What can be expected from the Government's overhaul of asylum laws?
So what is it all about? Here we look at the International Protection Bill 2025 and what it entails.
New proposed law
Ireland is already obliged to redraft its immigration laws to bring them into line with the EU Migration and Asylum Pact.
The pact involves the implementation of agreed procedures across the EU to provide more aligned and more effective processing of asylum applications.
It also specifies mandatory shorter timeframes along with enhanced screening and security checks on those arriving at borders.
Ireland agreed last year to opt into the agreement.
The pact comes into force on 11 June 2026 and Ireland is required to change its immigration laws by then to align asylum processes across the EU.
Today, Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan published the outline of the International Protection Bill 2025 to give effect to these measures.
Tighter decision making
The Bill will make it unlawful if a decision is not made on an asylum border application within a period of three months, in the vast majority of cases.
This deadline will apply to applicants from countries of origin with a recognition rate of 20% or less across the EU, or who have no documents or false documents, or who pose a security risk.
The three-month deadline will also apply to appeals for these applicants.
Some applications, however, may stretch to six months.
Fewer oral hearings
The other new plank to expediting decisions is the proposal to remove an automatic right to an oral hearing in an appeal.
Applicants are still entitled to an oral hearing in the first instance and that hearing will be recorded with the transcript preserved.
New appeals lodged after the Bill becomes law will be decided by a new entity called the Second Instance Body.
This body will have access to the transcript of the first hearing.
The Second Instance Body will replace the existing International Protection Appeals Tribunal for new appeals lodged after the Bill becomes law.
Oral hearings at appeal stage will only be allowed under limited specific circumstances with the aim of saving time and costs.
Opposition reaction
Sinn Féin has accused the Government of delaying in reforming the asylum area.
The party's Spokesperson on Justice Matt Carthy said the Government's migration policy was all over the place.
He said: "Minister Jim O'Callaghan is talking tough, but processing is still taking far too long and deportations are not being enforced for those who do not have a right to be here.
"The recent deportation flight to Georgia was simply a propaganda exercise to cover for dysfunction across the system, particularly when it comes to enforcement."
However, Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon said the new three-month deadline was cruel and lacked compassion.
He said: "Imposing a three-month deadline for asylum decisions prioritises bureaucratic speed over human fairness.
"International protection claims involve trauma, persecution, and complex histories. Arbitrary deadlines will inevitably lead to rushed, wrongful refusals - and the real risk of deporting people back into danger."
The minister said he disagreed, adding: "What is cruel is asking someone to come into the country and then processing their application over a period of up to three years, that's where the real cruelty arises.
"What we need to have is a process that gives people a quick decision. If you succeed, and are entitled to asylum you can stay, if you don't, you must leave."
Detention Centres
The Bill provides for the detention of applicants as a measure of last resort.
The minister said today he hoped that detention centres would not become necessary but he said the proposed law was required to provide for them.
Next steps
The general scheme of the Bill is published today and it will go to pre-legislative scrutiny over the next few months.
