&w=3840&q=100)
Israel-Iran ceasefire holds but doubts remain over US claims
Early on Tuesday, Trump announced on Truth Social that the US had successfully mediated a ceasefire agreement between the two nations in conflict, but the development was not immediately confirmed by Israel and Iran read more
An Iranian woman holds up her country's flag in an anti-US and anti-Israeli rally at Enqelab-e-Eslami (Islamic Revolution) square in downtown Tehran. AP
US President Donald Trump claimed to have brokered a peace deal between Israel and Iran yesterday. A lot has gone down since then, including a meltdown by the president and a brief blame game played by Israel and Iran.
Early on Tuesday, Trump announced on Truth Social that the US had successfully mediated a ceasefire agreement between the two nations in conflict, but the development was not immediately confirmed by Israel and Iran.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, after both countries declared that they had accepted the terms of the ceasefire, cross-border strikes continued for a couple of hours, prompting Trump to lash out at Israel and Iran alike . 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f— they're doing,' NBC News quoted Trump as saying.
Both Israel and Iran accused each other of breaching the ceasefire, although the dust has largely settled today with no reports of strikes so far.
Israel lifts restrictions
As the conflict seems to have come to an end, the Israel Defense Forces' Home Front has greenlit schools across the country to reopen and lifted all restrictions that were imposed after Iran launched its retaliatory strikes against the country.
Since the conflict erupted on June 13, classrooms across the country have remained closed, with several educational institutions struck by Iranian missile fire. A directive from the Home Front Command ordered the closure of schools and all nonessential businesses for safety reasons.
Meanwhile, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared the end of the '12-day war' yesterday, after Trump said 'the ceasefire is now in effect' on Truth Social and urged neither side to violate it.
US strikes on Iran a failure?
US media have cited people familiar with the Defence Intelligence Agency findings as saying the weekend strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or stockpile of enriched uranium.
Contrary to Trump's claims that US strikes 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, media reports downplayed the attacks that Washington joined early on Sunday.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the authenticity of the assessment but said it was 'flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked.'
Trump, on the other hand, rejected media reports saying that American strikes on Iran did not destroy its nuclear programme, but only set it back by a few months.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Will the ceasefire hold?
While the fighting has stopped between Israel and Iran, the ceasefire is widely seen as fragile by experts.
Jonathan Panikoff, a former intelligence officer and the director of the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council, told NPR that Iran's military capabilities have been significantly weakened, and Israel may also be approaching the limits of its endurance after days of missile exchanges.
There is a possibility for diplomatic engagement, potentially through mediators such as Oman or even China. However, Panikoff cautions that a comprehensive resolution to Iran's nuclear ambitions remains out of reach, he said.
'Iran has seen its power significantly reduced in the region. It has seen its ability to defend against Israel, frankly, be obliterated. It just did not exist fundamentally in the way that I think even a lot of Iranian officials thought it was going to. And I think for Israel, after years of war in Gaza and certainly the last 12 days, it's accomplished most of its objectives to really diminish Iran's ballistic missile program and nuclear program, and may itself be running out of interceptor missiles to defend against Iran's missile strikes that we've seen [going] into Israel, including overnight,' Panikoff added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran a step closer to suspending cooperation with IAEA as parliament passes bill
Iran's parliament approved a bill on Wednesday to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, state-affiliated news outlet Nournews reported. Iranian protesters hold their country's flags and posters of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally at Enqelab-e-Eslami (Islamic Revolution) square in downtown Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, June 24, 2025.(AP) The move follows an air war with Israel in which Iran's longtime enemy said it wanted to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. The bill, which must be approved by Iran's unelected Guardian Council to become law, stipulates that any future inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would need approval by the Supreme National Security Council. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf was quoted by state media as also saying Iran would accelerate its civilian nuclear programme. Tehran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says an IAEA resolution this month declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks. Qalibaf was quoted as saying the IAEA had refused even to appear to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and "has put its international credibility up for sale." He said that "for this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the Agency until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed, and move at a faster pace with the country's peaceful nuclear programme." Parliament's national security committee approved the bill's general outline this week and the committee's spokesperson said the bill would suspend the installation of surveillance cameras, inspections and filing of reports to the IAEA. The IAEA did not immediately comment on the Iranian parliament's approval of the bill. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said on Wednesday he was seeking the return of inspectors to Iranian sites, including the plants where it was enriching uranium, until Israel launched strikes on June 13. The full extent of the damage done to nuclear sites during the Israeli attacks and US bombing of underground Iranian nuclear facilities is not yet clear. "I think that our view on our nuclear programme and the non-proliferation regime will witness changes, but it is not possible to say in what direction," Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi told Qatar's Al-Araby Al-Jadeed this week.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
UK to purchase 12 US-made F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs: PM Keir Starmer
