Sony WH-1000XM6 are confirmed, so the XM5s are on sale
We have official word that the Sony WH-1000XM6 are due to hit shelves next week! That means we can expect the Sony WH-1000XM5 Wireless Headphones (the previous generation) to be on sale a bit more often, including right now! For a limited time, you can get the Sony XM5 cans for only $350. The full MSRP on this model is $400, which means you'll be saving yourself $50.
Why you should buy the Sony WH-1000XM5
We tested the Sony XM5 headphones back in 2023, and in a recent update to his official review, audio expert Simon Cohen said, 'Now three years old, Sony's best headphones are still a force to be reckoned with.'
When it comes to all-around premium, it's hard to beat the many wins of the Sony WH-1000XM5. These flagship over-ears are very comfortable for longer wear sessions, and the minimalist, classy casing will always guarantee these are the best-looking headphones in the room.
In terms of performance, you can expect big things from these Sony headphones. The warm and bass-forward sound profile sounds great across multiple music genres and podcasts, but you'll also be able to download the Sony Sound Connect app to change audio presets or create your own listening profile for a more customized experience.
The XM5 headphones deliver incredible noise-canceling too, eliminating all but the peskiest and most sudden of environmental sounds. You can also expect up to 30 hours of battery life with ANC enabled, and a whopping 40 hours of playback with ANC disabled.
Save $50 on the Sony WH-1000XM5 Wireless Headphones when you purchase today. You may also want to take a look at our roundups of the best headphone deals, best Amazon deals, and top Best Buy deals for even more discounts on top Sony products.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How AI Can Decode The Hidden Stories In Immigration Applications
Raghu Para is a tech exec with over 15 years of progressive experience in software, artificial intelligence and machine learning. getty Picture this: You've spent years gathering documents, filling out forms and waiting for your immigration decision. Meanwhile, the officer reviewing your case is buried under a mountain of paperwork, armed with the patience of a kindergarten teacher and the attention span of a detective running on espresso. This is the modern immigration system—a finely tuned cocktail of bureaucracy, backlogs and burnout. Governments want meticulous vetting. Applicants wait so long they could've binged Living Undocumented on Netflix. And the kicker? Much of the work is mind-numbingly repetitive. Officers aren't just reviewing facts—they're decoding intent. Is this a legit work visa? A bona fide asylum claim? They play legal detective, scan for red flags and occasionally channel TSA energy—unpacking a grandma's suitcase only to find a single, compliant three-ounce shampoo bottle. Could AI help? Sure. But the question is—can it understand human intent without making a mess? Let's address the customs officer in the room: AI in immigration is controversial. On the bright side, processing times are expedited, costs can be reduced and the risk of human error deciding anyone's fate can be mitigated. But let's not hand it a rubber stamp just yet. AI bias is real. It can reject perfectly good applications like it's giving out Halloween candy—and worse, hallucinate fake laws like the "Deportation Reform Act of 2065." That's not a typo—it's fiction. So what's the answer? Let tech sit at the desk—but humans still hold the stamp. As an AI researcher who's navigated the anxiety-inducing immigration process myself, I can tell you the challenge isn't building smart algorithms—it's building guardrails that stop them from going off-script. When designed carefully, AI can be the ultimate sidekick—bringing technical muscle and just enough empathy to keep things human. Today's systems aren't the clunky chatbots that used to ask, "Did you mean refugee or retirement visa?" before crash-landing on a 404 page from the Bush administration. Modern systems combine machine precision with human oversight, making a huge difference. Here's how: One of the biggest delays in immigration comes from verifying intent. AI now uses natural language processing to read between the lines, flag inconsistencies and detect fraud. Take a framework like Agent-Driven Semantic Analysis & Intent Detection (ADS-ID)—a multi-agent model I helped design: • The "document detective" deciphers even the messiest handwriting (think doctor's prescription, but worse). • The "legal scholar" cross-references case law better than your cousin with a law degree and zero follow-through. • The "consistency checker" spots contradictions like "You were working in Canada while attending school in Mexico?" Okay, time traveler. Other approaches use deep learning trained on millions of past cases or hybrid models combining logic rules and machine learning. But the solutions always keep humans in the loop to interpret AI's findings. And yes, there are challenges. • The Black Box Problem: If an AI makes a decision, it needs a "Kindergarten Explanation Layer"—something even a five-year-old (or a policy analyst) can understand. • Biased Training Data: Immigration decisions are rooted in decades of judgment calls—many flawed. We need AI that can recognize, adapt to and correct for that. • Constant Policy Change: Immigration rules can change faster than the promises of a politician. AI needs regular policy memos just to