
Live Reeves to hand out billions in spending review
Rachel Reeves is set to unveil billions of pounds of new public spending as the Chancellor argues that her priorities are 'the priorities of working people'.
Ms Reeves will deliver her eagerly-anticipated spending review at lunchtime and it is expected to include big increases for the NHS, defence and schools.
But other Whitehall departments are likely to face real-terms funding cuts.
Among the main announcements is expected to be a £30 billion increase in NHS funding, a rise of around 2.8 per cent in real-terms, along with an extra £4.5 billion for schools and a rise in defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5 per cent is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments, or further tax rises to come in the Budget this autumn.
This could mean a budgetary squeeze for areas such as local government, the justice system and the Home Office, despite reports that policing would receive an above-inflation settlement.
Ms Reeves is expected to say: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal.
'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Nursing home documentary should be investigated by gardai
He also said the state is too reliant on private nursing home care and 'far too many' people in Ireland go into nursing homes 'far too early'. Labour TD Marie Sherlock said during Leaders' Questions that there are 'huge questions for Government' over how to care for older people in Ireland. She said there are no minimum staffing levels for nursing homes, despite there being such standards in Northern Ireland and elsewhere. 'Are you comfortable that the nursing home sector is becoming dominated by big business in Ireland?' she asked. Responding, Mr Harris said: 'The short answer is I believe the state is too reliant on the private market when it comes to nursing home provision. 'That's why we established a commission of care because I do think we need to look at the entire model of how we care for older people in this country.' He also told the Dail: 'I've been reflecting on this, and I fully accept that people work in very demanding environments, I fully accept that as well. 'But I do also believe what stems from what we've seen on our television screens in recent days are real questions of personal accountability. 'There are laws in our land today. There are laws in relation to assault, there are laws in relation to how we conduct ourselves, and I would urge that a referral is made to An Garda Siochana in relation to the footage that we saw. 'Because what I saw with my own two eyes, the haunting scenes of people being, in my view, physically assaulted in their home, is something that – the Government has responsibilities here to do things, absolutely, but so too do people who carry out those actions. 'I do think there's a need for a Garda investigation into what we saw in relation to the individual actions of people in relation to that.' He also said Hiqa has questions to answer as there were 'serious shortcomings'. He added: 'There are many good private nursing homes, big and small, right across the country and I don't have an ideological view in relation that. 'I just want older people to have choice in relation to their care. I want their families to be supported in making those decisions. 'I want to know, whether it's a public nursing home or a private nursing home, that everyone is safe, that everyone is being treated with dignity. 'I do think we should also be more ambitious about care in the community. I do believe that. I believe far too many people in Ireland go into a nursing home far too early. I can think of good examples of where we have housing alternatives in place and home care opportunities, but they're far too rare. 'But I also think there are genuine, serious issues of personal accountability. 'There is no law, there is no ideology, or there is no model of care that can excuse away – either in its existence or its absence – the conduct of people who decided to physically manhandle elderly people with dementia, and I want them held accountable and I want the gardai to look at the matter.'


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cardiff University defends job cuts process amid crisis claims
Cardiff University bosses have defended the way a process to cut hundreds of jobs and axe some departments has been evidence to a Senedd Committee, Vice Chancellor Prof Wendy Larner said it had been "difficult" but they had taken "the right approach".Prof Larner was asked whether announcing plans to close some departments, including nursing and then "backtracking" had been wise in view of the impact on staff morale and the institution's comes after a union claimed the process had led to a "severe and urgent mental health crisis" among staff. Proposals initially included cutting 400 jobs and closing some subject areas including music, modern languages and nursing, which will now be during the consultation period and more than 150 staff leaving voluntarily also led to a reduction in the number of posts to be cut - currently down to 69 by 2029-30 Prof Larner told MSs. She said she was "delighted by the quality of the alternative proposals" which enabled them to change the initial plans "quite significantly".But she confirmed the business case going to the university council for sign off on 17 June would still mean stopping ancient history and religion and asked whether she had any regrets about the process, she said she regretted that some members of staff had learnt their jobs were at risk through media coverage after a "leak" of also expressed regret that the university had received an "undue share of attention" for the cuts despite many other universities facing similar challenges."Our intention all the way through has been to ensure that Cardiff University is successful for the future," she said. Prof Larner and chairman of the University Council Patrick Younge's appearance in front of MSs follows the University and College Union's (UCU) claim there was a "total health and safety crisis" at the said there had been a "comprehensive breakdown of trust and morale" between university bosses and staff."I think we've worked really hard to do what we can to ensure that staff have been adequately supported", said Prof Younge said the university had been "blindsided" by the UCU referring it to the Health and Safety Executive when it was due to agree a strategy to address the union's to the union's move, he said he was "deeply disappointed in some of the behaviours." Mr Younge outlined the financial challenges facing the university and said its reserves had to be spent on securing the university's future - including improving halls of residence which, he said, required a spend of £300m to £ about the university's new campus in Kazakhstan's capital, Astana, Prof Larner said the university had spent money on "due diligence" but the campus, which opens in September, was paid for by partners in said so far there had been 186 application for the two foundation courses initially offered on the site which was part of a "slow rollout".In response, Cardiff UCU said it remained "deeply concerned" about the proposed added the changes risked affecting the university's "ability to contribute" to teaching, research and training in Wales.


BreakingNews.ie
17 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Public Services Card database of millions of Irish people's faces declared illegal
The Data Protection Commission (DPC) has found that the collection of facial (biometric) data for the Public Services Card (PSC) is unlawful. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) said it partially welcomes the findings, but said the decision is "more than a decade late and inadequate". Advertisement The Government had previously claimed that the facial records were not biometric data. On Thursday, the DPC found that the Department of Social Protection (DSP) unlawfully collected facial records (biometric data) from 70 per cent of the population of Ireland over 15 years. In addition, the ICCL said the department failed to tell people why it was collecting their facial records and whether it was legal. In light of the infringements discovered by the DPC, it reprimanded the Department of Social Protection by issuing administrative fines totalling €550,000. It also issued an order to the department requiring it to cease processing of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration within nine months of this decision if the department cannot identify a valid lawful basis. Advertisement Deputy commissioner, Graham Doyle, said: 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the rollout of SAFE 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. "The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with SAFE 2 registration in the context of this inquiry. "This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for SAFE 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates SAFE 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.' 'Illegal facial database' The ICCL said the Data Protection Commission failed to take decisive action on Thursday and said that, after 15 years, its actions are not enough. Advertisement The ICCL is insisting on the immediate deletion of the illegal facial data database. It has also called for the department and the DPC to explain to the Oireachtas and the public how this system was permitted to operate unlawfully for so long. Executive Director of ICCL, Joe O'Brien, said: 'For many years, ICCL and our colleagues at Digital Rights Ireland, have argued that the PSC's mandatory use of facial recognition technology is unlawful. 'This is a partial win for the privacy and data protection rights of people living in Ireland. It confirms what we have advocated for, for many years - that the Public Services Card, which was estimated to have cost the State €100 million, trespassed upon human rights and infringed EU and Irish law. 'The DPC decision is over a decade late and does not go far enough. The Department effectively created a de facto national biometric ID system by stealth over 15-plus years without a proper legal foundation. This illegal database of millions of Irish people's biometric data must be deleted.'