It is expected that the full Bill will be published in November and it must be passed into law by June 2026 in order to comply with the EU Migration and Asylum Pact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
35 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
There can be no peace deal without input from Ukraine, says Tánaiste
Any peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine which does not include the latter will "lack credibility", the Tánaiste has said. Simon Harris joined EU foreign ministers on a virtual meeting on Monday ahead of a summit in Alaska on Friday between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, with Mr Trump suggesting that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories'. European leaders, however, see no sign that Russia will offer anything to swap. Speaking at Government Buildings, Mr Harris said there can be no peace deal without Ukrainian input and that its territorial integrity must be maintained. Mr Harris said the meeting had heard from the Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Minister, who "reiterated what has been the long standing view of the President of Ukraine, the government of Ukraine, the people of Ukraine, that they want an end to the war but they want to be involved in the peace discussions and peace negotiations". "Any sort of peace talks, or so called peace talks, that don't have Ukraine present really lack credibility," he said. "At a European level, I know we're very eager over the coming days to continue engagement between the European Union and the United States of America about the importance of involving Ukraine in any discussions about peace. "Everybody wants to see this war come to an end. But of course, how peace is made also matters, and Ukraine's territorial integrity matters. Ukraine's sovereignty matters, and European security matters as well." Mr Harris said it is important to avoid a "Putin trap" of attempting to sow division in Europe while not actually wanting peace. In 2022, Russia illegally annexed the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in Ukraine's east, and Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south, even though it does not fully control them. It also occupies the Crimean Peninsula, which it seized in 2014.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
CSO records 149,000 immigrants in 12 months, the highest number in 16 years
Nearly 150,000 people migrated to Ireland in the 12 months to April 2024, the largest number in 16 years, according to the Central Statistics Office. The CSO said more than 149,000 people immigrated over that time period, the third successive year in which incomings numbered more than 100,000. Some 30,000 of that number were returning Irish citizens, 27,000 came from elsewhere in the EU, and nearly 87,000 were other nationalities. Just 5,400 of the incoming cohort were British citizens. The vast majority of those entering Ireland, some 77,200 people, were aged between 25 and 44, the CSO said, with those aged between 25 and 34 showing the highest migration flows. The lowest proportion of people entering Ireland were those aged over 65, who accounted for just 3% of the movement noted. Aside from other EU countries and Britain, citizens of India, Brazil, and Ukraine were the most likely to move to Ireland. Ukrainians the exception to gender split Incoming arrivals are split evenly between men and women. The exception in recent years to this was in August, September, and October 2022, in the aftermath of the conflict emerging between Russia and Ukraine, when a significantly higher number of females entered Ireland than males. However, while the country saw record levels of immigration in the year to April, emigration levels were also at their highest in a decade at the same time. At least 69,000 emigrated during the 12 months in question, 35,000 of them Irish citizens, with Australia one of the most popular destinations. With 10,600 people heading there, 2024 saw Australia's popularity among the Irish diaspora reach its highest levels since the post-crash days of 2013. Population estimate of 5.38m The CSO said that, at best estimate, Ireland's population in the non-census year starting April 2024 was just under 5.38m people. The population of Dublin at that time was 1.53m, representing 28.5% of the total, while across the country 4.5m people living in Ireland held Irish citizenship, just under 85% of the total. A recent study by the Economic and Social Research Institute suggests the majority of Irish people have a positive view of migration into Ireland. However, the ESRI also found that 'people with lower qualifications and those who find 'making ends meet' more difficult' are less positive about immigration overall, believe protesting international protection arrivals is more acceptable, and feel less comfortable with the majority of migrant groupings.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Louth TD criticises regulator's ‘clean bill of health' for supermarkets amid soaring grocery prices
Labour's Ged Nash said he was skeptical at the verdict of the Competition & Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), which ruled the big Irish food retailers are no more or no less profitable than comparable EU supermarket chains. Irish supermarkets do not publish their profits publicly, but the Drogheda TD and his party have recently sponsored a private members' bill in the Dáil forcing the Irish supermarkets to do so. He demanded that his new bill be enacted so data on their profits is revealed publicly and for the government to order the CCPC to carry out an in-depth study of the Irish grocery market in the interests of transparency. Deputy Nash said: "Given the limited reliable data that is publicly available on supermarket profits, it is a big stretch for the CCPC to definitely claim that the Irish arms of global retailers are no more or less profitable than their EU counterparts. This is a peculiar conclusion to reach under the circumstances. "This is exactly why Labour's Unfair Pricing Bill, which could compel operators to share data on profit margins with the CCPC so they can undertake more robust market analysis and surveillance to ensure competition is working and consumers are treated fairly, must be enacted by the government. "Because the CCPC says that current prices in Ireland are in line with other EU countries is little comfort to hard-pressed Irish households where salaries are not rising as quickly as prices. "We need to get a better understanding of why prices for the basics in Ireland have remained high for so long; why they are not coming down and why there is only moderate competition with no new, major entrants in 25 years. "This report does not have the answers and it reveals in stark relief how limited the actual functions of the CCPC are. "Farmers have the Agri-Food Regulator to stand up for their interests, while the limited interest the government has in how competition and consumer protection works in the interest of citizens and small retailers means citizens are left to suck up high prices."
