Data reveals Oklahoma school choice program sending significant share of funds to wealthiest families
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — Oklahoma's school choice program was billed, in large part, as a way to help low-income families get their kids the best education possible, but new state data shows a major share of its funds are going to the state's wealthiest families, while the share going to families making below the average income remains unclear.
Now, some lawmakers say something has to change.Supporters of the Oklahoma Parental Choice Tax Credit program advertised it as being built on a promise: to allow families who couldn't otherwise afford it, to send their kids to private schools.
'It would never have passed' Some Oklahoma lawmakers say private school tax credit system not operating as expected
'Now we're gonna put the parents back in charge,' Governor Kevin Stitt said when advocating for the program in 2023.'This is an every kid wins policy and funding plan,' then-Oklahoma House Speaker Charles McCall (R-Atoka) said about the program in 2023.'Every parent should be able to make any decision they want with their kid,' Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters said at a rally advocating for 'school choice' policies in 2023.Supporters also claimed it could be funded without hurting public schools.'We're not pulling money from the appropriated funds for public education,' McCall said in 2023.But new data from the Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC) has some questioning whether the program is living up to its promise.'It's sort of school choice for thee but not for me,' said State Rep. Melissa Provenzano (D-Tulsa).'We're going to see this hurt the state's economy,' former Republican State Rep. Mark McBride said.The data shows Oklahoma paid out $91.7 million to families taking part in the Parental Choice Tax Credit system.
Parental Choice Tax Credit used to pay off debts before tuition
That money was divided among families based on their income.A $27.1 million portion, about 30%, went to families making below $75,000 a year.A nearly equal amount, $26.3 million, went to families making between $75,000 and $150,000.Another $15.7 million, or 17%, went to families making between $150,000 and $225,000.But about a fourth of the money, $22.6 million, went to the wealthiest families, those making more than $225,000 a year.
That concerns Provenzano.
'When you're saying school choice for all, what do you mean?' Provenzano said. 'And what we've discovered is overwhelmingly… tax credits went to families that are already attending private school.'
It also stood out to McBride, who was one of several Republicans who voted in favor of the tax credit, in order to pass a large public school funding bill alongside it.'I had people come to my office and they talk to me and it was always wealthy people or for profit groups,' McBride said. 'I always had a problem with that. I said, bring me somebody that makes household income less than $60,000 a year or $50,000 a year, because they kept saying when they when they would talk to me, that's what we're trying to help out.'
Governor Stitt addressed concerns about the program at a press conference on Wednesday.'It's working like we wanted it,' Stitt said. 'I mean, the fact is we've got we've got people using it.'
He pointed out the majority of funds did not go to the richest families.'79% went to working families,' Stitt said.It is true that 79% of the money went to families making below $250,000 a year.But a majority of that amount, about 65% of it, went to families making above $75,000.Oklahoma's median income is around $60,000.
It is unclear how much of the money went to families making at or below the median income, as the OTC did not release that data.'They set up these income bands of who gets access to these private schools through this credit,' Provenzano said. 'And the first band is $0 to $75,000. That really doesn't demonstrate accurately for our families that may fall below the poverty line — are they getting access?'Tim Gilpin, a former Oklahoma State School Board member, said the numbers were not surprising.
'This deal is getting worse all the time,' Lawmakers say administering Parental Choice Tax Credit costing more than expected
'It's no surprise that there isn't a voucher or a credit big enough so that someone, a middle-class or lower-economic-means family could pay private school tuition,' Gilpin said.
He said the legislature could amend the bill to address the concerns.
'I think a good change would be to lower the income level of anyone who can apply for it,' Gilpin said.'Let's just say, okay, if you make $60,000 or lower, you get the tax credit,' McBride said. 'If you make above that, you don't.'
Getting any changes past the governor could be difficult.
Tulsa World: State looking to claw back millions in private school tax credit paid to families who didn't qualify
Stitt is pushing to lift the financial cap on the program, and expand it.That's something Provenzano and McBride say has not worked out well in other states.'They tried that in Arizona. It was a train wreck. It led to a revenue shortfall,' Provenzano said.'They got a $1.4 billion deficit and most of that is due to their voucher system,' McBride said.'And the question is, is that a responsible thing to do in a in a fiscal year like this?' Provenzano said.
