
Trump's $200m ballroom: A history of home improvements at the White House
Trump, a former real estate developer, has repeatedly promised to build a 'beautiful' ballroom at the White House. In 2016, he offered $100m during Barack Obama's tenure for the project, which the then-president rejected.
But in a briefing to reporters at the White House on Thursday, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the 'much needed and exquisite addition' to the White House will be approximately 90,000 square feet (8,360 square metres), with a seating capacity of 650.
Most formal White House functions are currently held in the White House's East Room, which can seat approximately 200 people. According to Leavitt, construction is expected to be completed 'long before' the end of Trump's term in office in January 2029.
She also said that the president and other donors would pay for the renovations, but declined to give details. Renderings provided by the White House show that the ballroom will be similar architecturally to the rest of the mansion.
Leavitt said the ballroom would be built where the 'East Wing currently sits'. When asked whether the project would require knocking down that section of the White House, she said the East Wing would need to be 'modernised'.
'The White House has a history of expansion to accommodate the changing needs of the nation's chief executive,' Leslie Greene Bowman, who has served under four presidents on the Committee for the Preservation of the White House, told BBC News.
So, what have those been?
When and how was the White House constructed?
Construction of the White House began in 1792, based on a design by the Irish-born architect James Hoban. Built by enslaved labourers and European craftsmen, it was first occupied by President John Adams in 1800, though it still wasn't finished when he moved in.
Enslaved labourers were forced to do physically demanding work on the White House, like quarrying and transporting stone and making bricks. They were typically hired out by their enslavers, who were paid for their labour.
During the War of 1812 (also known as the Second War of Independence), British forces invaded Washington and set fire to the White House in August 1814.
Reconstruction began almost immediately afterwards under President James Madison, again led by Hoban.
President James Monroe moved into the restored building in 1817, and later added the South Portico in 1824. The North Portico followed in 1829 during Andrew Jackson's presidency, establishing the iconic facade of the White House as it is known today.
Over the course of the 19th century, amendments were made slowly. Running water, gas lighting, and furnishings were gradually added. In 1891, under President Benjamin Harrison, electricity was installed in the White House.
What changes were made to the White House in the 20th century?
President Theodore Roosevelt made one of the most transformative changes to the building in 1902. He removed the old Victorian-style interiors and relocated the presidential offices from the second floor of the residence to a new West Wing.
Roosevelt also expanded the State Dining Room – which could only hold 40 guests – by removing a staircase and increasing the size to a seating capacity of 100.
Roosevelt's renovations modernised the White House to suit the needs of a growing executive branch.
Then, in 1909, William Howard Taft expanded Roosevelt's West Wing and created the first Oval Office, a symbolic centrepiece of presidential power.
The biggest changes to the White House came under Harry Truman (president from 1945 to 1953). Truman gutted the inside of the building, leaving only the outer walls, while workers rebuilt the internal structure with steel beams and concrete floors.
Truman also added a controversial second-floor balcony on the South Portico, sometimes called the 'Truman Balcony'. Later presidents made more subtle, but still meaningful, changes to the White House.
John F Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy led a restoration project focused on historical authenticity, refurbishing rooms with antiques.
In 1969, Richard Nixon added a bowling alley and upgraded the Situation Room.
Under Bill Clinton, the White House saw major technological upgrades, including improved security systems and internet connectivity. George W Bush renovated the press briefing room and restored several historical rooms, including the Abraham Lincoln Bedroom.
In recent years, Barack Obama installed wi-fi throughout the White House and the West Wing. Obama, a lifelong basketball enthusiast, also had part of the White House's existing tennis courts adapted for basketball use.
Though no official estimate exists, the cumulative costs of construction and renovations amount to roughly $250m (in current dollar terms). As such, maintaining the home – and office – of the US president comes with a significant price tag.
What other building works are under way in Washington, DC?
The timing of the ballroom project is significant. Just a week ago, Trump seized on a sprawling renovation project undertaken by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) to criticise the central bank's chair, Jay Powell.
Trump zeroed in on the expensive price tag of the project – roughly $2.5bn to renovate two 1930s buildings. During a rare presidential visit to the central bank's headquarters on July 24, Trump accused Powell of financial mismanagement.
Last month, meanwhile, Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought (a Trump appointee) accused Powell of mishandling the 'ostentatious' refurbishment of the Fed's headquarters in Washington, DC.
