logo
French ex-PM Fillon given suspended sentence over wife's fake job

French ex-PM Fillon given suspended sentence over wife's fake job

France 248 hours ago

Fillon, 71, had been found guilty in 2022 on appeal of embezzlement for providing a fake parliamentary assistant job to his wife, Penelope Fillon, that saw her being paid from public funds although the court found that she never did any work in the National Assembly.
The Paris appeals court also ordered him to pay a fine of 375,000 euros ($433,000) and barred him from seeking elected office for five years.
The sentence was milder than the one handed down in 2022, when he had been ordered to spend one year behind bars without any suspension.
But France's highest appeals court, the Court of Cassation, overruled that decision and ordered a new sentencing trial.
No change was made to the punishment for Penelope Fillon, who is British, and who was handed a two-year suspended sentence and ordered to pay the same fine as her husband.
The couple has always insisted that Penelope Fillon had done genuine constituency work.
Neither was present in court for the sentencing.
Fillon, a conservative, earlier this year called the ban on seeking public office a "moral wound".
The scandal, dubbed "PenelopeGate" by the French press, hurt Fillon's popularity and contributed to his first-round elimination in France's 2017 presidential election that was won by current President Emmanuel Macron.
"The treatment I received was somewhat unusual and nobody will convince me otherwise," Fillon said. "Perhaps there was a link with me being a candidate in the presidential election."
'A free man'
Fillon claimed that fake parliamentary jobs were common between 1981 and 2021, saying that "a large majority" of lawmakers had been in a "perfectly similar situation" to his during that time.
His wife's fake contract ran from 2012 to 2013.
"It is the appreciation of the court that there is no proof of any salaried work in the case," the court said in its ruling.
Fillon's lawyer, Antonin Levy, welcomed the decision to spare his client time in prison.
"Francois Fillon is a free man," he said.
In another recent high-profile case involving French politicians, former president Nicolas Sarkozy, also a conservative, was stripped of his Legion d'Honneur distinction following his conviction for graft.
Sarkozy, 70, had been wearing an electronic ankle tag until last month after France's highest appeals court upheld his conviction last December of trying to illegally secure favours from a judge.
Sarkozy is currently on trial in a separate case on charges of accepting illegal campaign financing in an alleged pact with late Libyan dictator Moamer Kadhafi.
Another case involves far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who was convicted in an embezzlement trial over fake European Parliament jobs, and is appealing the verdict.
As well as being given a partly suspended jail term and a fine, she was banned from taking part in elections for five years, which would -- if confirmed -- scupper her ambition of standing for the presidency in 2027.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliamentary report urges Paris to apologise for French Polynesia nuclear tests
Parliamentary report urges Paris to apologise for French Polynesia nuclear tests

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

Parliamentary report urges Paris to apologise for French Polynesia nuclear tests

Paris should apologise to French Polynesia for the fallout of nuclear tests there over three decades, which led to harmful radiation exposure, a French parliamentary report released on Tuesday said. France conducted 193 nuclear tests in French Polynesia from 1966, especially at the Pacific archipelago's Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls, to help build up its atomic weapon arsenal. These included atmospheric and underground tests which had severe health impacts. Tens of thousands of people in the French overseas territory are estimated to have been exposed to harmful levels of radiation, leading to a significant public health crisis that has been largely ignored. The tests remain a source of deep resentment in French Polynesia, where they are seen as evidence of racist colonial attitudes that disregarded the lives of islanders. "The inquiry has strengthened the committee's conviction that a request for forgiveness from France to French Polynesia is necessary," the report said. "This request is not merely a symbol, nor a request for repentance. It must be a ... fundamental step in the process of reconciliation between French Polynesia and the State," the authors said. The report said the apology must be added to a 2004 law on French Polynesia's semi-autonomous status. Residents in the south Pacific Ocean islands are hoping for compensation for radiation victims. The investigative website Disclose, citing declassified French military documents on the nearly 200 tests, reported in March that the impact from the fallout was far more extensive than authorities let on. Only a few dozen civilians have been compensated for radiation exposure since the tests ended in 1996, Disclose said.

Israel's Rafael threatens to sue France over Paris Air Show shutdown
Israel's Rafael threatens to sue France over Paris Air Show shutdown

