logo
Why New Zealand must invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers

Why New Zealand must invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers

The Spinoff2 days ago

With political interests threatening to undermine conservation actions in Antarctica, it's more important than ever that New Zealand maintains its influence in the sphere – and this is a critical way to help ensure it will.
As climate change transforms Earth as we know it and geopolitics reshapes international relations, the governance regime that maintains peace in Antarctica is growing increasingly complex and consequential for New Zealand.
The 1959 Antarctic Treaty sets aside more than 10% of Earth's surface for peace, science and cooperation. New Zealand is an original signatory and has played an influential role in Antarctic science and politics over the past six decades.
Scientific knowledge provides the foundation for many Antarctic Treaty decisions. High-quality research is therefore essential for maintaining influence in this international forum.
But at recent Antarctic governance meetings, scientific arguments for much-needed conservation actions have been undermined by political interests.
Preserving Aotearoa New Zealand's influential voice in Antarctic decision making depends not merely on doing excellent science. Developing researchers who can navigate boundaries between environmental science, international policy and public engagement is critical.
We argue New Zealand risks losing its influence in Antarctic affairs if it does not adequately invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers and prepare them to achieve real-world impact.
A second chance for long-term impact
In a pre-budget announcement in early May, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment confirmed a $49 million investment in the Antarctic Science Platform for a second seven-year period. The platform's overarching aim is to 'conduct excellent science to understand Antarctica's impact on the global Earth system and how this might change in a +2°C (Paris agreement) world'.
We believe achieving this goal requires developing a comprehensive understanding not only of biophysical changes, but also of how geopolitical tensions will evolve, how governance structures will adapt, and how society will respond to a warmer world.
Renewed government investment provides stability for the Antarctic research community. It is also an opportunity to transcend short-term thinking and build capacity for the future. However, achieving scientific ' excellence ' must not be constrained by traditional understandings of 'research impact'.
Publishing in high-end journals (often behind paywalls) is not enough. Researchers, including the next generation, must be supported to work across science, policy and societal interfaces.
Fostering the next generation
Early-career researchers are key to supporting New Zealand's ongoing leadership within Antarctic governance. They bring diversity to the scientific community and can offer fresh approaches and enthusiasm to long-standing challenges.
But in the context of intensifying Antarctic geopolitics, cuts to international budgets that threaten New Zealand's Antarctic programme and uncertainty about changes to the science sector, these researchers are often at the bottom of the priority list. Research shows that under global and national disruptions, early-career researchers are disproportionately affected.
This challenge is further compounded by constrained university budgets. Fewer PhD scholarships and diminishing opportunities for postdoctoral and permanent positions significantly narrow the career pathway for Antarctic researchers.
As recently completed PhD students, we have witnessed these funding cuts and institutional changes. We are concerned the opportunities that enabled our own development are rapidly closing behind us, creating a gap in Antarctic research expertise that will be difficult to rebuild.
To maintain scientific continuity and secure Antarctica's research future, supporting early-career researchers should be a priority. Investing today ensures the uninterrupted development of scientific leadership and institutional knowledge that is as important as the science itself.
The Antarctic Science Platform offers an excellent opportunity to foster a trans-generational pipeline. But is New Zealand going far enough in its efforts to upskill and support the next generation?
An early-career vision for Antarctic research
A group of early-career researchers met recently to discuss their concerns and ideas regarding the future of Antarctic research and its impact.
The group identified that beyond scientific training, we need more innovative pathways to make an impact, including policy secondments, media training, mentoring and trans-disciplinary collaborations. This would give early-career researchers opportunities to communicate with and understand non-scientific audiences.
Antarctic science funding in New Zealand is also currently biased towards biophysical disciplines. Yet knowledge of policy, geopolitics, stakeholder engagement and communication will be necessary to understand Antarctica's future in a +2°C world. The disbanding of social sciences in the Marsden Fund further exacerbates this imbalance.
It is essential to cultivate a collaborative, cross-disciplinary mentality where diverse expertise converges around complex problems. Currently missing are environments where small interdisciplinary cohorts of early-career researchers are guided by experienced colleagues to collaborate with policymakers or the general public.
Such communities could address pressing challenges through integrated approaches that no single discipline can achieve alone.
A flexible micro-funding programme could empower Antarctic early-career researchers to pursue professional development opportunities. Rather than restrictive funding to predetermined categories, this approach could support any proposal demonstrating a connection to New Zealand's strategic Antarctic priorities – whether for scientific advancement, policy training or participation in Antarctic governance forums.
Our vision of scientific 'excellence' involves engaging more critically with how we prepare New Zealand for future challenges and strengthen Antarctic leadership.
With a concerning exodus of young professionals (in research and across other sectors) overseas, New Zealand risks losing essential knowledge and expertise. Antarctica's future – including New Zealand's role in it – depends on carving out enduring and innovative pathways for the next wave of great minds.
The authors of this piece have all previously carried out research funded by the Antarctic Science Platform, but are writing in their personal capacity. The article builds on discussions at a recent Antarctic early-career researchers' workshop, but reflects the concerns and ideas of a wider group, including Julianne Burns, Lizzy Skelton, Rose Foster-Dyer, Matthew Tankersley, Rafa Santana, Pauline Barras, Martin Forbes, Alexandra Strang, Liv Cornelissen and Angela Garzia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Core public service agencies spend $420m on consultants, contractors in 9 months to March
Core public service agencies spend $420m on consultants, contractors in 9 months to March