Trump has repeatedly demanded that the Fed lower interest rates by 3 percentage points, and has frequently raised the possibility of firing Powell, though the president has said he does not intend to do so. On July 22, Trump called the Fed chief a 'numbskull'.
Despite pressure from the White House, the Federal Reserve held interest rates steady at 4.25-4.50 percent on July 30, on par with economists' expectations, as tariff-driven uncertainty weighs on the US economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump offers UCLA $1bn settlement amid pro-Palestine protest standoff
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has requested that the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), submit to a $1bn settlement to resolve accusations stemming from the school's handling of pro-Palestine protests. A White House official and the University of California system both confirmed the proposed settlement to news agencies on Friday. The settlement proposal is notable for the massive sum requested, as the Trump administration seeks to pressure top schools into compliance with its policies. The $1bn price tag would far exceed the payouts inked in previous agreements reached with Columbia University and Brown University last month. Columbia agreed to pay a fine of about $221m, and Brown confirmed it would pay $50m to a state workforce development programme. 'The University of California just received a document from the Department of Justice and is reviewing it,' University of California President James Milliken said in a statement. He added that the institution had offered to have talks with the government earlier this week. UCLA, which boasts the largest student body in the University of California system, had also announced this week that the Trump administration suspended $584m in federal grants to the school. The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division explained that the funding would be frozen as a result of civil rights violations connected to pro-Palestinian protests since 2023. The school had acted 'with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students', it said. Free-speech advocates, however, have accused the Trump administration of willfully conflating pro-Palestine and antiwar advocacy with anti-Semitism in order to silence protesters. Last month, UCLA reached a $6m settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who claimed their civil rights were violated by pro-Palestinian protesters blocking their access to class and other areas on campus during a 2024 protest encampment. It was not immediately clear why the $1bn settlement sought by the Trump administration was so high. UCLA is also the first publicly funded university to face a potential grant freeze from the Trump administration. In his statement, Milliken said the payment would have wide-ranging consequences. 'As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources, and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system as well as inflict great harm on our students and all Californians,' he said. Civil liberties organisations have also underscored that students at publicly funded universities are typically afforded wider constitutional protections while on campus. That stands in contrast to private institutions, where students are generally subject to whatever restrictions on speech are outlined by administrators in their enrollment agreement. The First Amendment of the US Constitution restricts the government's ability to limit free speech. Any future agreement between the University of California system and the Trump administration might face a legal challenge, should it be perceived to trample on free-speech rights. Speaking on Thursday, California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has been one of Trump's most vocal Democratic opponents, urged the state's university officials not to kowtow to the administration's demands. 'We're not Brown, we're not Columbia, and I'm not going to be governor if we act like that,' Newsom said, according to the Los Angeles Times. 'Period. Full stop. I will fight like hell to make sure that doesn't happen.'


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Azerbaijan and Armenia sign accord overseen by Trump at the White House
United States President Donald Trump has hosted his Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at the White House for the signing of a peace treaty between the two longtime rivals. The US president said during a ceremony on Friday that he believed the two men would have a 'great relationship' and that the agreement would bring peace and new economic opportunities to the region. 'I want to congratulate these two great people, Prime Minister Pashinyan and President Aliyev, for coming to Washington to sign this momentous joint declaration,' Trump said. 'The countries of Armenia and Azerbaijan are committing to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity.' The agreement will create a transportation corridor between the two countries, which have fought over territorial disputes since the disintegration of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago. Those wars were largely fought over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is within Azerbaijan's borders but was previously populated by ethnic Armenians. They were ultimately expelled en masse during an Azerbaijani offensive in 2023. The deal grants the US exclusive developmental rights to the transport corridor, which will be dubbed the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity'. 'We anticipate significant infrastructure development by American companies. They're very anxious to go in to these two countries,' Trump said. He added that the US was also signing bilateral agreements with both countries to increase cooperation in areas like energy, trade and technology, including artificial intelligence. The deals would also lift previous restrictions on security coordination with Azerbaijan, which has faced scrutiny over its human rights record. 'I'm very grateful to the president that he lifted the restrictions that had been imposed on Azerbaijan back in 1992,' said Aliyev. While Trump has hailed the agreement as a diplomatic breakthrough and an opportunity for economic engagement, it is viewed with bitterness by many Armenians. During Azerbaijan's 2023 military campaign, the country sought to bring Nagorno Karabakh under its control. But that military offensive involved a brutal siege that rights groups say amounted to the restriction of food as a weapon of war. The conflict culminated in the forcible expulsion of the territory's ethnic Armenian population. Images of displaced Armenians fleeing with their possessions recalled painful memories of the Armenian Genocide, which took place from 1915 to 1923. Azerbaijan maintains that the campaign was necessary to restore order in a territory within its borders and that Armenians could have stayed in their homes. 'Erasing Nagorno Karabakh is not peace,' Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee of America, said in a statement on Thursday, saying the agreement had been reached 'at gunpoint'. 'Normalising ethnic cleansing is not peace.'


Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump administration subpoenas New York Attorney General Letitia James
The United States Department of Justice has subpoenaed New York Attorney General Letitia James, who had successfully filed a civil lawsuit against US President Donald Trump for alleged fraud in his business dealings. Friday's subpoenas come as the department convenes a grand jury to investigate whether James, a Democrat, violated the civil rights of President Donald Trump and other Republican-affiliated entities. Anonymous sources with knowledge of the subpoenas confirmed their existence to The Associated Press and other news agencies. According to the media reports, the grand jury will not only probe whether Trump's rights were violated by the fraud lawsuit, but the subpoenas will also seek information about a second lawsuit James launched against the National Rifle Association (NRA), an influential gun lobby group. A spokesperson for James's office did not confirm the subpoenas but rejected any wrongdoing. 'Any weaponisation of the justice system should disturb every American,' the statement said. 'We stand strongly behind our successful litigation against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association, and we will continue to stand up for New Yorkers' rights.' James's personal lawyer, Abbe Lowell, also said in a statement that her legal team was 'ready and waiting with the facts and the law'. 'Investigating the fraud case Attorney General James won against President Trump and his businesses has to be the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign,' Lowell said. A history of in-court clashes The reports on Friday revealing the subpoenas have fuelled criticism that Trump is increasingly weaponising the Justice Department to settle scores. Trump faced numerous legal challenges, both civil and criminal, during his period out of the White House from January 2021 to January 2025. He is the first US president to not only face criminal charges but to be convicted. James, meanwhile, was among the officials who spearheaded civil proceedings against him. She took office in January 2019 and has since filed several lawsuits against Trump and his policies. But one of the most high-profile has been the 2022 case in which she accused Trump of inflating the value of his assets — including his real estate properties and golf clubs — to defraud banks and lenders. In February 2024, Trump and his sons were ordered to pay $454m in the case, though the president continues to appeal that ruling. Trump has argued his financial statements actually under-valued his assets. Separately, James successfully filed a lawsuit against the NRA and its founder, Wayne LaPierre, for misusing millions in funding for the group. Trump maintains close ties to the anti-gun control lobby group. Revenge on political adversaries? For years, Trump has alleged that he is the subject of a political 'witch hunt'. Those who prosecuted him, he argues, have abused their office for political gain, in an alleged effort to dampen his popularity among voters. Trump has expressed particular ire towards James, calling her a 'horrible person' and a 'total crook' in May. That month, the Justice Department, under his authority, opened an investigation into James's real estate holdings, alleging she misrepresented her property records to obtain more favourable loans. Trump has also argued that statements James made on the campaign trail indicate her political bias against him. While running for office in 2018, for instance, James called Trump 'illegitimate', 'incompetent' and 'ill-equipped to serve in the highest office of this land'. Friday's subpoenas come on the heels of other investigations that critics perceive as retribution from Trump against his political adversaries. Just this week, the Department of Justice also announced it would open an investigation into members of the administration of former President Barack Obama, a longtime target of Trump's criticisms. The probe centres on intelligence community reports examining whether Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential election, which Trump won. The reports concluded that Russia sought to sway the election through disinformation, though no votes were tampered with. They also suggested that Russia favoured Trump over his Democratic rival, something Trump has since described as an effort to delegitimise his victory. Trump has since accused Obama of 'treason', although no evidence has emerged of wrongdoing. The Department of Justice has also recently sought to purge career employees who worked on two federal criminal cases filed against Trump after he left office in 2021. The first related to classified documents Trump took from the White House after his 2020 election defeat. The second was connected to Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.