosecutor says as trial closes
Sean (Diddy) Combs's lawyer mocks sex-trafficking case in closing, says charges 'badly exaggerated'
About an hour in, the foreperson reported that a juror might be having trouble following the 61 pages worth of instructions the judge had just read to them.
'We are concerned [the juror] cannot follow your honour's instructions,' the foreperson said in a note to Judge Arun Subramanian just after 12:30 p.m.
After the judge originally proposed asking the jury foreperson the nature of concerns about the fellow juror, defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo suggested caution and that it was better to say less than more.
'We can always ratchet it up. We can't ratchet it down,' Agnifilo said.
Subramanian sent his response to the jury around 2 p.m., reminding the panel to deliberate and to follow his instructions on the law.
The jury sent another note about three hours later asking for clarification on the part of the instructions addressing drug distribution – an allegation included in Combs' racketeering conspiracy charge.
As deliberations were happening, Combs prayed with his family and friends in the courtroom. Wearing his customary sweater and khakis, he stood facing his contingent in the audience and bowed his head with them. As they finished, they applauded, along with Combs.
Combs also showed off two books he's reading: The Power of Positive Thinking by Norman Vincent Peale and The Happiness Advantage by Shawn Achor.
As he sent the jury to deliberate, Subramanian told the five alternate jurors to remain on standby at home in case they're needed at a later point.
Jurors were provided with a laptop loaded with all of the exhibits shown in court, including text messages, photographs and videos of the sexual encounters at the heart of the case.
Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to federal charges of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking – relating to two of his ex-girlfriends – and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for allegedly arranging to fly his girlfriends and sex workers across state lines.
In closing arguments last week, federal prosecutors and Combs' defense team took their last shots at convincing jurors to convict or acquit the Grammy Award-winning founder of Bad Boy Records.
'The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik said. 'He thought that his fame, wealth and power put him above the law.'
She said that he used his 'close inner circle and a small army of personal staff, who made it their mission to meet the defendant's every desire, promote his power and protect his reputation at all costs.'
Defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo countered, 'This isn't about crime. It's about money.' He noted that one of Combs' accusers in the criminal case also sued him in civil court.
'He is not a racketeer. He is not a conspirator to commit racketeering. He is none of these things. He is innocent. He sits there innocent. Return him to his family, who have been waiting for him,' the lawyer told jurors.
In all, 34 witnesses testified, headlined by Combs' former girlfriends Cassie – the R&B singer born Casandra Ventura – and 'Jane,' who testified under a pseudonym. Both women said he often was violent toward them. Cassie said he forced her into hundreds of sexual encounters with paid male sex workers while Jane recounted numerous 'hotel nights.'
Jurors also saw now-infamous security camera video of Combs beating, kicking and dragging Cassie at a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 and clips from videos of sexual encounters.
Combs chose not to testify, and his lawyers didn't call any witnesses in their defense case. His attorneys elected instead to challenge the accusers' credibility during lengthy cross-examination questioning.
