Wetin dey cause di tension between Algeria and Mali?
According to Algeria Ministry of Defence, di unmanned aerial vehicle bin enta Algerian airspace without authorization, wey make di military respond like dat.
Dis incident don raise tensions between di two nations, wey, despite say dem dey share borders, dem still get a complex relationship.
While both kontris still dey deal wit security challenges for di Sahel region, including threats from extremist groups, di drone incident highlight ongoing concerns over airspace sovereignty and border security.
Algeria, wey for long don maintain a policy of non-interference for dia neighbours internal affairs, dey particularly sensitive to violations of dia airspace.
Meanwhile, Mali, wey dey deal wit internal instability and foreign military involvement, dey face serious scrutiny after di incident.
Di diplomatic fallout from dis event fit strain future cooperation between di two kontris, affecting dia efforts to address regional security issues.
Political groups and civil organisations no dey happy wit di adventure of sojas in di political space. But di junta dey use attacks by Tuareg fighters and jihadi militants as excuse to consolidate dia hold on power and dey turn towards Russia after breaking ties with former colonial power, France.
Di kontri dey also face deadly attacks by Jihadists linked to Al Qaeda wey mainly dey based in northern Malian cities. Dia brutal treatment of local populations and di influx of foreign fighters wey boku for di region don trigger fears say northern Mali fit become a launching pad for terror attacks.
No doubt say na Africa largest kontri by land area, Algeria don also try to position diasef as a big brother in North Africa. Dem be di most stable politically wen compared to dia southern neighbour.
Mali and Algeria share common border wey span 1,359 km (844 m) long, across di Sahara Desert, from Mauritania in di northwest to Niger in di southeast.
Di crisis in Mali begin for late 2011 as Tuareg militants wey bin dey seek independence from flow into di kontri, armed with weapons from Libya.
Di disorder allow di Tuareg insurgents to seize di main towns in di north. Wen di crisis escalate, some Malian soldiers, fearing say di militants go over run di kontri, overthrow di goment of President Amadou Toumani Touré in 2020.
Wetin be di allegations?
Mali for long don accuse Algeria of harbouring Tuareg armed groups along dia shared border, though Algeria consistently don deny dis claims. However, di latest diplomatic tension dey come from di shooting down of a Malian drone on March 31.
According to di Algerian military, di drone cross into dia airspace near di border town of Tin Zaouatine, wey prompt di military action. Mali, on di oda hand, don deny say di drone breach di border.
Di incident don spark a strong response from Mali oda neighbours, Niger and Burkina Faso, wey also don express dia support for Mali.
Both kontries condemn Algeria actions as an "irresponsible act" and a violation of international law.
In protest, dem don recall dia ambassadors from Algeria, further escalating di diplomatic standoff.
Dis development dey highlight di growing rift between Algeria and Mali, as well as di broader regional implications of di dispute.
How dis wan dey affect di Sahel kontries?
Mali bin dey rely on Algeria for support in dia fight against insurgency, wit Algeria playing a key role in mediating between Bamako and di Tuaregs until di 2020 coup.
However, following tensions, both kontris don close dia airspaces, escalating diplomatic conflicts.
Algeria, wit a population of 46 million and a land area wey nearly double Mali, na regional power. Mali, wey withdraw from Ecowas, bin dey depend on Algeria for trade, especially through di Mediterranean.
But Algeria recent troop deployment to di border with Mali dey suggest efforts to cut trade ties.
Additionally, di Alliance of Sahel Countries don impose tariffs on West African goods, wey also dey impact Ecowas trade. Ecowas officials go meet later dis month to discuss dis tariffs, but Mali dey face growing economic and diplomatic challenges.
Any hope of resolution in sight?
Hopes say Morocco or Mauritania go mediate di dispute dey low.
Deep-rooted distrust and a long-standing rivalry between Algeria and Morocco dey make any Moroccan-led mediation unlikely.
Mauritania, however, still dey maintain cordial ties wit both Algeria and Mali, and dem largely dey neutral. Dia relations wit Mali dey especially cooperative, wit joint development projects wey dey reduce Mali reliance on Senegal and Côte d'Ivoire.
Experts believe say Mauritania go fit help broker dialogue, though Nouakchott neva comment on di current tensions.
Notably, a year ago, Mauritania defence minister bin visit Mali to ease cross-border tensions, after accusing Malian forces and Wagner mercenaries of pursuing fighters into Mauritanian territory—an incident wey Mauritania help to de-escalate.
While di current tension between Algeria and Mali dey viewed by some as temporary, e get growing concerns say e fit threaten regional stability if e grow worse.