keep up. Some fraud is obvious, but some fraud is sneaky. AI can help by analyzing digital footprints for inconsistencies and flagging suspicious patterns in application histories. The U.K.'s Whitehall system, for instance, used AI to detect sham marriages, though critics noted it sometimes flagged real couples, too. Embassies are starting to use AI to estimate wait times based on application type, country of origin and historical data. It's not flawless, but it beats refreshing your status page 37 times a day. Officers often deal with documents in rare dialects, bad translations or messy handwriting. Systems should evolve to support the human dynamic, ensuring officers operate like collaborators who use AI as a sounding board—not make them "overrulers" who distrust any algorithmic suggestion or rubber-stampers who approve whatever AI says. AI in immigration isn't perfect. It can hallucinate laws, mishandle sensitive data that deserves Fort Knox-level security or reject a case with a digital shrug: "Too complicated, goodbye." That's why we need transparency, human oversight—and maybe a big red "Don't Panic" button. But if we build with care, the future is promising. We'll see AI that analyzes video (Photoshop weddings won't cut it), uses quantum computing (finally faster than a clerk on dial-up) and sends real-time updates that don't leave you in "Pending" purgatory. Immigration is—and always will be—a human business. But with AI as a savvy, respectful assistant, officers can focus on what really matters: serving people, not pushing paper. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure it's faster, fairer and insightful so families can reunite while processes flow. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Mortgage Rates Today: June 6, 2025 - 30-Year Rates Steady, 15-Year Rates Down
Currently, the average interest rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage is 6.76%, compared to 6.85% a week ago, according to the Mortgage Research Center. For borrowers who want to pay off their home faster, the average rate on a 15-year fixed mortgage is 5.74%, down 2.03% from the previous week. If you're thinking about refinancing to lock in a lower rate, compare your existing mortgage rate with current market rates to make sure it's worth the cost to refinance. Today, the average rate on a 30-year mortgage is 6.76%, compared to last week when it was 6.85%. The APR on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage is 6.79%. The APR was 6.88% last week. APR is the all-in cost of your loan. With today's interest rate of 6.76%, a 30-year fixed mortgage of $100,000 costs approximately $649 per month in principal and interest (taxes and fees not included), the Forbes Advisor mortgage calculator shows. Borrowers will pay about $134,477 in total interest over the life of the loan. Today's 15-year mortgage (fixed-rate) is 5.74%, down 2.03% from the previous week. The same time last week, the 15-year, fixed-rate mortgage was at 5.86%. The APR on a 15-year fixed is 5.78%. It was 5.91% a week earlier. A 15-year, fixed-rate mortgage with today's interest rate of 5.74% will cost $830 per month in principal and interest on a $100,000 mortgage (not including taxes and insurance). In this scenario, borrowers would pay approximately $49,802 in total interest. Today's average interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate jumbo mortgage (a mortgage above 2025's conforming loan limit of $806,500 in most areas) fell 4.29% from last week to 7.18%. Borrowers with a 30-year, fixed-rate jumbo mortgage with today's interest rate of 7.18% will pay approximately $678 per month in principal and interest per $100,000 borrowed. That would be $144,315. Mortgage rates initially trended downward post-spring 2024. However, they surged again in October 2024—despite cuts by the Federal Reserve to the federal funds rate (its benchmark interest rate) in September, November and December 2024. Rates began to drop again in mid-January 2025, but experts don't forecast them falling by a significant amount in the near future. Mortgage rates are influenced by various economic factors, making it difficult to predict when they will drop. Mortgage rates follow U.S. Treasury bond yields. When bond yields decrease, mortgage rates generally follow suit. The Federal Reserve's decisions and global events also play a key role in shaping mortgage rates. If inflation rises or the economy slows, the Fed may lower its federal funds rate. For example, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the Fed reduced rates, which drove interest rates to record lows. A significant drop in mortgage rates seems unlikely in the near future. However, they may decline if inflation eases or the economy weakens. To get an estimate of your mortgage costs, using a mortgage calculator can help. Simply input the following information: Mortgage interest rates are determined by several factors, including some that borrowers can't control: While the above factors set the base interest rate for new mortgages, there are several areas that borrowers can focus on to get a lower rate: As you compare lenders, consider getting rate quotes for several loan programs. In addition to comparing rates and fees, these programs can have flexible down payment and credit requirements that make qualifying easier. Conventional mortgages are likely to offer competitive rates when you have a credit score between 670 and 850, although it's possible to qualify with a minimum