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Core public service agencies spend $420m on consultants, contractors in 9 months to March

The spend has fallen to 4.5 percent of the total wage bill of 38 core agencies. Photo: Unsplash New figures show core public service agencies spent $420 million on consultants and contractors in a nine-month period to March. The spend has fallen to just 4.5 percent of the total wage bill of 38 core agencies. The [ Public Service Commission] says this is the lowest since measurement began seven years ago. The Education Ministry was far and away the biggest spender for the nine months, shelling out $146m. The spending by the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment has plummeted from high levels several years ago, to just $24m; the Ministry of Social Development has dropped a lot, too, to $31m, though these two major ministries were still among the biggest spenders in the period to March 2025. Only the core agencies are counted for this, leaving out the likes of big spenders such as Defence and Police. Once those two, and all Crown entities and non-core departments are counted in, the total spend for the nine months was $1.22 billion, split half and half between capital and operating spending. Often, capital spending on contractors is tied up with IT upgrades, while operating spending is on recruitment firms to hire temp workers to plug holes. National pledged in the election to cut $400m a year in operational - not capital - spending on contractors by the end of the 2024-25 financial year - end of June - compared to 2022-23. Halfway there, at the end of 2023-24, it had dropped $274m. In the year to June 2024, the total spend was almost $1b and two years ago it was $1.2b. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

ACT Responds To Legislation To Restrict Farm-To-Forest Conversions
ACT Responds To Legislation To Restrict Farm-To-Forest Conversions

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

ACT Responds To Legislation To Restrict Farm-To-Forest Conversions

Press Release – ACT New Zealand The Government is moving to address legitimate concerns in rural communities. Forestry is swallowing up productive farmland because the current system is rigged against those who feed the world. Responding to the introduction of legislation to restrict farm-to-forest conversions, ACT Rural Communities spokesperson Mark Cameron says: 'The Government is moving to address legitimate concerns in rural communities. Forestry is swallowing up productive farmland because the current system is rigged against those who feed the world,' says Mr Cameron. 'Red tape and distorted incentives make it more profitable to plant pine trees than to run a farm. 'There is more the Government could do to address the root of the problem. It could start by letting Kiwis offset their emissions overseas. There's no reason we should be covering our own productive land in carbon farms when planting is cheaper and more efficient in other parts of the world. 'It's also time for a wider conversation about whether New Zealand's Paris climate commitments are worth the cost. 'Right now, our only options to meet these targets are blanketing the countryside in trees, or driving up costs on fuel, electricity and everyday goods. Neither of those is acceptable. We need to ask whether the pain is worth it. 'Kiwi farmers are the best in the world at what they do – the freer they are to compete and grow, the better. ACT will keep backing farmers and rural communities.

Why New Zealand must invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers
Why New Zealand must invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers

The Spinoff

time2 days ago

  • The Spinoff

Why New Zealand must invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers

With political interests threatening to undermine conservation actions in Antarctica, it's more important than ever that New Zealand maintains its influence in the sphere – and this is a critical way to help ensure it will. As climate change transforms Earth as we know it and geopolitics reshapes international relations, the governance regime that maintains peace in Antarctica is growing increasingly complex and consequential for New Zealand. The 1959 Antarctic Treaty sets aside more than 10% of Earth's surface for peace, science and cooperation. New Zealand is an original signatory and has played an influential role in Antarctic science and politics over the past six decades. Scientific knowledge provides the foundation for many Antarctic Treaty decisions. High-quality research is therefore essential for maintaining influence in this international forum. But at recent Antarctic governance meetings, scientific arguments for much-needed conservation actions have been undermined by political interests. Preserving Aotearoa New Zealand's influential voice in Antarctic decision making depends not merely on doing excellent science. Developing researchers who can navigate boundaries between environmental science, international policy and public engagement is critical. We argue New Zealand risks losing its influence in Antarctic affairs if it does not adequately invest in the next generation of Antarctic researchers and prepare them to achieve real-world impact. A second chance for long-term impact In a pre-budget announcement in early May, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment confirmed a $49 million investment in the Antarctic Science Platform for a second seven-year period. The platform's overarching aim is to 'conduct excellent science to understand Antarctica's impact on the global Earth system and how this might change in a +2°C (Paris agreement) world'. We believe achieving this goal requires developing a comprehensive understanding not only of biophysical changes, but also of how geopolitical tensions will evolve, how governance structures will adapt, and how society will respond to a warmer world. Renewed government investment provides stability for the Antarctic research community. It is also an opportunity to transcend short-term thinking and build capacity for the future. However, achieving scientific ' excellence ' must not be constrained by traditional understandings of 'research impact'. Publishing in high-end journals (often behind paywalls) is not enough. Researchers, including the next generation, must be supported to work across science, policy and societal interfaces. Fostering the next generation Early-career researchers are key to supporting New Zealand's ongoing leadership within Antarctic governance. They bring diversity to the scientific community and can offer fresh approaches and enthusiasm to long-standing challenges. But in the context of intensifying Antarctic geopolitics, cuts to international budgets that threaten New Zealand's Antarctic programme and uncertainty about changes to the science sector, these researchers are often at the bottom of the priority list. Research shows that under global and national disruptions, early-career researchers are disproportionately affected. This challenge is further compounded by constrained university budgets. Fewer PhD scholarships and diminishing opportunities for postdoctoral and permanent positions significantly narrow the career pathway for Antarctic researchers. As recently completed PhD students, we have witnessed these funding cuts and institutional changes. We are concerned the opportunities that enabled our own development are rapidly closing behind us, creating a gap in Antarctic research expertise that will be difficult to rebuild. To maintain scientific continuity and secure Antarctica's research future, supporting early-career researchers should be a priority. Investing today ensures the uninterrupted development of scientific leadership and institutional knowledge that is as important as the science itself. The Antarctic Science Platform offers an excellent opportunity to foster a trans-generational pipeline. But is New Zealand going far enough in its efforts to upskill and support the next generation? An early-career vision for Antarctic research A group of early-career researchers met recently to discuss their concerns and ideas regarding the future of Antarctic research and its impact. The group identified that beyond scientific training, we need more innovative pathways to make an impact, including policy secondments, media training, mentoring and trans-disciplinary collaborations. This would give early-career researchers opportunities to communicate with and understand non-scientific audiences. Antarctic science funding in New Zealand is also currently biased towards biophysical disciplines. Yet knowledge of policy, geopolitics, stakeholder engagement and communication will be necessary to understand Antarctica's future in a +2°C world. The disbanding of social sciences in the Marsden Fund further exacerbates this imbalance. It is essential to cultivate a collaborative, cross-disciplinary mentality where diverse expertise converges around complex problems. Currently missing are environments where small interdisciplinary cohorts of early-career researchers are guided by experienced colleagues to collaborate with policymakers or the general public. Such communities could address pressing challenges through integrated approaches that no single discipline can achieve alone. A flexible micro-funding programme could empower Antarctic early-career researchers to pursue professional development opportunities. Rather than restrictive funding to predetermined categories, this approach could support any proposal demonstrating a connection to New Zealand's strategic Antarctic priorities – whether for scientific advancement, policy training or participation in Antarctic governance forums. Our vision of scientific 'excellence' involves engaging more critically with how we prepare New Zealand for future challenges and strengthen Antarctic leadership. With a concerning exodus of young professionals (in research and across other sectors) overseas, New Zealand risks losing essential knowledge and expertise. Antarctica's future – including New Zealand's role in it – depends on carving out enduring and innovative pathways for the next wave of great minds. The authors of this piece have all previously carried out research funded by the Antarctic Science Platform, but are writing in their personal capacity. The article builds on discussions at a recent Antarctic early-career researchers' workshop, but reflects the concerns and ideas of a wider group, including Julianne Burns, Lizzy Skelton, Rose Foster-Dyer, Matthew Tankersley, Rafa Santana, Pauline Barras, Martin Forbes, Alexandra Strang, Liv Cornelissen and Angela Garzia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store