In January 2024, Mali junta withdraw from di 2015 Algiers Accord wit Tuareg and oda separatist groups, wey come reignite conflict wit dis factions and add to di volatility.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Vladimir Putin's 'secret daughter' blasts Russian leader and supports Ukraine in war
An alleged daughter once hidden from public view has broken her silence by directly denouncing her 'father', Vladimir Putin, for the destruction he wrought across millions of lives in Ukraine A woman widely believed to be Vladimir Putin's long-rumoured daughter has emerged as she condemned the Russian leader for the devastation of war and extended her support to Ukraine amid the conflict. Elizaveta Krivonogikh, a 22-year-old art school graduate living in Paris who is believed to be Putin's youngest daughter, shared the messages on her private Telegram, in line with her increasing openness on Instagram as she's started to share more images of herself. Though her identity remains officially unconfirmed, she insisted that her father's decisions have cost "millions" of lives and obliterated any semblance of normalcy she might have known. It comes after Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. 'It's liberating to be able to show my face to the world again,' she wrote, Bild reported. 'It reminds me of who I am and who destroyed my life,' she added. The Telegram chat, dubbed 'Art of Luiza,' references her work pseudonym, Luiza Rozova. Krivonogikh has never shot down the theories surrounding her being Putin's daughter. The budding artist was born in 2003 after a suspected affair between Putin and her mother, Svetlana, the president's then-housekeeper. The bombshell was first revealed after a 2020 investigation by Russian media outlet Proekt, citing her 'phenomenal resemblance' to Putin. He isn't listed on her birth certificate, but 'Vladimirovna' was included, translating to 'daughter of Vladimir.' It comes as President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine is set to visit the White House on Monday and confront a difficult choice from President Trump: give up land to Russia in exchange for US. promises for Ukraine's future security, or hold his ground and risk reigniting Trump's anger. Just hours before the meeting, Russian attacks in the Ukrainian cities of Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia killed at least 10 people, including a child, and injured dozens of others, the Ukrainian authorities said. Mr Zelensky condemned the strikes as a deliberate attempt to put pressure on Ukraine amid the talks. Residents of Kyiv are said to be sceptical that his meeting with President Trump will bring progress toward an end to the Russian invasion. Many Ukrainians were still reeling from watching Trump greet Putin with a red carpet and warm handshake in Alaska on Friday, when the two leaders held talks that ended with Trump tilting toward Russia's position on ending the war. Putin invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, with the war still raging on three years later. According to the British Ministry of Defence, more than one million Russian troops have been killed or injured since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began on 24 February 2022. The estimate aligns with a recent study by the US-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), which puts Russian military deaths at up to 250,000 and total casualties, including the wounded, at over 950,000. Ukraine has suffered very high losses as well, with between 60,000 and 100,000 personnel killed and total casualties reaching approximately 400,000.
Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Starmer's coalition of the willing has been saved from itself
It is commonplace to accuse politicians of being out of touch. There is often some truth in the charge, and our elected representatives take it on the chin. One of the least likely politicians to face this charge has always been John Healey: the defence secretary has been one of the most sensible and pragmatic ministers in Sir Keir Starmer's cabinet – not a high bar, admittedly. And yet there are signs that he has succumbed to the Ministry of Defence's corrosive habit of dealing with the world as it wants it to be, not as it is. We all watched the news from Friday's summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Anchorage. However you try to frame the encounter, it was at best a huge disappointment for the US president. His Russian counterpart conceded nothing and his armed forces continue to pound Ukraine's cities. Meanwhile, his pre-conditions for any kind of negotiations remain the maximal aims with which he began the war: Ukraine must cede territory to Russia, rule out membership of Nato indefinitely and, in practice, allow the Kremlin a veto over its foreign policy. And yet, John Healey can't be accused of being a pessimist. 'In the circumstances of a ceasefire we're ready to put UK boots on the ground in Ukraine,' he told the BBC on Friday, shortly before the talks began. 'They are ready to go, they're ready to act from day one. The military plans are complete.' This is, of course, the 'coalition of the willing' which Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have worked so hard to assemble. But there is one problem: it may indeed be 'ready to go' – although this is doubtful – but there is no ceasefire nor any prospect of a ceasefire, and Russia has violated previous pauses in the fighting with impunity. Secretary of state Marco Rubio was downbeat in the wake of the summit. 'There remain some big areas of disagreement,' he admitted to ABC's This Week. 'We're not at the precipice of an agreement, we're not at the edge of one.' President Trump, for whom consistency is something that applies to other people, seems to have decided a ceasefire is no longer important, despite having previously stressed what a priority it was. He casually edited reality on his Truth Social platform in his characteristic and odd way: It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement, which often times do not hold up. Where does this leave the coalition of the willing? Starmer and Macron are now all dressed up with nowhere to go. They have made an enormous play of their genuinely tireless efforts in constructing the coalition, but its only purpose is to monitor, police or help implement a ceasefire in Ukraine. It is now plain to any rational observer that there will be no ceasefire in the foreseeable future, because it is not an approach which suits Putin and he now knows that Trump has little intention of putting pressure on him to bring it about. That may prove good fortune in a heavy disguise for Starmer because there is another consideration. Our armed forces are in no position to deploy significant numbers of troops in a safe and sustainable way to Ukraine. The size of the coalition's anticipated deployment is unknown but has been a moving target: in February, President Zelenskyy talked about needing a force of between 100,000 and 150,000. At the time, the Ministry of Defence carelessly allowed the idea to circulate that the UK might contribute 20,000 troops. In March, Starmer talked about 30,000 troops. The following month, the chief of the Defence Staff, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, consulted with his military colleagues in the coalition of the willing about generating a force of 64,000, and was told that not only was that utterly unrealistic, but that less than half that number, even 25,000, would be extremely challenging. Once again, UK ministers are trumpeting an idea that by definition cannot come to fruition. Without a ceasefire, putting boots on the ground in Ukraine is impossible; even if there were a ceasefire, the UK does not have the resources, especially in terms of artillery and logistics, to assemble anything more than a battlegroup of maybe 1,000 soldiers. Even our current commitments are stretching us. For context, Russia is estimated to have 600,000 soldiers in and around Ukraine. John Healey seems to have retreated into a comforting game of 'what if?', supposing that every eventuality he wants has come to pass and is then telling the media what the UK would do. Increasingly, though, he is talking not about potential outcomes but doors which have already closed. What if Russia agreed to a ceasefire, what if Putin moderated his demands, what if Russia and Ukraine could find an acceptable long-term settlement? As Jake says in the closing pages of Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises, 'Isn't it pretty to think so?'
