Nicola Willis Urged To Step In Now To Get Kiwi Food Aid To Gaza
Paypal has been freezing accounts which send money to Occupied Gaza – the latest being the account of Wellington-based writer 'Emily Writes' who has posted about her sickening experiences here.
'Paypal is happy to provide backup to Israel's genocide by ensuring food is only available through the Israeli military which is using it to ethnically cleanse starving Palestinians from the north to the south of the Occupied Gaza strip' says PSNA Co-Chair John Minto.
'Using food aid like this is a war crime and we are asking Minister of Finance Nicola Willis to step in and demand Paypal allow kiwis to donate to starving families in Gaza'
'Low and middle-income New Zealanders kiwis are naturally generous but Paypal is not only freezing these accounts but are refusing to refund the money.'
'The New Zealand government has refused to condemn Israel's mass killing and mass starvation of Palestinians but they can insist money from New Zealanders wanting to help is not frozen for six months while Israel's war on humanity continues'
We are waiting to hear back from the minister.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government report shows homelessness ‘appears' to be outstripping population growth
The report comes around halfway through this Government's term, which has included tightening emergency housing rules, and social and transitional housing initiatives. Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka said although accurate numbers on homelessness were difficult to find, it was 'clear we have a real problem'. 'The Government takes this seriously. All New Zealanders deserve a warm, dry place to stay, and the Government is determined to make progress on this long-running challenge for New Zealand.' Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says it is clear New Zealand has a real problem with homelessness. Photo / Mark Mitchell Potaka said the Government was seeking advice from officials on further interventions to help rough sleepers, saying 'we are also open to new ideas that will make an enduring difference'. Officials defined homelessness as living situations where people have no way of accessing safe and secure housing. This could include having no shelter at all, living in temporary or uninhabitable accommodation, or staying in a house with others, such as couch surfing. The report estimates people living without shelter are more likely to be older, with more than a quarter aged over 65. Twelve per cent were under 15 years old. Concerns from groups, collated in the report, included people and families sleeping rough, in cars, garages or uninhabitable conditions, or couch surfing during winter. They told researchers there were increasing levels of hopelessness and complex needs because of methamphetamine use, anti-social behaviour and severe mental health concerns. Emergency housing The portion of applications for emergency housing that were declined increased from 4% in March 2024 to 32% in March 2025, the report found. This statistic comes after Potaka's emergency housing policy changes in August 2024, which included limiting discretion and tightening rules to ensure it was only accessed 'where absolutely necessary'. Reasons people were declined included that they could meet their needs another way (34.3%), their circumstances could have been 'reasonably foreseen' (22.5%), they were not eligible for a grant (16.7%) or their situation was not considered an emergency (14.7%). Labour leader Chris Hipkins says the Government has no plan for where people go when they are removed from emergency accommodation. Photo / Mark Mitchell Potaka said more than $550 million was being spent annually across a range of programmes run by multiple agencies, including Transitional Housing, Housing First, Rapid Rehousing and many other support services. The minister argued there was a 37% increase in people living in shelters between 2018 and 2023 when the previous Labour Government was in power and that the Government was also dealing with the large-scale emergency housing 'social disaster' it had inherited from Labour. In January, the Government celebrated reaching its target for reducing the number of people in emergency motels by 75% five years early. But it raised questions over where people went when they left emergency housing. Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka (left) and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon say the Government has spent half a billion dollars helping people in homeless situations. Photo / Mark Mitchell Labour leader Chris Hipkins accused the Government of kicking 'everybody out of emergency accommodation' without having a plan for where they were to go. 'I think every New Zealander living in a main city can walk down the street and see there are more people living on the street, in cars, and that the Government's actions have contributed to that,' he said. 'When you boot everybody out of emergency accommodation ... this is what happens.' The report said for around 14% of people who left emergency housing, officials were not sure where they went. Others went into a mix of social and transitional housing, or received housing support supplements. 'We do know where 85% [of people] have gone and we're really happy that a lot of kids have come out of emergency housing. Those 14% we don't know where they've gone, but they don't have to tell us where they are going,' Potaka said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told reporters his Government had spent half a billion dollars helping people in these situations. 'Homelessness is a really complex issue. People often come with a complex set of needs, whether its mental health or addiction. No Kiwi wants to see homelessness.' Luxon said he was proud of 'the fact that we have taken 6000 people off the social state housing list'. 'I'm also really proud that we've got 2100 kids out of motels and into really good homes by prioritising those families.' Julia Gabel is a Wellington-based political reporter. She joined the Herald in 2020 and has most recently focused on data journalism.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Jo McCarroll and Mark Knoff-Thomas Part 1