The defense has acknowledged that Combs veered into violence, but his lawyers maintain that the sex acts were consensual. They contend that prosecutors are intruding in Combs' personal life and that he's done nothing to warrant the charges against him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
33 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
New Jersey Gun Crime Lawyer Adam M. Lustberg Discusses Unlawful Firearm Training
New Jersey gun crime lawyer Adam M. Lustberg ( is drawing attention to a significant but often overlooked state law, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14, which outlines strict criminal penalties for unlawful firearm training. The statute targets individuals who instruct or train others in the use of firearms, explosives, or similar devices when the purpose is to support or facilitate criminal acts. Even if a crime has not yet occurred, the law imposes harsh penalties on those involved in such training activities with unlawful intent. Lustberg, who represents clients across New Jersey as a gun crime lawyer at Lustberg Law Offices, LLC, notes that violations of this law can carry serious consequences, including second-degree felony charges. The statute's reach is broad, covering not only direct instruction but also group training sessions that mimic paramilitary activities. As a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, Lustberg warns that the consequences can extend well beyond prison time, potentially affecting future employment, housing, and immigration status. Adam M. Lustberg, a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, highlights that the law is rooted in preventing organized violence or terroristic plots. "The legislative intent of N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 is to prevent the formation and operation of private groups preparing for violent or terroristic acts," Lustberg explains. Originally enacted in 1983 and later amended in 1988, the statute aligns with New Jersey's broader efforts to keep military power in check under civilian authority. This legal framework targets behavior not addressed by general conspiracy laws—specifically the act of training others to commit crimes involving weapons. N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 criminalizes both individual and group activities. Individuals who knowingly or intentionally instruct someone in using or constructing firearms or explosives for criminal purposes face second-degree charges. Similarly, assembling with others to drill or train in tactics intended for unlawful use is also prosecutable under this statute. According to Lustberg, the law particularly focuses on gatherings that resemble private militias or extremist groups, which law enforcement views as public safety threats. It is important to note that the law does not prohibit lawful firearms training. Activities like gun safety classes, recreational shooting, and martial arts remain legal provided there is no intent to use the instruction for unlawful acts. The intent requirement is central to this statute. Lustberg points out that teaching someone to shoot for sport or helping a homeowner with firearm safety is fully permissible, but that same training could become illegal if it's clear that the knowledge will be used for a crime. Penalties for violating N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 are severe. As a second-degree felony, it carries five to ten years in prison, fines up to $150,000, and a presumption of incarceration—even for first-time offenders. The law falls under the Graves Act, New Jersey's stringent firearm sentencing legislation, which mandates minimum parole ineligibility terms and restricts bail and early release options. These sentencing structures significantly limit judicial discretion, making it difficult for defendants to avoid prison time if convicted. Beyond incarceration, the long-term impact of a conviction is extensive. A felony record under this statute can lead to loss of gun ownership rights, employment difficulties, and trouble with professional licensing or housing. For non-citizens, it may be classified as an aggravated felony under federal immigration laws, potentially leading to deportation or barring access to legal relief options. Lustberg emphasizes that N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 is distinct from other New Jersey weapons laws. Unlike statutes focused on unlawful possession or direct use of weapons, this law targets instructional and preparatory conduct. For example, someone lawfully possessing a firearm could still face charges under 2C:39-14 if they train someone for illegal purposes. It also differs from trafficking laws, which center on the sale and distribution of firearms rather than instruction or preparation. There are legal defenses available to those charged under this statute. One primary defense strategy involves challenging the intent element—prosecutors must prove the defendant knowingly trained someone for criminal purposes. According to Lustberg, demonstrating that a defendant believed the training was for lawful self-defense or sport can be an effective argument. Other defenses might question whether actual instruction took place or assert constitutional protections such as free speech or freedom of association. In some cases, defendants may also argue entrapment, particularly if law enforcement played a significant role in initiating the activity. When legal defenses are limited, negotiated resolutions may offer a path to reduced charges or sentencing. Lustberg notes that prosecutors may be open to plea deals in cases with weak evidence of criminal intent. In rare situations, defendants may even qualify for Pre-Trial Intervention, which could allow them to avoid incarceration entirely if no actual harm occurred. Facing charges under N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 carries serious risks that demand strong legal representation. Adam M. Lustberg of Lustberg Law Offices, LLC has handled numerous firearm-related cases and works to protect clients from the harsh penalties imposed by this statute. As Lustberg explains, even lawful gun owners can find themselves in legal jeopardy if their actions are misinterpreted as criminal training efforts. Laws like 2C:39-14 reflect New Jersey's strict approach to gun control and public safety. The consequences for those accused under this statute can be severe and long-lasting. For anyone facing investigation or charges related to unlawful firearm training, understanding the law and acting quickly is essential. About Lustberg Law Offices, LLC: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC represents clients throughout New Jersey in criminal defense matters. Led by attorney Adam M. Lustberg, the firm handles a range of legal issues including gun crime charges, with a commitment to defending client rights and seeking favorable outcomes in cases. Embeds: GMB: Email and website Email: alustberg@ Website: Media Contact Company Name: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC Contact Person: Adam M. Lustberg Email: Send Email Phone: (201) 880-5311 Address: One University Plaza Dr Suite 212 City: Hackensack State: New Jersey 07601 Country: United States Website:
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Jennifer Aniston to star in TV project based on child actor Jennette McCurdy's memoir
Jennifer Aniston is expanding her relationship with Apple TV+ beyond 'The Morning Show.' The streamer announced Tuesday that Aniston will next star in a new series based on 'I'm Glad My Mom Died,' Jennette McCurdy's 'unflinching No. 1 New York Times bestseller memoir of the same name.' (WireImage/Getty Images via CNN Newsource) Jennifer Aniston is expanding her relationship with Apple TV+ beyond 'The Morning Show.' The streamer announced Tuesday that Aniston will next star in a new series based on 'I'm Glad My Mom Died,' Jennette McCurdy's 'unflinching No. 1 New York Times bestseller memoir of the same name.' ''I'm Glad My Mom Died' is a heartbreaking and hilarious recounting of Jennette McCurdy's struggles as a former child actor while dealing with her overbearing, domineering mother,' a press release from Apple TV+ states. 'The dramedy will center on the the codependent relationship between an 18-year-old actress in a hit kid's show, and her narcissistic mother who relishes in her identity as 'a starlet's mother,' set to be played by Aniston.' McCurdy found fame starring as Sam Puckett in the Nickelodeon sitcom 'iCarly.' Her memoir was published on August 9, 2022 by Simon & Shuster and spent more than 80 weeks on the New York Times best seller list. She is set to write, produce, and showrun the new series with Ari Katcher and Aniston will serve as an executive producer. Aniston stars as Alex Levy on 'The Morning Show' and is also one of that show's producers. The series, whose fourth season launches on September 17, is based on a nonfiction book 'Top of the Morning' by CNN chief media analyst, Brian Stelter.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
American Justice Department says 2 Chinese nationals charged with spying inside the U.S. for Beijing
The seal of the Department of Justice, Aug. 1, 2023, at the Department of Justice in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) WASHINGTON — Two Chinese nationals have been charged with spying inside the United States on behalf of Beijing, including by taking photographs of a naval base, coordinating a cash dead-drop and by participating in efforts to recruit members of the military who they thought might be open to working for Chinese intelligence. The case, filed in federal court in San Francisco and unsealed Monday, is the latest Justice Department prosecution to target what officials say are active efforts by the Chinese government to secretly collect intelligence about American military capabilities — a practice laid bare in startling fashion two years ago with China's launching of a surveillance balloon that U.S. officials ultimately shot down over the coast of South Carolina. 'This case underscores the Chinese government's sustained and aggressive effort to infiltrate our military and undermine our national security from within,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement announcing the case. 'The Justice Department will not stand by while hostile nations embed spies in our country – we will expose foreign operatives, hold their agents to account, and protect the American people from covert threats to our national security.' Officials identified the defendants as Yuance Chen, 38, who arrived in the U.S. on a visa in 2015 and later became a lawful permanent resident, and Liren 'Ryan' Lai, 39, who prosecutors say lives in China but came to Texas this past spring as part of an effort to supervise clandestine espionage operations on behalf of China's Ministry of State Security or MSS. The two were arrested on charges of secretly doing China's bidding without registering as foreign agents with the Justice Department, as required by law. It was not immediately clear if they had lawyers. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately return a message seeking comment Tuesday. According to an FBI affidavit filed in connection with the case, investigators believe Lai had been developing Chen to be a Chinese intelligence asset since at least mid-2021. Their activities, the FBI says, included coordinating on a dead-drop of at least US$10,000 in cash to another person operating at the direction of the MSS. They also conducted surveillance of a Navy recruiting station in California and Navy base in Washington state, including through photographs and videos that investigators believe were sent to Chinese intelligence. Authorities say Lai and Chen also discussed recruiting Navy employees to work for China, with Chen obtaining during a tour of a Navy installation photographs of names and hometowns of recent recruits. Many listed China as their hometown and investigators believe the information was sent to China, the FBI affidavit says. The case is one in a series of prosecutions concerning Chinese intelligence-gathering, including concerning the military. Last year, for instance, the Justice Department charged five Chinese nationals with lying and trying to cover their tracks, more than a year after they were confronted in the dark near a remote Michigan military site where thousands of people had gathered for summer drills. And in 2023, two Navy sailors were charged with providing sensitive military information to China, including details on wartime exercises, naval operations and critical technical material. Eric Tucker, The Associated Press