score of 620. This home loan type also doesn't require annual fees when you have at least 20% equity and waive PMI. Several government-backed programs are better when you want to make little or no down payment: Comparing lenders and loan programs is an excellent start. Borrowers should also strive for a good or excellent credit score between 670 and 850 and a debt-to-income ratio of 43% or less. Further, making a minimum down payment of 20% on conventional mortgages can help you automatically waive private mortgage insurance premiums, which increases your borrowing costs. Buying discount points or lender credits can also reduce your interest rate. Most rate locks last 30 to 60 days and your lender may not charge a fee for this initial period. However, extending the rate lock period up to 90 or 120 days is possible, depending on your lender, but additional costs may apply. A mortgage interest rate reflects what a lender is charging you on top of your loan amount in return for allowing you to borrow money. Annual percentage rate (APR), on the other hand, is a calculation that includes both a loan's interest rate and finance charges, expressed as an annual cost over the life of the loan. In other words, it's the total cost of credit. APR accounts for interest, fees and time. Since APRs include both the interest rate and certain fees associated with a home loan, the APR can help you understand the total cost of a mortgage if you keep it for the entire term. The APR will usually be higher than the interest rate, but there are exceptions.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Majority Of Millionaires Supports Wealth Tax
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 15: People protest on tax day calling for billionaires to pay more tax on ... More April 15, 2025 in New York City. Activists suggested a 90% wealth tax to guarantee universal healthcare, free college education and to eliminate hunger and homelessness. (Photo by) A recent survey by Patriotic Millionaires UK shows that a majority of millionaires in G20 countries supports a 2% tax on wealth. When asked if any millionaires with a wealth of more than $10 million should pay the tax, 58% of the more than 2,000 millionaire survey participants said yes. As part of the same survey, 75% agreed that billionaires should pay the tax. Between 66% and 69% said that those with a household wealth of more than $50 million and more than $100 million, respectively, should pay up. On the other hand, there is still a considerable share of respondents with household investable assets of more than $1 million who think otherwise. Almost a third opposed or was torn about the tax concerning those with a wealth of $50 million or more, while this number was 40% concerning those with assets of $10 million or more. Only 11% of surveyed millionaires definitely opposed a tax on billionaires, however. This chart shows the share of surveyed G20 millionaires who said they supported additional wealth ... More taxes (in percent). Patriotic Millionaires UK is an organization of more than 60 British billionaires that advocate for the higher taxation of wealth and its fairer distribution. The first advocacy group by the name was founded in 2010 in the United States to lobby for the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts, which were extended under President Barack Obama, however. At the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2024, 250 millionaires and billionaires actually demanded that global leaders take action to tax very rich individuals but change has not come. According to a 2023 report by Oxfam, only 4 cents of every tax dollar raised globally came from wealth taxes, while half the world's billionaires lived in countries with no inheretance tax. Meanwhile, support among the public for wealth taxes mirrors that of the millionaire survey. According to Ipsos, Global Commons Alliance and Earth4All, 68% to 70% percent in G20 countries said they were in support of a tax on wealth, on high incomes and on large business profits. Many polls across time and different countries have shown the same results. The report by Patriotic Millionaires UK refutes the often-made claim that wealth taxes would led to capital flight and in turn, economic decline. It claims that many rich individuals would not change their residence and in fact welcome the change that they think strengthens democracy, fights global issues like climate change and not least prevents an eventual outbreak of violence over the unequal distribution of wealth. Three quarters of surveyed millionaires said that they thought well-funded public services and a functioning infrastructure were vital for entrepreneurs and a strong economy. 54 percent said that extreme wealth was a threat to democracy while 72 percent agreed that wealthy individuals were paying for their political influence. According to the latest figures by the World Inequality Database, the top 10% of the wealthiest individuals in the United States held more than 70% of the country's wealth in 2023, surpassed only by several African, Latin American and Arabian Gulf countries. In the United Kingdom, this figure stood at 57% most recently, comparable to the European Union level of 59%. Few countries achieved better result, with the most equal distributions found outside the EU in Norway at a still-high 52.6% and in Iceland at 56.7%. Within the EU, the lowest figures were 45.4% in the Netherlands and 49.4% in Slovakia. Charted by Statista