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

Israel's Rafael threatens to sue France over Paris Air Show shutdown

The Israeli weapons company Rafael has announced plans to sue the French government after its stand at the Paris Air Show was abruptly shut down due to Israel's campaign in Gaza. Since Monday morning, four Israeli stands, including Rafael, Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), and UVision, have been hidden behind black wooden panels. French authorities determined that 'offensive weapons equipment marketed by the firms could not be exhibited, given the situation in Gaza.' Rafael, Elbit, and IAI produce guided bombs and missiles while UVision manufactures drones. Faced with the companies' refusal to remove the equipment, the booths were fenced off during the night from Sunday to Monday. 'This morning, an official from the fair came over and told me that if I would remove some of the equipment, then he would tear down these walls. And I told him, I will not remove anything. You had enough time to make the decision, but you decided to act in the dark of night,' said Shlomo Toaff, Executive Vice President at Rafael. Technicians were seen on Tuesday morning adding further barricades to seal off the entrance to one of the booths, as no agreement was reached between Israeli manufacturers and the show's organisers. Meanwhile, a heavy security presence was seen patrolling the cordoned-off area on Tuesday. 'I assure you that we will sue the French government for what they have done to us,' Toaff told Euronews. 'We are going to sue them for causing financial damage, for not giving us access to the property that we had rented. We think this is an unjust decision. We're not getting equal rights like the other exhibitors," he said. The Rafael representative told Euronews they rented the booth a year in advance and submitted blueprints months ago. Their equipment cleared French customs about a month prior to the exhibition, they claim. 'We invested a lot of money in getting this booth and a lot of effort in preparing for it. I can't tell you the exact cost, but we're talking millions of euros," said Toaff. French authorities say the firms displayed 'offensive' weapons in violation of the pre-agreed framework with the Israeli government. 'France considers that this is a terrible situation for the Gazans, a situation from a human and humanitarian point of view, from a security point of view, extremely heavy,' French Prime Minister François Bayrou told reporters on Monday after inaugurating the show. 'France wanted to demonstrate that offensive weapons should not be present in this show.' The Israeli Ministry of Defence condemned 'this scandalous and unprecedented decision' in a press release published on Monday. 'I was totally disappointed,' said Sasson Meshar, Senior VP for Airborne Electro-Optics Systems at Elbit. 'We invested a lot of money in the exhibition.' 'We don't understand the logic of the decision, because from our perspective, it's discrimination, because everybody around is showing the same systems. It's a defence, military system, and that's what we are showing. We are not all here for some kind of flower exhibition.' 'We will consult with legal advisors, and we will follow their advice, and we'll consider our next stages later on,' Meshar said, evading the question of whether Elbit is considering following Rafael in the lawsuit. This isn't the first time Israeli arms manufacturers have faced restrictions at French defence shows. After initially being banned from the Eurosatory exhibition in spring 2024, they were later allowed to attend Euronaval last fall following a court ruling. On June 10, a Paris court rejected a request by several associations to ban Israeli companies from this year's Paris Air Show. The 2025 edition is taking place against the backdrop of intensifying diplomatic tensions between Paris and Tel Aviv. Israel is facing intense criticism over its military campaign in the Gaza Strip, launched in response to the 2023 Hamas attack. The death toll in Gaza is estimated to exceed 55,000 according to the Hamas-run Gazan Health Ministry. More than 1,800 Israelis have been killed as a result of the fighting.

MP to introduce private members' bill to ban fur in UK
MP to introduce private members' bill to ban fur in UK

Fashion Network

time6 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

MP to introduce private members' bill to ban fur in UK

A complete ban on fur imported and sold in the UK is on the agenda again. Labour MP for Newport West and Islwyn, Ruth Jones, has introduced a Private Members' Bill to parliament that would prohibit the import and sale of new fur products, reports the BBC. While fur farming has been banned in Wales and England since 2000, many types of fur are still legally imported and sold, she noted. Jones said: 'Twenty years ago, a Labour government banned fur farming because it was cruel and inhumane. If we think it's cruel and inhumane to farm it, why are we importing it? It doesn't make sense.' The MP added: 'Caged animals are kept in dreadful, inhumane conditions just to provide fur for a declining industry. Faux fur could do the job just as well.' But the proposal isn't without opposition, as the British Fur Trade Association (BFTA) has accused Jones of being the 'wardrobe police', adding the ban would be 'unenforceable and unworkable' and may breach trade agreements with the EU and the US. In a statement, the BFTA also warned that a ban could cost thousands of skilled British jobs: 'Standards in the fur sector are among the highest of any form of animal husbandry with rigorous and comprehensive animal welfare standards, third-party inspection and strict international and national laws,' it added. The bill follows Sonul Badiani-Hamment, UK director for animal welfare organisation Four Paws, recently presenting a petition with one-and-a-half million signatures in support of a fur-free Britain, alongside other campaigners. 'There isn't any justification for the cruelty experienced by these animals on fur farms,' she said. 'Country after country are leaving the market. Sweden recently committed to decommissioning the fur trade entirely.' But Mel Kaplan, who works at Vintage Fur Garden in London, also told the BBC that demand for vintage fur 'was growing... We have queues going out the door in the winter. Over the past three years, there's been a resurgence in the want for vintage fur. 'I think younger people especially are looking more to vintage clothing in general. I think fast fashion has taken a decline in popularity.' The second reading of the bill is expected to take place in parliament on 4 July.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store