Wisconsin tackle makes Phil Steele's preseason All-Big Ten offensive team
Mahlman has gained a ton of recognition in the offseason due to a solid 2024 campaign, during which he ranked as one of the top tackles in the Big Ten. Entering 2025, the veteran now ranks as the fifth-highest-graded returning offensive tackle in the conference, according to PFF.
Wisconsin made a conscious effort in the off-season to shift their offensive identity to one that more closely aligns with historical Badgers teams under Barry Alvarez, Bret Bielema, and Paul Chryst. That meant bringing in a run-first offensive coordinator in Jeff Grimes, who aims to return Wisconsin's running game to its previous heights. Having one of the top tackles in the Big Ten like Riley Mahlman is a huge help in that regard. His presence will be crucial as Wisconsin works to build a hard-nosed, smash mouth offense, built around running backs Dilin Jones and Darrion Dupree.
Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes and opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
There's only one Big Ten team Tom Izzo believes is a cut above MSU entering next season
In the eyes of Michigan State head coach Tom Izzo, there's only one team in the Big Ten he considers a cut above his Spartans right now. Izzo was a guest on Jon Rothstein's podcast Inside College Basketball Now this week, where he answered a number critical questions. One of those was assessing his team and where it stacks up with the rest of the league -- which Izzo apparently feels pretty good about. Izzo said he feels his team has as good of a returning nucleus as anyone else in the Big Ten, except for the Purdue Boilermakers -- who he believes are a cut above the rest of the league. "We got our main stays," Izzo said during the interview. "Coen Carr has gotten a lot better, Jeremy Fears, Carson Cooper has really made some progress, and Jaxon Kohler, and that's four really good main stays that have played a lot of minutes here. Now it's about adding in the guys. Does a Kur Teng -- a shooter that we have -- really improve, does it have to be one of our new guys. I think we more than anybody but Purdue, maybe, we have a base of, I wouldn't say starters back, but top six or seven guys and now two of those guys are seniors." Michigan State won the Big Ten last season by three games and was clearly the best team in the league by the time March rolled around. But the Spartans have lost a number of key contributors from that squad, including top scorers Jase Richardson and Jaden Akins. But regardless of that, Izzo appears to be pretty excited about the team he has in front of him for this next season -- which is great news for us Spartans. Izzo has never been the type to sugarcoat anything and will call it as it is, so to hear him speak this highly of his team for next year is a great sign. Click on the post below to watch the full response from Izzo on the team he has returning for next year: Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Robert Bondy on X @RobertBondy5.
New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
Mandel: SEC going to 9 games staves off potential disaster: The Big Ten's Playoff plan
The SEC finally going to nine conference games is great for the fans, for the sport and for ESPN's ratings. It could also help stave off a potential disaster. It could be the thing that gets Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti to back off his harebrained Playoff proposals. At Big Ten Media Days last month, one coach after another complained about having to play an additional conference game and the supposed disadvantage it causes them with the selection committee. (Conveniently ignoring that their league got more berths than the SEC last season.) They as well as Petitti himself used that talking point in lobbying for a 16-team field (before that somehow jumped to 28) comprised primarily of automatic berths determined by the leagues' own conference standings. Advertisement 'When you get to a system that's increasing the at-larges and the work of a selection committee, that's when you need to understand how we're competing in the regular season,' said Petitti. 'Look, at the end of the day, it's really simple math. With 18 schools and nine conference (games) — we're losing nine more games to start.' If that's really the main concern, then this long national nightmare should be over. No more disadvantage with the committee, no need to preordain that some conferences get four AQs while others get two. Or to make the thing big enough to ensure an unranked, 7-5 Michigan team gets to play in a 6 vs. 27 first-round game. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey has already made it known that his league supports the much-simpler 5+11 concept (five AQs for conference champions, 11 at-larges.) 