California company to earn nearly $4M for Parental Choice Tax Credit web portal
Gilpin said lifting the cap would come at a cost: the state's public school system.'You would drain the state budget,' Gilpin said. 'Our state's already strapped for public school funds, and it can't be responsible for public policy means because that is the elimination of our public school system. We're going to create—and have created—a two-tier class system where there are those of us who can already afford to put our kids in a school of choice, a private school, and those of us who can't.'News 4 reached out to Governor Stitt's Office with specific questions about the program, but no one responded.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Takeaways from New Jersey's primaries: GOP nominee's win is also a victory for Trump
NORTH BERGEN, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey primary voters have chosen their GOP nominee — and President Donald Trump notched a win in his endorsement belt — in one of two high-stakes governor's races being held this year. While officials from both parties say November's general election will hinge on local, pocketbook issues, the outcome will also be closely watched as a harbinger of how both parties might fare in next year's midterm elections, and as a test of both Democratic enthusiasm and how the GOP fares without Trump on the ballot. Here are takeaways from Tuesday's primary results: Trump notches a decisive win 2025's off-year elections have been rough for Republicans and Trump. The president went all in on Wisconsin's state Supreme Court race this spring, backing conservative Brad Schimel, even as polls showed Schimel lagging his Democratic-backed rival. Schimel went on to lose by a whopping 10 points, even after billionaire Elon Musk and groups he backed poured $21 million into the race. This time, Trump's chosen candidate, Republican front-runner Jack Ciattarelli, easily won the nomination. 'Jack Ciattarelli is a WINNER, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement – HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN,' Trump wrote in a social media post announcing his endorsement last month. 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, ELECT JACK CIATTARELLI!' After losing in 2021 to term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy by the slimmest of margins, Ciattarelli is hoping his third try for the office will be the charm. The endorsement was a blow, in particular, to Ciattarelli rival Bill Spadea, a conservative radio host who ran by vowing to enthusiastically back the president's agenda. Ciattarelli, he complained in one ad, 'did more than disagree with the president. He disrespected him. Me? I've been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator.' He said voters should feel free to flout Trump's advice: 'I've disagreed with him in the past. It's ok for you to disagree with him now.' Trump alluded to the name dropping during a tele-rally he held on Ciattarelli's behalf. 'Other people are going around saying I endorsed them. That's not true,' he said. Another primary all about Trump Candidates on both sides of the aisle vowed to tackle pocketbook issues, from high property taxes to grocery prices, to housing and health care costs. But Trump loomed large. On the GOP side, most of the candidates professed their allegiances to the president. Ciattarelli said in ads that he would work with Trump and end New Jersey's status as a sanctuary state 'on Day One.' (Currently, the state's attorney general has directed local law enforcement not to assist federal agents in civil immigration matters.) He also pledged to direct his attorney general to end lawsuits filed against the Trump administration, including one challenging Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship. Democrats featured him heavily, too. In one ad, Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill — who won the Democratic primary for New Jersey governor on Tuesday — featured an armada of pickup trucks waving giant Trump flags and warned that, 'Trump's coming for New Jersey with Trump-endorsed Republican Jack Ciattarelli.' 'We've gotta stop them,' it said. In another, she tells viewers, 'I know the world feels like it is on fire right now,' and vows to 'stand up to Trump and Musk with all I've got.' Past insults forgotten Back in 2015, Ciattarelli labeled then-candidate Trump a 'charlatan' who was unfit for the office of the presidency and an embarrassment to the nation. 'Instead of providing the kind of leadership that appeals to the better angels of our nature in calling us to meaningful and just action, Mr. Trump preys upon our worst instincts and fears,' he wrote. When Ciattarelli ran in 2021, he distanced himself from Trump, without the outward insults. Trump nonetheless complained about the treatment on Spadea's radio show last year, saying Ciattarelli 'made some very big mistakes' and would have won had he sought Trump's support. But like Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and so many others, past insults gave way to alliance. Trump offered his enthusiastic backing in a tele-rally, and in his endorsement, said that, 'after getting to know and understand MAGA,' Ciattarelli 'has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!).' A changing state November's presidential election offered warning signs for Democrats in the state. While Trump lost to Democrat Kamala Harris, he did so by only 6 points — a significantly smaller margin than in 2020, when President Joe Biden won by 16 points. 'New Jersey's ready to pop out of that blue horror show,' Trump said in the tele-rally held for Ciattarelli last week. Trump also made stunning gains in several longtime Democratic strongholds, including New Jersey's heavily Latino Passaic County. He carried the city of Passaic and significantly increased his support in Paterson, which is majority Latino and also has a large Muslim community. Indeed, 43% of Latino voters in the state supported Trump, up from 28% in 2020, according to AP VoteCast. November's election will serve as a crucial test for Democrats and whether they can regain Latino support — both in the state and nationally. Strategists, unions, organizers and politicians so far were pivoting away from immigration and focusing on pocketbook concerns in their appeals. 'At the end of the day, if you're worried about paying your bills and being safe at night, everything else is secondary,' Rep. Josh Gottheimer, one of the Democratic candidates, told the AP. 'I think that is front and center in the Latino community.' One exception was Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was arrested while trying to join an oversight tour of a 1,000-bed immigrant detention center. A trespass charge was later dropped, but he sued interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba over the dropped prosecution. In one of his final campaign ads in Spanish, he used footage from the arrest to cast himself as a reluctant warrior, with text saying he is 'El Único,' Spanish for 'the only one,' who confronts Trump.


Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor
Democrats chose Rep. Mikie Sherrill as their nominee for governor of New Jersey, as the party attempts to defy odds by holding onto the governorship for a third term in a row. The Associated Press called the race just under an hour after polls closed. The four-term member of Congress prevailed in the crowded Democratic primary field on Tuesday to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy. She'll face Republican Jack Ciattarelli, setting up a high-stakes battle of two party establishment favorites. Both sides acknowledge that November's election will be competitive. Although the electorate does favor Democrats, it's been decades since Democrats have won the governorship three terms in a row in the Garden State. But in recent history, the candidate of the party opposite of the one that controls the White House typically wins the race for governor. Still, Republicans are emboldened by President Donald Trump's closer-than-expected loss in New Jersey last November, as well as the gains they've made to cut into Democrats' voter registration advantage. And Republicans argue it helps that they have a candidate with high name ID: Ciattarelli ran for governor two times prior and narrowly lost to Murphy in 2021.