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
MoD urged to publish full details of Faslane incident
The facility on Gare Loch is home to all of the Royal Navy's submarines, including the Vanguard class which are armed with Trident missiles and the nuclear-powered Astute class hunter-killer vessels. A Category A NSER carries an "actual or high potential for radioactive release to the environment". Read More: The incident was the second such event at Faslane in the space of two years, with the previous the first since 2008. In total there were five Category B, 29 Category C and 71 Category D incidents at Faslane between April 22, 2024 and the same date this year. At RNAD Coulport, the storage and loading facility for Trident, there were no Category A incidents but 13 Category C incidents did occur along with 34 Category D. Approached for comment, the Ministry of Defence said there had been "no unsafe releases of radioactive material" in the Category A incident at Faslane but that it could not disclose details of individual incidents for reasons of national security. The MoD had previously admitted that radioactive material had been released into Loch Long from RNAD Coulport after the Royal Navy failed to adequately maintain the network of 1,500 water pipes on the base. A major leak in 2019 saw water contaminated with radioactive tritium discharged directly into the lake. Now SNP MSP Bill Kidd is calling for the Ministry of Defence to publish full details of the Category A incident, provide a complete contamination report for Loch Long, and set out a clear plan for clean-up and prevention. Bill Kidd MSP In a letter to defence minister John Healey MP he said: "It is unacceptable that Scotland is once again facing serious safety breaches because of the UK's nuclear weapons programme. "Your Department has now confirmed that a Category A nuclear safety event, the most serious classification, took place at HMNB Clyde earlier this year. This follows your admission that in the past year alone there have been 5 Category B incidents, 29 Category C incidents, and 71 Category D incidents. "Meanwhile, Loch Long, beside the UK's nuclear bomb store at Coulport, is confirmed to be contaminated with radioactive tritium. Emissions from the Royal Naval Armaments Depot have more than doubled in five years, the result of failing infrastructure, over 1,500 corroded pipes, and repeated leaks, including a major 2019 incident that discharged radioactive water directly into the loch. "This catalogue of failures is a direct consequence of Westminster's nuclear obsession and disregard for Scotland's environment, public health, and clear opposition to Trident. While billions are spent on weapons of mass destruction, our communities are left to bear the risks and clean up the mess. "I therefore request that you urgently provide: Full disclosure of the Category A incident, including any radioactive release and its impact; a detailed contamination assessment for Loch Long, including public health implications; a clear plan to prevent further incidents and remediate existing damage. "Scotland rejects nuclear weapons. Independence would mean their removal from our shores and an end to radioactive waste being dumped into our waters. Until then, your government must be held accountable for the danger and damage caused." Mr Healey's office has been contacted for comment. A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'We place the upmost importance on handling radioactive substances safely and securely. Nuclear Site Event Reports demonstrate our robust safety culture and commitment to learn from experience. 'The incidents posed no risk to the public and did not result in any radiological impact to the environment. It is factually incorrect to suggest otherwise. "Our government backs our nuclear deterrent as the ultimate guarantor of our national security.' The Trident system is designed to act as a deterrent to other nations with nuclear capability, as a first strike on the UK would not eliminate the ability to strike back given some of the country's weapons are continuously at sea. Four Dreadnought submarines, built at a cost of £7.75bn each, will replace the current Vanguard ships and are scheduled to begin entering service in the early 2030s. The concept of a nuclear deterrent is based on the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), which holds that no country possessing the weapons of mass destruction would use them against another nuclear-armed state because both would be destroyed the fighting. At least one Vanguard submarine is kept on patrol at all times, carrying up to 16 of more than 100 nuclear missiles in stock. The Trident missiles are leased from the United States, with much of the technology used in the system provided directly by the Pentagon.