'We have preferred a 16-team format … with the maximum number of at-large spots,' Sankey reiterated on Paul Finebaum's show Thursday. It's no coincidence the SEC finally resolved their 40-year debate over 8 vs. 9 just a day after the CFP announced tweaks to the schedule strength metrics used by the selection committee in response to criticism last season. Not only are they going to nine, they're requiring a 10th P4 game in non-conference play. 'The current schedule strength metric has been adjusted to apply greater weight to games against strong opponents,' the CFP said. 'An additional metric, record strength, has been added to the selection committee's analysis to go beyond a team's schedule strength to assess how a team performed against that schedule.' Sankey called it, 'an element that weighed in favor of the nine-game schedule being implemented.' So now the ball is back in the Big Ten's court, with a Dec. 1 deadline approaching to make CFP changes for 2026. Petitti and the coaches got the exact concession they so desperately wanted from the SEC. If 4-4-2-2-1 or 28 teams still lives past next week, we'll know this was never about schedule strength and entirely about creating television inventory. Advertisement Finally, speaking of schedule strength, some of the Big Ten's own schools may need to go back to the drawing board themselves. In defending his school's decision to drop P4 non-conference opponents going forward, Indiana coach Curt Cignetti said mockingly, 'We figured we would just adopt an SEC scheduling philosophy.' That did not age well. Next season, when every SEC team will be playing at least 10 P4 games, the Hoosiers will be playing Colorado State, Howard and Western Kentucky. Also at Big Ten Media Days, Penn State coach James Franklin called his conference's move to nine games, 'maybe the worst decision the Big Ten has ever made.' In 2026 his team is playing those nine games, plus Marshall, Temple and Buffalo. Alabama will be facing nine SEC foes plus West Virginia and Florida State. For all the complaints about one less conference game, or playing FCS teams in November, every computer metric has long said the SEC's schedules are the toughest in the country. With an extra P4 foe, it will be no contest. Whether the committee rewards them accordingly remains to be seen. But if SEC schools are willing to take that risk less than a year after only earning three berths, AND they support a system with even more committee influence, the Big Ten and Petitti truly have no excuse. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SEC announces move to 9-game conference schedules as College Football Playoff changes loom
The SEC's football schedules are going to look a bit different in 2026. The conference announced Thursday that its presidents have voted to adopt a nine-game conference schedule beginning in 2026, a long-awaited move that will bring it even with the Big Ten and Big 12. ACC leaders have also said it would likely follow suit if the SEC went to nine games. Under the new format, SEC teams will play three annual opponents each year while its remaining six games rotate among the rest of the conference's schools. Each team will fave every other program at least once every two years with a home and away across four years. SEC teams are also required to schedule at least one "high quality non-conference" opponent each year, meaning a Big Ten, Big 12 or ACC school or Notre Dame. From the conference: 'Adding a ninth SEC game underscores our universities' commitment to delivering the most competitive football schedule in the nation,' said SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey. 'This format protects rivalries, increases competitive balance, and paired with our requirement to play an additional Power opponent, ensures SEC teams are well prepared to compete and succeed in the College Football Playoff.' Per CBS Sports' Brandon Marcello, the move will net each SEC school an average of about $5 million per year. The possibility of the SEC moving to nine conference games has loomed for years, but came to pass this year amid debates over the future format of the College Football Playoff, which could expand to 16 games in 2026. The SEC's eight-game schedules have been a major sticking point for Big Ten president Tony Petitti, who has been pushing for the CFP to adopt a "4-4-2-2-1" model, in which each CFP would feature the top four Big Ten and SEC teams, the top two ACC and Big 12 teams, the top-ranked Group of Six champion and three at-large berths. The other possible format, which the ACC and Big 12 support, is "5+11," where the five highest-ranked conference champions and 11 at-large teams compete for the title. At Big Ten Media Days, Petitti complained about a potential advantage for conferences with eight-game schedules in the competition for at-large berths. It's unclear if the SEC and ACC both making the leap will change his position. The conference schedule announcement also comes a day after the CFP announced it will adjust its schedule strength metrics to "apply greater weight to games against strong opponents." That could reduce the risk of a ninth game to a team's at-large chances, making the change easier for the SEC.