Tonight on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Jo McCarroll and Mark Knoff-Thomas. First they discuss the RNZ story by Guyon Espiner about NZ First's relationship to the nicotine industry. They then examine proposed changes to allow more housing on food productive land, and, finally, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says New Zealanders are not getting a raw deal on butter: discuss! To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Joint Statement In Response To Government Declaration On Gaza
We, the undersigned organisations, express grave concern over the recent joint declaration by New Zealand and 24 other nations condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and accusing it of obstructing humanitarian aid. This statement is not only misguided, it represents a dangerous inversion of reality, in which: Terrorists are excused, and defenders are condemned Hamas's propaganda is cited as fact, and verified Israeli efforts are ignored The thief is pitied, and those delivering food under fire are vilified Blaming the Rescuers, Not the Arsonists The joint statement accuses Israel of 'inhumane' killing and 'drip-feeding' aid. Yet it is Hamas (the very group that started this war with a massacre on October 7 2023) that: Steals aid, sells it, and redistributes it to fighters; Creates disturbances and fires on civilians at aid stations to induce panic and lay blame on Israel; Places bounties on aid workers not under its control. To accuse Israel of causing the humanitarian crisis while ignoring Hamas's central role is to blame the firefighter for the fire. Israel has worked hard to coordinate necessary aid to the extent that there are currently hundreds of truckloads of food on the Gaza side of the border in need of distribution. Thus, there is no "drip-feeding" by Israel. Treating Terrorist Casualty Reports as Gospel The casualty numbers cited (tens of thousands of 'civilians' killed) come directly from Hamas's so-called 'Gaza Health Ministry.' This is not a neutral medical authority. It is: A Hamas-run information weapon, whose sole aim is to inflate civilian casualties; A notoriously unreliable source. Due to inconsistencies the UN has quietly revised its own reporting; Completely opaque and unverifiable, with no distinction between combatants and civilians. When governments like New Zealand cite these figures without context or scrutiny, they lend credibility to terrorists and undermine genuine humanitarian reporting. Condemning What Works, Ignoring What Fails While condemning Israel, the joint statement says nothing about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) — the one aid mechanism that actually works: GHF delivers aid using vetted drivers, uses GPS tracking and bypass routes around Hamas. It ensures direct civilian access to food and medicine. It has faced threats and sabotage from Hamas, and—most shockingly—refusal to cooperate from UN agencies and NGOs. According to a Times of Israel report (22 July 2025), these agencies have declined GHF's repeated offers to collaborate, even as they lament 'lack of access' and blame Israel. This is not humanitarianism — it is institutional dysfunction. Calling for Ceasefire While Hostages Rot in Tunnels The joint statement demands an 'immediate, unconditional ceasefire.' But what kind of ceasefire: Leaves 50 hostages in captivity? Enables Hamas to rearm, reorganise, and repeat the horrors of October 7? Forbids Israel from dismantling a terror regime that uses civilians as shields and hospitals as bases? A ceasefire without the above conditions does not end the war. It guarantees the next one. When Hamas Applauds You, Something Is Wrong That Hamas has celebrated the joint statement should alarm every signatory. If your position is being used by a terrorist group as vindication, it is time to re-examine whose reality you are serving. Why does NZ side with terrorists, when a tiny western style democratic state the size of Northland fights an existential defensive war? Israel did not start this war. She has an obligation to defend her citizens, to do everything possible to free the hostages and to protect her people from future 7 October style massacres. What Must Happen Now We urge the New Zealand Government and its partners to: Withdraw or amend the joint statement, explicitly naming Hamas as the source of Gaza's suffering; Publicly support the GHF and demand cooperation from UN and NGO agencies obstructing its work; Reject the inversion of truth, where democracies are condemned and terror groups are given a free pass; Recognise that Israel is fighting an existential war, and that peace is not possible if a genocidal terror regime is left in place; Demand the immediate release of all hostages and urge Hamas to accept the ceasefire. A Final Word: Reality Must Be Respected This is not a war between equals. It is a fight between a democracy that warns civilians and a death cult that hides behind them. Between those who seek peace and those who glorify death. Reversing that truth is not diplomacy. It is betrayal. We call on New Zealand to return to moral clarity — and stop legitimising the lies of Hamas. Dr David Cumin, Greg Bouwer - Israel Institute NZ Dr Sheree Trotter - Indigenous Embassy Jerusalem Rob Berg - Kol Israel Yifat Goddard, Ashley Church - Israel NZ Network Dennis Mcleod - Christian Friends of Israel