Jun 25, 2025 03:47 PM IST The United Kingdom will buy 12 U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs and will join NATO's shared airborne nuclear mission, in a major expansion of its nuclear deterrent, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Wednesday. Only three NATO members – the U.S., Britain and France – are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets. (Pic used for representation)(AP) The government called it 'the biggest strengthening of the U.K.'s nuclear posture in a generation.' Starmer made the announcement while attending a NATO summit in the Netherlands. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte welcomed the decision, calling it 'yet another robust British contribution to NATO.' The U.K. phased out air-dropped atomic weapons in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War. Its nuclear arsenal now consists of submarine-based missiles. Only three NATO members – the U.S., Britain and France – are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets that can carry either conventional or weapons or American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. The use of nuclear weapons by the U.K. as part of the mission would require the authorization of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the U.S. president and British prime minister. Starmer also announced that the U.K. will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from interest on seized Russian assets. The announcements come as the U.K. and other NATO members pledge to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035. The total includes 3.5% on defense and another 1.5% on broader security and resilience efforts. The U.K. currently spends 2.3% of national income on defense and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027. Get the latest headlines from US news and global updates from Pakistan, UK, Bangladesh, and Russia get all the latest headlines in one place with including Vance Luther Boelteron Hindustan Times.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Terms of trade: West Asia isn't the Empire's Achilles' heel anymore
This column is being written on a day when US President Donald Trump seems to have, or claims to have engineered a cease fire between Iran and Israel despite the US having helped the latter with its bombing of Iran's underground nuclear installations. The cease fire followed what seems like token missile attacks by Iran on US military bases in Qatar. The developments so far have turned all doomsday predictions of experts from various ideological standpoints -- they include MAGA's fears of the US entering yet another long-drawn war in West Asia, liberal voices fearing an uncontrolled escalation using even non-conventional means and market watchers fearing a large geopolitical disruption to the global economy and trade or energy flows -- gross overestimates. So, are seemingly knowledgeable people getting worked up about nothing? Or is Trump really a master of brokering deals, and most of the commentariat is unable to see this quality because of its prejudice towards him? There is another way to look at this question. It is best approached by quoting from the Wall Street Journal's 23 June Hard on the Street column. The cease fire followed what seems like token missile attacks by Iran on US military bases in Qatar. (AFP) 'Back in 1977, just before the Iranian Revolution began and planted the seeds of the Second Oil Crisis, the US had net imports of about 3.1 billion barrels of petroleum and refined products, or 14 barrels per person. That per-capita number was unchanged as recently as 2003 at the time of the Iraq war. The US also was a significant importer of natural gas in both of those years. Today, because of hydraulic fracturing, the US has net exports of about 2.5 barrels per capita and is also the world's largest seller of liquefied natural gas. The technology isn't new, but improvements in the past 15 years have been transformational,' it says. The US's military involvement in West Asia, especially in the post-WWII period has had a deep relationship with the petroleum economy. But things have changed in the last decade or so. The US is no longer an energy importer and therefore much more immune from any energy shocks coming from a disruption in this region. To be sure, a lot of friendly oil exporting countries in West Asia continue to be important for the US, more importantly the current US president. The legacy of this energy economy via the petrodollars means that these countries have a lot of money to invest/spend in the rest of the world and both Trump and the US would like a large part of this. But all the US had to do to keep this gravy train going was to derail the transition from fossil fuel use, which Trump has already done by killing the climate deal. If energy security is not really a concern, then why is Trump risking an involvement with Israel's military aggression in the region, one might ask then. The simplest answer to this question is that being seen as not standing with Israel would put the Trump administration in a position which would force a rupture with the neoconservative and Zionist lobby in US's domestic politics. This will have severe financial and ideological consequences. The pro-Israel lobby still controls a lot of purse strings for political finance in the US. Not standing with Israel at the current moment would also be seen as playing into the hands of a pro-Palestinian voice which does not stand against things such as Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran's other violent proxies. Also Read:India welcomes Iran-Israel truce, reiterates concern about stability in region However, Trump is shrewd enough to ensure that it is him and not Benjamin Netanyahu who is seen as the boss in the ongoing chain of events. His outburst including using expletives on Tuesday while referring to both Iran and Israel on Tuesday was meant to send exactly this message. The only other US president who is said to have used an expletive after having met Netanyahu is Bill Clinton, who was frustrated that it was the Israeli and not the American who got away with playing the superpower in that meeting held in 1996. The West Asian or Middle East (as the Americans and Europeans call it) contradiction for the US has lost its economic criticality significantly compared to what it used to be in the 20th century because of the US's self-sufficiency in energy. However, the Israeli aggression in the region – it is only expected to become worse – is creating a deep super-structural fault line in the West, US included, as the Muslim population rises in these countries and they assume a growing role in domestic politics. But it is the non-right-wing parties such as the Democratic Party in the US and Labour in the UK which are facing most of the growing strain because of this cleavage. Does this mean Trump can keep going from one deal or chutzpah to another? Not necessarily. A politics of schadenfreude – best seen in things such as Trump penalising Harvard University for refusing to crack down on alleged antisemitic behaviour on campus – can keep Trump's working class conservative base animated for some time. But it can do precious little to solve the economic contradiction which drove this lot to Trump's fold in the first place. This contradiction is best described as America's success in keeping down inflation by importing from the Global South, most importantly China, but which also entailed unleashing a deindustrialisation and destruction of blue-collared jobs in its domestic economy. Trump's knee jerk response to this problem, his reciprocal tariffs, which he himself put in abeyance, and even a crackdown on illegal migration will likely create more problems for his working-class base than bring back the glory days of the Golden Age of Capitalism. Trump's, or for that matter, all of the neo-right's political legacy will depend on what they can do to solve this primary contradiction rather than running away from it by seeking gratification from periodic acts of schadenfreude or chutzpah. We are very far from the final act in this larger political economy tension in the advanced capitalist world. Also Read: Iran Israel's fragile ceasefire in place - What's next? Explained History, if one were to make a provocative statement to end this column, is still moving at a pace when it changes in decades rather than weeks. an obsessive tracking of flashpoints in the past few weeks seems to have convinced many people that we are living in times where the latter is true. Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa
